Sep
20

Seeking nominations for the executives who are leading the next wave of marketing tech

From startups that help marketers manage data to large marketing clouds making big bets on the future of advertising, marketing technology is on the rise.

We're planning to publish a list of executives from marketing tech companies who are leading the charge in their own companies and the industry, and we want your ideas.

These executives are helping to solve challenges like measuring data and helping marketers prepare for regulation like Europe's GDPR and the upcoming California Consumer Privacy Act. They are pioneering new business models for marketing-tech software and shaking up decades-old industries like television. And they're raising money from VC firms and investors who are funding both established companies and new startups.

Please submit your nominations here by October 4.

Criteria for the list will be determined by several factors, and we are looking to identify a diverse group of people with different ranks and roles, based on our own reporting and nominations.

In determining the list, we'll consider company revenue, headcount and funding as well as interesting business models and the size of the problem that a firm is trying to solve.

Nominations for leaders should include the executive's title, role, responsibilities, and examples of the company's performance in the marketing industry, with as many quantitative results as possible.

This list is specific to marketing-tech companies and separate from a list Business Insider will publish later this year on top marketing-tech as well as advertising companies.

Here are a few examples of previous lists that show the structure and format that we use:

Sweeping regulations like California's upcoming privacy bill threaten to wipe out the advertising industry. These 10 tech companies are trying to help marketers survive.

Here are 12 of the most important executives leading Oracle's big push to take on Amazon, Microsoft, and Google in the cloud

Ad-tech companies are moving full speed ahead to chase OTT ad dollars. Here are the 13 companies poised to win the most.

Again, please submit your nominations here by October 4. We will aim to publish the list in October.

Still have a question about how the list will be compiled? Email me at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Original author: Lauren Johnson

Continue reading
  59 Hits
Mar
12

Cloud gaming platform Shadow brings its new plans to the US

When new versions of iOS include bugs, they typically come as a surprise. But the world was aware of a potential security bug in the new iOS 13 update well before its formal release this week — and despite that awareness, the bug appeared in the version that was released to iPhone users.

The bug is a security flaw that makes it possible to access a device's contact list without unlocking the phone first. It was first uncovered in the public beta version of iOS 13 that was released to developers by Jose Rodriguez, a tech researcher who demonstrates the bugs in this video.

In the description of the YouTube video, Rodriguez claims he notified Apple of the flaw on July 17. He posted a video of his method in August, and just about a week ago, circulated a new video that garnered widespread news coverage.

To exploit the flaw, it seems, all one has to do is receive a FaceTime call on their iPhone and then use Siri's voiceover feature — which lets users control their phone with their voice — to send a text message. Once in the screen for sending a text message, users can easily search the phone's entire contact list just by clicking the field to choosing a recipient.

This process takes a few minutes, so the bypass could only be carried out by someone who has physical possession of a stolen device — the type of attacker that security measures like passcodes, TouchID, and FaceID are meant to keep out.

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider, and has not made any public statement on the bug. However, Apple has already moved up the release of iOS 13.1, which will roll out next week on September 24th and include a number of bug fixes — and a spokesperson told Ars Technica that the 13.1 update will fix the problem.

The presence of bugs in iOS 13 has already been widely documented. Earlier this week, the US Department of Defense instructed its employees and contractors not to download iOS 13 and to instead wait until the release of iOS 13.1, Inc. reported. Outside the public sector, users have reported running into their share of bugs themselves.

Original author: Aaron Holmes

Continue reading
  68 Hits
Sep
20

People are complaining that Apple's big new iPhone update is filled with bugs (AAPL)

Apple just publicly released its new iPhone update on Thursday, which brings additions like an optional systemwide dark theme, a Street View-like feature for Apple Maps, and new privacy-oriented features. It also, however, has introduced many bugs to the iPhone owners who have installed it so far.

In the hours following the launch of iOS 13, users have complained about a variety of glitches that affect elements such as Bluetooth, WiFi, and the on-screen keyboard. More critically, the software shipped with a flaw that, when exploited, could allow an intruder to bypass the lock screen and access a user's contacts, CNN Business and Ars Technica reported.

Apple will be shipping a software update called iOS 13.1 on September 24 to address this flaw, as well as other general bugs. It'll also bring new features that were originally announced as being part of iOS 13, including the ability to share an ETA from Maps and add Siri shortcuts to HomeKit automations.

Read more: After spending two full days with Apple's new iPhones, I'm convinced the iPhone 11 is the best choice for most people — here's why

Apple did not immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment.

It's not uncommon for new operating-system updates to come with a few minor bugs. Apple typically releases a smaller update after each major iOS system update to patch general bugs, but it's unusual for the company to move up such a release in this way.

That's why it can be wise to wait a couple of days before installing the latest update. But that doesn't mean you should avoid updating entirely — software updates usually introduce important security-bug fixes, which can be critical to keeping your device safe.

It's not the first time Apple has come under scrutiny for launching software that's noticeably affected the user experience. When iOS 8.0.1 launched in 2014 — a small update that was meant to be a follow-up to iOS 8 — many users reported that their cellular connections had been disabled and encountered issues with Touch ID.

Original author: Lisa Eadicicco

Continue reading
  45 Hits
Mar
12

Men’s at-home health startup Vault takes in $30 million from Tiger Capital

On February 26, 2014, 21-year-old Christian Andreacchio was found dead in his apartment in Meridian, Mississippi.

Meridian police ruled his death a suicide after a 45-minute investigation, but Christian's family and a podcast about the case, "Culpable," contend there's substantial evidence suggesting he was murdered.

After 15 weeks of investigating, teams from Tenderfoot TV and Black Mountain Media, the companies behind "Culpable" — which is currently the No. 2 true-crime podcast on Apple Podcasts, and No. 3 overall — pooled together $100,000 to encourage anyone with information on Christian's case to speak out. The reward for information leading to an arrest is $50,000, with an additional $50,000 to come if there is a conviction.

Tenderfoot has a lot of experience when it comes to producing case-cracking crime podcasts.

The Atlanta-based company launched in 2016 with the release of the "Up and Vanished" podcast, which has been downloaded 330 million times and won "Best Crime Podcast" for its second season at the 2019 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards. Host Payne Lindsey tackled the missing person's case of Tara Grinstead a decade after she disappeared and his work on the podcast eventually led to two arrests in early 2017.

Tenderfoot has also worked on popular true-crime podcasts "Atlanta Monster," its follow-up "Monster: The Zodiac Killer," and "To Live and Die in LA."

At a dead end in a tight-lipped town, 'Culpable' took a different approach to gather information.

Jacob Bozarth, a producer on "Culpable," said the writers and producers of the show decided to contribute money for a reward after months of investigating left them determined to figure out what happened to Christian.

"We went into it thinking we were going to tell Christian's story, and as we did our own investigation and started digging in, we realized how deep the story goes," he told Business Insider.

"Culpable" host Dennis Cooper of Black Mountain Media was the first to suggest offering a reward to advance the case. When he proposed Black Mountain Media offer $50,000, Tenderfoot agreed to match that contribution, making this the second time it had offered a reward on a podcast.

The companies have been collaborating on the podcast production. The two companies have worked together before, in a fashion, as Resonate Recordings, a sister company to Black Mountain Media, worked on post-production for "Up and Vanished." ("Culpable" is the first podcast Black Mountain Media has launched.)

"One of the reasons we really wanted to do the reward is because we feel like people know something but they're afraid to speak," Bozarth said. "We wanted to make it an amount that could change someone's life if they came forward."

'We're invested in this 100%': The 'Culpable' team continues investigating after podcast finale.

Christian's mother, Rae Andreacchio, first connected with Black Mountain Media and Resonate Recordings at CrimeCon — the true-crime convention— in 2018, and shared hundreds of pages of information on her son's case, Bozarth said.

"When we heard her story, our hearts went out to Rae and her family," Bozarth said.

Since then, the companies have produced 15 regular-season episodes dedicated to the case plus Q&A episodes. They've also enlisted the help of private investigators to get to the bottom of what happened to Christian, but they're still searching for answers.

"Culpable" has brought national attention to Christian's case, which is why the team has no plans to stop investigating until the Andreacchio family has closure, Bozarth said.

"We're invested in this 100%," Bozarth said. "Even though the podcast formally had a finale, it's not stopping."

The team is used to creating the podcast as new information becomes available. Tips come in even as the show is being produced, Bozarth said, so more often than not episodes are produced in real time.

"I'm up on Sunday at 11:00 p.m. sometimes, tweaking the podcast before the drop at midnight," he said.

The "Culpable" team and the private investigators are still working on Christian's case, sifting through a flood of information from tips with the intention of releasing new episodes.

"There are a lot of opinions and different theories and rumors that you hear from people in that area, and we want to sift through all those things and really find out what happened," Bozarth said.

Anyone with information on Christian's case can share it here or by calling 470-300-4915.

Original author: Alyssa Meyers

Continue reading
  44 Hits
Mar
12

Unitary, an EF alumnus, raises £1.3M seed for its content moderation AI

Following is a transcript of the video.

In the early 1950s, US planes were conducting low-flying recon missions over the USSR. But there were constant worries of them being spotted and shot down.

So … in 1954, President Eisenhower authorized the development of a top secret, high-altitude recon aircraft dubbed Project Aquatone. The program required a remote location that wasn't easily accessible to civilians or spies. Area 51 fit the bill perfectly.

It was in the Nevada desert near a salt flat called Groom Lake. No one knows exactly why it's called Area 51, but one theory suggests it came from its proximity to the Nevada Nuclear Test Sites. The Nevada Test Site was divided into number-designated areas by the Atomic Energy Commission. The location was already familiar territory for the military, as it had served as a World War II aerial gunnery range.

In the summer of 1955, sightings of "unidentified flying objects" were reported around Area 51. That's because the Air Force had begun its testing of the U-2 aircraft. The U-2 can fly higher than 60,000 feet. At the time, normal airliners were flying in the 10,000 to 20,000 feet range. While military aircraft topped out around 40,000 feet. So if a pilot spotted the tiny speck that was the U-2 high above it, they would have no idea what it was. And they would usually let air traffic control know someone was out there. Which is what led to the increase of UFO sightings in the area. While Air Force officials knew the UFO sightings were U-2 tests, they couldn't really tell the public. So they explained the aircraft sightings by saying they were "natural phenomena" and "high-altitude weather research."

The testing of the U-2 ended in the late 1950s; but, Area 51 has continued to serve as the testing ground for many aircraft, including the F-117A, A-12, and TACIT BLUE.

No one knows for sure what Area 51 is up to these days. The government never even publicly acknowledged the existence of the base until 2013, with the release of declassified CIA reports. But if you're ever at the Las Vegas airport, keep an eye out for some small, unmarked, passenger planes in a fenced-off area. They're how Area 51 employees get to work from their homes in Vegas.

EDITOR'S NOTE: This video was originally published on July 13, 2017.

Original author: Corey Protin and Matthew Stuart

Continue reading
  50 Hits
Sep
20

SmileDirectClub's IPO was such a disaster that the CEO called up JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon to ask what went wrong (SDC)

It has been a tough couple of weeks for JPMorgan's investment bankers.

The coworking company WeWork slashed its valuation and put on hold its initial public offering, which the bank was set to lead, after a chilly reception from investors.

And the teeth-straightening startup SmileDirectClub had one of the worst public market debuts this year. The Nashville, Tennessee-based company priced shares at $23 last week in an IPO led by JPMorgan. The day after the pricing, shares tumbled 27%, closing below $17. They were last trading hands at around $18.40 as of Friday afternoon.

SmileDirect Club was the first US IPO since the financial crisis to raise more than $1 billion and price its above range but fall in its opening trade. That has led some to believe that the IPO had been mispriced by JPMorgan.

Read more: Buzzy healthcare startup SmileDirectClub just went public. Here are the execs and investors who stand to benefit the most.

The performance was so bad that SmileDirectClub CEO David Katzman held a call with JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon to look into exactly what had happened and if the IPO had been mishandled, according to people familiar with the matter. Large deals can sometimes involve phone calls between senior bankers or the CEO and company founders after the deal has priced.

Representatives for JPMorgan and SmileDirectClub declined to comment.

SmileDirectClub's relationship with JPMorgan extends beyond its IPO. The bank also served as placement agent to the company on a $380 million investment from the private-equity firm Clayton, Dubilier & Rice and the venture firms Kleiner Perkins and Spark Capital in October.

There are also more personal ties between Dimon and the company, and the CEO has known Katzman for years.

JPMorgan has made a commitment to invest $150 million to boost growth in Detroit, which in part stemmed from a relationship with Quicken Loans founder and billionaire Dan Gilbert.

Gilbert is Katzman's first cousin and former business partner.

Read more: Meet the star women running Silicon Valley's largest IPOs at Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and JPMorgan

SmileDirectClub's IPO marks a sharp outlier for what's been an otherwise strong market for digital-health companies to go public this year.

The diabetes-technology company Livongo surged in its first day of trading, closing up 36%. The gene-sequencing-technology company 10x Genomics, which JPMorgan also led, made its debut on the public market last week, pricing above the range and closing up 35%.

SmileDirectClub Chief Financial Officer Kyle Wailes told Business Insider that during the company's IPO road show, investors were positive about the company's growth prospects, as well as its margins.

To be sure, it's unclear if the SmileDirectClub deal will have any impact on JPMorgan's ability to win future IPO business.

The bank has been angling for more IPO work by trying to unlock the duopoly that Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have on taking the hottest companies public. The bank was lead left on the March offering for the ride-hailing startup Lyft and ranked as the top underwriter for tech IPOs this year by number of deals through September 10, according to Dealogic. JPMorgan is close to clinching a coveted lead role in the public float of Saudi Aramco, according to Reuters, which is expected to make the Arabian oil producer the most valuable company of all time.

Bankers must walk a fine line when pricing IPOs. If the company's shares pop too much on the first day of trading, they face criticism for pricing the deal too low. Similarly, a first day stock drop can be seen as bankers pricing a deal too aggressively.

SmileDirectClub makes straightening teeth more affordable by cutting out the steps of going in person to a dentist or an orthodontist to get braces or other alignments. The company sells clear aligners, an alternative to what you might get from an orthodontist. While it typically costs $3,000 to $7,000 to get traditional braces or Invisalign-brand aligners, SmileDirectClub goes for a fraction of that — you can either pay $1,895 up front or $2,290 spread out over two years.

SmileDirectClub's net loss widened from $33.8 million in the first half of 2018 to $52.9 million in 2018. The company increased its customer count from 22,000 in 2016 to about 246,000 in the first half of this year.

Original author: Lydia Ramsey and Dakin Campbell

Continue reading
  66 Hits
Jul
17

President Trump is reportedly taking a personal interest in the $10 billion Pentagon cloud contract that Amazon is widely expected to win (AMZN, MSFT, ORCL)

Regulators are starting to rattle the advertising industry.

A year after the European Union rolled out the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR — the sweeping law that regulates how marketers collect and use people's data — similar rules are coming to the United States.

The California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, is set to roll out in January, and similar proposed laws in Nevada, New York, and Washington state would clamp down on how marketers use people's data, particularly third-party data sources.

The proposed laws would require marketers to collect consumers' consent to use their data for marketing and advertising, and encourage marketers to beef up their first-party data from email, loyalty programs, and transactions.

Digital giants Facebook and Google also are facing increasing regulatory scrutiny and cracking down on advertisers' ability to use third parties on their platforms. Facebook is rolling out a tool called "off-Facebook activity" that lets consumers wipe data that Facebook collects from other websites for ad targeting.

Google plans to introduce new privacy tools that limit how advertisers use third-party data within its Chrome browser. And Apple is pitching its new "Sign in With Apple" tool as a privacy-friendly tool that would severely limit how advertisers retarget people with ads on its devices.

Read more: Google's looming privacy changes could shake up ad retargeting, and advertisers are scrambling to find alternatives

Startups are capitalizing on marketers' need to prepare for coming privacy regulations. Scores of advertising and marketing technology firms say they are regulation-proof and pitching marketers on software and services that promise to keep them safe too.

"Marketers are woefully under-prepared — many have taken a laissez-faire attitude towards privacy," said Ben Barokas, CEO of ad-tech firm Sourcepoint, which provides software for digital publishers to collect first-party data.

The catch is that tech firms are hesitant to take on too much legal responsibility, Jason Koye, VP and general counsel of North America and global privacy lead at Omnicom Media Group, added.

"The tools might be compliant, but no responsible vendor is saying, 'By virtue of using our tool, you will be compliant,'" he said. "What these regulations have done is create legal risk allocation that's constantly evolving where everyone is trying to push liability onto someone else."

For that reason, he said agencies need to be conservative about the number of vendors they work with.

Business Insider asked a handful of advertising agencies and investors which companies marketers are working with. They named startups like Zeotap, Perksy, and mParticle that help marketers organize and use first-party data for marketing and advertising, along with established firms like TrustArc, which specializes in security technology.

Below are 10 companies, listed alphabetically, that are helping marketers prepare for the new wave of privacy and regulation. We listed companies' financial information depending on their stage of development. For startups, we indicated how much funding they've received to date; for public companies, we tracked their revenue; and for acquired companies, we listed their sale price.

Original author: Lauren Johnson

Continue reading
  34 Hits
Sep
20

A $4.8 billion biotech wants to trade its expertise for equity in startups looking to manufacture better materials, drugs, and food

It started with a cold email.

Jason Kelly, the CEO of a then-fledgling biology startup called Ginkgo Bioworks, reached out to Sam Altman, the president of the Silicon Valley tech-startup accelerator Y Combinator, to say he appreciated a blog post that Altman had written. In the post, Altman had put out a call for life-science companies to apply for the YC program, which gives startups $150,000 in exchange for a 7% stake in them.

Kelly figured his company, which was six years old and focused on creating materials from living things, wouldn't be a fit for Altman's program. But he wanted to say he was glad that the software-focused incubator was finally expanding into science.

To Kelly's surprise, Altman was intrigued, he told Business Insider. Several meetings later, Ginkgo became the first non-software startup to get Y Combinator funding.

"It was the best thing we ever did," Kelly said of Ginkgo's Y Combinator experience.

On Thursday, Ginkgo announced a $290 million financing round, bringing the total amount raised by the company to $719 million. The firm's investors include the pharmaceutical companies Bayer and Roche and the Canadian cannabis company Cronos. The funding values Ginkgo at $4.8 billion, according to PitchBook.

Ginkgo is teaming up with Y Combinator to give other startups in the field of synthetic biology access to its tools, Ginkgo and Y Combinator told Business Insider. Ginkgo bills itself as the "organism company" because it uses custom-built cells to craft new materials and ingredients.

As part of the new partnership, any synthetic biology startup could theoretically get access to Ginkgo's manufacturing platform, the Y Combinator partner Jared Friedman told Business Insider. Potential beneficiaries of the deal could be working on meat substitutes, novel materials for clothing or buildings, or new pharmaceuticals, he said.

Friedman hopes the partnership enables Y Combinator to add more startups that build with biology (otherwise known as synthetic biology or syn-bio) to its portfolio. The end goal for many companies in the space is to replace traditional chemical manufacturing, a nearly $5 trillion global industry, according to SynBioBeta.

"I'd like YC to be the largest incubator of syn-bio companies in the world," Friedman said.

Ginkgo also benefits from the deal. In exchange for letting startups use its tools, Ginkgo will receive equity in the companies. The amount will be determined on a case-by-case basis, Kelly said.

Ginkgo plans to select participating companies based on several factors, including the scope and type of project they aim to do and whether the startup has intellectual property that conflicts with Ginkgo's. He anticipates the endeavor leading to a partnership with up to five nascent companies, he added.

As a field, synthetic biology is hot and getting hotter.

The approach involves harnessing the power of cells to manufacture with biology and replace traditional chemical manufacturing. The applications are varied. They include making everything from less-toxic sweeteners for food to drugs to and biodegradable building materials and bags.

From 2012 to 2017, funding for synthetic biology startups more than tripled, surpassing $1 billion for the first time in 2016, according to a report from CB Insights. Deals have also mushroomed, rising more than 150% since 2012, the authors of the report concluded.

"Ultimately this is why we want to do this: There's a lot more smart people outside Ginkgo than inside it," Kelly said. "We'd rather embrace that than fight it."

This story was published on September 16 and has been updated.

Original author: Erin Brodwin

Continue reading
  38 Hits
Sep
19

10 things in tech you need to know today

10 things in tech you need to know today, September 19 - Business Insider
World globeAn icon of the world globe, indicating different international options."

Edition

USINTLDEAUSFRINITJPMYNLSEPLSGZAES Business Insider logoThe words "Business Insider". Follow us on: We asked VCs which European startups impressed them the most this year. Here are the top 15. Advertising agencies are under threat on all sides, and now a new study shows trust in the business is lower than ever There are 6 billion very good reasons for WeWork to go public this year, despite the fact that Wall Street doesn't want it I'm 34 and make $200,000 a year as a freelancer. This is exactly how I spend my money to both scale my business and still enjoy my Miami life. Goldman Sachs' massive quant business now rivals AQR and Two Sigma. We talked to the bank's top quant about asset growth, finding data sources, and why critics of computerized trading are wrong.
Close iconTwo crossed lines that form an 'X'. It indicates a way to close an interaction, or dismiss a notification. Check mark iconA check mark. It indicates a confirmation of your intended interaction.
Original author: Charlie Wood

Continue reading
  81 Hits
Sep
19

Meet Ron Fisher, the SoftBank executive who awarded WeWork a $47 billion valuation months before it delayed its $10 billion IPO

It's not clear if Ron Fisher's billion-dollar gamble will pay off.

The SoftBank executive sits on WeWork's all-male board, having led the Vision Fund's multiple investments in the startup since 2017. As the Vice Chairman and Head of Investment at SoftBank Group, Fisher, 71, is one of the most senior employees overseeing SoftBank's first $100 billion Vision Fund, and the firm's WeWork investment could very well be his legacy.

SoftBank, and Fisher by extension, is widely credited with overinflating WeWork's valuation in later stage private funding rounds. SoftBank first became publicly involved with the New York-based coworking startup in August 2017 after it purchased $1.3 billion worth of shares from a group of undisclosed existing investors. At the time, WeWork was valued at $16.9 billion. That same month, SoftBank led the startup's $1.7 billion Series G, which valued it at $21.2 billion. At its peak, WeWork was privately valued at $47 billion after a $5 billion direct investment from SoftBank.

Read More: The history of WeWork's meteoric valuation rise — and fall

Now, Fisher's investment looks precarious, at best. After pouring billions in private funding into WeWork, the buzzy startup has decided to delay its public offering originally planned for the end of September. Once valued at $47 billion, the startup is now reportedly considering listing at a significantly discounted valuation of around $10 billion.

As one of only six board members, Fisher is in the unique position of knowing what might come next for the beleaguered real estate startup. But he may have sacrificed a lot to get there.

Here is what we know about Fisher, the SoftBank executive who led Vision Fund's controversial investment in WeWork.

Original author: Megan Hernbroth

Continue reading
  69 Hits
Oct
18

Netflix Betting Big on India - Sramana Mitra

WeWork may have postponed its initial public offering in the face of investor skepticism, but the commercial real estate giant has plenty of reasons to push through its IPO by the end of the year anyway.

At least 6 billion of them — the coworking company has a $6 billion loan that's riding on it going public by December 31. Indeed, when WeWork officially delayed the IPO, it said that it still expects to go public by the end of 2019.

But that's not the company's only motivation for pressing forward with the offering, real estate and business experts told Business Insider. Plain and simple, WeWork needs more cash to keep growing and even to just stay in business. The lack of a successful IPO could hurt both its bankers and its biggest backer. And the longer it delays an offering, the more likely it is that negative market or economic trends could harm its business and further depress demand for its shares.

"Everybody, except the market, wanted this thing to go public," said Scott Galloway, a professor of marketing at New York University and former startup founder who has been sharply critical of WeWork's offering, in a recent conversation with Business Insider.

WeWork representatives did not respond to an email seeking comment.

The company on Tuesday announced that it would postpone its offering until at least next month. The move came after it had faced significant pushback from public investors, who were disturbed by its revelations of spiraling losses, potential conflicts of interest involving CEO Adam Neumann and other executives, and questionable governance structure. Analysts and potential experts also worried about its nominal $47 billion valuation and its potential resilience in an economic downturn.

Read this: Here's how WeWork answered the 5 biggest questions about its business — and why analysts are still worried about its upcoming IPO

In response, WeWork took several steps to reform its governance, including reducing the number of votes Neumann will have for each of his shares from 20 to 10. It also, reportedly, pitched investors on the idea of it going public with a much reduced valuation. Last week, it was reportedly considering debuting with a market capitalization of as little as $10 billion.

WeWork appeared desperate to go public, for good reason

Those repeated efforts to try to placate and lure in potential investors smacked of desperation, said Jeff Langbaum, a real estate analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence.

"What it sounds like is they were getting to the point where it almost didn't matter what [WeWork] was worth," Langbaum said. "They needed to come out."

WeWork's business model, which involves building out and outfitting numerous offices spaces around the world, has required copious amounts of cash. WeWork Perhaps WeWork's biggest impetus for pushing on with the IPO despite investor resistance was the prospect of the massive loan. A collection of banks, including JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs, which are leading WeWork's offering, has agreed to lend WeWork up to $6 billion — up to $3 billion right after the IPO with another $3 billion available by early 2021.

But in order to get access to that financing, WeWork has to raise at least $3 billion in an IPO by December 31 — unless the lenders decide to give it more time.

WeWork has a pressing need for cash. Its IPO filings show that it burned through $2.2 billion last year just operating its business and purchasing property and equipment to fit out its office spaces. Such spending consumed another $1.5 billion in the first six months of this year.

At the end of June, WeWork had $2.5 billion in cash on hand, not including another $575.6 million it's had to set aside to primarily to help guarantee certain of its leases. At the rate it was going through cash in the first half of this year, it would burn through its unrestricted cash stash by early May.

And that may overstate how quickly it's likely to consume cash. The vast majority of WeWork's cash burn in recent years has come not from spending more on the day-to-day costs of running its business than it's collecting in revenue, but from its ostensibly longer term investments in property and equipment for its office spaces. But the reason that's so is that the company has been able to defer much of one of the chief costs of running its business — paying rent to its landlords.

In 2017, the company deferred $752,063 in rent. In 2018, that figure went up to $1.3 billion.

'They need the money'

Landlords often give a discount on the first year or two of rent to tenants who sign long-term deals. They also often give tenants a credit for improvements they make to the spaces they lease. Landlords typically earn back those credits and discounts by charging more in the later years of a lease.

Because of its vast expansion in recent years, WeWork is in the early years of long-term deals on many of its spaces. Its number of locations worldwide jumped from 111 in 2016 to 528 by the end of June. The deferred rent it reported reflects the discounts it's gotten on signing all those spaces.

The bills for all those spaces are going to start coming due soon. Next year, the company will owe $2.2 billion on its operating leases. It will owe another $2.3 billion in 2021.

"They need the money," said David Erickson, a senior fellow in finance at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School of business. He continued: "They don't have a lot of runway."

To date, WeWork has raised billions of dollars in the private markets, both from selling shares in venture funding rounds and from issuing debt or taking out loans. Even if it doesn't go public, it might be able to turn to its existing lenders and investors and potentially even from its landlords for more cash, business and real estate experts said.

WeWork has tried to convince investors to place it in the same category as tech firms such as Zoom, which had a standout public offering earlier this year. Mark Lennihan/Associated Press But the potential $9 billion in cash at stake with an IPO is important to WeWork for more than just keeping the lights on, they said. WeWork has tried to sell itself as not just another commercial real-estate firm, but as a fast-growing tech company. The distinction is important, because how investors classify WeWork will determine its valuation. The public market tend to pay a marked premium for hot young tech companies over real estate firms.

Crucial to WeWork's attempt to have the market put its business in the same category as the likes of relatively young cloud software firms like Slack and Zoom has been its rapid rise in revenue. Its sales more than doubled in each of the last two years, and are on track to do so again this year.

But as its cash burn indicates, that growth has been extraordinarily expensive. Its loss nearly doubled last year after more than doubling the year before, and it loses nearly a dollar for every dollar in revenue it sees.

Because there's little indication that WeWork will staunch those losses anytime soon, the company needs to have access to vast amounts of cash to continue its breakneck growth and be able to sell itself as something more than the average real estate firm, Bloomberg's Langbaum said.

"If they don't raise the money [in the IPO], they can't continue to grow. And if they can't continue to grow, then there's a very difficult story for them to sell," he said. "If they want to be able to grow in the future," he continued, "they need to get it done."

A recession could pose big problems for WeWork

But the company likely faces other time pressures for completing the IPO in the near term beyond just the year-end deadline imposed by banks behind the $6 billion credit line. One big one is the potential for a recession, which many economists, investors, and business leaders fear could hit the US economy as soon as next year. Such a downturn could pose a double threat to WeWork's hopes for going public if its offering got pushed back that far.

The IPO market tends to dry up in recessions. Worse for WeWork, the commercial real estate market tends to be hit especially hard in downturns, said Tom Smith, a cofounder of Truss, an online commercial real-estate marketplace. Due to the short-term nature of the deals its customers sign with it, WeWork's business could be hurt more than other real-estate firms by a recession.

Masayoshi Son, CEO of SoftBank, which has been trying to raise a second $100 billion venture fund even as its investment in WeWork has come under pressure. Kim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters Potentially investors have already been spooked by the theoretical danger of a recession to WeWork's business. But in the case of an actual downturn, they'd be able to see how WeWork's business really does perform in one, Smith said. WeWork could be posed with the prospect of trying to sell shares amid weak demand for new shares overall while having to report worsening business results to potential investors.

"It's important to have this [IPO] event before a [down] cycle" in the economy, said Smith. "No one knows when that cycle is going to hit," he continued. "I think [WeWork's] management really was cognizant of that."

And there's another timing factor that WeWork faces, Smith said. One of the longstanding concerns about WeWork's business has been that it the bulk of its customers are freelancers, startups, solo practitioners, and small businesses — the kinds of people and companies that tend to be most vulnerable in a recession. The company has been trying to address that concern by signing up larger businesses as its customers. At the beginning of June, 40% of its customers were companies that have 500 or more employees, up from just 20% as of March 2017.

But the company lured in many of those customers with sharply discounted deals, said Smith, whose company's marketplace counts WeWork among its customers. In the second half of last year, particularly, the company was offering remarkable promotions — in some cases, it was charging about half the going market rate for space, Smith said.

Because WeWork generally offers short-term deals, even to its largest customers, those agreements are starting to come up for renewal, he said. The company is hoping to have those customers re-up at market rates, he said. It's unclear how much success they'll have. But there are warning signs, he said.

Its partners also need it to go public

Many of the companies who signed those deals were originally in the market for traditional office space. They only signed up for space with WeWork because the promotions were so dramatic, he said.

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, which, together with other lenders, has loaned WeWork and Neumann each hundreds of millions of dollars. Brian Snyder/Reuters "They priced it so you couldn't say no," Smith said. "But now," he continued, "you get a renewal offer, and it's double what you've been paying — we'll see what the reaction is."

The company's success or failure in getting those customers to renew should be known in the next three to six months, he said. WeWork would almost certainly like to go public before it has to report anything about that to public investors, he said.

"They want to have monetization before some of these fundamental problems are revealed," he said.

But WeWork was and is likely getting pressure to go public from the outside too. SoftBank is trying to attract investors in a follow-on to its $100 billion Vision Fund. Having WeWork's IPO blow up is about the worst marketing pitch it could have, especially after it already has lost a reported $600 million on its Uber stake, Galloway said.

If WeWork went public, it at least could potentially sell some shares and get some of its cash out, he said — though Galloway also said that he doesn't actually expect WeWork to go public at all, and that the IPO will be completely scrapped.

Still, JPMorgan Chase and other banks have loaned Neumann hundreds of millions of dollars, backed by his shares in WeWork, and have loaned hundreds of millions more to WeWork itself. With WeWork's valuation under intense pressure, its IPO in doubt, and its cash running short, those loans look increasingly risky, Galloway said.

"You have a ton of parties here who needed to get this done," he said.

Got a tip about WeWork or another company? Contact this reporter via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., message him on Twitter @troywolv, or send him a secure message through Signal at 415.515.5594. You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Original author: Troy Wolverton

Continue reading
  41 Hits
Sep
18

Amid Snap's struggles as a public company, CEO Evan Spiegel gives this advice to founders: 'Don't go public' (SNAP)

Snap CEO Evan Spiegel had some #nofilter advice for founders taking companies public for their first time.

"Don't go public?" Spiegel said on stage at a Goldman Sachs investor conference in New York on Wednesday.

It's been little more than two years since Spiegel rang the opening bell on Wall Street. The photo messaging company's stock has struggled to trade above its IPO price of $17 a share, closing at $16.90 on Wednesday.

Snap is recovering from a wildly unpopular app redesign and a delayed update for Android users, in the same period that competitors like Instagram debuted features like Stories and duplicated its augmented reality filters. The company stopped adding and actually started losing users, though user growth has turned around so far in 2019.

The audience, mostly consisting of investors, laughed at Spiegel's remark. The moderator cracked that they would edit his reply out of the webcast recording, Alex Heath, a reporter at tech news site The Information, said in a tweet.

Spiegel then got serious.

"I think for us going public has really been a trust-building exercise with a totally new set of investors. And I think that, frankly, is something that takes time," said Spiegel, Snap's cofounder, who took it public in spring 2017.

"If we look at our investors who were private investors with us for many, many years, we build relationships with them by telling them we were gonna take a big risk, telling them what our vision was, and then executing. And over three, four, five years, we've built a lot of trust with those shareholders.

"We just have to go through the same process now with the new set of shareholders and building new relationships," Spiegel said. "And I think we just have to execute on the business, frankly, and deliver results."

Original author: Melia Russell

Continue reading
  32 Hits
Sep
18

WeWork founders Adam and Rebekah Neumann are close friends with Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner and invited them to Rebekah's extravagant 40th birthday bash in Italy

Rebekah Neumann's 40th birthday party in Italy was set to rival a celebrity's bash. The celebration included luxury suites for around 40 people and a yacht, perfect for exploring the Amalfi Coast off of Positano, one of the three cities on the itinerary.

But the invite list caused some headaches. Rebekah and her husband Adam, two of WeWork's three founders, have maintained a close relationship with Donald Trump's daughter, Ivanka Trump, and her husband, senior White House adviser Jared Kushner. The Neumanns wanted to invite the couple to the big party in Italy.

See more: Now WeWork wants to be a manufacturer. The coworking company is opening a 200,000-square-foot New Jersey plant to make its signature aluminum and glass walls.

The Kushners did not attend, and sources offer differing accounts about why. One ex-employee who worked closely with the WeWork executive team said that WeWork's then-head of communications - who did not respond to a request for comment - argued against their inclusion. The comms head was worried about the optics of socializing with Trump administration officials because of WeWork's generally progressive stance on social issues, this person said.

At the last minute, Adam Neumann agreed not to have his friends at the party. But another source familiar with the matter said Ivanka and Jared were invited, but the three-city event was too logistically challenging for the couple's security team.

Regardless of the party, three former employees who worked closely with senior management confirmed that the couples remain close.

A WeWork representative declined to comment, citing the company's quiet period ahead of its IPO. A spokeswoman for the Kushners did not respond to a request for comment.

Love, the Kushners

As WeWork navigates a rocky path to going public, the founders' leadership style has been under a microscope by current and potential investors. The company has more conflicts of interest among leadership than typical public companies, particularly around Adam Neumann's property dealings. WeWork took steps last week to address some of those perceived problems, though now the company is delaying its IPO plans after a chilly response from potential investors.

The Neumanns have used the company to advocate for progressive causes, including environmental issues and the LGBT community, so the former employees said the close ties to the couple, and by extension the White House, seemed hypocritical.

While the fact that the two couples have a relationship is far from secret, most media depictions up until this point had focused on their business ties and real estate negotiations, but not the details of their social connection and how it was perceived within WeWork.

Rebekah was photographed standing behind Ivanka Trump at actor Hugh Jackman's New York home last year. One former staffer said the couples dine occasionally and that the Neumanns have received gifts from the couple at headquarters, including a basket for the Jewish holiday Purim, which the ex-employee said had a note that ended "Love, the Kushners."

'Tequila shots and arm wrestling'

Adam Neumann has not shied away from talking about his business relationship with Kushner - WeWork is a major tenant in an office complex in Dumbo Heights, Brooklyn owned by Kushner's family real estate business, Kushner Companies. In 2014, Kushner told Forbes that he was initially skeptical of WeWork's pitch.

"It took us a little bit to get on the same page. My first impression was they had very big ambition, but I wanted to make sure there was enough substance behind it," Kushner said.

Per earlier reports, Kushner and Adam Neumann have taken tequila shots - Adam's drink of choice - and gone head-to-head in an arm wrestling match to settle a minor disagreement. Kushner lost. But Adam Neumann has called the real estate heir a mentor.

"I find Jared to be one of the most sophisticated real estate developers on earth," he told Bloomberg Businessweek in 2016. "A lot of times when I'm with Jared, I take cues from his behavior just to learn how to act. You know, just to act a little bit better myself because it's always good to learn."

Are you a current or former WeWorker with a story to share? Contact this reporter via encrypted messaging app Signal at +1 (646) 768-1627 using a non-work phone, email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., or Twitter DM at @MeghanEMorris. (PR pitches by email only, please.) You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Original author: Meghan Morris and Julie Bort

Continue reading
  28 Hits
Sep
18

Uber and Lyft just took a major blow in California, and now they're gearing up for war (UBER, LYFT)

California lawmakers approved a landmark bill that would force gig-economy companies like Uber, Lyft and others to treat many workers as employees instead of independent contractors, potentially devastating their business and drastically altering the ride-hailing industry as we know it.

Assembly Bill 5, which will codify a three-part test for determining worker status as written in a recent court decision, was signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday, September 18.

Newsom previously indicated support for the move, saying that tech companies and other employers are eroding workers' basic protections like "minimum wage, paid sick days, and health insurance benefits." In a Wednesday letter sent to California lawmakers, Newsom called the law "landmark legislation for workers and our economy."

The move could affect over 1 million workers in California.

Lyft, which is planning a $90 million fight against the new rules alongside Uber and DoorDash, said after the legislation was passed that it was disappointed in lawmakers.

"Today, our state's political leadership missed an important opportunity to support the overwhelming majority of rideshare drivers who want a thoughtful solution that balances flexibility with an earnings standard and benefits," a representative said last week. "The fact that there were more than 50 industries carved out of AB5 is very telling. We are fully prepared to take this issue to the voters of California to preserve the freedom and access drivers and riders want and need."

In a blog post earlier this month, Uber outlined its proposed compromise it hopes to reach with politicians and labor leaders.

"That is why we have been at the table in California — with other rideshare companies, lawmakers, the Governor's office, and labor unions — to propose a truly innovative framework that we believe would preserve Uber's key benefit for drivers (flexibility) and key benefit for riders (reliability), while improving the quality and security of independent work," the company said.

Lorena Gonzales, the bill's sponsor, praised the Senate for finally passing the bill.

"The State Senate made it clear: your business cannot game the system by misclassifying its workers," the Democrat said in a statement. "As lawmakers, we will not in good conscience allow free-riding businesses to continue to pass their own business costs onto taxpayers and workers. It's our job to look out for working men and women, not Wall Street and their get-rich-quick IPOs."

The bill could devastate Uber, Lyft and other gig-work companies

The law, which would take effect January 1 if signed by the Governor, would codify a three-part test that would determine a worker's status as an employee or independent contractor. That test says a worker is an employee unless the employer proves that:

(A): The worker is "free from the control and direction" of the company that hired them while they perform their work.

(B): The worker is performing work that falls "outside the hiring entity's usual course or type of business."

(C): The worker has their own independent business or trade beyond the job for which they were hired.

Lyft's CFO, Brian Roberts, told investors at a conference hosted by Citigroup last week that any increased costs associated with reclassifying drivers or the backlog of employment lawsuits would be passed through to consumers. That would mean much higher prices on rides in the state, as well as a potential slowdown in work for drivers.

An Uber executive, however, took a much harsher criticism of the bill, telling Business Insider that the law would cause a fundamental shift in how the company does business. Uber has no plans to re-classify drivers as employees any time soon, the person said.

Wall Street analysts are perhaps the most worried. Barclays estimated that the re-classification alone, and the $290 million in associated costs, could bankrupt the companies.

"Beyond higher wages, ride-hailing companies would be responsible for half (6.2%) of employees' Social Security and Medicare (1.45%) tax, as well as the costs for administering any employee benefits (e.g., health care and 401ks)," the bank's analysts said in a note to clients.

"With current driver earnings and incentives running at an estimated 78% and 76% of gross bookings for Uber and Lyft, respectively, a 25% increase in driver wage/benefit costs would essentially drive take rates to zero (absent rate increases to riders)."

"We think an adverse ruling on the contract workforce issue would potentially bankrupt both Uber and Lyft," they concluded.

Shares of Uber and Lyft fell less than 1% in early trading Wednesday following the bill's passage through the Senate.

Gearing up for a $90 million fight

If the bill becomes law and no deal is reached, Uber, Lyft and DoorDash have pledged a $30 million each for a ballot proposal to exempt themselves from the new rules.

Among Uber and Lyft's proposals for an alternative is a minimum wage for drivers while they are on their way to a ride, or actively shuttling passengers, as well as portable benefits that would follow them between jobs, and a collective bargaining agreement.

The companies are hoping to pioneer what's known as "sectoral bargaining," a popular labor technique in European countries, in the United States. That would mean Uber, Lyft and other gig-work companies would bargain with the industry at-large, and not just workers on their platform.

Original author: Graham Rapier and Rosie Perper

Continue reading
  26 Hits
Feb
05

Mobile banking alternative Bnext expands to Mexico

When Apple unveiled the first Apple Watch in 2014, the first thing CEO Tim Cook highlighted was how the watch performs as a timepiece — noting that the watch is synced so closely with the Universal Time Standard that it's always within 50 milliseconds of accuracy. After all, the Apple Watch's most important job is telling the time, right?

While that may be true, there's a good chance your Apple Watch turns into a blank black square for most of the day as it sits idly on your wrist.

That's all about to change with the Apple Watch Series 5, which the company is launching on September 20, with a price starting at $400. Ths new model comes with a new always-on display that can show information like the date, weather, activity progress, and any other metric you can add as a complication to one of Apple's watch faces — even when the screen isn't activated.

It's one of the few features that distinguishes the Apple Watch Series 5 from its predecessor, the Series 4, which Apple no longer sells. Other than a new screen that doesn't turn off, the new watch comes with a built-in compass and the ability to call emergency services even when traveling internationally.

Read more: The iPhone 11 proves Apple learned an important lesson after last year's iPhone launch — most people don't want to pay $1,000 for a new smartphone

I've only just unboxed the Apple Watch Series 5, but here's a look at the characteristics that have stood out to me so far. Our full review will dive more deeply into these features and other details about the watch.

Original author: Lisa Eadicicco

Continue reading
  22 Hits
Sep
18

WeWork cofounder Rebekah Neumann, cousin of Gwyneth Paltrow, reportedly demanded employees be fired within minutes of meeting them because she disliked their 'energy'

Rebekah Neumann, the WeWork executive and wife of cofounder and CEO Adam Neumann, demanded that employees be fired after meeting them for mere minutes because she disliked their "energy," The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.

The Journal's report didn't indicate if those employees were ultimately terminated. The We Company declined to comment on this report.

Rebekah Neumann is a cofounder and the chief brand and impact officer of WeWork. She is also the founder and CEO of WeGrow, the "conscious entrepreneurial school" for children ages 2 to 11 under The We Company's corporate umbrella.

She also happens to be the first cousin of the actress Gwyneth Paltrow, the founder of the health and wellness empire Goop, which, like WeWork, has occasionally endured ridicule. Rebekah Neumann's apparent focus on "energy" is another thing they might have in common: Goop article titles include "Clearing out old energy," "Understanding how to move and manipulate energy," and "Energetic Detox: How to get rid of bad energy."

Rebekah Neumann also "pushes to infuse spiritualism in We," former employees who worked with her told The Journal.

The Journal further characterized the Neumanns as "impulsive at times," reporting that Adam Neumann was "bemoaning the number of 'B' players hired amid rapid growth" and consequently ordered his staff to fire 20% of the company's workers annually.

Read more: WeWork CEO Adam Neumann reportedly smoked weed with friends on a private jet to Israel — and the flight crew later found a 'sizable chunk' in a cereal box and recalled the plane

The We Company included a plan for succession in its initial-public-offering filing in August involving Rebekah Neumann, who was described in the filing as Adam Neumann's "strategic thought partner." The plan would put Rebekah Neumann at the helm of a committee with two board members charged with selecting a new CEO if Adam Neumann were permanently incapacitated within 10 years of the IPO.

Involving Rebekah Neumann in the succession plan yielded investor pushback. Consequently, The We Company changed course, removing her from the plan and barring her from serving the board.

Read more: WeWork CEO Adam Neumann has a $4.1 billion net worth — Here's how he spends his money

Kevin Webb contributed to this report.

Original author: Rebecca Aydin

Continue reading
  30 Hits
Mar
12

Read the memo holding company IPG just sent staff saying that it will keep all offices open amid coronavirus outbreak

In 2017, the New York Times published a story that chronicled an in-air interaction between US Navy pilots and a strange object near San Diego, California.

The pilots had snagged footage of an oblong flying object with their F-18's gun camera on November 14, 2004. The object appeared dark against the bright daytime sky before "suddenly and instantaneously accelerating to the left, out of view of the [camera] sensor at what appears to be an unprecedented velocity," the video narrates.

That video was one of three instances in which Navy pilots caught an unknown aerial object on camera; the latter two videos were both recorded on January 21, 2015— giving rise to speculation that they depict the same object.

Today, Joseph Gradisher, the Navy's spokesman for the deputy chief of naval operations for information warfare, confirmed that his organization designates "the objects contained in these videos as unidentified aerial phenomena," or UAP.

Read More: The US Navy has finally confirmed that mysterious videos showing pilots spotting UFOs are genuine after years of speculation

The term UAP has been widely adopted by government officials in place of UFO, or "unidentified flying object."

Gradisher released the statement to The Black Vault, a civilian-run archive of government documents, and later Vice— the first time the Navy has publicly addressed the contents of these videos.

John Greenwald, curator of The Black Vault, told Vice that he "very much expected that when the US military addressed the videos, they would coincide with language we see on official documents that have now been released, and they would label them as 'drones' or 'balloons.'"

But that was not the case.

"They went on the record stating the 'phenomena' depicted in those videos is 'unidentified.' That really made me surprised, intrigued, excited, and motivated to push harder for the truth," Greenwald said.

But just because the Navy has classified these objects as "unidentified" doesn't indicate that they are extraterrestrial in nature. (Former members of the military have said glitches in the pilot's heads-up display are likely to blame, rather than aliens that happen to only float around Navy fliers who have newer radar systems.)

An F/A-18F Super Hornet takes off from USS Harry S. Truman in the North Atlantic in September 2018. Joseph A.D. Phillips/U.S. Navy via Getty Images

Seth Shostak, a senior astronomer at the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Institute, previously told Business Insider that just because a flying object we can't identify is caught on camera doesn't make it alien.

"If you see something in the air that you don't understand, and you're the guy in charge of the Air Force, you want to know what that is. It doesn't have much to do with aliens, necessarily," Shostak said. "Despite more than a half-century of this, the really good evidence that we're being visited still has failed to surface."

There are many reasons aliens probably haven't visited us

People use night vision goggles to look at the sky during an Unidentified Flying Object tour in the desert outside Sedona, Arizona. REUTERS/Mike Blake

Shostak said he's skeptical of any claims that Earth has been visited by aliens for a few reasons.

For one, distances in space are mind-bogglingly vast. NASA's Voyager 1 spacecraft, for example, is leaving our solar system at a clip of 38,000 miles per hour. If the probe were aimed at Proxima Centauri— the closest star to Earth besides the sun that might harbor a planet capable of sustaining life — it'd take nearly 75,000 years to reach that system. (It's roughly 4.24 light-years away.)

What's more, humans have been sending radio signals into space that indicate our status as intelligent galactic denizens for only the last 80 years or so. These signals are arguably the the only way anyone else out there would even know to come looking in our quadrant of the Milky Way.

"The only way they would know is to pick up, for example, signals from our transmitters — television, radio, radar, all that stuff. But those signals have been going out only since the second World War," Shostak said.

That means only extraterrestrials within a certain distance would have any chance of making it to Earth by now.

Read more: Smart aliens might live within 33,000 light-years of Earth. A new study explains why we haven't found them yet.

"If they're more than 35 light-years away, there hasn't been enough time for our signals to get to them, and for them to decide, 'Well this is worth the money to go down there and fly around.' Because they can't go faster than the speed of light, and they probably can't go the speed of light," Shostak added.

Within 50 light-years or so, there are only about 1,400 star systems.

"That sounds like a big number, but it's a very small number if you're looking for intelligent beings," Shostak said. "Unless they're the next star system over, which is statistically rather unlikely."

If aliens are here, 'they're not doing anything'

An absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, of course, but there's just no proof that aliens have ever visited us, Shostak said.

In nearly all credible reports of UFO sightings, there's no interaction with the witness (aside from claims of alien abductions, which evidence suggests are hallucinations caused by episodes of sleep paralysis and possibly abuse).

"They're the best house guests ever. Because if they're here, they're not doing anything ... They send a huge fleet of spacecraft, preferably shaped like dinner plates, just to fly around and get people agitated but otherwise not to do a thing," Shostak said. "It is a little odd that aliens would come hundreds and hundreds of light-years to do nothing."

Imagine, Shostak added for the sake of comparison, if European colonizers had sailed to America but never interacted with any indigenous Native American tribes: "They don't try and take any of their land, they don't bring any disease, they don't do anything; they just sort of walked around at the fringes of their settlements, leading to puzzling sightings, but that's it."

A sign off route US 285, north of Roswell, New Mexico, points west to the alleged 1947 crash site of a flying saucer on the Corn Ranch. 1997.STR New/Reuters

As for the military-verified UAPs in the Navy videos, Shostak said those peculiar sightings are likely the result of an upgrade to the 1980s heads-up display technology. That upgrade happened — likely not coincidentally — just before the pilots spotted the anomalies in those screens.

The technology allows pilots to "see" in radar, but sometimes those pings result in false tracks that don't belong to any object and are simply the result of a system glitch.

"As anybody who uses Microsoft products knows, whenever you upgrade any technical product, there are always problems," Shostak told Space.com in May.

Original author: Aylin Woodward and Dave Mosher

Continue reading
  27 Hits
Aug
26

Playbook, which aims to be the ‘Dropbox for designers,’ raises $4M in round led by Founders Fund

Tesla installed a Supercharger at the iconic Nürburgring race track in Germany, the company said on Wednesday, further fueling the electric-car maker's unofficial competition with Porsche.

It's not Tesla's first Supercharger in Germany, a country synonymous with supercars, thanks to heavyweights like Porsche, Mercedes-Benz, and Audi. The location shown in the tweet is not yet on Tesla's online database of Superchargers.

On Tuesday, a heavily modified Tesla Model S completed a lap of the circuit almost 20 seconds faster than Porsche's new electric Taycan, the automotive magazine Road & Track reported. The faster track time comes after Tesla CEO Elon Musk poked fun at Porsche on Twitter for calling the Porsche Taycan a Turbo, which stoked the perceived rivalry between the two automakers.

Porsche's Taycan, while a competitor with Tesla's vehicles when it comes to specs, is far from being comparably priced. The cheaper Taycan Turbo starts at $153,510, while the Turbo S clocks in at a whopping $187,610. Tesla's cheapest option, the Model 3, meanwhile, starts at $38,990. A fully loaded Model S can top out at nearly $115,000. A Model X with all the options can climb to nearly $130,000.

Read more: Porsche's $153,510 electric sports car, the Taycan, is set to compete with Tesla's Model S — here's how they stack up

Tesla will also have a slight advantage when it comes to overall speeds, with the Model S topping out at 163 mph, compared with Porsche's top speeds of 161 mph for both vehicles. Tesla's range — estimated at 345 to 370 miles by the US Environmental Protection Agency — is also likely to top Porsche, which says the Taycan Turbo S will have a range of up to 256 miles, while the Taycan Turbo will have a range of up to 280 miles.

Original author: Graham Rapier

Continue reading
  27 Hits
Mar
12

Heartbeat Health raises $8.2M to improve cardiovascular care

Your iPad's IP address is one of the most important bits of information about your device. It's how the internet identifies your iPad, and is usually assigned arbitrarily by your router or DHCP.

However, in some cases, an IP address can be a permanent non-changing number manually assigned by an administrator.

Regardless of how it is assigned, the IP address is a series of numbers, e.g. 123.56.447.9.

Your web-surfing habits (from shopping to searching to emailing) are all connected to your IP address. To troubleshoot network issues, you may need your IP address, and there are other uses for your IP address as well.

Here's how to find your iPad's IP address.

Check out the products mentioned in this article:

iPad (From $329.99 at Best Buy)

How to find the IP address on an iPad

1. Open your Settings app.

2. Tap on "Wi-Fi."

3. Tap on the network your iPad is connected to (one with a check next to it). This will pull up the information for the network and your iPad.

4. The IP address will be listed in the second box, under IPV4 address.

Your IP address will be labeled on the network information page. Ryan Ariano/Business Insider

If you need it for something, copy the numbers and paste them elsewhere so you can pull them up quickly.

Original author: Ryan Ariano

Continue reading
  25 Hits
Jun
02

Taking a Capital Efficient Company Public and Beyond: Medidata CEO Tarek Sherif (Part 7) - Sramana Mitra

We've all heard the old adage: "It's not what you know, it's who you know." And in many ways, that idea still holds true today.

But as Lunchclub cofounder and CTO Scott Wu told Business Insider in a recent interview, he quickly learned when entering the workforce that something wasn't quite right about the networking events he was attending.

"It felt so inefficient and artificial," Wu said. "It's like you're going through this transactional affair more for the purposes of growing your network and less so about really getting to know people."

Wu and his cofounder Vladimir Novakovski — who previously worked together at the investment management software company, Addepar — teamed up to try and change the way networking typically happens.

With Lunchclub, instead of cocktail parties with numerous attendees and nametags, users can set-up one-on-one coffee or lunch meetings with people who are looking to accomplish similar goals. If someone is looking for career advice, they'll be paired with someone who can offer them mentorship. If someone just wants to brainstorm their crazy ideas, they'll pair them with someone who wants to do the same.

Wu said that he and Novakovski actually found their third co-founder — Hayley Leibson — through Lunchclub. They were looking for someone to run operations at the company and Leibson was looking to join an early startup with major upside. Leibson was already a Lunchclub power user at the time, and so the fit was just right.

"We found that not only was she super, super amazing at building communities, but also that she was excited to join something new," Wu said of Leibson, who previously founded an online network of female founders called, Women Founders Community.

Read more: The pitch decks that helped hot startups raise millions

The first time CTO told us that the real "secret sauce" behind Lunchclub is the data his team uses to make connections. That data is comprised of public information from social networks (namely, Twitter and Linkedin), information users provide at setup regarding their goals for using Lunchclub, and user feedback from the coffee or lunch meeting they have already attended. Wu said that early on, the team used to make these connections manually, but that now the process is totally automated.

Each Monday, a user will receive an email that asks them how many Lunchclub meetings they want that week, which times work best, and which areas of the city would be most convenient to meet. Twenty-four hours later, they receive their matches with a personalized introduction.

Wu told us that the decision for Lunchclub itself to make the matches for users is an "important feature" of the product.

"There's no swiping aspect. You receive the match from Lunchclub and you're expected to take that meeting," Wu said. "I think that's a very important feature of it. A lot of the swiping culture I think has led to much more transactional and much less genuine [interactions] and a lot of the networks that build around that, you can see the effect."

Notably, Lunchclub is meant to foster professional relationships, Wu said, and so using the service for dating purposes isn't supported. Also, today, there is no cost to use Lunchclub. In the future, Wu said his team will consider offering an enterprise service where companies pay for connections to qualified candidates.

Currently, Lunchclub is available in seven major cities, including San Francisco, New York, LA, and London. And recently, to help grow its team and expand its services even further, the San Francisco-based startup raised a $4 million seed funding round led by the Silicon Valley powerhouse VC firm, Andreessen Horowitz. In total, Lunchclub has raised over $5 million from investors.

Here's the pitch deck that helped Lunchclub raise millions to help build the professional networking platform of the future (some sensitive data has been redacted):

Original author: Nick Bastone

Continue reading
  20 Hits