Mar
06

Thought Leaders in Cyber Security: Node International CEO Neil Gurnhill (Part 4) - Sramana Mitra

Larry Page and Sergey Brin. REUTERS/Jacob Silberberg

Good morning! This is the tech news you need to know this Monday.

The US Navy banned TikTok from government-issued mobile devices, citing a 'cybersecurity threat.' Pentagon spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Uriah Orland said in a statement the order was part of an effort to "address existing and emerging threats".Facebook says it removed fake accounts linked to a pro-Trump media outlet known to push conspiracy theories. The accounts pushed "anti-impeachment" and "pro-Trump" messages with AI-generated faces atop their profiles.The Securities and Exchange Commission is reportedly investigating the listings of a number of tech unicorns that went public on the New York Stock Exchange in the last few years, including Slack. The probe is focusing in particular on how trading was handled on the first day these companies went public.
After two years of unrest and employee protests inside Google, the sudden departure of founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin has elicited a surprisingly passive, almost apathetic reaction within the company. That's according to current Googlers, who said the changeover felt anticlimactic.
An app developer is accusing Apple of quietly changing the way it ranks apps in the App Store, further fueling concerns about the influence of big tech companies. The company, Blix, says in new court filings that it had discovered evidence showing that Apple had altered the rankings of apps in its App Store.
Vision Fund chief executive Rajeev Misra defended chief financial officer Navneet Govil and managing partner Jeff Housenbold after a blistering Bloomberg Businessweek report about the allegedly macho culture of the fund. Misra wrote that the report contained "unsubstantiated and reckless personal attacks on our employees," and that the firm is "taking the appropriate next steps, including potential legal action."
Leading experts in the UK tech scene told Business Insider that London was "overcrowded" with too many accelerators producing too few successful companies. More than 150 accelerators currently operate in the UK, a figure that has increased tenfold over the past decade. 
The forgotten 'third founder' of Google is fighting a fierce legal battle against his wife, who says he purposely sold his startup in a 'fire sale' amid their divorce. Huynh, herself an entrepreneur who witnessed the early days of Google, is accusing Hassan of trying to sell their robotics startup called Suitable Technologies at a stunningly low price for a huge tax write-off and huge savings in his personal income taxes.
Publicis' ambitious AI project Marcel has been hit by delays and technical difficulties, costing up to $40 million and requiring the help of Google and Microsoft. Insiders estimate the AI, intended to make agency staff more collaborative, now won't launch until 2020.San Francisco has amended its law banning facial recognition to now allow Face ID on iPhones. Originally, the ban meant the facial recognition unlock feature was illegal — even if it was switched off.

Have an Amazon Alexa device? Now you can hear 10 Things in Tech each morning. Just search for "Business Insider" in your Alexa's flash briefing settings.

You can also subscribe to this newsletter here — just tick "10 Things in Tech You Need to Know.

Original author: Shona Ghosh

Continue reading
  110 Hits
Apr
05

Lauren Sanchez has reportedly filed for divorce from her husband a day after Jeff and MacKenzie Bezos finalized the terms of their divorce

"Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker" earned an estimated $176 million at the domestic box office this weekend.That figure marks the third-best opening of the year.It is also the third-best opening for the month of December, below the openings of the previous "Star Wars" films "The Last Jedi" and "The Force Awakens."Though the opening is a huge figure, for the "Star Wars" saga it is underwhelming and is another indication audiences may be tiring with the franchise."Cats" took in only $6.5 million domestically.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Though "Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker" may have one of the worst Rotten Tomatoes scores in the franchise (57%), and CinemaScore, which surveys opening-weekend moviegoers, gave the movie a B-plus score (the first time a "Star Wars" movie didn't score an A), the movie is still dominating the box office.

"The Rise of Skywalker" brought in an estimated $176 million over the weekend at the domestic box office, good enough for the third-best opening of the year, behind the fellow Disney titles "The Lion King" ($191.7 million) and "Avengers: Endgame" ($357.1 million).

It is also the third-best opening for a December release. Ahead of it are the two other Disney releases in the Skywalker saga, "The Last Jedi" ($220 million) and "The Force Awakens" ($247.9 million).

Any studio would love to have a movie bring in the coin "Rise of Skywalker" did this weekend, but things are a little different when you look at a Disney release, especially from the "Star Wars" franchise.

Lucasfilm clearly felt the best way to close things out with the Skywalkers was to have a movie that basically answered every question fans had been asking since 2015's "Force Awakens." It even brought back that movie's director, JJ Abrams, for the final chapter. But the reaction seems to have fans torn. They certainly are going to see the movie, but some are leaving dissatisfied.

Disney Disney CEO Bob Iger has already addressed the sobering idea that "Star Wars" fans are getting burnt out. Since "The Force Awakens" there has been a "Star Wars" movie released every year ("Rogue One" in 2016, "The Last Jedi" in 2017, "Solo" in 2018, and "Rise of Skywalker" in 2019), both Disneyland and Disney World opened "Star Wars"-themed sections, and when Disney Plus launched, its standout original show was a "Star Wars" property, "The Mandalorian."

On top of that, the drama behind the scenes has been well publicized. There were the drastic reshoots for "Rogue One" that had the director Gareth Edwards hand over the movie to another filmmaker, Tony Gilroy. The original directors for "Solo," Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, were fired. The original director of "The Rise of Skywalker," Colin Trevorrow, left the project over creative differences (opening the door for Abrams' return). And most recently, the showrunners of "Game of Thrones," David Benioff and DB Weiss, walked away from creating a new trilogy for the franchise reportedly over the toxic fan base. Oh, and don't bother asking the "Last Jedi" director, Rian Johnson, about the status of his previously planned trilogy.

This has all led to "Star Wars" disfunction, which "Rise of Skywalker" had to walk right into.

The movie had the fifth-best Thursday preview-screenings take ever, with $40 million, and then had a $90 million opening day, sixth best of all time. But it did all this on 4,406 screens, more than "The Last Jedi" (4,232) or "The Force Awakens" (4,134).

Globally, the movie has a $373.5 million take, with $198 million coming from the international box office.

Both "Solo" and "The Last Jedi" had a second-weekend dip of over 65% at the domestic box office. But the results were very different as "The Last Jedi" went on to earn $620.1 million domestically (over $1 billion worldwide) and a year later "Solo" finished with $213.7 million domestic ($392.9 million worldwide). The box-office finish of "Rise of Skywalker" might predict how long the hiatus will be until we see another "Star Wars" in theaters.

"Cats." Universal The big-screen adaptation of the Broadway hit "Cats," from Universal, Amblin, and Working Title, had a disastrous opening, with the movie taking in just $6.5 million domestically on 3,380 screens. It's below the industry projection of $15 million. The global total is $10.9 million.Sony's "Jumanji: The Next Level" brought in $26.1 million, giving the movie a domestic total of $101.9 million in its second weekend in theaters (it has a worldwide total of $312 million). This will be the fiercest competition for "Rise of Skywalker" at the box office through the new year.
Original author: Jason Guerrasio

Continue reading
  83 Hits
May
28

E3 2021 news, Switch Pro rumors, and more | GB Decides 198

Hello! 

Welcome to your weekly fix of Business Insider's Prime stories.

I'm Cadie Thompson, Business Insider's deputy executive editor, and I'm helping fill in while Matt Turner is on paternity leave. 

This will be our last newsletter for 2019, as we will be taking next Sunday off. With that in mind, we'd just like to say thank you for being a loyal Prime member and we can't wait to do 2020 with you. 

Bracing for 2020

The year is coming to a close, which means it's time to start planning for the year ahead. Fortunately, we've got some stories to help you do just that. 

Are you wondering what the stock market will do in 2020 and where you should put your money? Akin Oyedele spoke with 14 top Wall Street experts to find out. 

Oyedele also got seven top-performing investors to reveal their best ideas for the new year. 

We've also got heaps of industry predictions for you, including what VC's foresee being the biggest media and healthcare trends in 2020. 

And if you are looking for a new job opportunity in the new year, we've got you covered. Dominick Reuter and Jennifer Ortakales put together a list of the 10 best industries for entrepreneurs to start million-dollar businesses and our tech enterprise team has compiled 47 enterprise startups to bet your career on in 2020.  We also got ex-McKinsey employees to tell us how to get onto the partner track and make millions of dollars. 

And if you are just starting off in your career, you should definitely check out Ashley Rodriguez's breakdown of the best Netflix teams and roles for recent college grads.

Googlers don't seem to care that Larry and Sergey stepped down

Google insiders are seemingly shrugging off Larry Page and Sergey Brin stepping down as CEO and President. Employees also don't seem to be that enthused about Sundar Pichai getting promoted to the top spot at Alphabet. 

Current and former workers told Business Insider that Page and Brin have been checked out for some time, so the changes just seem like the natural progression at this point. 

"It feels anticlimactic," a current worker told Business Insider's Rob Price and Allana Akhtar. "I haven't seen anything outside of Sundar being in charge of things … internally, it seems as though that's already the level at which he was mostly operating."

FedEx takes a beating while Amazon gets vengeance

FedEx had a rough week.

On Sunday, Amazon announced third-party sellers could not use FedEx's Ground and Home shipping for Prime services. The logistic company's stock took a hit on the news. 

The move comes after FedEx ditched Amazon twice this year. First, in June when FedEx Express cut its US business with Amazon, and then in August when FedEx Ground followed suit.

To make matters worse for FedEx, the company reported disappointing earnings on Thursday which were described in a note by Deutsche Bank's Amit Mehrotra as "breathtakingly bad." The numbers were so bad in fact, that by Friday morning some $3.5 billion of the company's market value had been wiped out. 

Amazon dropping FedEx right before Christmas and right before the company's earnings was brilliant timing, experts told Business Insider's Rachel Premack. 

"FedEx broke up with Amazon and Amazon is now giving them a stick in the eye," Sterling said. 

Finance and Investing

This year's unicorn IPO flops exposed a culture clash between private and public markets, and a top tech banker warns that the growth-at-all-costs mentality won't cut it anymore

The bar has been raised for startups looking to go public, according to LionTree founder Aryeh Bourkoff.

We got a firsthand look at the tech used at SoftBank-backed real-estate brokerage Compass, including a sneak peek at beta features

Compass New York regional manager Rory Golod gave us a look at how exactly its platform works. 

Charles Schwab's charitable giving arm just got dragged into the college-admissions scandal

Bill McGlashan, the founder and former managing partner of the high-profile private-equity firm TPG Growth, said in a court filing on Wednesday that it was through Schwab's charitable business that he made a donation to the college-admissions scandal mastermind Rick Singer.

There's a huge reorg underway at M Science, the pioneer alt-data seller owned by Jefferies. It's shaking up its executive ranks and sales team, and cutting data-scientist jobs.

The company has cut several people from its 20-person data-science team, several sources said, including Dipanjan Sen, who was the data-science team lead and a former data scientist at Peter Thiel's Palantir.

Tech, Media, Telecoms 

Google's head of talent says that the tech giant is hiring for collaboration — here's how she screens for team players

Kyle Ewing, Google's head of talent and a 13-year company veteran, told Business Insider that she values humility in job candidates.

Andreessen Horowitz-backed Wonderschool is cutting 25% of its staff, and some employees say it's a 'desperate' attempt to juice its business for investors

The job cuts affected 18 employees, our sources said, and about half of them worked in operations — an umbrella organization that's tasked with adding new childcare providers as partners, offering customer support to parents, and growing the company in new markets.

A tech investor whose firm made early bets on Facebook and Instagram explains TikTok's superpower

Connie Chan, a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz, believes TikTok has one key advantage over its competition: an ever-growing library of delightful content.

2019 was a tumultuous year for the media industry, with 7,800 jobs slashed and billions in value erased. Here are the biggest winners and losers.

In one of the year's biggest deals, Vice Media acquired Refinery29, a company that had raised $133 million, for mostly stock. Group Nine Media also acquired the fellow millennial media company PopSugar in a stock deal.

3 YouTube influencers who made over $20,000 from a single video explain how — and it's not just about view count

How much money a creator on YouTube will earn from a single video varies depending on a number of factors. And getting a lot of views — even millions of them — doesn't always guarantee a huge payday.

Health, Retail, Transportation 

5 top cannabis VCs told us where they plan to place their bets, from scooping up distressed assets to the emergence of new markets in Germany and China

Morgan Paxhia, a cofounding partner of Poseidon Asset Management, says next year will be the "ending of a period of recalibration" for the cannabis industry.

2019 was the year the cannabis bubble burst. We talked to more than a dozen top cannabis execs about what's next.

For the companies that survive, this era of crashing stock prices will be seen as a small blip on the path to global domination, insiders said.  

Here's how a 'shoetuber' with over 500,000 subscribers earns thousands of dollars a month making YouTube videos about how to resell sneakers

Reselling sneakers can be profitable on its own. But there's a whole wave of sneakerheads who have figured out how to use YouTube to make even more.

The parent company of Taco Bell, KFC, and Pizza Hut is increasingly likely to acquire more chains, and it reveals a massive shift in the fast-food industry

Yum Brands' David Gibbs told Business Insider that the "restaurant industry is becoming all about scale."

Leaked Amazon data reveals the salaries for 168 truck drivers roles nationwide — explore the full spreadsheet on the burgeoning transportation giant

Amazon is revolutionizing one of the most entrenched practices in the long-haul trucking industry: paying per mile.

Lime has lost another communications executive amid continued management turnover at the scooter startup

Paloma Castro Martinez is no longer Lime's head of international communications according to her LinkedIn profile, marking yet another departure at in a year that's been marked by executive turnover for the firm. 

One more thing...

We're hosting an event focused on the future of retail in New York City on Tuesday, January 14.  From the rise of direct-to-consumer brands to sustainable fashion, the future of retail is all about connecting with customer passions and values. Join us for a series of conversations with retail entrepreneurs and experts to discuss industry strategies and innovations, and investment opportunities that these innovations create.

Speakers will include Layla Amjadi, Product Manager, Instagram Shopping, Michelle Cordeiro Grant, Founder & CEO, LIVELY, Jack Forestell, Chief Product Officer, Visa; Arpan Podduturi, Director of Product, Shopify; Geoff Ramsey, Co-Founder and Chief Evangelist, eMarketer; Anushka Salinas, Chief Operating Officer, Rent the Runway; and Maggie Winter, Co-Founder and CEO, AYR.

Click here for more information and to apply to attend.

Original author: Cadie Thompson

Continue reading
  79 Hits
Dec
22

The chief executive of the largest clean tech incubator in North America reveals the 3 things that startups need to survive

Emily Reichert is the CEO of the Boston-based Greentown Labs, the largest clean-tech incubator in North America. More than 230 startups have been in the program, including Bevi, Malta, and Sense.Since the clean-tech bust in the late 2000s, investors have been reluctant to fund startups in the industry. Yet under Reichert's leadership, Greentown Labs' companies have had a survival rate of 88% and gone on to raise more than $750 million.Reichert says there are three things that successful startups need to survive, other than capital. These include a tight product-market fit, strong industry partnerships, and team diversity.Do you want more stories about the future of energy? Let us know. Please send story feedback and tips to this reporter at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..Click here for more BI Prime articles.

Around 2008, Silicon Valley declared clean tech dead. Poor investments coupled with coalescing financial forces led to weak returns.

While the industry is starting to bounce back, progress has been slow. That's according to Emily Reichert, the CEO of Greentown Labs. There's a persistent mentality, she says, that "clean tech is not a good place to invest."

That makes Reichert's job particularly challenging. After all, Greentown Labs is a startup incubator — the largest in North America — designed to help clean-tech companies get off the ground. That is, she helps them secure investment.

But against all odds, Greentown Labs' companies seem to be thriving. The company has incubated more than 230 startups since it was founded in 2011, and those companies have a survival rate of 88%. Graduates include the buzzy beverage company Bevi, in addition to businesses like Sense, which makes a home-energy sensor.

So what makes her companies survive? Other than capital investment, Reichert says there are three things that successful startups have in common. She shared them with Business Insider in an exclusive interview.

Clean tech startups need a proven product-market fit

"The number one problem we see startups struggle with is the product-market fit," Reichert told Business Insider. "They have tech that can be applied to something. But they don't necessarily have the data to know that there's a real market."

Entrepreneurs might invent something innovative and flashy in a lab that has no clear market, she says. Maybe it's too expensive. Maybe it's too difficult to manufacture at scale. Or maybe no one wants it.

"They can spend years stuck on thinking this is the best thing since sliced bread," she said of some entrepreneurs. "A lot of times you get stuck with not having the technology and the market find each other. You're not going anywhere without the market."

That's one reason so many neat technologies that promise to turn trash — or carbon or whatever waste product the world doesn't want — into something useful pop into the news cycle, make a big splash, and then never reappear. Many of these products work, but they don't find a market.

Corporate partnerships are tough to build. But they can spell the difference between success and failure.  

"One thing that I see startups fail at is partnerships," Reichert said. 

Corporate partnerships can really pay off, she says. Industry giants can provide technical expertise, investment, or the infrastructure to manufacture products at scale. Often, they're also the customer. 

But Reichert says it's not uncommon for relationships between startups and corporate partners to unravel. That can leave the startup bankrupt with no plan B. And if nothing else, these deals just take a while to reach. 

"Often, those deals can take months or even a year or more to negotiate," she said. "So the startup is kind of trudging along with a small budget, knowing that they have a limited amount of runway. And so sometimes those time lines just don't line up."

Or worse, a company will suddenly sell off a division, she says, and move in a new direction. 

That's why Reichert puts a lot of effort into building out strong corporate partnerships at Greentown Labs. She brings startups and partners like Enel and National Grid together early so that when it comes down to deal-making, sign-off is swift.

"We have very structured engagements with corporate partners where we can force all of that interaction to happen," she said. "It just collapses the decision-making time. It's so simple, but no one does it."

Diversity of all kinds makes startups 'move so much faster'

If there's one thing that jumps out when you scroll through the staff pages of clean tech startups (and legacy energy companies) it's that they're filled with faces of men, mostly white. That's a problem. Diversity begets innovation, Reichert said. 

"The best teams are diverse teams," she said. "The more diverse teams are more successful and make more money."

And diversity doesn't just apply to gender and race, she says. 

"Is there a business person and a technical person, who are both together at the beginning?" Reichert said. "Companies that have that move so much faster. What they bring to the table is complimentary."

As for what it's like for Reichert, who's one of the rare female CEOs in the industry, she says, "it's nothing new." Reichert has a PhD in chemistry — "in college, I was in physics classes where I was the only female" — and an MBA.

But now on her own team, it's a different story: "This is definitely the most diverse team that I've worked on in my entire life." 

Original author: Benji Jones

Continue reading
  38 Hits
Sep
18

1Mby1M Virtual Accelerator Investor Forum: With Patricia Nakache of Trinity Ventures (Part 2) - Sramana Mitra

Microsoft has been talking about what it calls "tech intensity" for at least the past year, including prominently with a new "State of Tech Intensity 2019 Study."Tech intensity basically means the potential for its customers to grow by adopting technology and then building their own on top of it.Microsoft continues to talk about tech intensity as it positions Microsoft to be the provider of those platforms, tools, and training as traditional companies adopt new technologies.Click here to read more BI Prime stories.

Microsoft yet again heralded the phrase "tech intensity" last week when it released a study about how American companies were using technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning.

CEO Satya Nadella has been talking about tech intensity — basically, the potential for its customers to grow by adopting technology and then building their own on top of it — for at least the past year, and it's become an important part of Microsoft's pitch to customers.

Nadella appears to have first talked publicly about "tech intensity" in his keynote at the company's 2018 Ignite conference, and the phrase has persisted. Nadella has written blog posts about it, Microsoft executives have used the phrase in interviews, it has appeared in official communications and marketing materials from the company, and it even made a comeback during Nadella's keynote at Ignite this year.

"In a world where every company is becoming a digital company, we see examples of organizations in every industry embracing tech intensity to thrive and maximize their impact," Nadella wrote in a blog entry early this year.

Much like its other often-used "digital transformation" phrase, Microsoft continues to talk about tech intensity as it positions Microsoft to be the provider of those platforms, tools, and training as traditional companies adopt new technologies.

What is tech intensity

Nadella often uses a formula to describe tech intensity — "(tech adoption) ^ tech capabilities = tech intensity" — but he defined it most clearly in a LinkedIn post in January as "the potential for companies and countries to jump-start their growth by not just adopting technology, but by building their own technology too."

Basically, Nadella is saying companies in all industries need to adopt the latest technology platforms and tools — ideally, Microsoft products — and then train their workforce to be able to create their own uses for advanced technologies like artificial intelligence.

Microsoft also wants to be part of the second half of the equation, too. The company is investing in educational resources, including recently building a new team capable of training users at any technical level on how to get the most out of its Azure cloud-computing business.

Microsoft said it recently surveyed 700 executives and decisions makers from US companies in nearly every industry and found 73% of companies reported they're creating their own intellectual property using technologies such as AI and machine learning, the Internet of Things, blockchain, and mixed reality.

Why Microsoft won't stop talking about it

Tech intensity is basically a pitch for Microsoft.

It positions Microsoft to be the provider of those platforms, tools, and training as traditional companies adopt new technologies. The phrase is closely linked to another often-used phrase at Microsoft, "digital transformation," which basically means traditional businesses transitioning to new technologies such as the cloud to stay ahead of the curve.

The pharmaceutical company Novartis, for example, is using Microsoft artificial-intelligence technologies to establish an "innovation lab" for its employees to find new ways to use AI across the business.

The tech-intensity pitch may have even been part of the company's bid for the Pentagon's contentious $10 billion cloud-computing contract known as JEDI. Microsoft's US regulated industries president, Toni Townes-Whitley, used the term throughout a lengthy blog post in October describing what Microsoft could offer governments.

Original author: Ashley Stewart

Continue reading
  44 Hits
Feb
01

Microsoft versus Amazon: What Acquisitions Could Move the Needle? - Sramana Mitra

A decade marked by rapidly rising valuations and "founder-friendly" funding rounds is coming to a close, and founders are already starting to fret that the good old days are behind them.

According to a new study from First Round Capital, a prominent early stage venture capital firm in Silicon Valley, upwards of 70% of polled startup founders think that investors will overtake founders as the controlling parties in venture deals in 2020. The study also found that 65% of founders anticipate having more difficulty raising funding in the new year.

But VCs see the landscape differently, as founders at hot startups have their pick of would-be investors to bring into the fold. It's never been easier to raise venture funding than the last 12 months, several investors have told Business Insider, and the terms of each deal are almost always more favorable to the founder.

"At the end of the day, no matter how many investors there are, companies still want to work with the best investors," Sapphire Ventures Managing Director Nino Marakovic told Business Insider.

Becoming the best investor, however, means that firms are raising larger and larger funds to offer founders a bigger check at higher valuations — a process that was upended with SoftBank's $100 billion Vision Fund swept through Silicon Valley with nine-figure checks and even bigger valuations. Just Wednesday, Sapphire Ventures announced its own $1.4 billion fund that will allow it to write checks as large as $100 million, which Marakovic said was necessary to keep pace with the increasingly competitive ecosystem. That's not going away in 2020, he said.

"Private companies are raising more money. There is more money and more rounds, so we had to bulk up," Marakovic said. "This new fund puts us in a good position with the competitive set."

A billion-dollar trend

Andreessen Horowitz — often considered a trendsetter in Silicon Valley investor set thanks to its early investment in Facebook and other now-major companies — also announced a billion-dollar dedicated growth fund in 2019, and has written several nine-figure checks to startups in the months since it launched. Other early-stage firms, such as Bessemer Venture Partners, also announced massive growth funds in 2019.

"Venture, I feel, has regressed in the last 10 years, and a lot of it is too much money coming in," Unusual Ventures cofounder and entrepreneur Jyoti Bansal told Business Insider. "We'll go through a correction at some point, I feel. Which will be healthy."

As the founder of enterprise software startup Harness and a venture investor, Bansal is uniquely situated to see both sides of the debate. The correction he sees isn't one of macroeconomics or consumer spending, but of the power dynamics between venture investors and founders. With smaller funds, he thinks founders will remain in control and investors will have to find other ways to compete for deals.

"Investors tend to hold companies accountable at every stage, and you don't want the governance structures to taint it in any way. You don't want the company and the management team and the founders to have almost no influence and it's so much controlled by the investors. But you don't want the other way also, like it's so much controlled by the founders and the investors have no control, no influence. Either extremes are bad," Bansal said.

WeWork was an example of the founder-friendly extreme, Bansal said. In his view, WeWork's investors agreed to terms that left too much control with cofounder and CEO Adam Neumann, who ultimately stepped down amid a disastrous attempt to go public.

A new dynamic emerges

In the wake of the cautionary tale of WeWork, investors are not surprised that founders are anticipating a change in the power dynamic between the two.

Investors are more hesitant to sink millions of dollars in venture funding at the lofty valuations some founders were looking for, or might choose to exercise more control over its board of directors or other matters of corporate governance.

This could very well be why founders are starting to take a hard look at the fundraising landscape in 2020, multiple investors said — but that's not necessarily a bad thing. More restraint and realistic growth targets might help in the event of an economic downturn and create stronger companies in the long run, they said.

"We know and have seen this before," Sapphire Ventures cofounder and CEO Jai Das told Business Insider. "You buckle up, cut costs, soldier on, and come out on the other end. The companies that survived 2001 and 2008 came out much stronger when the downturns stopped, and as investors we have the resources to help companies to go through that."

Original author: Megan Hernbroth

Continue reading
  28 Hits
Mar
06

SaaS companies flirt with correction territory as another wild week comes to a close

Kerry Goyette is the founder and president of Aperio Consulting Group. She is a certified professional behavior analyst and certified forensic interviewer with postgraduate studies in psychometrics.She says that getting likes or shares on a platform like Instagram triggers the reward center of the brain. And while the brain's basic needs haven't changed much, how different generations were raised impacts what they need. Millennials, for example, desire feedback.Right now, likes only provide a short-term boost for our brains. Removing them could perhaps move Instagram from an aspirational identity to a platform for actual belonging.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

By now, you've probably heard about Instagram's announcement to hide public likes on user images. And while we're all waiting to see how these changes will play out for regular folks and influencers alike, it's worth noting that the needs of the human brain have not been subject to change.

Neuroscience research shows that the brain's most basic human needs haven't changed much in the last 10,000 years. The limbic brain, or the oldest part of your brain, prioritizes social connecting and asks, "Am I in or am I out?" In fact, the brain never stops asking that question.

When we're getting hearts or likes or shares, it triggers the reward center in the brain. When we feel like we're not getting approval — even if it's from something we believe to be trivial like "not enough" likes — it can trigger emotional pain and fear of being left out. Why? Because the brain is always assessing belonging.

Which brings us to a fundamental question about how we use social media: Are we using a platform to build a social profile with likes, comments, and shares to affirm an aspirational identity? Or are we using it to build a social community where we connect with people over common threads and feel we belong?

While we all share the basic human need for belonging, there are generational trends and tendencies that differentiate how those needs are best met. As products of our environment and the context in which we grew up, generational differences spawn different adaptations. 

This past spring, I attended a Certified Generations Professional training with Dr. Melissa Furman, faculty member and former assistant dean at Augusta University in Atlanta, GA and founder of Career Potential, LLC. Her areas of expertise include generational diversity, and what I learned at this training shaped the way I understood the workplace needs of different generations.

Kerry Goyette. Courtesy of Kerry Goyette

For example, I'm a Gen X-er who grew up in the '70s and '80s and, like many others in my generation, I had odd jobs for most of my childhood before starting work in my teens. Indeed, research shows X-ers tend toward workaholism, under-engagement, and burnout. My generation — along with Baby Boomers — has a high divorce rate. When it comes to belonging, it seems that Gen X-ers tend to search for and find connectivity through work and personal achievements.

Millennials, on the other hand, were largely raised by Baby Boomers who came of age in the '60s. Their sense of belonging is far more socially oriented. Millennials tend to become financially independent later than other generations because of a heightened emphasis on formal education, gap years, and the Great Recession. They tend to like feedback at work because recognition and feedback were ingrained in their childhoods. 

These experience-based tendencies don't make millennials poor employees; it just means they're different from the generations who came before them. This desire for feedback is reinforced by social media platforms — and millennials may suffer on these platforms if they're used to comparing themselves to others. Comparison may come in the form of counting likes and followers, or just thinking that someone's life is far better than your own. In short, if you grew up evaluating your worth by comparing yourself to others, then the absence of a comparison mechanism creates a bit of an identity crisis.

As for Gen Z, early research indicates that because they were raised by Gen X-ers who were so work focused — and because they're being raised in a time when social media is everywhere — they crave authentic relationships to feel they belong. Z-ers are showing that they want face-to-face communication and generally use technology more as a tool. It will be interesting to see how these needs translate to their sense of belonging as they continue to grow up and enter the workforce.

Regardless of preference, belonging is a human need for everyone. Whether you turn to Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, Tik Tok, or eschew social media entirely, this need drives our behavior. Even though we know intellectually that social connectivity is about more than the superficial connection of "likes," it doesn't mean we're immune to the habituated rush of pleasure or dose of pain that can come when the brain signals to the rest of the body that you do or don't belong.

Research shows us that likes on social media do provide a boost, but only in the short term. Your dopamine goes up, but pretty soon you'll need another boost. In other words, likes can feel nice and curb the hunger, but they won't feed the soul.

We'll have to see if this new version of Instagram moves us from aspirational identity and short-term ego hits to a platform with more opportunity for authentic community building and belonging. Will users turn to other platforms for their quick, feel-good boosts? Will ceasing to publicly count likes help build a stronger social community? And as this unfolds, we will still know what the human brain needs — the question is, where will we go and what will we do to get it?

Original author: Kerry Goyette

Continue reading
  22 Hits
Dec
22

A $1.1 million electric fire truck will soon be operating in Menlo Park, California

Menlo Park Fire Protection District in the Bay Area of California has reserved an all-electric fire truck that will cost $1.1 million after shipping and inspection.The truck was created by the Austria-based Rosenbauer Group and was created with the intention of tackling shifts in firefighting.Production of the vehicle will begin in 2021.Visit BusinessInsider.com for more stories.

Menlo Park Fire Protection District has reserved an all-electric fire truck that cost $1,112,900 after shipping and inspection. 

The truck —  created as a rescue vehicle with pumps, tanks, and recovery equipment — was designed by Austria-based Rosenbauer Group and was created with the intention of tackling shifts in firefighting, the environment, and ergonomics.

"Based on the megatrends in firefighting, Rosenbauer is already designing the firefighting vehicle of tomorrow - today," Rosenbauer wrote on its website. 

Its maker claims the truck was built with predicted shifting trends in gender and age for firefighting. Other predicted shifts that were taken into account when designing the vehicle also include connectivity, urbanization, and migration.

One of the vehicle's most nontraditional physical aspects is that it isn't the classic red people associate with the fire fighting vehicles

"To increase the visibility as well as emphasize the special and ecological importance of the Concept Fire Truck, we have chosen the color lime green," its maker wrote on its website.

The Menlo Park Fire Protection District has reserved one of 10 pre-production slots for 2021, according to the district's letter of intent.

"Typically, most emergencies only last 30 minutes or less and this response unit can be shut down once it arrives at the Incident, so an electric motor is very practical, efficient and environmentally responsible!" the Menlo Park Fire Protection District wrote in a staff report.

Keep scrolling to learn more about the truck that you may soon see on the streets:

Original author: Brittany Chang

Continue reading
  23 Hits
Dec
22

Looking for $600 cardigans or $220 bee venom-infused face serum? Head to this San Francisco street, where expensive everyday items are the norm.

Fillmore Street runs north to south through San Francisco's Pacific Heights, a neighborhood known for housing tech bigwigs and old-moneyed families.There's clearly a market for high-end shops full of high price tags, and a six-block stretch of Fillmore Street consists of exactly that.We took a stroll, weaving in and out of the upscale retailers, and found everyday items at sky-high prices.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

If there's going to be a concentration of high-priced luxury shops nested together in San Francisco, it might as well be near the Pac Heights neighborhood.

It's one of the most prestigious districts in the city, and where a good portion of San Francisco's tech billionaires live. The median real-estate value is $2.02 million, but that doesn't mean homes aren't listed well above that — a $27 million mansion a block away from the city's "Billionaire's Row" is currently for sale.

So there's clearly a market of shoppers with cash to burn within walking distance of Fillmore Street.

The roughly six-block stretch isn't the only nest of upscale retail shops in San Francisco, but it's the main shopping district for the Pac Heights neighborhood.

Brands like Ralph Lauren, Intermix, Reformation, Frye, and Rag & Bone are just some of the hot shops dotting the district.

We took a jaunt down the street to find out what lurks within the glistening shops and found, among other things, $600 cardigans, bottles of bee venom-infused face serum for $200 a pop, $1,184 pairs of jeans, and $30 face massagers.

See for yourself.

Original author: Katie Canales

Continue reading
  23 Hits
Dec
22

Automation is now more valuable to workers than programming skills, says a report from app connectivity tool Zapier

Workers are 43 percent more likely to say that automation skills will help them land their dream job, as opposed to coding or programming, according to a recent report from Zapier, a company that helps connect online tools so they work together. This suggests that low-code and no-code tools are gaining popularity in the workplace as a way to automate certain routine tasks. Wade Foster, CEO and cofounder of Zapier, thinks that automation is a skill that employers will start looking for in job candidates — it's easier to learn than coding, and can help speed up a tremendous variety of tasks."With the emergence of a lot of these no code tools...it's a lot easier to learn how to build some stuff that automates some of these boring parts of your job," Foster told Business Insider.Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Learning to code used to be high up on many people's New Year's resolutions lists. However, that might be changing. Workers now are more interested in automating parts of their job, rather than learning how to code, according to a recent report from Zapier, a hot startup that helps connect online tools so they work together. 

According to that report, workers are 43 percent more likely to say that automation skills make them a top candidate for their dream job, over coding or programming skills. It suggests that tools that offer the ability to automate certain routine tasks, without the need to code very much or at all, are becoming more popular in the workplace. 

Wade Foster, CEO and co-founder of Zapier, thinks this trend is rooted in the fact that while learning to code is a valuable skill, it takes time. For people who don't work specifically as any kind of software developer, that skill doesn't always translate directly to their daily tasks. Automation, however, requires less. 

"In my day to day job, there is a lot of tasks that I do that are not interesting to me, are pretty boring, and can be fairly easily automated. And with the emergence of a lot of these no code tools...it's a lot easier to learn how to build some stuff that automates some of these boring parts of your job," Foster told Business Insider. "Stuff that if you were to learn how to code you could do too, but this is a much faster way." 

Zapier isn't necessarily neutral here: it's one of the no code/low code tools that is helping make this sort of automation possible. The company has raised $1.2 million in seed funding thus far, and in 2018, Zapier told Business Insider that it had a $35 million annualized run rate, a measure of how much revenue it expects to generate in a year.

The company's platform helps connect the tools workers are already using for their jobs — like Google's G Suite, Slack, Salesforce, Trello, MailChimp — so they don't have to manually send the necessary data from one app to another. And users can build integrations on top of that to make the apps work seamlessly together. 

What's driving the push towards automation is that people want to do their jobs more efficiently, and so do the companies they work for, Foster said. Before these tools existed, it took a lot of bespoke coding and engineering to make data go from one service or app to another.

"I think there's two things going on. One, there's these real problems that people need solving and two, the tools that they use are getting a lot easier. It's getting a lot more acceptable for them to build these little automations, it doesn't take an engineer anymore," Foster said. 

He also thinks the ability to intelligently automate will be a skill companies will be looking for when they hire new employees. Bigger companies will start hiring people that specialize in automation and can teach others how to do it, too.  He thinks we'll also start to see more people picking up these skills outside of work, and schools starting to teach these skills. 

"The value is there when you're able to automate these menial tasks. You're talking about, for the average knowledge worker, you're talking about saving four hours a day for every single one of them and that is a huge value add," Foster said. 

The flip side is that automation and AI often get associated with job loss. But Foster thinks automation will take away the types of jobs that involve repetitive or manual tasks, which people don't like doing anyways, and can free up people's time to do the creative parts of the job. In the long run, he thinks this will create more jobs by opening up opportunities to do more creative work.

Got a tip? Contact this reporter via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or Signal at 925-364-4258. You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Original author: Paayal Zaveri

Continue reading
  30 Hits
Dec
22

This $10 million 'Star Trek' themed Silicon Valley home looks like a spaceship and has a two-story airplane hangar door

This Silicon Valley home feels like a step into the future with designs inspired by "Star Trek," and smart devices controlling nearly every aspect of life.

The $10 million, six-bedroom home is filled with innovations that feel straight out of a sci-fi film. Owners Junaid Quraishi and Malika Junaid told The Wall Street Journal of some of the many high-tech tools they've installed.

Lights, sound, and climate can all be controlled from their phones or smartwatches, and they can also adjust pool and shower temperatures the same way.

The kitchen has hidden features, too. For example, one button releases a hidden spice rack from the island, while another exposes a second, smaller kitchen used for parties. 

The highlight of the home, though, is the two-story glass airplane hangar door, which can be raised to open up the house to the outdoors, giving Quraishi and Junaid stunning views from their elevated dining room. 

Original author: Mary Meisenzahl

Continue reading
  22 Hits
Dec
22

These charts show how the era of rampant Tesla stock volatility could be coming to an end (TSLA)

A few years back, amid one of Tesla's periodic stock rallies, I suggested that shares could hit $400.

Didn't happen! The stock retreated and, until quite recently, failed to threaten that mark again.

But this week, Tesla surged through $400, an over-60%-improvement since September. The rally started when the company reported a surprise profit for the third quarter. And yet again, Tesla's market cap is the biggest of any US automaker (at better than $70 billion, Tesla has a big lead on No. 2 General Motors' $50 billion).

It remains to be seen whether Tesla shares remain at this level, testing that $400 mark, or whether they plunge or climb still higher. With the fourth quarter nearly wrapped, analysts expect another profit, so the stage is set for the rally to extend early next year.

Volatility has always defined Tesla trading, but this rally has been a pretty smooth ascent. Could the era of wild swings in Tesla's stock price be coming to an end?

Let's dig into some charts:

Original author: Matthew DeBord

Continue reading
  21 Hits
Mar
06

Roundtable Recap: March 5 – Do Not Spray and Pray - Sramana Mitra

A new e-book from NASA compiles 25 years of satellite images taken a night. Some of those images show that US cities emit more light around Christmas and New Year's.NASA researchers also found that Middle Eastern cities are illuminated during Ramadan.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Leave it to NASA to find a way to measure holiday spirit from space. 

In a new 200-page e-book, "Earth at Night," the agency has compiled 25 years of satellite images taken when the planet was enveloped in darkness.

At night, small pockets of light from human activity are visible on Earth's surface. During the holidays, those lights get noticeably bigger and brighter.

After analyzing the world's nighttime light patterns between 2012 and 2014, NASA researchers found, unsurprisingly, that the US emits more intense light around the time of Christmas and New Year's. They also found more bursts of light during Ramadan in the Middle East.

Take a look at the cities with the brightest lights. 

Original author: Aria Bendix

Continue reading
  22 Hits
Dec
22

I've been switching between Apple's standard AirPods and the AirPods Pro, and there's only 1 reason you should consider buying the more expensive version (AAPL)

If you're trying to decide whether to purchase the standard AirPods or the pricier AirPods Pro, consider how important noise cancellation is to you.There are several features that differentiate the AirPods from the AirPods Pro, but noise cancellation is the most noticeable one by far.Otherwise, the AirPods Pro offer a new design with an in-ear fit and slightly improved audio quality among other changes. Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories. 

Those in the market for a pair of AirPods now have more choice than ever before.

There's the $160 standard AirPods, which Apple refreshed earlier this year, the $200 second-generation AirPods that come with a wireless charging case, and the $250 AirPods Pro. The latter represent a more significant update to Apple's original AirPods that offer a new in-ear design, active noise cancellation, and resistance to sweat and water.

If you're struggling to decide between the AirPods and AirPods Pro, the biggest factor to take into account is how important noise cancellation is to you. The AirPods Pro offer several upgrades over Apple's standard pair, but noise cancellation is the most noticeable one that truly sets the Pro model apart from the regular version.

Both types of AirPods also support the same features that make Apple's wireless earbuds stand out in the first place, like the ability to automatically connect with your iPhone once you flip open the case. 

Here's a closer look at how the AirPods Pro compare to their less expensive predecessors. 

Original author: Lisa Eadicicco

Continue reading
  23 Hits
Dec
22

JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs tech bankers say direct listings are just the beginning of reimagining old-school IPOs

Spotify and Slack were the first two big tech companies to choose a new way to go public, opting for a direct listing instead of an initial public offering. Top tech bankers at Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan told Business Insider that they expect more companies to go the direct listing route in 2020. The bankers also expect to see more innovation for both IPOs and direct listings, even after the SEC this month scuttled a proposed change from the New York Stock Exchange to allow companies to raise fresh capital in a direct listing."We're absolutely on the side of innovation and want to find more paths to the public markets," said  Nick Giovanni, the co-head of Goldman Sachs's global technology, media and telecom group.For more BI Prime stories, click here. 

Spotify and Slack were the first two big tech companies to take a non-traditional path to public markets by opting for a direct listing over an initial public offering. 

And top tech bankers at Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan told Business Insider they're seeing more interest in companies learning about the direct listing process for 2020, even if they don't ultimately choose that route. 

In a direct listing, early investors and employees sell their shares directly to investors, and the company doesn't raise new money – at least not immediately. An initial public offering, by contrast, creates new shares that raise money in a process that takes more time and costs the company more in fees paid to investment bankers. 

According to media reports, Airbnb is the most notable of the companies considering a direct listing, and it could be even bigger than Spotify. But direct listings will likely remain a niche part of the IPO market overall. And regardless of whether companies choose a direct listing or traditional IPO, timing of public debuts will gravitate towards the first half of the year to avoid possible market turmoil around the 2020 US election, Business Insider reported.

Even though direct listings may represent a smaller pool of fees for investment bankers, the ones we talked to said that they are embracing different paths to going public and working with companies to figure out which option makes the most sense. 

"We're absolutely on the side of innovation and want to find more paths to the public markets," said  Nick Giovanni, the co-head of Goldman Sachs's global technology, media and telecom group. "We understand the private markets have changed and companies don't need to raise capital when they go public in all cases. We led the Spotify and Slack direct listings, and we're working on more now."

To be sure, most of the companies that go public will still choose an IPO, both because it's a well-trodden path and because it raises fresh money. There's been a push to allow companies to raise money via direct listings, which would allow them to bring in fresh capital without underwriters, but the SEC earlier this month rejected a proposal from the New York Stock Exchange to do just that. 

"We'll find an IPO landscape going forward where both elements of the direct listing process and the IPO process continually evolve and improve to give issuers greater optionality on the way they would like to become public," said Greg Chamberlain, JPMorgan's head of US technology, media, and telecoms equity capital markets.

JPMorgan is "working with a large number" of companies eyeing a 2020 or 2021 IPO, he said. 

"We spend a lot of time with them quite early in their thinking around the best way they might become public," Chamberlain said. 

GitLab chief executive Sid Sijbrandij told Business Insider earlier this month that he's eyeing a direct listing in November – but both timing and the way the development platform goes public could change. 

Sijbrandij highlighted the direct listing's benefits of lower costs, no multimonth lockup period, and better transparency. Even though GitLab is known for being quirky, the company isn't banking on SEC rule changes or otherwise looking to shake up the path to listing. 

"We will not try to innovate on an IPO or a direct-listing process," Sijbrandij had told us. 

Original author: Meghan Morris

Continue reading
  19 Hits
Apr
05

A little-known quirk on the Boeing 737 may have made things difficult for the pilots of the crashed Ethiopian Airlines flight (BA)

In June 2017, Publicis Groupe announced that it would skip all awards and industry events for a year to develop an AI-driven project management platform called Marcel.It was supposed to be Arthur Sadoun's first big move as CEO of the world's third-largest holding company and create a huge splash in the industry.But Marcel became one of the industry's most mysterious and ridiculed projects in recent years and was hampered by internal skepticism, tension, and confusion.When Publicis and Microsoft finally debuted a Marcel prototype in May 2018, it fell short of its promise.Since then, holding company leadership stopped talking about the platform as conversation shifted to the $4.4 billion acquisition of data firm Epsilon. Now, Publicis estimates that Marcel will be available to all employees in mid-2020.Click here for more BI Prime stories.

"Silly." "Fatuous." "Unrealistic."

These are some of the words a former top Publicis Groupe executive used to describe Marcel, the AI-powered HR and project management app that has been one of the industry's most mysterious and ridiculed projects in recent years. According to Publicis, Marcel would change the ad industry by connecting the holding company's estimated 84,000 employees with one command spoken into a voice interface.

Publicis CEO Arthur Sadoun announced Marcel in summer 2017 in a manner designed to make the biggest possible splash: Cancelling an entire year of the thing many agency creative professionals value most, awards shows.

He later told Business Insider he had to fight internal rebellion over his betting the future of the $11 billion ad network on a platform that would manage all things Publicis, from employee timesheets and pitch decks to closely guarded client sales data. 

The platform was supposed to launch in the US by the end of 2019. But Publicis executives have mostly stopped talking about Marcel to focus on even bigger and more expensive projects, like the $4.4 billion acquisition of data collection company Epsilon. Now, after two and a half years of development, Publicis says the platform will go live around the world in summer 2020.

Six people with deep knowledge of the project said Marcel's journey from concept to real-world product has involved internal agency politics, executive-level turnovers, and a battle between tech giants Google and Microsoft to help develop Marcel.

One person who worked on Marcel estimated it cost $30 million to $40 million and that Microsoft made millions more to develop it. Publicis wouldn't comment on what Marcel cost, though chairman Maurice Levy said in 2018 that the project's cost had already exceeded what Publicis spent in a given year in Cannes, undercutting a widespread assumption that the purpose of the so-called "awards show ban" was to save money.

These sources said while the platform may be a necessary step forward for Publicis, it will fall short of the revolutionary product that the company hoped it would be.

This is the story of the long, bumpy road between vision and reality — and it's a prominent example of how the ad industry has struggled to adapt to the digital revolution. 

Publicis Groupe's new CEO needed to shake things up

In 2017, the stagnant ad agency model desperately needed a shake-up. Like rival WPP, Publicis Groupe's revenues and stock price have dropped as Google and Facebook increase their dominance of the ad business and clients cut spending.

Publicis Groupe's stock price has tanked over the past few years. Markets Insider

Sadoun, a former strategist who had previously overseen Publicis Groupe's creative agency network, succeeded longtime CEO Maurice Levy on May 31, 2017. In his introductory company-wide video, Sadoun laid out his goal to transform Publicis "from a holding company to a platform." 

The industry found out what he meant two months later — on the first day of advertising's biggest festival, the Cannes Lions, he announced Publicis would skip all awards and trade shows for a year to devote all its resources to developing Marcel, a project named in honor of company founder Marcel Bleustein-Blanchet.

Several sources said this news came as a complete surprise to most employees, including the chief creative officers and regional leaders whose teams would be most affected. The resulting confusion and frustration led some Leo Burnett staffers to mount a futile protest by placing a "Marcel" sign over their founder's name at the front entrance to agency headquarters in Chicago. As a result, Sadoun spent the next 12 months selling the concept to skeptical employees.

"[Marcel] was the biggest, most interesting project in the industry," Marcel president Dawn Winchester told Business Insider. She said the launch was timed to coincide with Sadoun's promotion and forward his vision of using technology to sync up employees across nearly 1,400 agencies in 72 countries.

But sources who spoke to Business Insider said the project was announced with little planning or concepting. One said work on Marcel at the time began and ended with a preview video presented to leadership the week before Cannes, and that the company's PR strategy amounted to a media FAQ sheet.

At various points in its development, industry observers and insiders have described Marcel as a "disappointment," a "talking robot," and an "80,000-person circle jerk." Publicis even made light of these barbs in its 2018 all-staff holiday video where a voice attributed to Marcel asked, "Why create me if no one wants me?"

Tensions developed between Publicis leadership and the team building Marcel

A few weeks after the awards announcement, Publicis-owned design firm Sapient began pulling employees from client assignments to begin work on the project. A lot of work lay ahead. One Sapient source recalled a brainstorming session involving 53 people in one large conference room who went through 3,800 Post-It notes over two days while designing the app's most rudimentary functions.

But tensions soon emerged that threatened to derail the project. One former employee said Marcel was low priority for Sapient leadership because it closely resembled the sort of internal IT platforms they regularly designed for clients. The source said a two-day workshop where Publicis employees gathered to identify problems they hoped Marcel could address was very similar to the ones Sapient organizes for clients.

"We were eating our own dog food," the source said.

Several people assigned to the project said cultural tensions emerged between the designers on the tech side and the executives and creatives on the agency side who were working on Marcel. Two people said this was because Publicis treated Marcel like another marketing campaign, placing traditional agency leaders in top roles and focusing on promotion over product.

Multiple people who worked on Marcel also said none of the executives leading the project had worked on software products in the past. Winchester disagreed with that characterization.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella introduces Arthur Sadoun onstage at VivaTech in 2018. Getty Images

The pitch pitted two of tech's biggest names against one another

Publicis' choice of a tech vendor also was controversial. Publicis needed outside vendors to complete Marcel, and leadership soon began meeting with companies to build on its framework. Emmanuel Andre, Publicis Groupe's chief talent officer who initially oversaw the project, told Business Insider that 27 businesses competed for the contract.

The finalists were two of tech's biggest names: Google and Microsoft.

Four sources said the AI and IT experts overseeing the work for Sapient overwhelmingly preferred Google because it had better technology. One said that Google wanted to build Marcel with Sapient and arrange for shared rights to the critical client and employee data that the platform would house.

Microsoft, meanwhile, wanted to develop a software product on the back of Marcel, that person said. Another described the company's proposal as an extension of its own MS Office suite that included no details regarding the AI that was supposed to drive the platform.

But despite internal preference for Google, Publicis awarded the business to Microsoft. According to the people who helped develop Marcel, this decision showed that Publicis leadership was more concerned with maintaining its relationship with Microsoft than building a quality product and completing it on time.

One source attributed the decision to go with Microsoft to convenience, given that a majority of the network's agencies already used Office software.

Winchester said several factors contributed to the win, including the "maturity of the Outlook product," Microsoft's AI capabilities, and the fact that more than 50% of Publicis employees participating in Marcel's UK-based soft rollout connect to the platform through LinkedIn, which is also owned by Microsoft.

Three people told Business Insider that Arthur Sadoun finalized the deal over a December breakfast meeting with CEO Satya Nadella before the partnership was announced in January 2018. Sadoun and Nadella would later present their beta version of Marcel at VivaTech, the Paris-based, Publicis-founded tech conference.

A PR firm representing Microsoft declined to comment for this story. Microsoft's PR didn't comment. Google representatives did not respond to several requests for comment.

Marcel teams faced confusion over ownership

The team responsible for getting Marcel ready for its global debut in May 2018 faced confusion over who was responsible for what.

According to a senior-level source, Sapient was to do most of the technical work while Microsoft handled the plumbing.

But as Publicis leadership assigned more of Marcel's information technology architecture to Microsoft, this person said, Sapient employees began to ask what they were doing "beyond wire frame, graphic design, style guides, etc."

A former executive said Microsoft consistently failed to deliver on promises and that the team had to slash the number of features in the beta version of Marcel that it would present at the conference.

Another challenge concerned a database that, by Winchester's estimates, includes more than 5 billion individual files. Consolidating all this information so every employee could access it is a gargantuan task, in part because most of Publicis' 1,400-plus agencies use different storage systems, said one person involved in the early stages of Marcel.

As a result, when Marcel was debuted at VivaTech in May 2018, it couldn't do many of things it was supposed to.

Sadoun onstage at VivaTech. Getty Images The world gets a first glimpse at the new tool that will "break the industry"

Sapient and Microsoft managed to get a demo done in time for day one of VivaTech on May 24, 2018.

That morning, Sadoun went on stage to run a 75-second video titled "Marcel: The Vision" that was heavy on sizzle and light on the specific ways it would unite all Publicis employees in what the video called "a revolutionary act."

"We believe it's time to break the industry … to reinvent it," Sadoun told attendees. On the same day, he presented the full video, including testimonials from Publicis client Walmart, to journalists in Q&A sessions.

Sadoun acknowledged that the project would continue to be challenging, with only 100 employees using what was at the time a completely voluntary service. But he said every Publicis employee would soon have the entire company in the palm of his or her hand.

But after VivaTech, Publicis executives stopped talking about Marcel. Less than a year later, Epsilon became the focus of the organization as Sadoun aggressively started to sell his updated vision: A combination of data from millions of consumers to drive better creative work and media buys and the ability to create client-specific teams by picking talent from different agencies around the world.

Asked why the company has been quiet on Marcel, Winchester told Business Insider leadership chose to focus on developing the platform instead of promoting it and said Publicis would work to get it adopted in the US in 2020.

Publicis founder and Marcel namesake Marcel Bleustein-Blanchet in 1990. Getty Images

Publicis said Marcel would still play a key role

Today, Publicis' top priority is integrating Epsilon and turning around a poor financial performance. But leaders said Marcel would play a key role in shaping the Publicis of the future.

In June, Publicis publicly launched the service in the United Kingdom, revealing some key changes such as a shift away from a voice-only interface. The company has also expanded its Marcel team in the United States, tasking Sapient VP Cliff Anderson with making Marcel live.

Winchester told Business Insider her team has made considerable progress over the past two and half years and learned key lessons along the way.

For example, employee feedback led them to drop the voice interface on the desktop version of the app. Winchester also said a job-listing aggregator was one of the most popular features among the 52% of UK-based Publicis employees now voluntarily using Marcel.

Andre said that Marcel is now a real-world product, not a dream — at least in its limited capacity — while emphasizing it would continue to evolve.

"There's never going to be a day to say, 'That's done, now let's do something else,'" Andre said.

The former executives who spoke to Business Insider offered a more critical assessment.

One source said Marcel was necessary but that the splashy way Publicis announced it fed skepticism among observers and employees and that the company should have done more to bridge the cultural gap between its tech and creative employees.

Another person said Marcel would represent progress in tying together systems like consistent time tracking. But he expressed doubts that Marcel would fulfill its initial promise to instantly connect employees around the world on projects or share information — work that previously would have taken hours, days, or even weeks.

A third former executive recalled an occasion where Sadoun himself tried to use the app's voice interface and grew frustrated when it didn't work properly, stating that these sorts of kinks should have been worked out before Publicis announced the project. The ex-exec predicted that Marcel would ultimately fade away — especially since Publicis has more immediately pressing concerns like ensuring returns on the multi-billion-dollar Epsilon investment.

"Something about being creative makes you think you can do anything, because you're so used to selling the idea of being able to do anything that you start to believe it," the former exec said.

Got more information about this story or another ad industry tip? Contact Patrick Coffee on Signal at (347) 563-7289, email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., or via Twitter DM @PatrickCoffee. You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Original author: Patrick Coffee

Continue reading
  18 Hits
Mar
06

Quibi will launch with 50 shows on April 6

Earth's magnetic north pole has been leading scientists on something of a wild goose chase.

Over the last 40 years, the spot toward which all our compasses point has moved by an average of about 30 miles per year. In September, magnetic north aligned briefly with geographic north (where all the lines of longitude converge at the North Pole) as it passed over the Prime Meridian. 

But then it kept moving, skittering from its previous location in Nunavut, Canada towards Siberia. 

"Magnetic north has spent the last 350 years wandering around the same part of Canada," Ciaran Beggan, a scientist from the British Geological Survey (BGS), told Business Insider. "But since the 1980s, the rate it was moving jumped from 10 kilometers [6.2 miles] per year to 50 kilometers [31 miles]."

Beggan is part of a group of scientists who track the errant pole from year to year. Their work informs the World Magnetic Model (WMM), a map of the planet's magnetic field. 

According to the most recent update of the WMM, magnetic north is still zooming along, though its speed has decreased a bit, to 24.8 miles per year. 

"By 2040, all compasses will probably point eastward of true north," Beggan said, adding that magnetic north's march toward northern Russia is far from over.

The latest version of the World Magnetic Model. The white star indicates the current position of the magnetic north pole. NOAA/British Geological Survey

Magnetic north is crucial for navigation systems

Earth's magnetic field is a sheath of geomagnetic energy that shields the planet from deadly and destructive solar radiation. Without it, solar winds could strip Earth of its oceans and atmosphere. 

But the magnetic field and its poles aren't static. Since scientists discovered the magnetic north pole's existence in 1831, it has moved 1,400 miles. Magnetic south, however, hasn't moved at all in the last century, Beggan said. 

Keeping tabs on changes in the magnetic field is imperative for European and American militaries, since their navigation systems rely on it. So, too, do GPS apps and commercial airlines.

That's why every five years, BGS and NOAA release an updated World Magnetic Model. 

The WMM isn't a static snapshot of what the Earth's magnetic field looks like every five years. Rather, it's a list of numbers that allows devices and navigators to calculate what the magnetic field will look like anywhere on Earth at any time during the five years after the model was published. The WMM was updated for 2015 and scheduled for another update for 2020. 

Recently, however, magnetic north's gambol around the Arctic accelerated so much that the movement made the WMM inaccurate.

Mapping a moving field 

The Magnetic north pole has shifted north with startling speed since the 1900s. Wikimedia Commons

The magnetic north pole's uncharacteristically fast movement over the last five years introduced errors into the 2015 model that became big enough to worry the US military.  

"We asked the US Department of Defense if they wanted an early update, and they said yes," Beggan said. "UK ministry defense wasn't bothered either way."

So the WMM got an unprecedented "out-of-cycle update" in February. Then the scheduled update for 2020 was released on December 10. 

The last version of the World Magnetic Model. The white star indicates the most current position of the magnetic south pole. NOAA/British Geological Survey

According to Beggan, however, a discrepancy between the WMM and the movement of the magnetic pole doesn't affect us as much as one might think.

"Compasses and GPS will work as usual; there's no need for anyone to worry about any disturbance to daily life," he said in a press release.

It's really only directional drilling companies and the Department of Defense that need a more up-to-date, accurate model, he added. That's because drilling companies use compasses and the magnetic field to guide drill bits. The DOD, meanwhile, wants as much precision as possible for navigation systems on its planes, submarines, and parachutes.

Tugged by changes in the Earth's core 

One theory about why the planet's magnetic field keeps shifting is that geomagnetic pulses in the planet's core throw the field into whack.

Earth's magnetic field exists thanks to swirling liquid nickel and iron in the planet's outer core, 1,800 miles beneath the surface. Anchored by the north and south magnetic poles (which tend to shift and even reverse every million years or so), the field waxes and wanes in strength, undulating based on what's going on in the core.

 "The outer core's liquid iron is hot and runny, as runny as water is on Earth's surface," Beggan said.

A visualization of the interior of the Earth's core, as represented by a computer simulation model. Aubert et al./IPGP/CNRS Photo library

Periodic and sometimes random changes in the distribution of the turbulent liquid metal in the Earth's core can cause idiosyncrasies in the magnetic field. If you imagine the magnetic field as a series of rubber bands that thread through the magnetic poles and the Earth's core, changes in the core essentially tug on different rubber bands in various places.

Those geomagnetic tugs influence the north magnetic pole's migration and can cause it to veer wildly from its position. 

But the turbulence of the outer core can make it hard for researchers like Beggan to predict how it might affect the magnetic field in the future. In the next 10 to 20 years, he said, we might see magnetic north continue toward Siberia, or it could stop moving or go back the other way. 

A weakening magnetic field

Another theory about why magnetic north has become nomadic is that our magnetic field is undergoing a period of weakening. 

A snapshot of Earth's magnetic field. Shades of red show areas where the field is stronger, and shades of blue show areas that are weaker. ESA/DTU

Justin Revenaugh, a seismologist from the University of Minnesota, previously told Business Insider that such weakening can accompany a process in which magnetic north and south switch places.

That has happened several times in Earth's history; the latest reversal was 780,000 years ago. 

When such swaps are occurring, the magnetic field drops to about 30% of its full strength, Revenaugh said. Magnetic north loses its strength during these times too, according to Beggan, and sometimes disappears completely for a time. If the pole were to vanish, compasses would instead point to local magnetic north poles that form all over the planet.

Then about a millennium later, those local poles would reform into one big magnetic north pole as the reversal process progressed.

But a full reversal takes so long that people on Earth would be mostly unaffected. According to a paper published in August, the last swap took 22,000 years to be fully complete.

"So you'd never know if you were living through a reversal, really," Beggan said. 

Original author: Aylin Woodward

Continue reading
  13 Hits
Mar
09

Elon Musk says he's 'definitely going to be dead' before humans ever reach Mars — unless the pace of innovation picks up

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Good morning! This is the tech news you need to know this Friday.

The way Facebook transfers people's data abroad from the EU is valid, according to an adviser to Europe's top court. The opinion — which is not a ruling — centered on a tool called "standard contractual clauses" and elements of the EU-US Privacy Shield, a data-transfer pact between the two regions.Business Insider found the site where Amazon is building a giant factory to make internet satellites, and it's right on Microsoft's and SpaceX's doorsteps. Sources told Business Insider the headquarters for Amazon's Project Kuiper is a two-building campus just a few miles from Microsoft's headquarters called the Redmond Commerce Center.Airbnb scored a major victory as Europe's top court rules it's an online service and not a real estate agent in disguise. France's tourism association had complained that Airbnb hadn't complied with local property laws and that it should be regulated like an estate agent, potentially putting its business in the country at risk.San Francisco is changing its facial recognition ban after it accidentally made the iPhones it gave to city employees illegal. The city banned city agencies from using gadgets equipped with facial recognition technology back in May, but it became apparent that government-issued iPhones came equipped with Apple's Face ID, illegal under the new law.Facebook's support forum is overrun with scammers trying to defraud desperate users, and the company has ignored it for months. The issue means that some of Facebook's least technically literate and most vulnerable users risk being victimized by scammers all over again while looking for help after being hacked or suffering other issues.More than 3,000 Ring users' passwords were leaked online, potentially giving hackers access to people's addresses, credit card info, and camera footage. Ring said in a statement to Business Insider that the exposure was not the result of Ring's servers being hacked.Over 267 million Facebook users had their names, phone numbers, and profiles exposed thanks to a public database, according to a researcher. Bob Diachenko, a data-security researcher, traced the database back to Vietnam but could not identify exactly how the data had been accessed or what it was being used for. Instacart has quietly resumed delivering from Target this month, just two years after ending its formal partnership. The move shows Instacart's continued effort to expand selection amid intensifying competition in the on-demand delivery space.Lyft thought some users' real names were offensive content. Candice Poon, Cara Dick, Mike Finger and others were ordered to get new names by December 21.Facebook and Instagram are going on the offensive against misinformation around the 2020 US census with a new set of sweeping bans. The social media giant said it would ban "misleading information about when and how to participate in the census and the consequences of participating."

Have an Amazon Alexa device? Now you can hear 10 Things in Tech each morning. Just search for "Business Insider" in your Alexa's flash briefing settings.

You can also subscribe to this newsletter here — just tick "10 Things in Tech You Need to Know.

Original author: Isobel Asher Hamilton

Continue reading
  69 Hits
Dec
20

Lyft thought some users' real names were offensive content. Candice Poon, Cara Dick, Mike Finger, and others were ordered to get new names within 2 days. (LYFT)

Some Lyft users received a strange notification Thursday informing them that their names violated company guidelines.Some of these people had names that could be mistaken as suggestive of inappropriate words.The company said in a response to a customer that the message was sent in error when it was trying to improve its systems.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Some Lyft users received a message from the company Thursday saying their names violated the ride-hailing service's community guidelines.

In the notification, Lyft didn't provide a reason for flagging an account beyond saying the name "doesn't align with its Community Guidelines." Many of the Lyft members who received the prompt have names that could be mistaken for inappropriate content, such as Nicole Cumming, Cara Dick, and Dick DeBartolo. The notification told users they must change their name by Saturday, giving them two days.

Lyft said in a statement to Business Insider that the prompt was sent in error.

"Some members of the Lyft community were using names that were either inaccurate, offensive, or both," a company representative said. "In trying to fix the problem, we cast too wide of a net. We were well-intentioned, but our response clearly led to errors that we are working to correct, and we apologize."

The company has also been responding to affected customers, as shown in a response that one person shared on Twitter.

"This message was sent in error," Lyft's response to the affected user Candace Poon said. "We were trying to improve our systems to create a safe and respectful community, and we missed the mark here. Rest assured, your name does not violate our Community Guidelines, and we're sorry that we sent you an email that communicated otherwise."

Regardless, the incident resulted in confusion and left some Lyft users unsure of how to proceed with the situation since they were being told that their legal name didn't comply with its policies.

—Nicole Cumming (@necummi) December 19, 2019
—Cara Dick (@caradick) December 19, 2019
—Dick DeBartolo (@thegizwiz) December 19, 2019
—Mike Finger (@mikefinger) December 19, 2019
—hereforcontent (@Kikeyinks) December 19, 2019
—Candice Poon (@candicepoon) December 19, 2019
Original author: Lisa Eadicicco

Continue reading
  83 Hits
Mar
09

Edtech startups prepare to become ‘not just a teaching tool but a necessity’

Amazon said this week it was building a new headquarters for the company's Project Kuiper satellite initiative somewhere in Redmond, Washington, but did not reveal the location.Sources told Business Insider it's a two-building campus just a few miles from Microsoft's headquarters called the Redmond Commerce Center.Project Kuiper is the Seattle-based company's effort to provide low-latency, high-speed broadband internet by launching more than 3,200 satellites into orbit. Amazon has yet to confirm the location of the facility but said it would serve as the headquarters for research and development and "prototype manufacturing and qualification facility."We went to the site to check it out and took a few photos.Click here to read more BI Prime stories.

Amazon has kept mum about the specific location of the headquarters for its initiative to fling thousands of satellites into space, but sources told Business Insider that the home base for Amazon's Project Kuiper is a two-building campus just a few miles from Microsoft's Redmond, Washington, headquarters and SpaceX's Redmond facility.

Project Kuiper is Amazon's effort to provide low-latency, high-speed broadband internet by launching more than 3,200 satellites into low earth orbit. 

Amazon on Wednesday said it has leased a two-building 219,000-square-foot campus in Redmond to serve as the headquarters for research and development and "prototype manufacturing and qualification facility" for Project Kuiper. But it provided no further information.

The location of the campus will be the Redmond Commerce Center, according to two sources familiar with the situation who offered the information independently. Amazon recently leased the entirety of the center, which was formerly occupied by a construction-tool manufacturer called Genie Industries, the sources said.

Here's a look at some of the buildings, which Business Insider visited on Thursday:

Amazon plans to move its Project Kuiper team into the new headquarters in 2020. Ashley Stewart

Amazon did not immediately respond to Business Insider's request to confirm the location. The company said in Wednesday's announcement that renovations on the facilities were already underway and the Project Kuiper team would move into the new headquarters next year.

The company appears to have big plans for Project Kuiper, according to the 165 job advertisements for the initiative posted on its website at the time of this writing. The company may be planning to hire more than one employee per position. It's unclear how many Amazon employees are working on the initiative now, but 84 users on LinkedIn list the term "Project Kuiper" in their job titles.

Amazon said work on its Project Kuiper headquarters has already begun. Ashley Stewart

The Project Kuiper headquarters, Amazon said, will include offices and design space, research and development labs, and prototype-manufacturing facilities. 

The satellites are meant to provide high-speed internet connectivity to populations in remote and rural areas that traditional satellites don't serve. Amazon isn't alone in this endeavor. SpaceX is planning to launch as many as 42,000 of its Starlink satellites over the next decade, according to government filings, and has already launched 120.

Got a tip? Contact this reporter via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., message her on Twitter @ashannstew or send her a secure message through Signal at 425-344-8242. 

Original author: Ashley Stewart

Continue reading
  59 Hits