Aug
09

DreamBox Learning’s CEO Jessie Woolley-Wilson on startup strength through purpose

This year, VC-backed startups could see the lowest number of exits since 2011, according to Pitchbook.As the number of IPOs and acquisitions decline, startups might start pursuing alternative exits, such as acquisitions by blank-check companies.  The VC ecosystem depends on company exits to reward investors and provide liquidity for employees with stock options. With fewer companies filing to go public or successfully seeking out acquisitions, the pool of capital could start to dry up. With less capital to go around, unprofitable, growth-driven startups will continue to make tough decisions about slashing costs in order to extend their runways.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

It's safe to say that 2020 has been a mixed bag for startups. 

The year has seen a handful of high profile acquisitions: Lululemon bought home-exercise startup Mirror for $500 million, while Uber acquired food-delivery startup Postmates for $2.6 billion.

But data from Pitchbook about venture capital activity in 2020 Q2 tells a rather gloomy story. 

In the first half of 2020, VC-backed startup exits have reaped a total value of 45.3 billion, which is less than one fifth of the $261.6 billion that venture-backed companies racked up from their exits for all of 2019. If exits continue at the same pace this year, they will fall far below the 2019 total. 

Just 147 startups pulled off an exit in 2020 Q2, at a total value of $21.2 billion, according to Pitchbook.  

This total pales in comparison to 2019's Q2, which was the best quarter ever for VC-backed startup exits: 383 startups exited for a record total value of $138.3 billion, per Pitchbook.

It's hard to compare 2019, which saw a number of high profile startups like Uber, Pinterest, Slack, and Zoom go public at sky-high valuations, to 2020, which so far has seen VC-backed startups lay off thousands of employees, and hot startups like Airbnb slow down their IPO plans. 

If exits don't start to pick up soon, Pitchbook projects that 2020 will be the year with the fewest VC-backed startup exits since 2011, when 742 startups exited at a total value of $67.3 billion. However, 2020 doesn't seem headed for the same low points touched in 2008 to 2010, in the aftermath of the financial crisis, according to Pitchbook. And the firm said an uptick in IPO filings at the end of the first half of 2020 might be a positive sign. 

With fewer exits on the books, some VC firms might find themselves strapped for cash. However, fundraising has remained robust for larger funds, per Pitchbook. 

The economic situation in the United States remains precarious in 2020. As coronavirus cases and deaths continue to surge across the United States, there is a good chance that many schools will remain closed, which could seriously hinder startup workers and founders with children. Without open schools, many other US workers will have to stay home, with ripple effects on employers and the economy. And if a second wave of coronavirus strikes the US, stocks could plunge 20-30%, as Business Insider's Ben Wink has previously reported.

Startups are responding to the unprecedented economic conditions in a number of different ways. 

Some companies have taken advantage of the brewing coronavirus recession by buying up smaller startups at rock-bottom prices. Financial technology startup Brex, for example, acquired three startups in March 2020, just before raising $150 million at a $3 billion valuation and laying off 17% of its staff in May. 

The coronavirus pandemic could also accelerate a movement of startups seeking to exit by selling to shell companies known as SPACs, which are sometimes called blank-check companies. Hims, the hair loss treatment startup that has received funding from Peter Thiel's Founder Fund as well as from Redpoint Ventures and SV Angel, is reportedly negotiating a deal with a SPAC, per Reuters.  

SPACs, which usually perform better during market downturns, make it possible for startups to bypass the administrative headache of going public while also getting liquidity in the hands of the startup's early investors and early employees. 

The VC ecosystem depends on exits to achieve liquidity, and with fewer companies filing to go public or successfully seeking out acquisitions, the pool of available capital could start to dry up if the economic decline becomes extended. Venture capital firms need to demonstrate that they can provide a good rate of return for their limited partners, who are the investors in VC funds. 

Some VCs have encouraged their portfolio companies to extend their runway, which is how much cash a startup has in the bank to fund its operations, for up to 3 years. It seems likely that startups will continue to do this by slashing headcount, slowing down growth, and reducing other overhead costs, like sky-high rents.

If the gloomy forecast for 2020 startup exits comes true, then VCs, who have poured billions into unprofitable startups like Uber and Airbnb in their pursuit of growth, may have to switch gears and focus on profitability. 

And if unprofitable startups start to run out of runway and fail to raise additional funds, they might become some of the first causalities of the worst recession in the US since the 1930s Great Depression, which lasted a decade. 

Original author: Alexander Torres

Continue reading
  31 Hits
Oct
11

MioTech gets $7M to build artificial intelligence based tools for wealth managers in Asia

How’s your 60-second pitch working for ya? Could it stand a refresh? Get ready to learn new and better ways to make your pitch more effective at opening doors to opportunity. Step one: register here — it won’t cost you a dime.

Step two: tune in and join us tomorrow, July 23 at 4:30 p.m. ET / 1:30 p.m. PT, for the next Pitchers & Pitches competition. We randomly chose five Digital Startup Alley exhibitors to bring the heat — in the form of their best 60-second pitch — in front of a panel of expert judges. We’ll name all the names in just a minute.

Note: Anyone can attend Pitchers & Pitches, but only companies exhibiting in Digital Startup Alley during Disrupt 2020 are eligible to pitch.

The invaluable critique, feedback and advice pitchers receive will help them take their elevator pitch to new heights — a great way to prepare for showcasing their tech at Disrupt 2020. Not pitching? No problem — you can apply what you learn to your own business and take your elevator pitch up a few more floors.

Here are five more excellent reasons to tune in:

Check out the new virtual Disrupt platform before it goes live in SeptemberWatch and interact with the pitch-off event on the virtual main stageMeet and video network with other attendeesConnect with the five pitchers in their virtual booth in the startup expoThe viewing audience (that’s you folks) chooses which team wins the pitch-off

The founders of the winning startup get a consulting session with cela, a company that connects early-stage startups to accelerators and incubators that can help scale their businesses.

Okay, let’s get to the judges for this session. We’ve tapped the experienced minds of two TechCrunch editors — Jordan Crook and Alex Wilhelm. Rounding out the panel we have two top featured VCs — Monique Idlett, of Reign Ventures and Jess Morris Jr., general partner and founder of Chapter One VC. They’ll drop a whole lot of knowledge to help you impress potential investors and customers alike.

Here are the five pitchers currently warming up in the bullpen and ready to take the mound in tomorrow’s competition:

Mnemonic AI

Timshel

IVORY & GOLD

Lamienins

ZeBrand Inc. 

The next Pitchers & Pitches takes place tomorrow, July 23 at 4:30 p.m. ET / 1:30 p.m. PT. Register here for free. Don’t miss your chance to improve your pitch, bring the heat and unlock more opportunity.

Is your company interested in sponsoring or exhibiting at Disrupt 2020? Contact our sponsorship sales team by filling out this form.

Continue reading
  38 Hits
Aug
09

Bootstrapping from the UK to Over $10 Million: Roger Hale, Co-Founder of Linguamatics (Part 3) - Sramana Mitra

Tesla CEO Elon Musk said on Wednesday that those who don't think a computer could become smarter than them are "way dumber than they think they are.""The people I see being the most wrong about AI are the ones who are very smart, because they can't imagine that a computer could be way smarter than them," Musk said.Musk has said he believes AI poses a greater threat to humanity than nuclear weapons.Are you a current or former Tesla employee? Do you have an opinion about what it's like to work there? Contact this reporter at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. You can also reach out on Signal at 646-768-4712 or email this reporter's encrypted address at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk reiterated his concerns about the future of artificial intelligence on Wednesday, saying those who don't believe a computer could surpass their cognitive abilities are "way dumber than they think they are."

"I've been banging this AI drum for a decade," Musk said. "We should be concerned about where AI is going. The people I see being the most wrong about AI are the ones who are very smart, because they can't imagine that a computer could be way smarter than them. That's the flaw in their logic. They're just way dumber than they think they are."

Musk has previously said he believes AI poses a much larger threat to humanity than nuclear weapons and called for regulations to monitor the development of AI technology.

"I think the danger of AI is much bigger than the danger of nuclear warheads by a lot," Musk said in 2018. "Nobody would suggest we allow the world to just build nuclear warheads if they want, that would be insane. And mark my words: AI is far more dangerous than nukes."

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has disagreed with Musk, saying AI has already improved health care and could reduce car accidents, while calling excessive pessimism about AI "pretty irresponsible." In response, Musk called Zuckerberg's understanding of AI "limited."

Are you a current or former Tesla employee? Do you have an opinion about what it's like to work there? Contact this reporter at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. You can also reach out on Signal at 646-768-4712 or email this reporter's encrypted address at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Original author: Mark Matousek

Continue reading
  35 Hits
Aug
09

NBCUniversal is shutting down Seeso, its streaming service for comedy fans

Retired US Army Gen. Russel Honoré, the three-star general who commanded the military's response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005, sharply criticized the Department of Homeland Security for wearing military uniforms."That uniform represents the cloth of our nation for people who don't draw overtime, who serve around the world at the direction of the national command authority," Honoré said to MSNBC.The optics of federal agents, who wore US Army uniforms in crackdowns on protesters, have concerned top Pentagon officials and lawmakers. Some armed activists have also worn pieces of the Army's uniform or carried with them military-style gear to protests, making it even more difficult to differentiate civilians from law enforcement."Federal agents who are wearing camouflage in our streets and carrying out the orders of our corrupt president against Americans obviously have no understanding of our military's most basic values — to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States," Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton, a former US Marine Corps infantry officer, told Insider.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Retired US Army Gen. Russel Honoré, the three-star general who commanded the military's and Federal Emergency Management Agency's response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005, sharply criticized the Department of Homeland Security's controversial methods to quell to the ongoing protests in Portland, Oregon.

Several members of the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency, which operates under the DHS, wore the US Army's camouflage uniform as they patrolled Portland's streets last week in a mission officials said was to protect federal buildings that were vandalized by demonstrators.

The CBP agents, who were also kitted with the same woodland camouflage uniforms US troops wear in combat, were shown in numerous videos and pictures detaining and beating demonstrators. One video uploaded to social media channels showed an individual suspected of assault or property destruction being whisked away in an unmarked minivan, prompting state and congressional leaders to demand an investigation.

"That uniform represents the cloth of our nation for people who don't draw overtime, who serve around the world at the direction of the national command authority," Honoré said to MSNBC on Tuesday. "And is not to be used as an instrument of protest suppression."

"That uniform is designed to blend into terrain, not to make you look like a warrior," Honoré added, referring to the distinct woodland camouflage pattern designed to obscure troops' outlines in battlegrounds like Afghanistan. "They're wearing these uniforms as a function of intimidation to look like warriors."

PreviousNext Police respond to protesters during a demonstration, Friday, July 17, 2020 in Portland, Ore. Dave Killen/The Oregonian via Associated Press

'Get the hell out of our uniforms'

Following President Donald Trump's decision to broaden the duties of federal agencies to curb the protests across the country, specialized federal law enforcement units have been given paramilitary-like roles to suppress demonstrators.

Federal agents from agencies like the CBP's immediate-response force, also known as the Border Patrol Tactical Unit (BORTAC), were mobilized in an effort to protect federal buildings, despite resistance from state and local leaders. These units and other federal law enforcement agencies often wear the US Army's camouflage uniform — BORTAC in particular has deployed to austere environments in the past, including Iraq and Afghanistan.

But concerns have grown as pictures of the uniformed personnel in Portland beating protesters with batons were widely publicized amid the federalized crackdown. The optics of the federal agents, who were confused with US service members, have concerned top Pentagon officials due to its implication.

US Army Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, previously highlighted his concerns, saying there needs to be clear "visual distinction" between the two organizations.

"You want a clear definition between that which is military and that which is police, in my view," Milley said during a congressional hearing earlier in July. "Because when you start introducing the military, you're talking about a different level of effort there."

Gen. Honoré likened the federal agents' actions against protesters as a "lawless group" who were "literally beating them with batons."

"Police don't do this, what kind of bull---- is this," Honoré said. "Get the hell out of our uniforms."

A Customs and Border Protection patch for sale on eBay. Screenshot via Ebay

Unit patches

The DHS and CBP have disputed the suggestion that their agents at the scene were unidentifiable "masked stormtroopers."

CBP commissioner Mark Morgan on Tuesday pointed out that his agents wore patches to identify their agency, and that "it is offensive to refer to these dedicated men and women that are out there as law enforcement professionals."

Examples of their patches worn on their uniforms or protective vests include a unique string of numbers and letters for internal purposes; a distinct "POLICE" velcro patch; or the CBP's own logo.

But both the Army's uniforms and law enforcement patches are also available for purchase online by the general public, fueling concerns that a renegade group would be able to mimic the same tactics used by the federal agents — particularly in the scenario with unmarked minivans seen in recent videos.

And for many observers, including seasoned US service members and civil-rights groups, the visibility of the patches are often overshadowed by the military uniforms or even obscured by the fog of war during a time of crisis.

Members of specialized response teams, such as BORTAC, previously wore distinct uniforms depending on their location and circumstance. BORTAC members wore an olive-green uniform, without a camouflage pattern, that is currently worn by ordinary Border Patrol officers.

A militia member in Oakdale, California. Screenshot via CBS Sacramento.

More patches, more confusion.

Several people have already been arrested after they were accused of posing as members of the military and law enforcement during the George Floyd protests.

In Los Angeles, Gregory Wong was taken into custody after he wore similar attire to a National Guard member ABC7 reported, citing sources. Wong, who was armed with an AR-15-type rifle and a pistol, was spotted by actual National Guard members after he fell into formation with them, the outlet said.

At a protest in Las Vegas, Zachary Sanns was charged with false impersonation of a federal officer, according to 8 News Now. Prosecutors reportedly said he stood on alongside police officers while armed with an AR-15-type rifle and wearing tactical gear.

Other activists, such as members of the Boogaloo movement, have also worn pieces of the Army's uniform or carried with them military-style gear to the same protests throughout the country — adding to the confusion in identifying actual law enforcement agents from others groups.

Members of movements like the Boogaloo and the Three Percenters militia often wear several velcro patches on their outfits in a similar arrangement to that of active-duty US service members, making themselves difficult to identify for those unfamiliar with military customs and regulations.

A BORTAC agent guards the US side of the border wall with Mexico in Brownsville, Texas, October 17, 2018. Reuters

Some of these visibly armed activists also wear the same specialty patches worn by US troops upon completion of the military's specialty schools, such as the US Army's Airborne or Ranger School, likely in reference to their past achievements if they previously served in the military.

A Pentagon spokesman on Tuesday echoed Gen. Milley's view and said Defense Secretary Mark Esper has made the Trump administration aware of his concerns with the appropriation of the US military's uniforms.

"We saw this take place back in June, when there were some law enforcement that wore uniforms that make them appear military," Defense Department spokesman Jonathan Hoffman said to reporters, referencing the George Floyd protests throughout the country earlier this year.

"The secretary has a expressed a concern of this within the administration, that we want a system where people can tell the difference," he added.

Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton, a former US Marine Corps infantry officer, questioned the presence of camouflage uniforms on urban streets and likened it to "the president's secret police."

"Federal agents who are wearing camouflage in our streets and carrying out the orders of our corrupt president against Americans obviously have no understanding of our military's most basic values — to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States," Moulton said to Insider.

"The use of these shadow forces by President Trump and the acting DHS secretary is deeply disrespectful to our military men and women in uniform who risk their lives abroad to fight for the rights our Constitution guarantees us.

"We shouldn't just tell these police officers to change out of camouflage, we should do away with BORTAC ... so that federal law enforcement masquerading as military can never again be used as the president's secret police," Moulton added.

Original author: David Choi

Continue reading
  37 Hits
Aug
10

Thought Leaders in E-Commerce: Brenda Boehler, CEO of Bellacor (Part 1) - Sramana Mitra

Affirm said on Wednesday it will power Shopify's buy now, pay later product, Shop Pay Installments, set to launch later this year.The partnership dramatically expands Affirm's reach to US consumers looking for an alternative to credit cards.Shopify has been on a product-launching spree, with a focus on ways to boost sales for its merchants.Offering a buy now, pay later option like Affirm can help retailers convert browsers to buyers online.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Shopify has been on a product-launching spree recently, moving beyond its e-commerce enabling software and eyeing more consumer-facing products. 

In early May, it released a consumer-shopping app. Later that month it announced plans to roll out a new buy now, pay later feature for its merchants called Shop Pay Installments, set to go live later this year.

On Wednesday, Affirm said that it will be Shopify's exclusive partner powering the buy now, pay later offering.

"We're super excited to be part of Shopify's growth," Max Levchin, founder and CEO of Affirm, told Business Insider.

Read more: POWER PLAYERS: Meet the 12 key execs driving Shopify, the breakout e-commerce star that's inking partnerships with Walmart and Facebook and seen its stock price triple since March

Shopify powers over one million merchants, more than half of which are based in the US. That opens up a huge market of retailers, and in turn, shoppers, that Affirm will now have access to.

"Tens of millions of US consumers are going to be exposed to Affirm, which is a huge leap for us in terms of just being visible," Levchin said.

Currently, Affirm is available at check out for more than 6,000 merchants. Prior to the announcement, Affirm was available to Shopify merchants through its app store. But retailers needed to integrate Affirm's tech, which, at times, was more complicated. 

By powering Shop Pay Installments, the integration on the merchant side will be more seamless, Levchin said.

"You just flip the switch and off you go," Levchin said. "It eliminates all forms of complexity and makes it a choice for the merchant that's super easy."

Affirm's brand will still be featured on Shop Pay Installments

Often, fintechs will sell their tech to other companies, letting them rebrand it themselves. Startup Bread, for example, does this with its buy now, pay later tech, selling it directly to retailers.

But with this partnership, Affirm's brand will still be featured on the Shop Pay Installments product. In fact, keeping Affirm's name was a sticking point for Levchin.

"We get full credit and visibility. We actually insist. Part of the adherence of our mission is that people need to know who their heroes are," he said. "We are bringing transparent and honest financial products, and people need to know that it's us who are doing it."

As they grow in stature, buy now, pay laters are increasingly considering their brand awareness. For example, Klarna recently announced a loyalty program for customers.

Valued at $2.9 billion, Affirm has raised $800 million to-date from investors including Andreessen Horowitz, Lightspeed Venture Partners, and Spark Capital.

See more: From Affirm to Klarna, buy now pay later startups are booming. But experts warn juggling explosive growth with responsible lending is a tricky balance.

Levchin, who was a cofounder of PayPal, has been vocal about Affirm's 'mission of honest finance,' offering consumers a more transparent alternative to credit cards. As part of that, Affirm has never charged late fees.

"We think it is incredibly important that we be transparent with our merchants and buyers," Kaz Nejatian, vice president and general manager of financial solutions at Shopify, told Business Insider in emailed comments.

"Like Affirm, we believe that products that hide behind late fees and hidden fees are bad for everyone," he added.

And Levchin says Affirm's commitment to working with its users that are unable to pay has been key to its success during recent months.

"That's the brand Affirm stands for. We will work with you and treat you like a grown up," Levchin said. "Part of that requires the end customer knowing that they're dealing with Affirm, so we really have never white labeled."

Offering buy now, pay later can help merchants boost sales

Shopify's consumer-focused products — like its Shop app — are all about driving more business to the network of merchants running on its platform. And Shop Pay Installments is no exception.

Offering a buy now, pay later product at checkout can help retailers increase sales and convert online browsers to buyers. Affirm, which already partners with brands like Casper and Peloton, says that it can increase average order values by 85% and up repeat purchase rates by 20%, as of May this year.

Read more: Buy now, pay later startups are 'having a moment' — here's why retailers like Walmart and Target are betting on installment payments to keep consumers spending

"We're looking forward to partnering with Affirm to power Shop Pay Installments in the U.S. for eligible merchants, helping them give their customers better shopping experiences while boosting their overall sales," Nejatian said.

Affirm, in addition to other buy now, pay later players like Afterpay and Klarna, continue to see a growing number of consumers sign on for their products, often marketed as a more flexible alternative to credit cards.

"Today's consumers want more flexibility when they're shopping and making purchasing decisions," Nejatian added. "By giving our merchants the ability to offer more payment choice and flexibility, we're helping them meet their customers' wants and needs."

Read more

Buy now, pay later startups are surging. But Affirm CEO Max Levchin says the industry will see a shakeout as the pandemic hits borrowers.

$85 billion e-commerce giant Shopify is trying to make banks irrelevant for small businesses. Its chief product officer lays out why.

Buy now, pay later startup Affirm just launched a high-yield account with an eye-popping rate. Its CEO explains why the startup wants to cater to both saving and splurging.

Original author: Shannen Balogh

Continue reading
  41 Hits
Aug
10

Glint is a stealthy London fintech startup that promises to turn gold into a ‘new global currency’

Researchers have created a machine-learning technique that can identify disinformation campaigns on social media.The algorithm finds patterns of suspicious posts and accounts, which could help companies shut down these campaigns early on.The method works on various social media platforms, which could enable companies to coordinate their efforts.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Election season now brings an expected threat: foreign meddling via online disinformation campaigns.

To combat this interference, a team of researchers have developed a machine-learning algorithm that spots and flags internet trolls as they pop up. The technique, the programmers say, could help social-media companies quickly shut down coordinated efforts to meddle in US elections.

The tool, described in a study published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances, works by learning to recognize known, common patterns associated with troll activity and disinformation campaigns. Russian troll accounts, for instance, have posted many links to far-right websites, but the content on those sites didn't always match the posts' accompanying text or images. Venezuelan trolls, meanwhile, have often posted fake websites.

Based on its knowledge of this type of pattern, the algorithm then identifies other accounts and posts with similarly suspicious activity.

The researchers said the tool works on a variety of social-media platforms — in tests, it identified trolls on Twitter and Reddit using the same techniques. 

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey REUTERS/Anushree Fadnav

"A major value of the findings is the ability to transfer them over time and platforms," Cody Buntain, an assistant professor in informatics at New Jersey Institute of Technology and a co-author of the study, told Business Insider. "It allows platforms to respond and track in real time," he added. 

A coordinated plan of attack

Buntain said many social media companies are probably already using machine learning to identify and remove trolls from their platforms, but his team's model offers a way for companies to coordinate their efforts. It also allows companies to find new campaigns early and predict some elements of future disinformation campaigns, since it can use data from known troll accounts to identify brand-new ones.

"Being able to do forecasting gives the platform some time to do real interventions," Buntain said.

To test their algorithm, researchers trained it on publicly available Twitter data: posts and links made by users linked to disinformation campaigns. The users came from Russia, China, and Venezuela. 

Then they added in data from ordinary Twitter accounts as well as more politically active ones to see how effectively their tool could sniff out trolls. In each test, the model identified a majority of posts and accounts involved in disinformation campaigns, even when those accounts were brand-new. 

"We're capturing something in the political message that these trolls are pushing,"  Buntain said.

The model was also effective at separating trolls from authentic, politically engaged Twitter users. 

Putting the tool into practice

Buntain and the other researchers are offering their algorithm for free, though they said like to partner with companies to get better insight into how to optimize the tool. At least one company has expressed interest in their work, Buntain added. 

Ideally, platforms that adopt the new tool could use its findings to quickly remove or suppress users that post suspicious content, warn human users when they exhibit troll-like behavior, and warn the public about disinformation campaigns as they're found.

However, Buntain also said that companies need to be careful if they adopt this kind of algorithm, since the method isn't 100% accurate. 

"The concern — and I think this is legitimate — is, what happens when you're wrong?" he said. 

He also noted that companies would need to be vigilant about staying a step ahead of disinformation coordinators that might try to thwart the tool. Russian campaigns, for instance, have grown increasingly sophisticated since early 2015. 

Retraining the algorithm every few weeks can help it stay up to date, Buntain added, but when major events or political actors start trending on a platform, it can take a few days for the tool to catch up. Given that lag, human troll-watchers would be still be necessary, too. 

Original author: Susie Neilson

Continue reading
  27 Hits
Aug
10

Tableau Delivers Better Performance, But Acquisition Recommended - Sramana Mitra

Federal officers cited livestreamed YouTube footage as evidence when they arrested a protester in Portland earlier this month, which was first reported by Recode Wednesday.Officers said in a legal document that they saw someone place a wooden board that was on fire against the wall of a federal courthouse, which led to their arrest of Kevin Benjamin Weier.Trump ordered federal agents into the city amid ongoing protests, where they have used aggressive tactics against demonstrators include tear gas and throwing people into unmarked vans.City and state officials have opposed the federal intervention, calling it a "blatant abuse of power" and demanded that the officers leave the city.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Federal law enforcement officers from the US Department of Homeland Security arrested a protester in Portland, Oregon, earlier this month after saying they saw him commit a federal crime while watching a YouTube livestream, first reported by Recode on Wednesday.

A court document submitted by Micah Coring, an agent with the Federal Protective Services, a division of DHS, said officers watching the video saw a protester place a wooden board — that was initially on fire — against the outside wall of a federal courthouse before a second person adjusted it and a third extinguished it.

The document also said that while first person's face was obscured, the second person's face was visible, and officers sent screenshots to other agents who used them to surveil an individual for several hours before arresting Kevin Benjamin Weier, who they allege is the person they saw on the livestream.

Weier has been charged with attempted arson of a federal building and could face up to 20 years in prison if convicted.

The arrest shows how publicly available evidence published on protesters' social media feeds or captured by journalists is both exposing abuses of power and being used by law enforcement to dig up evidence on activists.

Portland, in particular, has become a major flashpoint between law enforcement officers and protesters in recent weeks following President Donald Trump's executive order that allowed federal agents to deploy to the city. Demonstrations there — which have been largely peaceful but have also resulted in some vandalism — have been going on for more than 50 days.

Since the order, militarized federal agents have been patrolling the streets in a dramatic show of force while using tear gas, smoke bombs, and physical violence to break up crowds. They've also been seen throwing protesters into unmarked vans without explanation.

The aggressive tactics by federal officers have prompted strong opposition from city and state officials, who have requested that they withdraw from Portland. 

Business Insider previously reported that Oregon Gov. Kate Brown has called the deployment a "blatant abuse of power," and Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler declared the use of force an "attack on our democracy." The state's attorney general has since sued the Trump administration, alleging officers are "unlawfully detaining" protesters, according to the Associated Press.

Original author: Tyler Sonnemaker

Continue reading
  33 Hits
Aug
09

Mens activewear startup Pistol Lake raises $600K from Slow Ventures

Tesla turned a profit in the second quarter, it said Wednesday, topping Wall Street's expectations for the three-month period marked by coronavirus shutdowns, cementing its longest streak of profitability in company history. 

Here are the important figures:

Earnings per share (adjusted): $2.18 versus an expected $-0.15Revenue: $6.04  billion versus an expected $5.2 billion

"We believe the progress we made in the first half of this year has positioned us for a successful second half of 2020," the company said in a press release. "Production output of our existing facilities continues to improve to meet demand, and we are adding more capacity. Later this year, we will be building three factories on three continents simultaneously."

On a conference call following the release, Tesla announced Austin, Texas as the official location for its second US factory, where it will eventually build its Cybertruck and other vehicles. 

"I've never been more optimistic or excited about the future of Tesla in the future of the company," CEO Elon Musk said. 

Shares of Tesla, already at record highs, rose as much as 7% in late trading Wednesday following the release. 

The company also disclosed $428 million worth of revenue from regulatory credits that it sells to other automakers who make far fewer electric vehicles, its highest ever for the growing segment, helping to insulate the company's balance sheet from falling vehicle prices. In total for 2020, those credits will likely total more than $1 billion, CFO Zach Kirkhorn said. 

Lower overhead costs thanks to a "temporary reduction" in employee compensation also helped to fuel the quarter's success, Tesla said. That's despite an increase in capital expenditures as the company builds its third car factory near Berlin in Germany. 

Analysts on the call are likely look for insight about demand trends the company is seeing at home in North America as well as in the increasingly important Chinese market. They're also sure to ask for updates on the new European factory, and for any decisions on its second US factory, which is seemingly headed for Austin, Texas.

Before the pandemic hobbled the entire auto industry, Tesla had announced plans to build up to 500,000 vehicles in 2020, something says it will still be able to do despite the ongoing difficulties. Many of Tesla's competitors have in recent months lowered their expectations because of the negative economic environment.

For investors that have piled into the stock in recent months, sealing Tesla's status as the world's most valuable automaker, the beat is likely to be taken as pure vindication. Following delivery numbers that surpassed expectation in June, the stock has hit record highs on a near weekly basis, fueled in part by speculation it could be added to the benchmark S&P 500 index after a full year of profitability. 

"We continue to believe EV demand in China is starting to accelerate with Tesla competing with a number of domestic and international competitors for market share with Giga 3 remaining the linchpin of success which remains the prize that Musk and Tesla are laser focused on capturing," Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush, said Wednesday. 

Original author: Graham Rapier

Continue reading
  31 Hits
Aug
09

For SAP, IoT is the Next Big Thing - Sramana Mitra

Tesla will build its newest factory in Austin, Texas, the company said Wednesday. Austin, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and other cities had fiercely competed in recent months to win the $1 billion investment. Eventually the plant will make Tesla's Cybertruck and hire up to 5,000 workers, the company said. Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

It's official — Tesla's fourth car factory, its second in the US, will be in Austin, Texas.

CEO Elon Musk made the announcement on Tesla's second-quarter earnings call Wednesday after a fierce bidding process that also involved Tulsa, Oklahoma, and other cities. In the end, however, Travis County and a local school district's deal for more than $65 million in tax rebates over 10 years won over the electric-car maker.

"It's going to be right near Austin," Musk said, "five minutes from Austin International Airport and about 15 minutes from downtown Austin."

What is currently a concrete plant on a rural swath of land in the city's southeast quadrant airport will soon be home to a 5 million-square-foot plant for Tesla's Cybertruck, Semi truck, and Model 3 and Y. The company said it hoped to hire up to 5,000 workers at a starting wage of $15 an hour for many of the low-skill manufacturing roles.

The land is an "ecological paradise" along the Colorado River, Musk said, and will remain open to the public for recreation opportunities. 

But the decision wasn't without controversy, as with most tasks undertaken by Tesla and Musk. At a series of public meetings, citizens turned out in force to remind county commissioners of past legal issues the company's had in regard to labor relations, worker safety, unions, and environmental impact.

In Austin, Tesla will join a large and entrenched cohort of high-tech companies that began to flock to the area in the 1970s led by Dell, IBM, and 3M. As companies continued to pour in over recent decades, the city has experienced skyrocketing population growth. A business-friendly climate with no state income tax for residents and a wealth of educated workers have made it a fitting home for hundreds of companies, both tech imports and home-grown enterprises alike. 

Tesla's market valuation continues to skyrocket as the company slowly ramps up annual production. While it's easily the most valuable automaker, it produces just a fraction of the vehicles sold by Detroit's old guard, including Ford and General Motors. That could soon change if current rates hold and Austin joins the likes of Berlin, Shanghai, and Fremont, California.

Oklahoma officials, while disappointed to not win the factory, said they were looking forward to supporting Tesla suppliers given the state's close relationship with Texas.

"Over the past few months, Tulsans and Oklahomans as a whole showed the nation and the world that our state is worthy of being one of two finalists for an innovative, cutting-edge company like Tesla," Gov. Kevin Stitt said in a statement. "The comprehensive effort made by the State of Oklahoma, the City of Tulsa and the Tulsa Regional Chamber proves Oklahoma remains open for business and an ideal destination for the automotive industry despite today's announcement."

Original author: Graham Rapier

Continue reading
  32 Hits
Aug
09

After heavy restructuring, London on-demand delivery app Jinn claims to be ‘profitable’

Serverless technology is emerging as a popular way to build large-scale cloud applications in a cost-effective way. The nascent market for serverless computing is dominated by Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, and Google Cloud — but early-stage startups are emerging to serve the sector.Investors are betting on these startups because they can help customers save on their cloud costs and make it easier to take advantage of multiple cloud platforms.Some prominent startups that offer serverless technology include Stackery, Nuweba, Iguazio, Vercel, Lumigo, and Ozcode.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

In 2014, Amazon introduced Lambda, a pioneering new product that introduced a concept called serverless computing. Six years later, serverless has blossomed into a full-fledged field – and venture capitalists are starting to place their bets on promising startups in the space.

The promise of serverless computing is that it gives developers the ability to run large-scale applications without the headache of managing the underlying server infrastructure. A serverless app spins up the cloud resources it needs to meet its immediate needs right in the moment, and then vanishes it all away afterwards. Ultimately, serverless computing helps customers cut costs and overhead.

The approach is new enough that only Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud have made significant inroads in the nascent market, offering serverless technology alongside their more typical cloud offerings.  

But startup founders — and the venture capital industry — believe there's room to carve out a niche.

For example, startups Iguazio and Vercel allow developers to more easily build serverless applications, raising $71.7 million to build artificial intelligence app and $20.99 million to build web apps respectively. Other startups focus on monitoring and debugging serverless applications, like Ozcode, which raised about $3.5 million before being acquired in March, and Lumigo, which has raised a total of $8 million.

While serverless is still in its early days and these startups are still in their early stages, venture capitalists and founders alike think that it's an opportunity which will only keep growing. Serverless is already growing fast among large and small companies in industries like retail, finance, and gaming, a recent report from IT industry community Spiceworks showed that about one-third of companies are either currently using or planning to adopt serverless computing this year. 

Some, like Trinity Ventures partner Schwark Satyavolu, believes that all companies will eventually move to serverless and that developers will redesign existing applications to be serverless, too. The pricing scheme of serverless — where customers pay based on exactly how much compute they use — is "game-changing in what it'll enable in terms of new business models that are not possible today," Satyavolu said. "That is the primary reason why we believe it will be the foundation of truly different kinds of products and services."

 Beyond cost, another main tenet of serverless is making developers lives easier. 

"We wanted to relieve the developer of burden," Guillermo Rauch, CEO and co-founder of Vercel, told Business Insider.

Part of that ease is speed:

"People want to develop software quickly," Yaron Haviv, founder and CTO of the startup Iguazio, told Business Insider. "It's all about getting value quickly. I need the tools that will allow me to do the job as soon as possible. Why is everyone in New York using Uber again and not buying their own cars? Today you're taking Uber to get from point to point. You want to focus on building business applications, not on managing infrastructure."

Erez Berkner, cofounder of Lumigo, a platform that alerts customers if something goes wrong with their serverless applications and helps them find the root cause, echoed that sentiment:

"I don't need to deploy a server or operating systems, so my life is much easier," Berkner told Business Insider as he reflected on why serverless benefits developers. "I can get a system up and running in a couple of days compared to a couple of weeks."

One advantage these startups like Vercel and Iguazio have over cloud giants like AWS, Google, and Microsoft, is that they offer flexibility. Many potential customers are concerned with being locked into one cloud — these startups generally make it simple for companies to run services with multiple clouds, while some tools from the cloud giants favor their own services.

Guillermo Rauch, CEO and co-founder of Vercel Vivan Cromwell/Vercel

For example, serverless platform startup Nuweba, which has raised $15 million, is both challenging the market leaders and selling tools that are compatible with their serverless platforms, too. 

Similarly, some startups like Stackery are seeing the cloud giants as more of a partner than a threat. Stackery, which has raised a total of $7.47 million, helps developers build serverless applications using AWS capabilities.

"We all share the belief that engineers should focus their time on delivering value to their users, not on the underlying plumbing," Farrah Campbell, alliances and ecosystem director at Stackery, told Business Insider. "We all believe serverless is a way to deliver on that vision."

Got a tip? Contact this reporter via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Signal at 646.376.6106, Telegram at @rosaliechan, or Twitter DM at @rosaliechan17. (PR pitches by email only, please.) Other types of secure messaging available upon request.

Original author: Rosalie Chan

Continue reading
  28 Hits
Aug
09

Nextdoor turns to real estate listings for monetization

Apple's 2022 iPhone could come with a different type of camera lens that's generally better-equipped for taking zoomed photos, according to analyst Ming-Chi Kuo.This periscope-style lens is already available on smartphones from Samsung and Huawei.Cameras have become one of the biggest ways in which smartphone makers differentiate their products from those of competitors.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Apple hasn't even launched its much-rumored iPhone 12 yet, but reports are already starting to paint a picture of what to expect two years ahead in 2022. One well-known Apple analyst suggests the company's 2022 iPhone may have a different type of camera lens that would make it much better at taking zoomed photos.

Ming-Chi Kuo, an analyst with TF International Securities known for his predictions about unreleased Apple products, said in a new report that the 2022 iPhone will likely have a periscope lens. Kuo's research was reported by 9to5Mac, Apple Insider, and MacRumors. 

It's not the first time Kuo has mentioned that Apple may be planning to outfit its future iPhone with a periscope lens; the analyst issued a similar report back in March.

Apple did not immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment. 

A periscope lens uses a mirror to help it achieve a closer optical zoom, which would ultimately result it crisper zoomed images compared to digital zoom. Phones like Samsung's Galaxy S20 Ultra and the Huawei P30 Pro already use periscope lenses for zooming. Samsung's phone, for example, provides a 10x optical zoom, while Huawei's offers a 5X optical zoom. The iPhone 11 Pro, by comparison, only supports a 2x optical zoom.

It could be a critical addition for Apple as cameras have become one of the biggest ways in which companies differentiate their devices from competitors. And data shows that camera quality plays a role in the buying decision when purchasing a new smartphone. Data from Global Web Index published in 2019 listed "more camera and video capabilities" among the top five most desired smartphone features based on its survey of internet users between the ages of 16 and 64 in the United States and United Kingdom. 

Both Samsung and Apple flaunted their respective phones' cameras as major selling points when announcing the Galaxy S20 Ultra and iPhone 11 Pro. The S20 Ultra can zoom in at up to 100x digitally (although doing so may result in blurry photos), while the iPhone 11 Pro is Apple's first smartphone to come with a triple lens camera.

As for this year's iPhone, Apple is expected to add a depth sensor to the iPhone 12's camera system much like the one found on the company's latest iPad Pro. Kuo's note also mentioned that the iPhone 12 may have better autofocus capabilities.

Original author: Lisa Eadicicco

Continue reading
  27 Hits
Aug
08

Here’s the 22nd batch of 500 Startups companies

Tesla has chosen the site of its next US factory, but has not disclosed the site's location. (Update: After this story was published, Tesla said the factory will be built in Austin, Texas.) The electric-car maker made the announcement on Wednesday in its second-quarter earnings release, in which it said "next US Gigafactory site selected" and that "preparations are underway" at the new facility.

Austin, Texas, and Tulsa, Oklahoma, were the final contenders Tesla considered from a list of eight cities, all of which are located in the central US. If the company builds the factory in Austin, it will receive at least $65 million in tax incentives.

Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment on which city it chose.

The company plans to produce its Model Y SUV and upcoming Cybertruck pickup at the new factory. Cybertruck production is set to begin in late 2021.

The upcoming US factory will likely be Tesla's sixth, as the company has plants in California, Nevada, New York, and Shanghai, and is building one in Germany that is set to open in 2021. Only the Nevada and New York plants are not designed for vehicle production. The former produces batteries and the latter makes solar roof-tiles, among other products.

Are you a current or former Tesla employee? Do you have an opinion about what it's like to work there? Contact this reporter at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., on Signal at 646-768-4712, or via his encrypted email address This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Original author: Mark Matousek

Continue reading
  33 Hits
Aug
08

Audioburst launches a web and mobile search engine for audio news

When you buy through our links, we may earn money from our affiliate partners. Learn more.

Today Show anchor Al Roker activates an installation advertising Peacock outside of NBC's New York City headquarters. Nathan Congleton/NBC/NBCU Photo Bank via Getty Images Peacock, NBCUniversal's new on-demand streaming service, launched nationwide on July 15.The platform combines hundreds of classic movies from Universal with even more shows from NBC, like "30 Rock," "Parks & Recreation," and "Saturday Night Live."More than 13,000 hours worth of movies and shows are available for free with ads on Peacock, and a $4.99 a month Peacock Premium subscription will get you access to exclusive content.For those who can't stand commercials, Peacock Premium Plus removes most ads for $9.99 per month.The free library is certainly appealing, but a Peacock Premium subscription doesn't offer as much value as other on-demand services like Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime Video.

Peacock debuted nationwide on July 15, bringing another choice to a crowded field of on-demand streaming services that has seen newcomers, like Disney Plus and HBO Max, working to compete with established services, like Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime Video.

Launched by NBCUniversal, Peacock relies on a freemium model for on-demand streaming, offering a mix of TV shows, movies, and live sports for free with ads. Peacock Premium gives subscribers access to exclusive content and a significantly larger back catalog of NBC shows, like "Law & Order," for $4.99 a month. With that said, Peacock Premium still relies on ads to generate revenue. To go ad-free, you need to sign up for a Peacock Premium Plus subscription for $9.99 a month.

Peacock's subscription model is similar to what Hulu employed until 2016, allowing viewers to watch 13,000 hours worth of programming for free with ads. Viewers who want to catch up on NBC shows, like "30 Rock" or "Saturday Night Live," can mostly do so without a premium subscription, though a handful of classics, like the original "Law & Order" and "Everybody Loves Raymond," require a paid account.

Peacock's large library of free content is enticing and NBC has promised to limit commercials to five minutes at most per hour of streaming. However, Peacock Premium lacks the value offered by streaming competitors like Netflix and Hulu, and there are some major gaps in NBCUniversal's catalog.

Peacock review: Peacock gives NBC its own streaming home, but key Universal movies are missing

Universal's "Fast & Furious" franchise won't be on Peacock for months due to prior contracts. Universal Studios

Peacock's library is primarily anchored by NBC TV series like "30 Rock," "Law & Order SVU," and "Will & Grace." Notably missing is "The Office," which will become exclusive to Peacock in January 2021.

New episodes of NBC's current primetime series are available on Peacock one day after they air on TV, along with content from live programs like "The Today Show," "The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon," and "Late Night With Seth Myers."

"Downton Abbey," "Pawn Stars," and "Ray Donovan" lead a handful of popular series from other networks that have also made their way to Peacock. Peacock's catalog features about a dozen exclusive series, movies, and documentaries, that can only be viewed on Peacock, including Dale Earnhardt Jr's documentary series "Lost Speedways," and "Psych 2: Lassie Come Home," a new movie continuing the hit USA mystery series.

Peacock hosts hundreds of movies from Universal Pictures, but many of the studio's recent releases are absent due to prior agreements with HBO and FX. Several key Universal franchises, including "Fast & Furious" and "How to Train Your Dragon," are already available on competing streaming services (HBO Max and Amazon Prime Video, respectively) but it's unclear how long it will be until they arrive on Peacock.

Instead, Peacock offers decades worth of classics spanning the work of Alfred Hitchcock to 2013's "Lone Survivor." Peacock has promised that new and upcoming Universal movies, like "Boss Baby 2" and "Trolls World Tour," will eventually appear on Peacock as well, and future Universal releases won't be contracted to other services.

Peacock will feature films from other studios, like "American Psycho," "Reservoir Dogs," and "The Mummy," on a rotating basis, but with popular movies like "The Matrix" and "Jurassic Park" scheduled to leave the service just two weeks after its launch, it's hard to feel confident about what will remain in the library long term.

Sports fans who don't have access to NBC Sports through their television can use Peacock to watch live Premier League matches and other events, including the 2021 Olympics.

Peacock's "freemium" model offers a different kind of value

Peacock is touting 15,000 hours of on-demand content at launch. Peacock

Unlike Netflix, Hulu, and HBO Max, anyone can watch thousands of hours worth of movies and shows on Peacock for free with ads. A Peacock Premium subscription will get you access to more episodes from Peacock original shows, and more classic series and movies for $4.99 per month. The ad-free version of Peacock costs $9.99 per month and includes the premium content without commercials.

If you're a Comcast or Xfinity cable customer you can get Peacock Premium for free by creating an account and logging in with your cable provider.

Peacock's premium content currently pales in comparison to services like Netflix and Hulu, especially when you consider the thousands of hours worth of free content that's already available.

Die-hard fans may be willing to pay a monthly fee to watch "Two and a Half Men" or "Shrek," but the Premium subscription won't offer much value until more exclusive shows and anticipated classic series, like "The Office," appear on the platform, and even then it's not clear which upcoming additions will require a subscription.

Peacock's interface works well enough, but it's lacking common features from other streaming services

These are the shows and movies that require a Peacock premium subscription. Peacock

Peacock's layout and functionality meet the minimum expectations for an on-demand streaming service — movies and shows are separated by category and users can create a watchlist of their favorites.

Peacock lacks the option to create separate profiles for different viewers, so parents need to engage the parental control pin on their own account to prevent their children from accessing inappropriate content. Other missing ease of use features, like a "Play from Beginning" button, would certainly be welcome too.

Ads on the free plan are mostly non-intrusive and NBCUniversal has promised no more than five minutes of commercials per hour you spend watching Peacock. The service also has a built-in feature to prevent the same ads from playing during every commercial break.

Peacock is available on most devices, except for Roku and Amazon Fire TV

Maskot/Getty Images

Peacock's streaming app is available on Vizio and LG smart TVs, as well as iOS and Android mobile devices, Android TV, Xbox One, and Chromecast. The service is also available through its official website, PeacockTV.com.

The Peacock app is currently unavailable on Amazon Fire TV and Roku devices. You can browse a full list of supported devices here.

Peacock doesn't offer support for 4K, HDR video, or Dolby Atmos sound. This is disappointing since all of these features are offered by Netflix, Disney Plus, and Amazon Prime Video.

The bottom line

Peacock's huge library of free content is appealing, but the lack of recent movies and the limits of NBC's catalog make Peacock Premium seem like an unnecessary expense. Longtime fans of the NBC shows will be satisfied with their new streaming home but Peacock doesn't feel like much of a competitor to Netflix, Hulu, or even the recently launched HBO Max.

Perhaps Peacock Premium will offer more value when "The Office" and Universal's new slate of movies arrive on the service in 2021, but until then, it's another addition to the increasingly crowded dashboard on my Smart TV, and yet another constantly changing streaming library I'll have to keep track of.

Pros: Tons of movies and shows available for free with commercials, commercials are limited to five minutes per hour watching, lots of classic films

Cons: Premium offerings aren't very exciting, $4.99 subscription plan still has ads, missing a bunch of popular Universal movies released between 2013 and 2019, it's unclear how often popular franchises will leave or be added to Peacock

Original author: Kevin Webb

Continue reading
  28 Hits
Aug
08

The new wave of Brazilian SaaS innovators

When you buy through our links, we may earn money from our affiliate partners. Learn more.

A Nintendo Switch surrounded by a NES (Nintendo Entertainment System) Classic Mini (left) and a SNES (Super Nintendo Entertainment System) Classic Mini (right) video game consoles. Guillaume Payen/SOPA Images/Getty Images New and returning college students who are preparing to move into dorms or apartments will soon be in need of home entertainment products to fill their living spaces.Thankfully, there are plenty of compact TVs, soundbars, and media devices that are ideal for smaller rooms. From a 32-inch smart TV to a space-saving smart speaker, we've put together a handy list of compact home entertainment recommendations for college students heading back to school.

Despite a shift toward virtual learning and some continued uncertainty surrounding campus openings, many college students will soon be returning to or moving into dorm rooms and apartments. Though these spaces tend to be on the small side, that doesn't mean students can't enjoy an immersive home entertainment experience. 

Home theaters are typically thought of as space hogs, but it's actually possible to build a compact home entertainment setup in a dorm or apartment. With the right gear, you can even enjoy advanced video and audio formats, like HDR and Dolby Atmos, without needing a massive display or a room full of surround sound speakers.

Below, we've selected the best home entertainment products for dorms and smaller apartments, including compact TVs, soundbars, a streaming stick, a game console, and a smart speaker. Whether you're looking to buy that special college student in your life a gift or you're a student yourself searching for tech recommendations, these picks will help turn any small living space into an immersive entertainment center.

Original author: Steven Cohen

Continue reading
  24 Hits
Aug
09

Health startup Buoy raises $6.7 million to invest in recruitment and research

Ford's long-awaited new Bronco is a hit. Hours after its debut last week, a deluge of customers trying to put down $100 reservation briefly crashed Ford's website.

The new family of four-by-four SUVs is being offered in a trio of trims, with a wide range of available packages. One of those — the "First Edition" — was initially planned for 3,500 units, but according to Road & Track, Ford doubled that number.

Ford said that all First Edition reservations have been taken, but you can always configure another trim level. Business Insider's Kristen Lee has provided a helpful guide.

At any rate, here's a closer look at the Bronco First Edition, now one of the most exclusive new Fords:

Original author: Matthew DeBord

Continue reading
  26 Hits
Aug
30

Capital Efficient Entrepreneurship: Ephesoft Founder Ike Kavas (Part 3) - Sramana Mitra

New Zealand company Edge Innovations developed animatronic dolphins to be used in aquariums.The robots are remote controlled and could be used in place of captive dolphins.One dolphin robot could cost $26 million. Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Aquariums could soon be home to animatronic dolphins, and visitors might not even know the difference right away.

Edge Innovations, a company in New Zealand, is combining artificial intelligence and animatronics to foster a human zoo or aquarium experience. "The marine park industry has had falling revenues for over a decade due to ethical concerns and the cost of live animals, yet the public hunger to learn about and experience these animals is still as strong as ever," designer Roger Holzberg told The Guardian.

Visiting a marine park and seeing shows with live dolphins can be exciting and educational for people, but detrimental to the animals' health. So, Edge Innovations enlisted American designers, including Walt Disney Company alums and Walt Conti, the designer behind Free Willy. 

Animatronic dolphin. Edge Innovations

Robotic dolphins aren't cheap — they will likely run about $26 million each, according to The Guardian. Edge Innovation claims that they will last longer, and they don't have the same maintenance requirements as large ocean mammals. The animatronics will be "sustainable, safe, and profitable" according to promotional materials.

Animatronic dolphin. Edge Innovations

Not only will these robots provide a more humane way to have the experience of interacting with sea creatures, the company sees a future for the animatronics beyond aquariums. Edge Innovation's website suggests hotels, cruises, malls, and museums as other potential venues, and they don't plan to just stop with dolphins. The website mentions great white sharks and sea dragons as other options in the future. 

Animatronic dolphin. Edge Innovations

The animatronic dolphins are shockingly realistic, and could easily be mistaken for the real thing. They weigh nearly 600 pounds each. In fact, making them indistinguishable from real dolphins was one of the conditions for investment in the project. An audience was unable to recognize that they were robotic, according to the Guardian. 

Animatronic dolphin. Edge Innovations

The robots are remote-controlled and can last up to ten hours on a single charge.  They're being developed for a new aquarium in China, although they could eventually show up in all other kinds of settings. 

Original author: Mary Meisenzahl

Continue reading
  28 Hits
Aug
30

Billion Dollar Unicorns: Newly Public Redfin Wants to be the Amazon of Real Estate - Sramana Mitra

Microsoft reported fourth-quarter and full fiscal year earnings at market close on Wednesday, beating Wall Street estimates on the top and bottom lines. Microsoft continued to see strong growth in businesses like Office 365, Microsoft Azure, Windows, and Xbox, as stay-at-home orders nationwide lead to heightened demand for both remote work tools and video games.
For the first time, Microsoft posted $50 billion in annualized recurring revenue for its commercial cloud business, which includes sales of Microsoft Office and Azure to businesses.However, its Office and Windows businesses were hurt by a slowdown in transactional licensing to small and mid-sized businesses, Microsoft said.The stock is trading down over 2% at the time of publication.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Microsoft reported earnings for its fiscal fourth quarter and the full 2020 fiscal year earnings at market close on Wednesday, beating analyst expectations for overall results but missing estimates on a key business unit including its Office products.

Here's what the company reported for Q4 2020:

Revenue: $38 billion (Wall Street expected $36.5 billion), compared to $33.7 billion in the same quarter last year.Earnings: $1.46 per share, compared to analysts' estimate of $1.37 per share.Profit: $11.2 billion, down 15%

Here's what the company reported for its fiscal year 2020:

Revenue: $143 billion, up 14%Earnings: $5.76 per share, up 14%Profit: $44.3 billion, up 13%

Shares are down more than 2% in after-hour trading to less than $206 per share following the release.

While the company beat on many of its most important metrics for the fourth quarter, it did notably miss expectations on the key business unit that includes Office 365 cloud productivity suite and its Microsoft Teams communications app.

The unit — which is called "Productivity and Business Processes" and includes Office products for businesses and customers, LinkedIn revenue and Dynamics products and cloud services — reached $11.75 billion in Q4, missing estimates of $11.9 billion. 

For the second quarter in a row, Microsoft said it experienced a slowdown in transactional licensing, especially for small and medium businesses. Microsoft said the slowdown contributed to a 34 percent decline in revenue for Office products used by businesses, "reflecting continued customer shift to cloud offerings from multi-year on-premises agreements." Transactional licensing refers to the traditional, one-time purchase model of buying software.

Microsoft's "Intelligent Cloud" business, which includes Azure, server products, enterprise and cloud services, brought in $13.37 billion in Q4 revenue, slightly beating analyst expectations. Microsoft doesn't report revenue figures for its Azure cloud computing business, but said revenue grew 47% from the same period of 2019 — a notable dropoff from the 59% growth rate it posted in the prior quarter, and 62% in the quarter before that.

Revenue for the business unit Microsoft calls the "More Personal Computing," unit which includes Windows, search, Xbox and Surface, was $12.9 billion in Q4, up 14% from this time last year.

Meanwhile, Microsoft said its commercial cloud business  – which includes Microsoft Azure, Office 365 and other cloud services – surpassed a $50 billion annualized run rate for the first time this year.

While the pandemic has created challenges for many companies, including the smaller partners Microsoft relies on to sell its software and services, the shift to remote work has been a considered boost to the overall company, as users turn to products like the Microsoft Teams chat app and the Microsoft Azure cloud.

Microsoft last week cut a small number of jobs as it transitioned to the new fiscal year. One person familiar with the situation told Business Insider the cuts affected less than 1,000 jobs. Microsoft's professional social network subsidiary LinkedIn on Tuesday announced plans to cut an additional 960 jobs.

Microsoft also made significant changes last month by announcing plans to shut down its video game streaming service would be shut down and plans to close of most of its retail stores. Those moves, analysts say, signal CEO Satya Nadella's strategy to ruthlessly prioritize Microsoft's strengths and cut its losses in other areas. 

Got a tip? Contact this reporter via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., message her on Twitter @ashannstew, or send her a secure message through Signal at 425-344-8242.

Original author: Ashley Stewart

Continue reading
  24 Hits
Nov
23

These are the best deals airlines are offering for Black Friday

Kevin Henderson Contributor
Kevin Henderson is founder and CEO of Indenseo, a data and analytics software automation company empowering the insurance industry to change how it assesses risk.

I have struggled for years about whether or not to write a piece like this.

Speaking out about racism goes against every lesson I have learned since I was the only Black kid in my first-grade class in the Boston suburbs:

Save candid conversations about race for Black people. You’re being a victim. People will think you’re whining or making excuses. They’re not interested. Don’t make white people feel uncomfortable.

In a professional environment, speaking up could be career suicide. But now is not the time to be silent.

The startup I founded, Indenseo, is a data and analytics software insurtech company that provides automated underwriting services, software and analytics services to the insurance industry.

Despite strong customer relationships and support from angel investors, we didn’t complete building solutions and moving the company forward until we stopped taking unproductive pitch meetings with VCs. Some of my [white] colleagues who attended those meetings characterized these encounters as disrespectful and dismissive, but for me, they were par for the course.

Black founders have a better chance playing pro sports than landing VC funding

I was raised by a single mother in West Medford, Massachusetts, and worked my way through Harvard, located about five miles away. Before starting Indenseo, I worked for @Road, a fleet management telematics company that was acquired by Trimble, a company that says it transforms “the way the world works by delivering products and services that connect the physical and digital worlds.” There, I led a team that pioneered the sale of telematics data, which started with using data for traffic predictions and expanded to other markets, including insurance.

At Trimble, I saw the difficulty legacy insurance carriers faced when they tried to incorporate new types of data into their underwriting and business processes; I started Indenseo to solve this problem by combining deep insurance industry experience with the nimbleness of a startup.

I knew fundraising would be a challenge: Commercial auto insurance has been unprofitable for years, and industry executives would be naturally skeptical that my solution would make it better. As my insurance industry friends said, “you sure picked a hard problem to solve.”

Even as a first-time founder, I did not anticipate how difficult it would be to raise venture funding, but the experience offered some insights into why so few Black entrepreneurs are funded by VCs.

Insurance is not the most mainstream venture category, though in recent years many insurtech companies have received funding. And VCs are not accustomed to seeing Black founders in this space. The overall scarcity of Black founders suggests that they’re not used to seeing many of us, period.

The odds of winning a venture round are low for everyone, but Black founders have a better chance playing pro sports than they do landing venture investments.

The odds of winning a venture round are low for everyone, but Black founders have a better chance playing pro sports than they do landing venture investments.

According to a Harvard study, between 1990 and 2016, just 0.4% of the entrepreneurs who received funding were Black. That’s 188 Black entrepreneurs, versus 34,000 white entrepreneurs in total, or about seven per year. In 2016, nine Black NFL quarterbacks started at least one game during the season. Should anyone wonder why ambitious young Black men pursue sports careers?

I got the meetings and pitched Indenseo to investors in Silicon Valley, New York City, Chicago and Boston. I expected that my experience, my best-in-class team, the compelling Indeseo proposition, market fit, and the financial and advisory backing of notable insurance executives would land the dollars, despite the odds. I was wrong.

One recurring phenomenon we frequently encountered were dismissive and disrespectful investors (in the words of a white colleague). When I had one disappointing meeting after another, people in my multiracial network — many with extensive fundraising experience — told me it didn’t make sense. I’d resisted getting distracted by race as a factor, but white colleagues were saying that something wasn’t adding up.

As Toni Morrison said, “The very serious function of racism is distraction. It keeps you from doing your work.” My own lived experience is that it’s an added factor that Black entrepreneurs have to manage.

I assumed most investors were jerks, but my white colleagues were shocked

I followed advice given to many Black founders: take a white colleague to your pitch meeting. I brought colleagues who had done a lot of fundraising themselves; some of these meetings were with their contacts. I tried this strategy dozens of times, and my colleagues were repeatedly shocked at the treatment we received.

I assumed most investors were jerks in pitch meetings, but they told me the level of disrespect and dismissiveness I received was not typical.

But if I lose my temper, I’d likely be labeled as just another angry Black man.

I did let my frustration show once when I directed a VC’s attention to the milestones we’d met and industry support we had gathered.

“What does it take for us to get a check from you?” I asked. His response: There is nothing you can say or do to get me to invest, but if you get another VC to lead the round, call me.

In another conversation with a VC, I pointed out the lack of diversity in both the ranks of investors and the entrepreneurs they choose to fund. He replied that Silicon Valley has produced the greatest accumulation of wealth in human history in the last 25 years. Why do we need to change anything?

GW Chew is a friend and a Black founder who was also having difficulty getting VC funding for his vegan meat company, Something Better Foods. He approached investors to raise funds to meet the fast expanding demand for his products. Talk about traction.

A white investor told Chew that if the founder/CEO were white, the company would have raised millions already. My friend told me he’s no longer talking to VCs and is raising funds from alternative sources.

Then there are the grifters. I don’t think Black founders are the only ones whose ideas get stolen after pitch meetings, but it happened to me.

We pitched a VC firm that had a consultant with an insurance background on their team to help evaluate the Indenseo opportunity. VCs don’t sign NDAs, but we did sign one with the consultant, who said Black founders can’t get companies funded but white founders can. (Yes, he said it.)

He later tried to ingratiate himself by saying he was considering investing too. Instead, he founded a company that copied our ideas. (So much for our NDA.)

Eventually, he told me, “I like your team. Call me when the wheels fall off.” When he announced his new company, we saw that he was backed by the VC who brought him into our meeting. He has since gone on to raise more than $40 million.

So why didn’t I sue him for violating the NDA? I consulted with some of our angel investors and they said we would be better off fighting them in the marketplace, given our limited time and resources. It wasn’t the first time our ideas were stolen.

When another company we pitched appropriated some of our ideas, my contact there informed his executives that they’d signed an NDA with Indenseo. Their reply: Indenseo doesn’t have the money to sue us. But they weren’t domain experts and we had left out much about our plans: They announced their launch in The Wall Street Journal, but as I expected, they failed.

I’ve never pitched at a VC firm that had a Black person in the room

Am I calling VCs racists? I don’t know what’s in their hearts, but I do know what’s in their numbers. Dealing with unconscious bias is difficult because as a Black entrepreneur trying to build a company, you know it exists and you have to figure out a way to manage around it. But it’s a subtle problem.

I don’t think VCs wake up in the morning and consciously decide not to invest in Black entrepreneurs or businesses intentionally choose not to buy from companies founded by Black entrepreneurs. But, the results of who receives investment and who doesn’t are quantifiable: few VC funds have Black employees or invest in companies started by Black founders.

I have never pitched at a VC firm that had a Black person in the room. And the pipeline excuse doesn’t work. There are Black people with technical degrees who aren’t hired at VC firms and white VC investment partners who earned liberal arts degrees.

Sure, there are funds started by Black VCs, but they encounter unconscious bias too when raising money. While more Black VCs with more capital is a crucial element of addressing underrepresentation, does that mean VC firms that aren’t founded by Black investors don’t have to change anything?

Deciding to stop the time-consuming VC pitch process and go in another direction to fund and develop the company was quite liberating. Moving forward, we’re free to manage our startup without wondering how VCs will view our decisions in the future when we seek funding.

We raised money from angel investors (including the former CEO of one of the world’s leading analytics software companies and his wife). In addition to money, it expanded our knowledge and it improved our products. Another lesson learned: Angel investors may be more helpful to your company than VCs.

The ultimate judgment on Indenseo’s products and team will be rendered by customers, partners and domain experts. The insurance industry has unique metrics that determine a company’s profitability. If you’re selling analytics software and services, either your solution is helping improve those metrics or it isn’t. The insurance industry is validating our market fit and survival skills.

Don’t let VCs be the gatekeepers of your success

I was able to build Indenseo without VCs because the insurance industry operates differently from VCs. One of the keys to success in the insurance industry is developing trust. Insurance isn’t a tangible product. It offers the promise that when a customer pays its premiums the insurance company will be able to support them when they file a claim. Without trust, a company can’t succeed in the industry.

There is a process to get insurance industry trust, and many senior executives in the industry are reluctant to invest the time in startups that’s necessary for them to get that trust. That’s because they aren’t convinced the startup will persevere to get through the process of getting that trust. We are able to get time with those executives because they trust our team and they don’t doubt that it’s worth their time to talk to Indenseo. They know we won’t fold when times are difficult.

A change I’ve seen since I started Indenseo that works in our favor is insurers don’t rely on VCs to act as a de facto screen for which insurtechs have the best teams and solutions. That’s because they don’t have confidence in investors’ judgments about insurtech companies.

Another lesson I’ve learned from my experiences: Don’t let VCs be the gatekeepers of your success. There are other funding sources, such as angel investors, corporate strategic investors, crowdfunding and more. There is funding outside the United States. Don’t overlook international investors: There is wealth in African countries. I found a way of funding the company that works for Indenseo.

We’ve developed Indenseo with angel investors and sweat equity. The key to our success is the amazing team, our advisory board and using capital efficiently. They remind me that you’re not the only one with an emotional investment in this company. When I started this company the only people in the insurance industry I knew were the people I had interacted with when I worked at Trimble.

Most of the people on our advisory board and team with insurance industry backgrounds are people I’ve met since I started Indenseo. It takes time to build those relationships. Because of them there is no corner of the commercial property casualty insurance industry we can’t access. The head of insurtech at a global reinsurance company told me that ours is the best balanced team of any insurtech company they’ve seen.

We are in the early stages of showing our flagship product, and it isn’t available for general release yet. Our VP of Engineering is telling me about a new concern: that we don’t take on too many customers too quickly.

Continue reading
  36 Hits
Aug
31

People Are The Price of Admission

Amazon is now letting sellers to choose a marketplace in Sweden when they register for Brand Registry, in trademark protection tool.It's the latest sign that Amazon is close to launching a new marketplace in Sweden.The marketplace in Sweden would be Amazon's third to launch this year, and bring its total number of marketplaces to 18 worldwide.Amazon's international sales have slowed in recent years, despite having invested billions of dollars in overseas markets.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Amazon appears to be nearing the launch of a new marketplace in Sweden, a move that signals its commitment to international markets even amid slowing growth.

The new marketplace in Sweden would be Amazon's third overseas service to launch this year, following the ones in the Netherlands and Saudi Arabia. Amazon has 17 total marketplaces worldwide, but the bulk of its sales, or over 70%, comes from the US.

Amazon recently added the option to sign up for a marketplace in Sweden when sellers sign up for Brand Registry, Amazon's own trademark registration tool, according to a screenshot seen by Business Insider. The option appears in a section asking sellers to choose the "country-specific marketplace" they want to sign in to. Sellers use Brand Registry for each individual country marketplace they intend to sell in to prove ownership of their brands and prevent counterfeits.

Amazon started showing the option to choose Sweden's marketplace in Brand Registry, its trademark protection service Rasmus Dines Petersen/Agenturium

The move is likely intended to give enough time for sellers to register their brands on Brand Registry ahead of the Swedish launch, according to Rasmus Dines Petersen, CEO of Agenturium, a Denmark-based company that helps Amazon sellers. That way, sellers would feel safer when the marketplace actually launches, he said. Amazon has also purchased the domain amazon.se in 2017 and has hired a number of translation positions in Sweden this year, according to Petersen, who first spotted the change.

"That you are able to register your brand on Amazon Brand Registry Sweden is clearly an indication saying Amazon is on its way to Scandinavia," Petersen told Business Insider.

The Swedish marketplace would make sense for Amazon given the lack of a dominant online shopping service in the country, despite having high e-commerce penetration, Petersen said. The country's strong purchasing power and wide internet usage rates are also a plus. On top of that, establishing a presence in Sweden could make it easier for Amazon to launch in other neighboring countries, like Denmark and Norway, he said.

Amazon's spokesperson declined to comment.

Amazon's international sales growth hasn't been as impressive lately, despite having poured billions of dollars in overseas markets. In 2019, international sales grew just 13% from the year before to $74.7 billion, down from the previous year's 21% growth rate and the 23% expansion seen in 2017. 

The sales growth bounced back in the first quarter of 2020 to 18%, but international sales still accounted for just 29.3% of Amazon's total revenue, the smallest share ever, according to Marketplace Pulse.

Still, Amazon continues to be doubling down on international markets. Earlier this year, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos pledged to invest an additional $1 billion in India, after having spent roughly $7 billion in the region previously. Last year, Amazon launched new marketplaces in the UAE and Singapore, but shuttered its service in China.

Of the 17 Amazon marketplaces globally, the US service is the largest with over $170 billion in revenue last year. But the UK, German, and Japanese businesses are also big enough to require separate revenue disclosures. 

Original author: Eugene Kim

Continue reading
  22 Hits
Nov
23

Everyone spent their Thanksgiving dinner shopping on their iPhones under the table — and it's great news for retailers like Walmart and Target

Glimpse is giving Airbnb hosts a way to make extra money while also supplying their accommodations with new products.

The startup was founded by CEO Akash Raju, COO Anuj Mehta and CPO Kushal Negi, who all attended Purdue University together. It’s part of the current batch of startups at accelerator Y Combinator — where, coincidentally or not, Airbnb is the most famous alum.

Raju said that he and his co-founders came up with the idea while they were still in school and working with brands to create pop-up shops on campus. They realized that many new, direct-to-consumer brands are looking to increase awareness, and they decided that Airbnbs were the perfect place to convince someone to try (for example) a new mattress or a new kind of coffee. After all, hotels are already in the product placement business.

If you’re an Airbnb host, you can sign up and then browse offers for free product samples. (If you really want to stock up, you can buy larger quantities at a discounted price.)

Glimpse works with you to showcase the products on your properties, and to email a digital “lookbook” highlighting the various products to guests at the beginning and end of their stay. You then earn a commission fee (Raju said $100 to $500 on average, though it can be even higher for big-ticket items) when these samples lead consumers to make a purchase.

Glimpse founders

Brands that have marketed themselves through the platform include the GhostBed mattress and Liquid Death water.

The startup first launched in March of this year — not exactly the best time for the travel business. Raju recalled, “We actually launched right before COVID started. After that, what we really spent a lot of time on was empathizing with hosts.”

In fact, some of Glimpse’s early partners stopped listing their properties for a while. But travel is on the rise again, including (or even especially) via Airbnb, and Raju said many of Glimpse’s 750 current properties are now fully booked through September. And given the lost income of the past few months, hosts might be even more interested than usual.

He added that the team will continue building out the platform with new features for product discovery and attribution, but he said, “The key thing that makes us unique is our emphasis on that in-home experience.”

Continue reading
  37 Hits