Jul
27

Reddit cofounder Alexis Ohanian explains how he curbs his reliance on his smartphone and reduces his time spent on email to get more done every day

Much ink has been spilled and hands wrung on the issue of "having it all." From the gendered origins of the question to the responses that are unreasonable and unsatisfying, founders have been battling the idea that managing their business comes at a cost to their personal obligations.

But during an event on managing workplace burnout in San Francisco on June 24, Reddit cofounder Alexis Ohanian didn't mince his words, calling his mobile phone an "ever-present ball-and-chain" keeping him connected to work even when he wants to log off.

The founder-turned-venture investor at Initialized Capital let the audience in on some of his best productivity hacks to help him get the most out of the limited hours in his day. His biggest inspiration? His wife, tennis star and venture investor Serena Williams.

"The reason that Serena is so great is because she works just as hard when she's not working than when she is working," Ohanian said. "When she's not working, she is completely off. It's a wall that she is able to build and turn on, and I think it's the only way to perform well under that amount of scrutiny and pressure like she does."

Read More: Reddit cofounder Alexis Ohanian: San Francisco is great but 'no one in their right mind' will build a company here anymore

Here are some of Ohanian's productivity hacks that keep the cofounder, venture investor, father, and avid traveler sane.

Original author: Megan Hernbroth

Continue reading
  45 Hits
Jul
27

Tesla needs to redesign the Model S sedan — here are 9 changes I'd like to see (TSLA)

The Model S was Tesla's first "real car," and it was an immediate hit. Introduced in 2012, it won Motor Trend's Car of the Year award, and this year, Motor Trend named the Model S its greatest-ever Car of the Year.

All good, but the Model S is getting long in the tooth, and consumers aren't as thrilled by it as they used to be. Sales have been flagging, partly because the cheaper Model 3 is fresher, but also because the Model S, brilliant as it is, has become dated.

Seven years is at the outside edge of what most car makers would allow for a model. Designs are typically all-new every five to seven years, and there are usually a few refreshes in a model's cycle.

Tesla has tweaked the Model S a few times, and the automaker said that over-the-air software updates could give owners the impression of a brand-new car. But still, an early 2010s design is gonna get boring by the end of a decade, even it was conceived to last.

Here, then, are nice features I'd like to see on an all-new Tesla Model S:

Original author: Matthew DeBord

Continue reading
  39 Hits
Feb
04

Cloud Stocks: SAP Bets Big on Experience Management - Sramana Mitra

You have $400 set aside for a pair of headphones, and Bose just happens to release the new NC 700 wireless noise cancelling headphones.

Serendipity? Fate? Perhaps.

I've been using the new Bose NC 700 ever since they came out, and they're great headphones.

But then I placed a pair of old favorites upon my ears — the Nuraphone, by boutique audio company Nura — and I stick by my original assessment of the Nuraphone from my 2018 review: "If you've made the decision that you're going to spend around $400 on a pair of wireless headphones, the Nuraphone should be at the top of the list."

Original author: Antonio Villas-Boas

Continue reading
  52 Hits
Nov
05

Forza Horizon 5 is great, Activision Blizzard is a mess, and more | GamesBeat Decides 221

Scientists have been listening to whispers from below Mars' surface.

NASA's InSight lander, which touched down on Mars in November 2018, gave scientists the unprecedented ability to detect and monitor quakes on Mars. The lander's built-in seismometer detected its first quake in April, and since then, researchers have recorded dozens more potential Mars quakes.

The nature of this shaking is changing what scientists thought they knew about the red planet.

An artist illustration of the InSight lander on Mars. NASA/JPL-Caltech

So far, the biggest surprise is that seismic waves on Mars more closely resemble moon quakes than earthquakes — which probably means Mars' crust is more dry and broken up than we thought.

"So far, we have assumed that the crust of Mars is similar to the Earth's crust," Simon Stähler, a Mars seismology researcher at ETH Zurich, said in a press release. "The fact that the wave form of the Mars quakes resembles the moon quakes gives us for the first time a picture of how the Martian crust is internally structured. Until now, we could only look at it from the outside."

NASA

Mars, the moon, and Earth quake for different reasons

Studying seismic activity helps scientists piece together the history of how rocky planets formed in our solar system. On Earth, for example, tracking how seismic waves move through the planet's interior helped researchers calculate the size of its core.

Reading the seismic waves on Mars, scientists hope, will reveal clues about what the plant's inside looks like and how it's changing.

"Seismology is how you get the details," Mark Panning, a seismologist on the NASA InSight team, told Business Insider.

Not all quakes are created equal. When the Earth shakes, it's because tectonic plates in the crust are clashing at fault lines. Mars doesn't have tectonic plates, though. So scientists think Mars quakes probably come from a constant internal-cooling process, which happens inside most rocky planets. As the core cools, the material contracts, which causes stress to build. This eventually cracks the crust and causes a quake.

Earth's tectonic plates meet at fault lines, where their activity can cause earthquakes.NOAA

Seismic waves from quakes — regardless of the cause — also travel on different paths and at different rates, depending on what type of material they're moving through.

On Earth, the source of seismic waves is easily detectable, since the crust is comprised of relatively uniform, solid rock (which has been melted and re-paved by volcanic activity over millions of years). That rock also has water in it, which absorbs energy, causing waves to die out faster. That's why earthquakes last for just a few minutes.

On the moon, however, quakes can last longer than an hour.

Apollo astronauts installed seismometers on the moon.NASA

"A moon quake builds up for minutes, then decays away for an hour or more. So it looks very different," Panning said. "The reason moonquakes look that way is because the moon's surface is really dry and really broken up. It's been basically sitting there for billions of years and getting hit by meteorites."

Still, researchers expected quakes on Mars to fall more on the Earth-like end of the spectrum. That's because they thought the planets had similar crusts, given that Mars once had plenty of volcanic activity and water.

But the initial data suggests that may not be the case.

How Mars quakes are changing scientists' understanding of the red planet

Mars' polar ice cap.NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS

So far, the length of Mars quakes seems to fall somewhere in the middle of the moon's and Earth's, at about 10 to 20 minutes. Mars also appears to be a little more seismically active than the moon, but a lot less than Earth.

Mars' seismic waves also reverberate more than waves on Earth, and more similarly to moon quakes.

"It's bouncing off all of these broken-up bits, so that gives you something that lasts a long time," Panning said.

This suggests that Mars' crust has layers of rugged, dry, broken-up rock like the moon's.

The artist's representation below shows how seismic waves from a Mars quake might move through the red planet's interior.

The animation, made by an InSight seismologist at ETH Zurich, shows the different types of waves the InSight team is studying. The blue waves are the initial bouncy pulses that spread out quickly from the quake's source. The red ones follow as a result, and seismologists can use the lag between them to calculate how far away the quake's source is.

The long waves of red and white that spread along the sides of the animation are surface waves that bounce through crust material — their reverberations suggested the moon-like qualities of Mars' crust.

The researchers expected Mars' crust to be more dry and broken than Earth's, but not quite this much. They don't know yet what to make of the new finding.

Much more to learn

A few dozen Mars quakes aren't enough to reveal the red planet's secrets, however.

"The biggest thing that we can do with the pretty small number of events we've seen so far is really understand how active Mars is now," Panning said. "That's telling you a lot of information on how Mars is evolving over time."

So far, the signals from Mars quakes have also been too faint to offer information about the internal structure of the planet below its crust. A person standing on Mars would not have been able to feel any of the shaking InSight's tools picked up.

In fact, a team of InSight seismologists in Zurich had to amplify those seismic signals by a factor of 10 million in order to accurately simulate the shaking on the scale of an earthquake.

For these reasons, the InSight team is still waiting for a big quake that travels through the planet's core.

"Then we can start actually making detailed pictures of what the Martian interior looks like," Panning said. "There's a waiting game right now. We're going to be listening for another year and a half, so we're expecting to see a lot more things."

In the meantime, the InSight team trying to fix the lander's "mole," a tool that's supposed to dig down 16 feet and take Mars' temperature. The mole stopped working properly in February.

In the future, Panning would like to see sensors on every planetary body that quakes, especially Enceladus, a moon of Saturn from which plumes of water shoot out. Even better than one seismometer: a whole network of them.

"Seismology on Earth is almost entirely built on networks of data," Panning said. "I'd love to put seismometers everywhere."

Original author: Morgan McFall-Johnsen

Continue reading
  46 Hits
Jul
27

Thought Leaders in Cloud Computing: Feyzi Fatehi, CEO of Corent Technologies (Part 6) - Sramana Mitra

Sramana Mitra: You have very efficient and seamless ways to retrofit software that is not SaaS-enabled and turn them into SaaS. It think it’s extremely valuable. It’s interesting that you’re doing...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  9 Hits
Nov
09

How play-to-earn gaming brings rewards to players

Google's update on its cloud revenues on Thursday caught investors by surprise, providing a rare peak behind the curtain from a company famous for saying very little.

Is this the start of a new, more open Google?

The financial analysts who follow the $137 billion revenue company certainly hope so. In the wake of Thursday's cloud surprise, Business Insider asked some of the top Google analysts what other information they'd like the tech giant to start disclosing now that it's in a sharing mood.

James Lee, an analyst at Mizuho Securities, told us that if he could pick any numbers to be included consistently in Google-parent company Alphabet's earnings report, he would put YouTube revenues at the top his list.

Second on his wish list, Lee said he would like to see actual cloud revenues — not just the annualized "run rate" Google provided Thursday — as well as cloud profit margins; and third, he'd like know pricing for mobile and desktop search ads.

Alphabet shows investors only how its ads business is performing, lumping the rest of its businesses into fuzzy categories called "Other Revenues" and "Other Bets," which covers separate companies under the Alphabet umbrella, like its self-driving-car company, Waymo.

And even within its ads revenue line item, analysts are left scratching their heads.

YouTube, the world's top video streaming site, for instance, makes most of its money from ads and is the company's second-largest revenue generator. But nowhere on the company's income statement will you see YouTube as a line item.

REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

Instead, YouTube's ad revenue is combined with Google's search ads to make up the company's overall ad revenue segment. For a business that's estimated to bring in between $16 and $25 billion annually, that's a major puzzle piece missing for analysts and investors.

Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter and Jefferies' Brent Thill told us as well that they think the YouTube number would be one of the most important to break out. Pachter also wished search ad revenues were a stand alone line item.

The two also agreed with Lee that seeing regular numbers for its cloud business — which appears to be growing in significance at Alphabet — would be a top ask.

"I think Google should break out search, YouTube, third party and cloud as separate line items," Pachter said. "Apparently, Ruth Porat [Google's CFO] disagrees with me."

"Thanks, but we still want more"

Dan Ive, who is also an analyst at Wedbush, described Google's cloud reveal as a step in the right direction.

As it stands now, Google's cloud business results are obfuscated within a line item on Alphabet's income statement known simply as "Other Revenues." That line item contains all the revenue Google generates that doesn't come from ads, including things like the app store and hardware sales.

So when "Other Revenues" are up or down — on Thursday it was up 40% year-over-year — it's impossible to know how much of that was due to the cloud business or to sales of gaming apps in the Google Play Store. The last time the company shared actual numbers from its cloud business was in Q4 2017 when it said it had reached $1 billion in revenues for that quarter.

"As its cloud business ramps, the Street will demand more transparency and run rates," Ives said.

His sentiment was consistent with most analysts we spoke to about the one-off cloud reveal — "Thanks, but we still want more."

Dan Morgan, a senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust Company, put consistent cloud revenue at the top of his wish list. After that, he pined for information about hardware sales, such as the Pixel smartphones (Google said sales of its Pixel phones more than doubled in Q2, but provided no specific numbers that would give the statement any real meaning).

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Like others, Morgan wants YouTube revenue too. But given that YouTube now has a nascent premium business, for streaming TV and streaming music, Morgan says a breakdown of the various YouTube revenue-generators would be appropriate.

If they told us, they'd have to kill us

There is legal precedence ( TSC Industries v. Northway) for companies being forced to provide information in its earnings report that a "reasonable shareholder might consider important."

In 2017, the SEC actually looked into why, specifically, Alphabet was not disclosing its YouTube revenues. But after the company reportedly said, among other things, that its overall goal was to sell online advertising — not just ads on YouTube — the commission backed off and no changes were demanded of the tech giant.

Morgan thinks it would actually be in Alphabet's interest to be more open.

As the company's core ad business matures, it becomes more difficult to post bombshell growth numbers. In the second quarter, for instance, Alphabet's advertising revenues beat analysts predictions and its Q1 numbers, but were still way down from the same period last year (Ad revenues grew 16% year-over-year in Q2 2019 compared to almost 24% in Q2 2018).

"[New disclosures] would give you something to get excited about in terms of the stock," Morgan said. "All of a sudden, the spotlight goes off your maturing ad revenue growth, and the spotlight goes on these new, exciting businesses in GCP [Google's cloud business] and YouTube. More clarity would really light it up."

Still, even though pulling the curtain back on more of its business might make strategic sense for Alphabet, some are not convinced that it will actually happen. Analysts have been calling on the company to give more transparency into the business for some time now to no avail.

"I don't understand them at all," Wedbush's Pachter said. "They treat us like if they told us anything, they'd have to kill us."

Got a tip? Contact Nick Bastone via Signal or WhatsApp at +1 (209) 730-3387 using a non-work phone, email atThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Telegram at nickbastone, or Twitter DM at@nickbastone.

Original author: Nick Bastone

Continue reading
  31 Hits
Jun
02

The 23 most powerful LGBTQ+ people in tech

In the US, 37 million people have chronic kidney disease, and it's the ninth leading cause of death.

Because such a significant part of the population is affected, and because treatment can be so expensive, the government covers the medical expenses of people with end-stage kidney disease through the Medicare program. In 2016, Medicare spent about $114 billion caring for people with chronic and end-stage kidney disease.

Earlier this month, Trump released an executive order to transform kidney care in the US, reducing costs and improving outcomes for patients by encouraging more home-based kidney care. The order also outlined the need to provide better access to kidney transplants and to prevent kidney disease from progressing.

Read more: Trump just announced a new approach to caring for millions of people with a devastating disease, and it could upend a $114 billion market

To address the high cost of kidney care, the goal is to target dialysis, a procedure that filters the blood for people whose kidneys are failing. Currently, 88% of patients receive their dialysis in centers. They must go three times a week for hours at a time. By 2025, The Trump administration wants 80% of patients who are newly diagnosed with kidney failure to be able to get care at home or get a kidney transplant.

Home-based dialysis treatment can be better for patients, as patients can perform their own dialysis more frequently, leading to improved health and potentially lower costs.

"Home dialysis has a lot of advantages in terms of quality of life, convenience, and control of one's schedule," said Dr. Leslie Wong, the vice chairman of the Department of Nephrology and Hypertension at Cleveland Clinic. "I've been in the field for 15 years and physicians have been supportive of home dialysis since I began practicing."

For-profit companies DaVita, Fresenius, US Renal Care, and American Renal Associates operate centers where people can get dialysis. Currently, Fresenius and DaVita control about 75% of the market, according to an analysis from S&P Global. US Renal Care has about 5% and and American Renal Associates has 3%, S&P said.

Startups like Somatus, Outset Medical, and Cricket Health, which offer different types of kidney care, including home-based dialysis, are trying to break in. CVS Health, which operates in-store clinics and owns the health insurer Aetna, is now investing in home-dialysis technology, too.

Never miss out on healthcare news. Subscribe to Dispensed, our weekly newsletter on pharma, biotech, and healthcare.

There are two types of dialysis: hemodialysis and peritoneal. Hemodialysis pumps blood out of the body to an artificial kidney machine and returns the clean blood to the body via tubes connected to the patient. That's the type of dialysis you'd usually get at a center. Peritoneal dialysis fills the abdomen with fluid and uses the membranes in the body as a filter. Most home dialysis is peritoneal, which is easier to do.

Medicare spent $28 billion on hemodialysis and about $2 billion on peritoneal dialysis in 2016, according to the US Renal Data System. Peritoneal dialysis is cheaper on a per-person basis. It cost about $76,000 for each recipient, while hemodialysis cost about $91,000.

Business Insider talked to top executives at CVS Health, Cricket Health, Outset Medical, and Somatus, which are all seeking to reshape kidney care. We also checked in with DaVita and Fresenius. Here's what they told us about how the Trump's administration's moves could affect the market and their companies.

Original author: Clarrie Feinstein

Continue reading
  15 Hits
Jul
27

Facebook's privacy settlement is such a joke, Mark Zuckerberg likely celebrated its signing (FB)

The Federal Trade Commission would like to have you believe that its settlement with Facebook over the latter's alleged privacy violations was a great deal.

And it was — for Facebook.

The FTC — or at least its Republican majority that approved the agreement announced Wednesday — touted the "record" $5 billion penalty the company will pay as part of it and the "unprecedented" new restrictions the agency is putting in place to oversee the social media giant's privacy practices going forward. The agency also argued that the settlement was far better than it could have gotten — and agreed to much sooner than would have happened — if it had gone to court.

Maybe so. But the deal is much more show than substance. And, given the scope of Facebook's alleged misdeeds, is far too lax on the company and CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

The $5 billion penalty is all-but-inconsequential to a company as profitable as Facebook. The new oversight structure has some major flaws and weaknesses. The settlement does little to limit Zuckerberg's power and doesn't hold him personally accountable for the actions of a company that he alone controls. And the agreement does almost nothing to stop the collection and sharing of data — or the use of it for targeted advertising — that was at the heart of the company's privacy violations.

The agreement "lets Facebook off the hook," said FTC Commissioner Rohit Chopra, who joined with fellow Democrat Rebecca Kelly Slaughter in voting against the deal, in a written dissent. "The fine print in this settlement," he continued, "gives Facebook a lot to celebrate."

Chopra wasn't the only one lambasting the agreement. Consumer groups including Free Press and the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which for years has been criticizing Facebook's privacy practices, blasted it as inadequate. So too did Republican Sen. Josh Hawley, a frequent Facebook critic, who called it disappointing, saying that it "utterly fails to penalize Facebook in any effective way."

Facebook can easily afford $5 billion

For all the patting on the back the FTC's majority gave itself for the agreement, it's not hard to understand why many see it as a bad deal.

Take the monetary penalty. A $5 billion fine sounds like a lot, and the FTC's majority certainly trumpeted it as such. After all, the biggest prior penalty the agency had imposed in a case like Facebook's was the $22.5 million fine it slapped on Google in 2012.

But compared to Facebook's revenue, profits, cash flow, market capitalization, or cash on hand, $5 billion is fairly small. In its second quarter alone, for example, Facebook posted $16.9 billion in sales, generated $8.6 billion in cash from its operations, and ended the quarter with $48.6 billion in cash and marketable securities. It "only" posted a profit of $2.6 billion for the period, but that amount included a deduction for the FTC fine. In other words, even with the fine, it earned billions of dollars of profit in the period.

Read this: The FTC's $5 billion fine for Facebook is so meaningless, it will likely leave Zuckerberg wondering what he can't get away with

And that was just one quarter. Facebook's alleged violations date back years, meaning that over the period in question, it's generated easily hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue and tens of billions of dollars in profits.

Meanwhile, comparing the fine to past penalties is not actually supposed to be part of the FTC's methodology, as Chopra noted in his dissent. The FTC has a well defined set of factors it's supposed to take into account when determining financial penalties. Among other things, the agency is supposed to take into account a company's ability to pay, its good or bad faith in dealing with the agency, and the profits it made that can be attributed to its offending conduct.

"In my view, a rigorous analysis of unjust enrichment alone ... would likely yield a figure well above $5 billion," Chopra said.

The company can keep on collecting consumer data

But it's not just the penalty where the agreement is far less than it seems on the surface. The new privacy oversight Facebook will have to put in place as part of the deal is also more impressive in the abstract than it's likely to be in reality.

Under the deal, the company will have to set up a new privacy committee comprised of independent directors. It will also have to establish a new nominating committee, also composed of independent board members, that will name people to the privacy committee.

FTC Chairman Joe Simons announces the penalty. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

Facebook's new chief privacy officer, Michel Protti, whose naming was also required by the agreement, will have to give quarterly reports to the privacy committee about the company's privacy practices under the deal. It will also have to name an independent person to assess its compliance with the privacy program laid out in the deal on a biannual basis to the FTC.

What's more, Facebook will have to assess and report on the risk to privacy of each new product or service it launches.

All of that sounds pretty onerous. But it's likely to be more of a bureaucratic headache than a meaningful restriction on Facebook's activities. That's because the order generally doesn't preclude Facebook from implementing new products and services that infringe on users' privacy or from collecting their personal information.

Under the order Facebook can no longer use members phone numbers that they've supplied it for the purpose of its two-factor authentication feature to target them with ads. It also has to get their express consent before applying its facial recognition technology to pictures of their faces. But other than those exceptions, it's free to continue collecting, using, and sharing whatever personal data it wants on its users, as long as it makes an assessment of the risks involved and describes what safeguards it puts in place — if any — to mitigate them.

"The order allows Facebook to evaluate for itself what level of user privacy is appropriate, and holds the company accountable only for producing those evaluations," Chopra wrote. "What it does not require is actually respecting user privacy."

The agreement doesn't check Zuckerberg's power

The new governance structure similarly seems more about trying to give the semblance that the FTC was doing something rather than meaningfully constraining Zuckerberg's power. For all the talk in the order about "independent" directors, it's hard for any Facebook board member to be truly independent when Zuckerberg controls the company.

Thanks to his ownership of a special class of stock that give him 10 votes per share, Zuckerberg has about 58% of the voting power at Facebook. By himself, he can determine the outcome of any shareholder vote or board election. The agreement did nothing to limit that fundamental power.

The agreement purports to limit that control by barring the removal of any member of the privacy committee without the support of shareholders representing two-thirds of the voting power at the company, or more than what Zuckerberg alone controls. But that's not really a meaningful constraint.

As Chopra noted in his dissent, it's rare for corporate directors to be removed from office midway through their term. Generally, they get replaced when their term is up, when companies hold a vote for directors at their annual shareholder meeting. If Zuckerberg doesn't approve of a supposedly independent director's work on Facebook's new nominating or privacy committees, he could name and vote in alternative board members at the annual meeting all by himself.

"The proposed settlement ratifies Facebook's governance structure instead of changing it," Chopra said. "The 'Independent Privacy Committee' has little independence, no meaningful powers, and no buy-in from shareholders."

The FTC let Zuckerberg off the hook — without interviewing him

But perhaps the worst part about the settlement is that with it, the FTC is essentially wiping the slate clean for Facebook and its executives unnecessarily and before it even finished its work.

The agency could and probably should have held individual Facebook executives and directors responsible for allegedly breaking the terms of the 2012 agreement. But it didn't. Even though Zuckerberg, Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg, and the company's directors were responsible for ensuring that Facebook hewed to that agreement, the settlement doesn't hold any of them personally accountable for allegedly failing to do so. That's in sharp contrast to the actions the FTC has taken against smaller companies, including Cambridge Analytica. In that case, which the agency settled on the same day, it did actually hold the company's executive personally responsible.

Relatedly, despite investigating Facebook for 16 months, the agency never interviewed Zuckerberg. The agency's enforcement director said the FTC feared Facebook would have gone to court rather than allow Zuckerberg to be deposed and that the agency felt it had all the information it needed without him.

But that assertion seems ludicrous on its face. Zuckerberg controls the company. He was the one who announced or was intricately involved in the major steps that affected the ability of companies including Cambridge Analytica to access the personal data of Facebook users without their knowledge.

The agency likely could have learned at least something about his involvement and thinking in those decisions by interviewing him. And even if it still chose not to hold him personally responsible for those decisions, the interview itself would have been a way of holding him accountable.

Given Zuckerberg's control over Facebook, the FTC failure to uncover his role in the company's myriad alleged privacy violations — including by interviewing him — was a "critical" missed step in the investigation, Chopra said.

"It is hard to imagine that any of the core decisions at issue were made without his input," he said. "The FTC Act," he continued, "does not include special exemptions for executives of the world's largest corporations, but this settlement sends the unfortunate message that they are subject to another set of rules."

And that's precisely why they're likely celebrating at Facebook's headquarters.

Got a tip about Facebook or the tech industry? Contact this reporter via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., message him on Twitter @troywolv, or send him a secure message through Signal at 415.515.5594. You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Original author: Troy Wolverton

Continue reading
  32 Hits
Jul
27

YouTubers Tana Mongeau and Jake Paul are getting married in Las Vegas this weekend, and MTV filming it all. Here's everything we know about the couple's upcoming marriage

One of YouTube's most popular, yet controversial, couples is getting married Sunday, and the entire event will be filmed for their more than 20 million combined fans to see.

Tana Mongeau and Jake Paul — who have referred to themselves as "two of the internet's biggest sociopaths" — will be getting married this weekend in Las Vegas to tie the knot on a relationship that some fans and YouTubers believe to be completely fabricated for views.

Since getting together in late April, the two got engaged at Mongeau's 21st birthday party, then announced at online-video convention VidCon they would be getting married July 28.

The two YouTubers have been long immersed in drama and controversy, both as a couple and separately, so what takes place at their wedding is anyone's guess.

Here's everything we know about about Tana Mongeau and Jake Paul's wedding taking place Sunday:

Original author: Paige Leskin

Continue reading
  34 Hits
Jul
27

Startups Weekly: SoftBank’s second act

Hello and welcome back to Startups Weekly, a weekend newsletter that dives into the week’s noteworthy startups and venture capital news. Before I jump into today’s topic, let’s catch up a bit. Last week, I noted some challenges plaguing mental health tech startups. Before that, I wrote about Zoom and Superhuman’s PR disasters.

Remember, you can send me tips, suggestions and feedback to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or on Twitter @KateClarkTweets. If you don’t subscribe to Startups Weekly yet, you can do that here.

Anyway, onto the subject on everyone’s mind this week: SoftBank’s second Vision Fund.

Well into the evening on Thursday, SoftBank announced a target of $108 billion for the Vision Fund 2. Yes, you read that correctly, $108 billion. SoftBank indeed plans to raise even more capital for its sophomore vehicle than it did for the record-breaking debut vision fund of $98 billion, which was majority-backed by the government funds of Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi, as well as Apple, Foxconn and several other limited partners.

Its upcoming fund, to which SoftBank itself has committed $38 billion, has attracted investment from the National Investment Corporation of National Bank of Kazakhstan, Apple, Foxconn, Goldman Sachs, Microsoft and more. Microsoft, a new LP for SoftBank, reportedly hopped on board with the Japanese telecom giant as part of a grand scheme to convince the massive fund’s portfolio companies to transition to Microsoft Azure, the company’s cloud platform that competes with Amazon Web Services . Here’s more on that and some analysis from TechCrunch editor Jonathan Shieber.

News of the second Vision Fund comes as somewhat of a surprise. We’d heard SoftBank was having some trouble landing commitments for the effort. Why? Well, because SoftBank’s investments have included a wide-range of upstarts, including some uncertain bets. Brandless, a company into which SoftBank injected a lot of money, has struggled in recent months, for example. Wag is said to be going downhill fast. And WeWork, backed with billions from SoftBank, still has a lot to prove.

Here’s everything else we know about The Vision Fund 2:

It’s focused on the “AI revolution through investment in market-leading, tech-enabled growth companies.”The full list of investors also includes seven Japanese financial institutions: Mizuho Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, MUFG Bank, The Dai-ichi Life Insurance Company, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank, SMBC Nikko Securities and Daiwa Securities Group. Also, international banking services provider Standard Chartered Bank, as well as “major participants from Taiwan.”The $108 billion figure is based on memoranda of understandings (MOUs), or agreements for future investment from the aforementioned entities. That means SoftBank hasn’t yet collected all this capital, aside from the $38 billion it plans to invest itself in the new Vision Fund.Saudi and Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth funds are not listed as investors in the new fund.SoftBank is expected to begin deploying capital fund from Fund 2 immediately, and a first close is expected in two months, per The Financial Times.We’ll keep you updated on the Vision Fund 2’s investments, fundraising efforts and more as we learn about them.

On to other news…

IPO Corner

WeWork is planning a September listing

The company made headlines again this week after word slipped it was accelerating its IPO plans and targeting a September listing. We don’t know much about its IPO plans yet as we are still waiting on the co-working business to unveil its S-1 filing. Whether WeWork can match or exceed its current private market valuation of $47 billion is unlikely. I expect it will pull an Uber and struggle, for quite some time, to earn a market cap larger than what VCs imagined it was worth months earlier.

Robinhood had a wild week

The consumer financial app made headlines twice this week. The first time because it raised a whopping $323 million at a $7.6 billion valuation. That is a whole lot of money for a business that just raised a similarly sized monster round one year ago. In fact, it left us wondering, why the hell is Robinhood worth $7.6 billion? Then, in a major security faux pas, the company revealed it has been storing user passwords in plaintext. So, go change your Robinhood password and don’t trust any business to value your security. Sigh.

Another day, another huge fintech round

While we’re on the subject on fintech, TechCrunch editor Danny Crichton noted this week the rise of mega-rounds in the fintech space. This week, it was personalized banking app MoneyLion, which raised $100 million at a near unicorn valuation. Last week, it was N26, which raised another $170 million on top of its $300 million round earlier this yearBrex raised another $100 million last month on top of its $125 million Series C from late last year. Meanwhile, companies like payments platform Stripesavings and investment platform Raisintraveler lender Uplift, mortgage backers Blend and Better and savings depositor Acorns have also raised massive new rounds this year. Naturally, VC investment in fintech is poised to reach record levels this year, according to PitchBook.

Uber’s changing board

Arianna Huffington, the CEO of Thrive Global, stepped down from Uber’s board of directors this week, a team she had been apart of since 2016. She addressed the news in a tweet, explaining that there were no disagreements between her and the company, rather, she was busy and had other things to focus on. Fair. Benchmark’s Matt Cohler also stepped down from the board this week, which leads us to believe the ride-hailing giant’s advisors are in a period of transition. If you remember, Uber’s first employee and longtime board member Ryan Graves stepped down from the board in May, just after the company’s IPO. 

Today I told my fellow @Uber board members that given @Thrive's growth, I will no longer be able to give my board duties the attention they deserve, so I will be stepping down. I look forward to watching Uber go from strength to strength! Here is the email I sent to the board: pic.twitter.com/sck0CPLwAV

— Arianna Huffington (@ariannahuff) July 24, 2019

Startup Capital

Unity, now valued at $6B, raising up to $525M
Bird is raising a Sequoia-led Series D at $2.5B valuation
SMB payroll startup Gusto raises $200M Series D
Elon Musk’s Boring Company snags $120M
a16z values camping business HipCamp at $127M
An inside look at the startup behind Ashton Kutcher’s weird tweets
Dataplor raises $2M to digitize small businesses in Latin America

Extra Crunch

While we’re on the subject of amazing TechCrunch #content, it’s probably time for a reminder for all of you to sign up for Extra Crunch. For a low price, you can learn more about the startups and venture capital ecosystem through exclusive deep dives, Q&As, newsletters, resources and recommendations and fundamental startup how-to guides. Here are some of my current favorite EC posts:

What types of startups are the most profitable?The roles tools play in employee engagementWhat to watch for in a VC term sheet

#Equitypod

If you enjoy this newsletter, be sure to check out TechCrunch’s venture-focused podcast, Equity. In this week’s episode, available here, Equity co-host Alex Wilhelm, TechCrunch editor Danny Crichton and I unpack Robinhood’s valuation and argue about scooter startups. Equity drops every Friday at 6:00 am PT, so subscribe to us on Apple PodcastsOvercast and Spotify.

That’s all, folks.

Continue reading
  19 Hits
Jul
27

Thought Leaders in E-Commerce: Jimmy Duvall, Chief Product Officer of BigCommerce (Part 5) - Sramana Mitra

Sramana Mitra: What about logistics? That must be another area where Amazon is a player that you have to interface with. Jimmy Duvall: Absolutely. They help our retailers handle logistics and...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  24 Hits
Jun
22

Investor Marlon Nichols and Wonderschool’s Chris Bennett on getting to the point with a pitch deck

Earlier this month, TechCrunch held its inaugural Mobility Sessions event, where leading mobility-focused auto companies, startups, executives and thought leaders joined us to discuss all things autonomous vehicle technology, micromobility and electric vehicles.

Extra Crunch is offering members access to full transcripts of key panels and conversations from the event, such as Megan Rose Dickey‘s chat with Voyage CEO and co-founder Oliver Cameron and Uber’s prediction team lead Clark Haynes on the ethical considerations for autonomous vehicles.

Megan, Oliver and Clark talk through how companies should be thinking about ethics when building out the self-driving ecosystem, while also diving into the technical aspects of actually building an ethical transportation product. The panelists also discuss how their respective organizations handle ethics, representation and access internally, and how their approaches have benefited their offerings.

Clark Haynes: So we as human drivers, we’re naturally what’s called foveate. Our eyes go forward and we have some mirrors that help us get some situational awareness. Self-driving cars don’t have that problem. Self-driving cars are designed with 360-degree sensors. They can see everything around them.

But the interesting problem is not everything around you is important. And so you need to be thinking through what are the things, the people, the actors in the world that you might be interacting with, and then really, really think through possible outcomes there.

I work on the prediction problem of what’s everyone doing? Certainly, you need to know that someone behind you is moving in a certain way in a certain direction. But maybe that thing that you’re not really certain what it is that’s up in front of you, that’s the thing where you need to be rolling out 10, 20 different scenarios of what might happen and make certain that you can kind of hedge your bets against all of those.

For access to the full transcription below and for the opportunity to read through additional event transcripts and recaps, become a member of Extra Crunch. Learn more and try it for free. 

Megan Rose Dickey: Ready to talk some ethics?

Oliver Cameron: Born ready.

Clark Haynes: Absolutely.

Rose Dickey: I’m here with Oliver Cameron of Voyage, a self-driving car company that operates in communities, like retirement communities, for example. And with Clark Haynes of Uber, he’s on the prediction team for autonomous vehicles.

So some of you in the audience may remember, it was last October, MIT came out with something called the moral machine. And it essentially laid out 13 different scenarios involving self-driving cars where essentially someone had to die. It was either the old person or the young person, the black person, or the white person, three people versus one person. I’m sure you guys saw that, too.

So why is that not exactly the right way to be thinking about self-driving cars and ethics?

Haynes: This is the often-overused trolley problem of, “You can only do A or B choose one.” The big thing there is that if you’re actually faced with that as the hardest problem that you’re doing right now, you’ve already failed.

You should have been working harder to make certain you never ended up in a situation where you’re just choosing A or B. You should actually have been, a long time ago, looking at A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and like thinking through all possible outcomes as far as what your self-driving car could do, in low probability outcomes that might be happening.

Rose Dickey: Oliver, I remember actually, it was maybe a few months ago, you tweeted something about the trolley problem and how much you hate it.

Cameron: I think it’s one of those questions that doesn’t have an ideal answer today, because no one’s got self-driving cars deployed to tens of thousands of people experiencing these sorts of issues on the road. If we did an experiment, how many people here have ever faced that conundrum? Where they have to choose between a mother pushing a stroller with a child and a regular, normal person that’s just crossing the road?

Rose Dickey: We could have a quick show of hands. Has anyone been in that situation?

Continue reading
  24 Hits
Jul
26

Lessons from the hardware capital of the world

A week is obviously not enough time to truly understand a market as massive and fascinating as China. Hell, it’s not really even enough time to adjust to the 12-hour time difference from New York. That said, each of the three visits I’ve taken to the country in the past two years has yielded some useful insights into my role as hardware editor here at TechCrunch.

Late last week, I got back from an eight-day trip to Shenzhen in the Guangdong Province of South China and nearby Hong Kong. In some respects, the cities are worlds apart, though a newly opened high-speed rail system has reduced the trip to 30 minutes. Customs issues aside, it’s the height of convenience. Though for political and cultural reasons I’ll not get into here, some have bemoaned the access it’s provided.

This particular visit was sort of a scouting trip. In November, TechCrunch will be hosting its first Hardware Battlefield event in a couple of years. Previous events had been held at CES for reasons of easy access to young startups. This time out, however, we’ve opted to go straight to the source.

The birthplace of hardware

Continue reading
  35 Hits
Sep
04

Loog launches a trio of new educational guitars

Another day, another mega round for a fintech startup. And this one is mega-mega.

Brazil-based Nubank, which offers a suite of banking and financial services for Brazilian consumers, announced today that it has raised a $400 million Series F round of venture capital led by Woody Marshall of TCV. The growth-stage fund is best known for its investment in Netflix but has also made fintech a high priority, with over $1.5 billion in investments in the space. According to Nubank, the company has now raised $820 million across seven venture rounds.

Katie Roof and Peter Rudegeair of The Wall Street Journal reported this morning that the company secured a valuation above $10 billion, potentially making it one of a short list of startup decacorns. That’s up from the $4 billion valuation we wrote about back in October 2018.

Part of the reason for that big-ticket round is the company’s growth. Nubank said in a statement that it has now reached 12 million customers for its various products, making it the sixth-largest financial institution by customer count within its home market. Brazil has a population of roughly 210 million people — indicating that there is still a lot of local growth potential even before the company begins to consider its international expansion options. Nubank announced a few weeks ago that it will start to expand its offerings to Mexico and Argentina.

Over the past year, the company has expanded its product offerings to include personal loans and cash withdrawal options as part of its digital savings accounts.

As I wrote earlier this week, part of the reason for these fintech mega-rounds is that the cost of acquiring a financial customer is critical to the success of these startups. Once a startup has a customer for one financial product — say, a savings account — it can then upsell customers to other products at a very low marketing cost. That appears to be the strategy at Nubank as well, with its quickly expanding suite of products.

As my colleague Jon Shieber discussed last month, critical connections between Stanford, Silicon Valley and Latin America have forged a surge of investment from venture capitalists into the region, as the continent experiences the same digital transformation seen elsewhere throughout the world. As just one example from the healthcare space, Dr Consulta raised more than nine figures to address the serious healthcare needs of Brazilian consumers. Additionally, SoftBank’s Vision Fund, which was rumored to be investing in Nubank earlier this year, has vowed to put $5 billion to work in the region and recently invested $231 million in fintech startup Creditas.

In an email from TCV, Woody Marshall said that, “Leveraging unique technology, David Vélez and his team are continuously pushing the boundaries of delivering best in class financial services, grounded in a culture of tech and innovation. Nubank has all the core tenets of what TCV looks for in preeminent franchise investments.”

NuBank was founded in 2013 by co-founders Adam Edward Wible, Cristina Junqueira, and David Velez. In addition to TCV, existing backers Tencent, DST Global, Sequoia Capital, Dragoneer, Ribbit Capital and Thrive Capital also participated in the round.

Continue reading
  19 Hits
Jul
26

David and Goliath: Approaching the ‘deal’

Adam Zagaris Contributor
Adam Zagaris is an attorney, partner and founder at Moonshot Legal, specializing in commercial contracts. Adam helps startups close deals and move up and to the right.

It is a simple question with a complex answer. How does a startup get from zero to execution when negotiating contracts with potential customers that are large enterprises? The 800-pound gorillas. Situations in which your negotiating leverage is limited (often severely so).

As a commercial contracts attorney, clients often ask me about the one right way to approach deals. Many are looking for a cheat sheet of universal terms they should push for in contracts. But there is no one answer.

Deals are not cookie-cutter, and neither are the contracts on which they are built. That said, a basic framework can help provide startups with some grounding to better think about negotiations with large enterprises. The idea is to avoid over-lawyering, and instead approach the discussion with a legally prudent yet deal-centric mindset.

There are generally six overarching considerations as you head into negotiations with large, enterprise organizations.

Continue reading
  19 Hits
Mar
22

1Mby1M Virtual Accelerator Investor Forum: With Nandini Mansinghka of Mumbai Angels Network (Part 4) - Sramana Mitra

Jim has bootstrapped a $10M company by providing a software solution to the charity auction management problem. Interesting journey. Sramana Mitra: Let’s start at the very beginning of your journey....

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  56 Hits
Jul
26

Facebook on Thin Ice with Payment Foray - Sramana Mitra

This week, Facebook (NASDAQ: FB) reported a strong quarter that beat analyst estimates. Market has reacted positively to its strong quarter and the recent FTC settlement. Facebook’s Financials...

___

Original author: Sramana_Mitra

Continue reading
  78 Hits
Jul
26

Thought Leaders in Cloud Computing: Feyzi Fatehi, CEO of Corent Technologies (Part 5) - Sramana Mitra

Sramana Mitra: What are the open problems where you would encourage new entrepreneurs to start companies? Feyzi Fatehi: One question I ask people is, in your opinion, how many open source...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  69 Hits
Feb
13

Datometry snares $17M Series B to help move data and applications to the cloud

FeaturePeek, a member of the Y Combinator Summer 2019 cohort, wants to change the way companies review front-end interfaces. Instead of kludging together reviews with screenshots or involving product managers and marketing people at the last minute, they want to make it easy to carry out reviews throughout the development cycle.

“FeaturePeek allows product teams and designers to give feedback on new front-end work as the developers are working on it, and as a pull request is open. So that while it is still top of mind for the engineer, you can make critical changes, and then really focus on actual QA during your QA cycle,” co-founder Eric Silverman told TechCrunch

Like so many startups, the two co-founders, Silverman and long-time friend and former college roommate Jason Barry, started the company after experiencing first-hand the pain of last-minute reviews.

“We both started our careers at Apple, and then we were both at a SaaS startup a few years ago, and noticed that every night or two before the release, the product team and designers start chiming in on our staging environments, saying, ‘Oh, this isn’t really what I meant,’ ” Silverman explained. This created frustration and a lot of last-minute changes just as the site was supposed to go live.

They understood that this system was fundamentally flawed through nobody’s fault. It’s just the way the process had developed over time, but they also knew everyone would benefit if they could get the product and marketing teams involved much sooner in the design cycle. “There wasn’t really good tooling to do these kind of reviews earlier in the cycle. Engineers have code review tools. [Others] have their own QA and staging environment, but those don’t really solve the right time to review new front-end implementations,” he said.

Being engineers, the founders built the tool right into GitHub. Once installed, after engineers commit their front-end code to GitHub, FeaturePeek automatically spins up a review environment in the background. Once complete, any stakeholders can go in and comment on the design as the design is happening, and is still front of mind for the engineers, instead of at the last minute.

Silverman and Barry began developing the product in January after the company they had been working at shut down. They were encouraged by some Y Combinator alum to apply to YC and were pleasantly surprised to get an interview. They were even happier to be invited to join the Summer 2019 class.

As engineers, they are used to spending their days coding, but that’s not always the case anymore. As startup founders, they have to worry about sales, marketing and networking, and so many more responsibilities beyond the coding side of things. They say YC has really helped them understand those new roles.

They have been thinking about this project for over a year, and they say being in Y Combinator has helped them move beyond their own ideas and start to put together a viable business.

Continue reading
  13 Hits
Nov
08

Report: 57% of all ecommerce cyberattacks are bot-driven

Muzmatch, a matchmaking app for Muslims, has just swiped a $7 million Series A on the back of continued momentum for its community-sensitive approach to soulmate searching for people of the Islamic faith.

It now has more than 1.5 million users of its apps, across 210 countries, swiping, matching and chatting online as they try to find “the one.”

The funding, which Muzmatch says will help fuel growth in key international markets, is jointly led by U.S. hedge fund Luxor Capital and Silicon Valley accelerator Y Combinator — the latter having previously selected Muzmatch for its summer 2017 batch of startups. 

Last year the team also took in a $1.75 million seed led by Fabrice Grinda’s FJ Labs, YC and others.

We first covered the startup two years ago when its founders were just graduating from YC. At that time there were two of them building the business: Shahzad Younas and Ryan Brodie — perhaps an unlikely pairing in this context, given Brodie’s lack of a Muslim background. He joined after meeting Younas, who had earlier quit his job as an investment banker to launch Muzmatch. Brodie got excited by the idea and early traction for the MVP. The pair went on to ship a relaunch of the app in mid 2016, which helped snag them a place at YC.

So why did Younas and Brodie unmatch? All the remaining founder can say publicly is that its investors are buying Brodie’s stake. (While, in a note on LinkedIn — celebrating what he dubs the “bittersweet” news of Muzmatch’s Series A — Brodie writes: “Separate to this raise I decided to sell my stake in the company. This is not from a lack of faith — on the contrary — it’s simply the right time for me to move on to startup number 4 now with the capital to take big risks.”)

Asked what’s harder, finding a steady co-founder or finding a life partner, Younas responds with a laugh. “With myself and Ryan, full credit, when we first joined together we did commit to each other, I guess, a period of time of really going for it,” he ventures, reaching for the phrase “conscious uncoupling” to sum up how things went down. “We both literally put blood, sweat and tears into the app, into growing what it is. And for sure without him we wouldn’t be as far as we are now, that’s definitely true.”

“For me it’s a fantastic outcome for him. I’m genuinely super happy for him. For someone of his age and at that time of his life — now he’s got the ability to start another startup and back himself, which is amazing. Not many people have that opportunity,” he adds.

Younas says he isn’t looking for another co-founder at this stage of the business, though he notes they have just hired a CTO — “purely because there’s so much to do that I want to make sure I’ve got a few people in certain areas.”

The team has grown from just four people seven months ago to 17 now. With the Series A the plan is to further expand headcount to almost 30.

“In terms of a co-founder, I don’t think, necessarily, at this point it’s needed,” Younas tells TechCrunch. “I obviously understand this community a lot. I’ve equally grown in terms of my role in the company and understanding various parts of the company. You get this experience by doing — so now I think definitely it helps having the simplicity of a single founder and really guiding it along.”

Despite the co-founders parting ways, there’s no doubting Muzmatch’s momentum. Aside from solid growth of its user base (it was reporting ~200,000 two years ago), its press release touts 30,000+ “successes” worldwide — which Younas says translates to people who have left the app and told it they did so because they met someone on Muzmatch.

He reckons at least half of those left in order to get married — and for a matchmaking app, that is the ultimate measure of success.

“Everywhere I go I’m meeting people who have met on Muzmatch. It has been really transformative for the Muslim community where we’ve taken off — and it is amazing to see, genuinely,” he says, suggesting the real success metric is “much higher because so many people don’t tell us.”

Nor is he worried about being too successful, despite 100 people a day leaving because they met someone on the app. “For us that’s literally the best thing that can happen because we’ve grown mostly by word of mouth — people telling their friends ‘I met someone on your app.’ Muslim weddings are quite big, a lot of people attend and word does spread,” he says.

Muzmatch was already profitable two years ago (and still is, for “some” months, though that’s not been a focus), which has given it leverage to focus on growing at a pace it’s comfortable with as a young startup. But the plan with the Series A cash is to accelerate growth by focusing attention internationally on Muslim-majority markets versus an early focus on markets, including the U.K. and the U.S., with Muslim-minority populations.

This suggests potential pitfalls lie ahead for the team to manage growth in a sustainable way — ensuring scaling usage doesn’t outstrip their ability to maintain the “safe space” feel the target users need, while at the same time catering to the needs of an increasingly diverse community of Muslim singles.

“We’re going to be focusing on Muslim-majority countries where we feel that they would be more receptive to technology. There’s slightly less of a taboo around finding someone online. There’s culture changes already happening, etc.,” he says, declining to name the specific markets they’ll be fixing on. “That’s definitely what we’re looking for initially. That will obviously allow us to scale in a big way going forward.

“We’ve always done [marketing] in a very data-driven way,” he adds, discussing his approach to growth. “Up til now I’ve led on that. Pretty much everything in this company I’ve self taught. So I learnt, essentially, how to build a growth engine, how to scale and optimize campaigns, digital spend, and these big guys have seen our data and they’re impressed with the progress we’ve made, and the customer acquisition costs that we’ve achieved — considering we really are targeting quite a niche market… Up til now we closed our Series A with more than half our seed round in our accounts.”

Muzmatch has also laid the groundwork for the planned international push, having already fully localized the app — which is live in 14 languages, including right-to-left languages like Arabic.

“We’re localized and we get a lot of organic users everywhere but obviously once you focus on a particular area — in terms of content, in terms of your brand etc. — then it really does start to take off,” adds Younas.

The team’s careful catering to the needs of its target community — via things like manual moderation of every profile and offering an optional chaperoning feature for in-app chats — i.e. rather than just ripping out a “Tinder for Muslims” clone, can surely take some credit for helping to grow the market for Muslim matchmaking apps overall.

“Shahzad has clearly made something that people want. He is a resourceful founder who has been listening to his users and in the process has developed an invaluable service for the Muslim community, in a way that mainstream companies have failed to do,” says YC partner Tim Brady in a supporting statement. 

But the flip side of attracting attention and spotlighting a commercial opportunity means Muzmatch now faces increased competition — such as from the likes of Dubai-based Veil: A rival matchmaking app that has recently turned heads with a “digital veil” feature that applies an opaque filter to all profile photos, male and female, until a mutual match is made.

Muzmatch also lets users hide their photos, if they choose. But it has resisted imposing a one-size-fits-all template on the user experience — exactly in order that it can appeal more broadly, regardless of the user’s level of religious adherence (it has even attracted non-Muslim users with a genuine interest in meeting a life partner).

Younas says he’s not worried about fresh faces entering the same matchmaking app space — couching it as a validation of the market.

He’s also dismissive of gimmicky startups that can often pass through the dating space, usually on a fast burn to nowhere… though he is expecting more competition from major players, such as Tinder-owner Match, which he notes has been eyeing up some of the same geographical markets.

“We know there’s going to be attention in this area,” he says. “Our goal is to basically continue to be the dominant player but for us to race ahead in terms of the quality of our product offering and obviously our size. That’s the goal. Having this investment definitely gives us that ammo to really go for it. But by the same token I’d never want us to be that silly startup that just burns a tonne of money and ends up nowhere.”

“It’s a very complex population, it’s very diverse in terms of culture, in terms of tradition,” he adds of the target market. “We so far have successfully been able to navigate that — of creating a product that does, to the user, marries technology with respecting the faith.”

Feature development is now front of mind for Muzmatch as it moves into the next phase of growth, and as — Younas hopes — it has more time to focus on finessing what its product offers, having bagged investment by proving product market fit and showing traction.

“The first thing that we’re going to be doing is an actual refreshing of our brand,” he says. “A bit of a rebrand, keeping the same name, a bit of a refresh of our brand, tidying that up. Actually refreshing the app, top to bottom. Part of that is looking at changes that have happened in the — call it — ‘dating space’. Because what we’ve always tried to do is look at the good that’s happening, get rid of the bad stuff, and try and package it and make it applicable to a Muslim audience.

“I think that’s what we’ve done really well. And I always wanted to innovate on that — so we’ve got a bunch of ideas around a complete refresh of the app.”

Video is one area they’re experimenting with for future features. TechCrunch’s interview with Younas takes place via a video chat using what looks to be its own videoconferencing platform (correction: it was using a video room powered by appear.in), though there’s not currently a feature in Muzmatch that lets users chat remotely via video.

Its challenge on this front will be implementing richer comms features in a way that a diverse community of religious users can accept.

“I want to — and we have this firmly on our roadmap, and I hope that it’s within six months — be introducing or bringing ways to connect people on our platform that they’ve never been able to do before. That’s going to be key. Elements of video is going to be really interesting,” says Younas teasing their thinking around video.

“The key for us is how do we do [videochat] in a way that is sensible and equally gives both sides control. That’s the key.”

Nor will it just be “simple video.” He says they’re also looking at how they can use profile data more creatively, especially for helping more private users connect around shared personality traits.

“There’s a lot of things we want to do within the app of really showing the richness of our profiles. One thing that we have that other apps don’t have are profiles that are really rich. So we have about 22 different data points on the profile. There’s a lot that people do and want to share. So the goal for us is how do we really try and show that off?

“We have a segment of profiles where the photos are private, right, people want that anonymity… so the goal for us is then saying how can we really show your personality, what you’re about in a really good way. And right now I would argue we don’t quite do it well enough. We’ve got a tonne of ideas and part of the rebrand and the refresh will be really emphasizing and helping that segment of society who do want to be private but equally want people to understand what they’re about.”

Where does he want the business to be in 12 months’ time? With a more polished product and “a lot of key features in the way of connecting the community around marriage — or just community in general.”

In terms of growth, the aim is at least 4x from where they are now.

“These are ambitious targets. Especially given the amount that we want to re-engineer and rebuild but now is the time,” he adds. “Now we have the fortune of having a big team, of having the investment. And really focusing and finessing our product… Really give it a lot of love and really give it a lot of the things we’ve always wanted to do and never quite had the time to do. That’s the key.

“I’m personally super excited about some of the stuff coming up because it’s a big enabler — growing the team and having the ability to really execute on this a lot faster.”

Continue reading
  14 Hits