Nov
05

MIT study finds humans struggle when partnered with RL agents

Money from big tech companies and top VC firms is flowing into the nascent “virtual beings” space. Mixing the opportunities presented by conversational AI, generative adversarial networks, photorealistic graphics, and creative development of fictional characters, “virtual beings” envisions a near-future where characters (with personalities) that look and/or sound exactly like humans are part of our day-to-day interactions.

Last week in San Francisco, entrepreneurs, researchers, and investors convened for the first Virtual Beings Summit, where organizer and Fable Studio CEO Edward Saatchi announced a grant program. Corporates like Amazon, Apple, Google, and Microsoft are pouring resources into conversational AI technology, chip-maker Nvidia and game engines Unreal and Unity are advancing real-time ray tracing for photorealistic graphics, and in my survey of media VCs one of the most common interests was “virtual influencers”.

The term “virtual beings” gets used as a catch-all categorization of activities that overlap here. There are really three separate fields getting conflated though:

Virtual CompanionsHumanoid Character CreationVirtual Influencers

These can overlap — there are humanoid virtual influencers for example — but they represent separate challenges, separate business opportunities, and separate societal concerns. Here’s a look at these fields, including examples from the Virtual Beings Summit, and how they collectively comprise this concept of virtual beings:

Virtual companions

Virtual companions are conversational AI that build a unique 1-to-1 relationship with us, whether to provide friendship or utility. A virtual companion has personality, gauges the personality of the user, retains memory of prior conversations, and uses all that to converse with humans like a fellow human would. They seem to exist as their own being even if we rationally understand they are not.

Virtual companions can exist across 4 formats:

Physical presence (Robotics)Interactive visual media (social media, gaming, AR/VR)Text-based messagingInteractive voice

While pop culture depictions of this include Her and Ex Machina, nascent real-world examples are virtual friend bots like Hugging Face and Replika as well as voice assistants like Amazon’s Alexa and Apple’s Siri. The products currently on the market aren’t yet sophisticated conversationalists or adept at engaging with us as emotional creatures but they may not be far off from that.

Continue reading
  24 Hits
Jul
29

Ordermark, the online-delivery order management service for restaurants, raises $18 million

Los Angeles-based Ordermark, the online delivery management service for restaurants founded by the scion of the famous, family-owned Canter’s Deli, said it has raised $18 million in a new round of funding.

The round was led by Boulder-based Foundry Group. All of Ordermark’s previous investors came back to provide additional capital for the company’s new funding, including: TenOneTen Ventures, Vertical Venture Partners, Mucker Capital, Act One Ventures and Nosara Capital, which led the Series A funding.

“We created Ordermark to help my family’s restaurant adapt and thrive in the mobile delivery era, and then realized that as a company, we could help other restaurants experiencing the same challenges. We’ve been gratified to see positive results come in from our restaurant customers nationwide,” said Alex Canter, in a statement.

A fourth-generation restaurateur, Canter built the technology on the back of his family deli’s own needs. The company has integrated with point of sale systems, kitchen displays and accounting tools, and with last-mile delivery companies.

As the company expands, it’s looking to increase its sales among the virtual restaurants powered by cloud kitchens and delivery services like Uber Eats, Seamless/Grubhub and others, the company said in a statement.

Although the business isn’t profitable, Ordermark is now in more than 3,000 restaurants. The company has integrations with more than 50 ordering services.

Continue reading
  38 Hits
Nov
05

Rider’s Republic review: Fast-paced fun, surprisingly peaceful

Launch vehicles and their enormous rocket engines tend to receive the lion’s share of attention when it comes to space-related propulsion, but launch only takes you to the edge of space — and space is a big place. Tesseract has engineered a new rocket for spacecraft that’s not only smaller and more efficient, but uses fuel that’s safer for us down here on the surface.

The field of rocket propulsion has been advancing constantly for decades, but once in space, there’s considerably less variation. Hydrazine is a simple and powerful nitrogen-hydrogen fuel that’s been in use since the ’50s, and engines using it (or similar “hypergolic” propellants) power many a spacecraft and satellite today.

There’s just one problem: Hydrazine is horribly toxic and corrosive. Handling it must be done in a special facility, using extreme caution and hazmat suits, and very close to launch time — you don’t want a poisonous explosive sitting around any longer than it has to. As launches and spacecraft multiply and costs drop, hydrazine handling remains a serious expense and danger.

Alternatives for in-space propulsion are being pursued, like Accion’s electrospray panels, Hall effect thrusters (on SpaceX’s Starlink satellites) and light sails — but ultimately, chemical propulsion is the only real option for many missions and craft. Unfortunately, research into alternative fuels that aren’t so toxic hasn’t produced much in the way of results — but Tesseract says the time has come.

“There was some initial research done at China Lake Naval Station in the ’90s,” said co-founder Erik Franks, but it fizzled out when funds were reallocated. “The timing also wasn’t right because the industry was still dominated by very conservative defense contractors who were content with the flight-proven toxic propellant technology.”

A live fire test of Tesseract’s Rigel engine.

The lapsed patents for these systems, however, pointed the team in the right direction. “The challenge for us has been going through the whole family of chemicals and finding which works for us. We’ve found a really good one — we’re keeping it as kind of a trade secret but it’s cheap, and really high-performance.”

You wouldn’t want to rinse your face with it, but you can fuel a spacecraft wearing Gore-Tex coveralls instead of a hermetically sealed hazmat suit. Accidental exposure doesn’t mean permanent tissue damage like it might with hydrazine.

The times have changed, as well. The trend in space right now is away from satellites that cost hundreds of millions and stay in geosynchronous orbit for decades, and toward smaller, cheaper birds intended to last only five or 10 years.

More spacecraft being made by more people makes safer, greener alternatives more attractive, of course: lower handling costs, less specialized facilities and so on further democratize the manufacturing and preparation processes. But there’s more to it than that.

If all anyone wanted was to eliminate hydrazine-based propulsion, they could replace the engine with an electric option like a Hall effect thruster, which gets its thrust from charged particles exiting the assembly and imparting an infinitesimal force in the opposite direction — countless times per second, of course. (It adds up.)

But these propulsion methods, while they have a high specific impulse — a measurement of how much force is generated per unit of fuel — they produce very little thrust. It’s like suggesting someone take a solar-powered car with a max speed of 5 MPH instead of a traditional car with a V6. You’ll get there, and economically, but not in a hurry.

Consider that a satellite, once brought to low orbit by a launch vehicle, must then ascend on its own power to the desired altitude, which may be hundreds of kilometers above. If you use a chemical engine, that could be done in hours or days, but with electric, it might take months. A military comsat meant to stay in place for 20 years can spare a few months at the outset, but what about the thousands of short-life satellites a company like Starlink plans to launch? If they could be operational a week after launch rather than months, that’s a non-trivial addition to their lifespan.

“If you can get rid of the toxicity and handling costs of conventional chemical propulsion, but maintain performance, we think green chemical is a clear winner for the new generation of satellites,” Franks said. And that’s what they claim to have created. Not just on paper either, obviously; here’s a video of a fire test from earlier this year.

“It’s also important at end of life, where doing a long, slow spiral deorbit, repeatedly crossing the orbits of other satellites, dramatically increases the risk of collision,” he continued. “For responsibly managing these large, planned constellations the ability to quickly deorbit at end of life will be especially important to avoid creating an unsustainable orbital debris problem.”

Tesseract has only seven full-time employees, and was a part of Y Combinator’s Summer 2017 class. Since (and before) then they’ve been hard at work engineering the systems they’ll be offering, and building relationships with aerospace.

A render of Tesseract’s two flagship products — Adhara on the left and Polaris on the right.

They’ve raised a $2 million seed round, but you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to know that’s not the kind of money that puts things into space. Fortunately, the company already has its first customers, one of which is still in stealth but plans to launch a Moon mission next year (and you better believe we’re following up on that hot tip). The other is Space Systems/Loral, or SSL, which has signed a $100 million letter of intent.

There are two main products Tesseract plans to offer. Polaris is a “kickstage,” essentially a short-range spacecraft used to deliver satellites to more distant orbits after being taken up to space by a launch vehicle. It’s powered by the company’s larger Rigel engines; this is the platform purportedly headed to the Moon, and you can see it propelling a clutch of 6U smallsats on the right in the image above.

But Franks thinks the money is elsewhere. “The systems we think will be a bigger market opportunity are the smallsat propulsion systems,” he said. Hence the second product, Adhara, a propulsion bus for smaller satellites and craft that the company is focusing on keeping straightforward, compact and, of course, green. (It’s the smaller rig in the image above; the thrusters are named Lyla.)

“We’ve heard from customers that complete, turnkey systems are what they mostly want, rather than buying components from many vendors and doing all the systems integration themselves like the old-school satellite manufacturers have historically done,” Franks said. So that’s what Adhara is for: “Keep it simple, bolt it on there, let it maneuver where it needs to go.”

Engineering these engines was no cakewalk, naturally, but Tesseract wasn’t reinventing the wheel. The principles are very similar to traditional engines, so development costs weren’t ridiculous.

The company isn’t pretending these are the only solutions that make sense now. If you need to have the absolute lowest mass or volume dedicated to propulsion, or don’t really care if it takes a week or a year to get where you’re going, electric propulsion is still probably a better deal. And for major missions that require high delta-V and don’t mind dealing with the attendant dangers, hydrazine is still the way to go. But the market that’s growing the most is neither one of these, and Tesseract’s engines sit in a middle ground that’s efficient, compact and far less dangerous to work with.

Continue reading
  26 Hits
Jul
29

Facebook and YouTube’s moderation failure is an opportunity to deplatform the platforms

Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter have failed their task of monitoring and moderating the content that appears on their sites; what’s more, they failed to do so well before they knew it was a problem. But their incidental cultivation of fringe views is an opportunity to recast their role as the services they should be rather than the platforms they have tried so hard to become.

The struggles of these juggernauts should be a spur to innovation elsewhere: While the major platforms reap the bitter harvest of years of ignoring the issue, startups can pick up where they left off. There’s no better time to pass someone up as when they’re standing still.

Asymmetrical warfare: Is there a way forward?

At the heart of the content moderation issue is a simple cost imbalance that rewards aggression by bad actors while punishing the platforms themselves.

To begin with, there is the problem of defining bad actors in the first place. This is a cost that must be borne from the outset by the platform: With the exception of certain situations where they can punt (definitions of hate speech or groups for instance), they are responsible for setting the rules on their own turf.

That’s a reasonable enough expectation. But carrying it out is far from trivial; you can’t just say “here’s the line; don’t cross it or you’re out.” It is becoming increasingly clear that these platforms have put themselves in an uncomfortable lose-lose situation.

If they have simple rules, they spend all their time adjudicating borderline cases, exceptions, and misplaced outrage. If they have more granular ones, there is no upper limit on the complexity and they spend all their time defining it to fractal levels of detail.

Both solutions require constant attention and an enormous, highly-organized and informed moderation corps, working in every language and region. No company has shown any real intention to take this on — Facebook famously contracts the responsibility out to shabby operations that cut corners and produce mediocre results (at huge human and monetary cost); YouTube simply waits for disasters to happen and then quibbles unconvincingly.

Continue reading
  20 Hits
Jul
29

Should Amazon Remain One Company? - Sramana Mitra

Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) last week reported a mixed quarter. Its earnings missed estimates while revenue growth was strong. Its cloud segment AWS missed analyst sales estimates. Amazon’s Financials...

___

Original author: Sramana_Mitra

Continue reading
  67 Hits
Jul
29

1Mby1M Virtual Accelerator Investor Forum: With Francis Simisim of Original Pitch Ventures (Part 1) - Sramana Mitra

Responding to a popular request, we are now sharing transcripts of our investor podcast interviews in this new series. The following interview with Francis Simisim was recorded in June 2019. Francis...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  70 Hits
Jul
29

Thought Leaders in Healthcare IT: David Weingard, CEO of Cecelia Health (Part 1) - Sramana Mitra

David and I talk about diabetes management in this conversation. Sramana Mitra: Let’s start by introducing our audience to yourself as well as to Cecelia Health. David Weingard: I’m the Founder and...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  65 Hits
Sep
01

1Mby1M Virtual Accelerator Investor Forum: With Deepen Parikh of Courtside Ventures (Part 3) - Sramana Mitra

Genetics testing startup Prenetics today announced a major new deal for its brand in Asia. The company is partnering with A.S. Watson Group, the personal care giant whose stores are ubiquitous in many East and Southeast Asian countries. That means Watsons’ Hong Kong stores and website will be the first retailer in Asia to sell Circle DNA, Prenetics’ new consumer DNA testing kit, before it launches in Watsons’ other Asian markets.

Watsons has 15,200 stores in 25 countries across Asia and Europe, including Hong Kong, China, Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Ukraine and Russia, and claims to be the largest health and beauty retailer in the world. Also based in Hong Kong, Prenetics began by providing DNA tests for insurance firms and health care providers, before branching into consumer tests by buying London-based startup DNAFit last year. The acquisition of DNAFIt, which still sells testing services under its own brand, also gave Prenetics a foothold in the U.S., where DNAFit is partnered with Helix, another gene testing company.

Prenetics launched in 2009 and has raised more than $50 million so far from investors including Beyond Ventures and Alibaba Hong Kong Entrepreneurs Fund, who led its $40 million Series B in 2017.

As it expands, Prenetics will become a more direct competitor with companies like 23andMe and AncestryDNA. Circle DNA’s kits differentiate by focusing primarily on health reports instead of ancestry. The most important advantage a DNA test can offer, however, is accuracy, and the ability of consumer DNA tests to answer certain questions reliably has been called into question by geneticists. Prenetics claims its technology, which uses whole exome sequencing instead of genotyping, is able to provide 50 to 100 times more data than competing tests.

In a press statement, A.S. Watson Group chief operating officer Malina Ngai said “We are excited to launch Circle DNA first in Watsons Hong Kong, providing an easy solution for personalized digital healthcare assessment. Combined with our strong customer connectivity, scalable pharmacy network, professional health team and loyalty program, we are committed to help customers to take further actions to improve their known health concerns.”

Continue reading
  60 Hits
Feb
04

Thought Leaders in Cloud Computing: Actifio CEO Ash Ashutosh (Part 2) - Sramana Mitra

Listen up founders — TechCrunch is on the lookout for game-changing, early-stage startups to feature at TechCrunch Disrupt Berlin‘s Startup Battlefield. This is your chance to launch on the famous TechCrunch stage and compete for the a $50,000 equity-free prize and the attention of top global investors and hundreds of media outlets from around the world. Apply here.

We’ve had some incredibly successful companies launch at our European-based event. N26, European fin-tech startup and Startup Battlefield EU 2016 alum, just raised a $170 million Series D round, bringing the company’s valuation up to a whopping $3.5 billion dollars. Startup Battlefield EU 2015 winner JukeDeck was just acquired by TikTok. The list of Startup Battlefield companies doesn’t stop there — Dropbox, GetAround, SirenCare, Fitbit, Mint.com, Vurb and more, and now is your chance to join this impressive group of companies. More than 857 participating companies have raised over $8.9 billion in funding, with 112 successful exits (IPOs or acquisitions). 

How does it work?

Apply. TechCrunch charges zero fees and takes no equity. Fill out your app here. Early-stage startups from any country and any vertical are eligible — hardware, AI/ML, biotech, insurtech, to name a few. All companies must have an MVP to demo to the review committee. TC editors review applications and select 15-20 of the highest potential startups to pitch onstage at Disrupt Berlin (December 11-12).

Train. Selected founders will get intensive training from the Startup Battlefield team to refine pitches and demos, sharpen business models and prepare for this international launch.

Pitch. Trained Startup Battlefield founders will pitch on the live-streamed main stage at Disrupt Berlin for six minutes, including a live demo, followed by a six-minute Q&A with our esteemed judges. Past judges have included Jeff Clavier (Uncork Capital), Eileen Burbidge (Passion Capital), Sonali De Rycker (Accel) and Roelof Botha (Sequoia Capital). After the semi-final round, 4-6 companies will pitch again on day two — same pitch, but with a new panel of judges. The judges will select the winner, who will get the $50,000 check, a feature post on TechCrunch, the Disrupt Cup and the attention of millions.

Disrupt. At the conference, participants get VIP treatment with access to private events, CrunchMatch: TechCrunch’s Investor Startup Matching Program, backstage access, complimentary exhibition space for all days of the conference, free subscriptions to Extra Crunch and a ticket to all future TechCrunch events.

Pitch on the most famous stage in tech. Apply now.

Continue reading
  71 Hits
Jul
29

Catching Up On Readings: Softbank Vision Fund 2 - Sramana Mitra

This feature from TechCrunch covers the new Softbank Vision Fund that will focus on AI-based technology. Worth about $108 billion, the LPs include Apple, Foxconn, and Microsoft. For this week’s...

___

Original author: jyotsna popuri

Continue reading
  29 Hits
Jul
28

Thought Leaders in E-Commerce: Jimmy Duvall, Chief Product Officer of BigCommerce (Part 6) - Sramana Mitra

Sramana Mitra: I can think of two entrepreneurs that I’ve talked to within our program who would appreciate talking to BigCommerce about what they’re doing. But taking advantage of your ecosystem,...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  20 Hits
Jul
28

Facebook just had an absolutely wild rollercoaster of a week. Here's everything that happened.

This week has been a regulatory maelstrom for Facebook.

The Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission all took chunks out of the social media this week, many of which stemmed from Facebook's handling of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

Read more: Facebook's humbling deal with the FTC is the biggest assault on Mark Zuckerberg's power in the firm's history

The bulk of the damage was done on Wednesday, with the blockbuster $5 billion penalty from the FTC being the star attraction — although the DOJ set the tone by announcing its sweeping investigation into big tech earlier in the week.

Here is a rundown of one of the wildest weeks in Facebook's 15-year history.

Original author: Isobel Asher Hamilton

Continue reading
  70 Hits
Feb
04

470th 1Mby1M Entrepreneurship Podcast With Osayi Igharo, Ripple VC - Sramana Mitra

The Federal Aviation Administration was poorly positioned to oversee the safety of the automated flight system that was to blame for the two deadly crashes of Boeing's 737 Max plane over the last year, The New York Times reported Saturday.

The agency engineers in charge of keeping a watch on the airplane's flight control systems through the latter part of its development had little experience with such software, according to The Times report. And Boeing largely kept them in the dark about the importance of the flight-control system on the 737 Max and a crucial change they made to the software soon before releasing the plane commercially, The Times reported.

The Times did not name the engineers in its report.

In a statement emailed to Business Insider, Boeing spokesman Peter Pedraza said the company actually had informed the FAA about changes it made to the flight-control system, dubbed MCAS, during the 737 Max's development.

"The 737 MAX met the FAA's stringent standards and requirements as it was certified through the FAA's processes," Pedraza said in the statement. "The FAA," he continued, "considered the final configuration and operating parameters for MCAS and concluded it met all certification and regulatory requirements."

FAA spokesman Lynn Lunsford declined to comment on The Times' report. The agency's certification process for the 737 Max is the subject of multiple investigations and reviews, he said in an emailed statement.

"While the agency's certification processes are well-established and have consistently produced safe aircraft designs, we welcome the scrutiny from these experts and look forward to their findings," he said in the statement.

The 737 Max's flight control system, dubbed MCAS, has been at the center of the investigation into the safety of the plane. In certain circumstances, that system can take control of the plane and tilt its nose sharply downward.

The software is believed to have played a role in both of fatal crashes, which together killed 346 people. The FAA grounded the plane after the second crash in March.

Read more: Boeing says it could suspend 737 Max production if grounding continues, putting tens of thousands of jobs at risk

An aerial photo shows Boeing airplanes, many of which are grounded 737 MAX aircraft, at Boeing Field in Seattle, Washington. REUTERS/Lindsey Wasson

According to The Times report, FAA had two highly experienced engineers overseeing the safety of the Boeing's flight control systems in the agency's Seattle office. But both engineers left the FAA midway through the development of the 737 Max, The Times reported. One of the engineers the FAA named in their place had little flight control experience. The other was a newly hired engineer who graduated from graduate school just three years earlier.

The two "seemed ill-equipped" to be in charge of the safety of the MCAS software, The Times reported, citing unnamed people who had worked with them.

Even if the engineers had been more experienced, they might not have caught the problems with the system, The Times suggested.

Early reviews of the plane's development provided by Boeing to the engineers played down the system's importance and the safety risks it might entail, according to the report. An FAA manager later delegated a safety review of the system to Boeing itself — an increasingly common, albeit controversial, practice by the agency, The Times reported.

A Saudi man whose brother died in the crash of an Ethiopian Airlines 737 Max in March, stands near some of the wreckage of the plane. REUTERS/Baz Ratner As the plane got closer to production, Boeing made a big change to the MCAS system, allowing it to turn on at low speeds and to move the tail stabilizer by as much as 2.5 degrees each time it turned on, according to the report. Previously, the system could only activate at high speeds and could only move the stabilizer by 0.6 degrees a time.

Boeing didn't provide the FAA with an updated safety assessment of the flight-control system after making the changes and the two new agency engineers were unaware that the software could move the tail by 2.5 degrees, according to the report.

After the first crash of the 737 Max last October, FAA officials found they didn't understand and had little documentation about the workings of the MCAS system, The Times reported.

Got a tip? Contact this reporter via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., message him on Twitter @troywolv, or send him a secure message through Signal at 415.515.5594. You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Original author: Troy Wolverton

Continue reading
  66 Hits
Jul
27

GitHub is reportedly blocking access to its site for users in places like Crimea and Iran, which are under US sanctions (MSFT)

Some longtime GitHub users reported this week that the Microsoft-owned company has restricted their use of its code-hosting service because they live in countries that are subject to US trade sanctions.

A software developer who is based in the Russian-occupied Crimea region of Ukraine and another who lives in Iran each said in separate online posts that they'd been notified by GitHub that their access to its service has been curtailed. The Iranian developer, Hamed Saeedi, said in a post on Medium on Wednesday that his code repository has been disabled, he can't access parts of the GitHub site, and he can't download the data he had hosted there.

"I hope that they can find a good way to fix this," Saeedi said via direct message on Twitter Saturday. "Before this, as a software developer I really liked GitHub."

But he's not the only GitHub user who reported being restricted by the service, as ZDNet first reported on Friday. Also affected was Anatoliy Kashkin, the Crimean programmer. Kashkin developed an application called GameHub that allows users to download and run computer games from multiple sources, including Steam and Humble Bumble and hosts the code for the program on GitHub. In a post on GitHub Wednesday, he said the service has blocked him from creating new private code repositories and disabled his existing ones.

Kashkin confirmed those restrictions in an email to Business Insider. But an issue he had had with his website, which is also hosted by GitHub, has since been resolved he said. In the email, he played down the seriousness of the GitHub restrictions.

"It hasn't affected my main open-source project that much," he said in the email.

"I have no idea why there's so much attention to this," he continued. "I don't really think this restriction differs that much from previous restrictions we have experienced for the last 5 years and people from other countries experienced even longer."

On an undated support page on its website, GitHub said it is trying to comply with US trade laws and noted that the Crimea, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and Syria are all under US trade sanctions. It's unclear why GitHub only started restricting access recently, given that the sanctions in some cases have been in place for years.

"To comply with US trade control laws, GitHub recently made some required changes to the way we conduct our services," the company said on the support page. "As US trade controls laws evolve, we will continue to work with US regulators about the extent to which we can offer free code collaboration services to developers in sanctioned markets."

GitHub representatives did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

The company has become a popular place for developer to host and share code and software. It was purchased last year by Microsoft for $7.5 billion.

Got a tip? Contact this reporter via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., message him on Twitter @troywolv, or send him a secure message through Signal at 415.515.5594. You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Original author: Troy Wolverton

Continue reading
  75 Hits
Jul
27

Items that once belonged to Neil Armstrong have drawn more than $12 million in bids, but are sparking controversy among people who knew him

Items that once belonged to Neil Armstrong — the first man on the moon — are fetching some sky high prices at auction.

Among the items sold in the auctions was this gold medal, which flew to the moon with Armstrong. The medal sold for more than $2 million.Heritage AuctionsA gold commemorative medal that flew with with Armstrong on Apollo 11 sold for more than $2 million. A plaque that included an identification plate from the lunar module from that mission sold for $468,500. And a piece of one of the propellers from the Wright brothers' Flyer — the first powered airplane — that Armstrong also took with him to the moon sold for $275,000.

All told the items from Armstrong's collection have garnered more than $12.1 million over the course of three different auctions held since November by Dallas-based Heritage Auctions. The most recent, which featured the gold medal, was held earlier this month to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the launch of the Apollo 11 mission.

"The response from admirers of Mission Commander Armstrong's contribution to humanity has been simply overwhelming," Michael Riley, Heritage's director of space exploration, said in a press release.

Heritage will hold a fourth auction of items from Armstrong's collection on November 14 and 15.

In addition to attracting interest and big bids, the auctions have also drawn controversy, according to The New York Times. None of the items are known to have been offered by Carol Armstrong, the astronaut's second wife, according to The Times. And several people who knew Armstrong believe he would have felt that the attempt to cash in on his fame was unseemly.

Armstrong stopped signing autographs in 1994 after he discovered that some people were turning around and selling the documents he'd autographed, The Times reported. He also rejected numerous offers to profit from his fame, according to the report.

The items were put up for auction by Rick and Mark Armstrong, the astronaut's sons, the Times reported. Mark and his wife defended the sales, telling The Times that what mattered was what they did with the money, not what happened to the items. The brothers have donated nearly $2 million in cash and artifacts to museums, according to the report. Meanwhile, Mark and his wife have set up an environmental nonprofit called Vantage Earth in honor of his parents.

Got a tip? Contact this reporter via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., message him on Twitter @troywolv, or send him a secure message through Signal at 415.515.5594. You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Original author: Troy Wolverton

Continue reading
  69 Hits
Jul
27

Facebook was once a hot startup looking to conquer the world. Today, my journalist friends in the Philippines grapple with threats and lies on the social network (FB)

I covered Facebook when it was the hottest startup in Silicon Valley, when its biggest problem was not FTC probes or hate speech or fake accounts, but convincing Wall Street that it could make tons more money than it was already raking in.

Many have probably forgotten that its blockbuster IPO in 2012, one of the most high profile offerings of the decade, was a huge flop. Facebook's stock gained a dismal 23 cents in its Wall Street debut and subsequently sank on growing fears on the Street that it wouldn't make that much money on mobile.

Well, that turned out to be a non-issue. Facebook's stock has soared, as the social media giant made loads of dough, through targeted ads delivered to billions of users mobile and desktop devices.

Every corner of the world

It's been able to do that partly by trying to expand to pretty much every corner of the globe — including my homeland, the Philippines.

In 2013, Facebook announced that it was offering free or discounted messaging access to users in a dozen countries, including the Philippines. As I wrote a short item about it, I remember thinking, "That's pretty cool."

Only years later, after I left the Facebook beat and took a break from journalism, did it become clear that it was not. What happened next was summed by the headline of a New York Magazine article: "Facebook Used the Philippines to Test Free Internet. Then a Dictator Was Elected."

I returned to the tech beat recently as a harsh spotlight was turned on Facebook's record on hate speech.

A private Facebook group run by current and former US Border Patrol agents sparked an uproar over xenophobic and sexist posts. Two months ago, co-founder Chris Hughes pointed to Mark Zuckerberg "unilateral power over speech," calling it "the most problematic aspect of Facebook's power."

"There is no precedent for his ability to monitor, organize and even censor the conversations of two billion people," Hughes wrote in the New York Times, in an editorial in which he called for the break up of Facebook.

Targeting journalists

In the Philippines, those conversations feature virulent posts that sometimes include threats of violence. Much of that hate has been directed against journalists, including some of my friends. And much of it comes from supporters of Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, the leader widely condemned for inspiring mass killings since he took power in 2016.

Duterte launched his presidency by declaring war on illegal drugs. But that campaign has led to the deaths of thousands of alleged users and dealers, most of whom were poor Filipinos slaughtered without due process. Many were killed by police who claimed they resisted arrest, and others were murdered execution-style by vigilantes supposedly aiding the anti-drug campaign, according to Human Rights Watch.

The body of a man whom police said was killed during a drug-bust operation on "Shabu" (meth), is seen in Manila, Philippines, August 18, 2016. REUTERS/Ezra Acayan

On Facebook, the Duterte-inspired bloodbath got a boost from an army of online supporters who defend the campaign, who deny the killings were happening or harassed critics of the anti-drug campaign. Some of the targets of this harassment include journalists simply doing their jobs.

They were reporting on the killings and how Duterte, at times, appeared to be celebrating the bloodshed. Duterte even openly declared once, "My only sin is the extrajudicial killings."

In 2016, Manny Mogato, a reporter with Reuters' Manila bureau, covered a Duterte appearance in which the Philippine president likened himself to Adolf Hitler.

In stunning public comments, Duterte noted that the Nazi dictator murdered millions of Jews, then added, citing a statistic that has been disputed: "There are three million addicts (in the Philippines). I'd be happy to slaughter them."

News reports of the speech predictably sparked outrage. But it also prompted Duterte supporters to hit back on social media, especially Facebook. Among their targets were journalists who were painted as being part of a conspiracy against the Philippine president.

Manny was vilified for reporting Duterte's comments.

"Some were calling for punishment like tokhang," he told me, referring to the name of the police anti-drug operation that critics charge have led to summary executions.

The harassment escalated as Manny continued reporting on Duterte's presidency. His Facebook account was hacked, forcing him to change his name on the social network.

"It was the first online attack on Reuters journalists so my editors were concerned and sent a security team to look into our safety," he said. "We were advised to take a vacation for a week. My family got scared."

But Manny kept reporting and documenting the abuses under Duterte. Last year, he and two other Reuters reporters won the Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting for Duterte's War, a series on the killings in the Philippines. (The previous year, the New York Times won a Pulitzer for breaking news photography for a feature titled "They Are Slaughtering Us Like Animals.")

Another journalist who's been targeted on Facebook is Glenda Gloria, managing editor of Rappler, the online media startup which has won praise, and has been the target of the attacks, for reporting on Duterte.

Glenda was on a Nieman Fellowship at Harvard last year when trolls posted a photo of her family, including her daughter, and accused her of being aligned with the opposition political party.

Her Facebook Messenger inbox "was flooded with all sorts of hate messages," she told me. Trolls called her ugly, stupid and told her, "Your days are numbered." Facebook Messenger is "my least fave messaging app precisely because that's where I got trolled," she said.

Where Facebook IS the internet

In the Philippines, Facebook is the internet. And it's largely because the tech giant wants to be dominant, no matter the cost.

Maria Ressa, founder and CEO of Rappler, tried personally to explain this to Facebook's top brass, including Zuckerberg.

She was named one of Time Magazine's Persons of the Year for leading Rappler in a turbulent time. She is also the most vilified Filipino journalist on Facebook. She has received death and rape threats, and been taunted by Duterte supporters on the social network.

Partly due to her efforts, Facebook has been focusing intensely on the Philippines, identifying pages and accounts found to be engaged in "coordinated inauthentic behavior" including attacks against journalists and politicians opposed to Duterte.

Facebook also added Rappler and another Philippine news site, Vera Files, to its International Fact-Checking Network, giving them the ability to flag stories and posts suspected of being misleading or hoaxes. In fact, Facebook has turned to the Philippines for even more intensive, excruciating work, hiring Filipino contractors to flag gruesome images and video, including knife slashings and child molestation.

These moves have been welcomed in the Philippines. But Facebook has had such a huge impact on the country, many feel these are not enough and that Facebook has yet to fully reckon with how its influence in the Philippines. The ongoing harassment and threats Filipinos are experiencing on Facebook can only be resolved if the tech giant takes a much more muscular role policing the environment it created.

But Zuckerberg has, at times, suggested that that's not really a priority.

In a 2017 meeting, Maria asked Zuckerberg to visit the Philippines to "see the impact" the social network is having on her country, where 97% of the population are on Facebook, she recalled in an interview with Kara Swisher.

Zuckerberg responded: "What are the other 3% doing, Maria?'"

Got a tip about Facebook or another tech company? Contact this reporter via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., message him on Twitter@benpimentel. You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Original author: Benjamin Pimentel

Continue reading
  66 Hits
Jul
27

We checked out the neighborhood where Amazon is building a new 43-story tower in Bellevue, its tallest office building yet (AMZN)

Amazon was originally founded by CEO Jeff Bezos in Bellevue, Washington, a suburb of Seattle.

But soon, Bezos moved its headquarters to Seattle to provide an urban environment for its young tech workers. Now, Amazon is inching its way back to its original home city. Amazon is already planning to move its entire worldwide operations organization, which is responsible for most customer orders, to Bellevue, GeekWire reported.

Right now in Bellevue, Washington, Amazon has four buildings leased, and in April, it just bought another piece of property for $194.9 million. This property is at 600 108th Ave. N.E.

Right now, there's a 10-story corporate building there called Bellevue Corporate Plaza, and it will stay in tact. Behind it, Amazon plans to build its tallest tower, the Seattle Times reported. This tower will be 43 stories high, and the Seattle Times estimates it can hold 4,200 employees.

Amazon's existing offices in Bellevue total about 1.8 million square feet. By the time Amazon completes its tower in 2024, the Seattle Times estimates that Bellevue will be able to have 11,000 employees.

Amazon declined to comment on its plans for the building.

Original author: Rosalie Chan

Continue reading
  25 Hits
Jul
27

451st Roundtable Recording on July 25, 2019: With Doug Atkin, Communitas Capital Partners - Sramana Mitra

In case you missed it, you can listen to the recording here:

___

Original author: Maureen Kelly

Continue reading
  35 Hits
Jul
27

Colors: Rice Terraces, Green Valley - Sramana Mitra

I’m publishing this series on LinkedIn called Colors to explore a topic that I care deeply about: the Renaissance Mind. I am just as passionate about entrepreneurship, technology, and business, as I...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  28 Hits
Jul
27

These are the 20 best players in the NFL, according to 'Madden 20'

"Madden" has been the top football video game for more than a decade, and each year, the development team at Electronic Arts rates thousands of NFL players based on more than 50 different attributes.

The NFL is now filled with a generation of players who grew up playing "Madden," and many players pay close attention to their score as a point of pride.

The creators of "Madden NFL 20" said they want the game to feel more realistic this season, leading to lower ratings overall and larger skill gaps between superstars and average players. The game's highest possible rating is a 99 overall, but only a select few players make it into the coveted "99 Club" each year.

Only four players in "Madden NFL 20" earned a 99 overall rating, and three of them are defensive superstars. That could change once the season begins, since Madden offers weekly ratings adjustments during the course of the season based on player performance.

Read more: These are the top 32 quarterbacks in the NFL, according to 'Madden 20'

Original author: Kevin Webb

Continue reading
  29 Hits