Dec
19

Dataiku raises $101 million for its collaborative data science platform

Gagan Biyani cofounded Udemy, an online education company worth $2 billion. He also started the Growth Hackers Conference and worked as interim head of growth at Lyft when it was less than 30 people.Gagan also had a massive failure with Sprig, where he was CEO and cofounder. Sprig was a food delivery company that raised $60 million from Greylock and Social Capital. After Sprig, he took a three-year sabbatical and traveled the world as a nomad, living on almost every continent and studying anthropology. Now, he writes and teaches other entrepreneurs at gaganbiyani.com. On Twitter, he shared the story of the failure of his company Sprig, which was thriving until Uber Eats entered as a competitor.After three pivots and multiple layoffs, they decided to shut down. "If you're gonna fail, do it fast. If you're gonna succeed, do it slowly," he says to other entrepreneurs.Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Nobody talks about failure in Silicon Valley, yet 90% of startups fail.

Why?

Three years ago, Neeraj Berry and I shut down our company Sprig, which raised $60 million from Greylock Partners and Social Capital and grew to $20 million revenue.

Then, it all fell apart.

In 2013, I was at Lyft, envious of how fast it was growing.

While working as a growth advisor to Lyft, multiple people approached me: What if we pursued Lyft for food?

We looked at Postmates and thought:

the food arrived sloppy and restaurants didn't seem to care about deliveryit took forever (about an hour!) to get your foodit was overall too expensive

We struggled through product iterations until we found "magic": Three taps and $15 and a healthy meal was delivered to your door in 15 minutes.

To make it possible, we had to run the restaurant ourselves; it would be expensive, but worth it. We recruited Nate Keller, Morgan Springer, and Matt Kent as founders.

We launched and had immediate success. The buzz was unbelievable. Within months, we were on track to do $1 million in revenue a year.

Our series A was a hot round. I did four partner meetings on the same day and raised $10 million by nightfall.

Great investors, a great team, and we were off to the races.

Two challenges eventually arose:

The Health Department and Planning Department of San Francisco made our lives hell. They didn't like our innovations — we were a new type of business that didn't fit within the rules they had for caterers or restaurants. They didn't like that we asked for forgiveness instead of permission, and bogged us down in bureaucratic processes as a result. We had to hire lobbyists who had good relationships with the city to smooth things over and teach us how to manage the situation. At times, it felt more like a legal bribe than an honest transaction.As we grew, our burn rate grew, too. We were losing money on every meal — if only we could get to critical mass.

We had epic revenue growth with burn-rate growth. Soon, we were burning $1.5 to $2 million a month.

We were always "one to two months away" from managing the burn.

We finally got some progress on margins, but it meant degrading the product: Food is fickle. Less money in, worse food out.

Nonetheless, it was growing three times faster than Udemy, my previous company, had. Margins were improving — we were down to losing just $1 a meal.

Sprig's peak was February 2016:

4,500 meals delivered per day$22 million run-rate1,300 employees (including delivery workers)$60 million raised

I had never felt better. I was confident and getting super strong reviews from my team. The public treated me like a star, which was both uncomfortable and awesome. Even my dating life felt like it had improved significantly.

But secretly, I was nervous — it didn't feel like a done deal.

All of a sudden, everything changed. 

On Feb 22, 2016, our growth curve inverted: +2% a week became -2% a week.

We scrambled to figure out why. Was it seasonality? Was it our rising prices? Was it the quality of the food?

Everyone was running tests to figure out why and what to do.

It was Uber Eats, which had launched that week.

After hearing all of the war stories from Lyft, I knew they were unsavory competitors. Super smart, ruthless with big coffers.

Board meetings were tense: Should we restart? We had $15 million in revenue still — if we closed, we'd lose it.

What about pursuing a sale? If we did layoffs, then we couldn't sell. If we didn't, we might die trying.

We decided to pivot to a new offering that focused on food quality. It was all f-----.

Everyone — family, friends, investors — thinks you're doing well and you can't tell them you're not. We were in pure panic mode.

We launched Sprig 2.0, shut down Chicago, and laid off a third of our HQ staff to conserve burn.

Managing external and internal parties was tough. I shut down external activities, such as talks and press, so we didn't become a Theranos. Internally, I leaned on my executive team. They were honest and kind with our employees. Through it all, we had only one departure.

Sprig 2.0 wasn't enough. We got to $0 margins, but the traction didn't improve. The board asked us: What would it take to be fully profitable?

We were running a restaurant doing $6 million in revenue but paying real estate for a place that needed $20 million in revenue to be profitable.

The team had fought hard — but we were all completely exhausted.

After three pivots and multiple layoffs, we faced a final decision. We had $8 million left and knew we had to restart or quit and return the money.

Berry and I made an executive decision: We shut Sprig down on May 27, 2017.

There were three causes for failure:

In 2013, we mistook present for future. Delivery apps got better with scale. We got worse.The profit equation was off. The market size in San Francisco was too small for our big kitchen. We blitz-failed.Cap table + burnout. Hard to restart after losing $50 million.

I'm grateful for the experience. I learned way more in four years at Sprig than four years at Udemy or UC Berkeley.

Few grudges were held and we took care of the team. They mostly landed on their feet (Silicon Valley embraces failure).

A classy ending helped sow the seeds for forgiveness. All told it was just four years.

If you're gonna fail, do it fast. If you're gonna succeed, do it slowly.

In startups, remember to watch your flanks. Your competitors are not your direct competitors, but the whole market.

Thanks to everyone who believed in us.

Original author: Gagan Biyani

Continue reading
  22 Hits
May
30

'The year of the customer, rather than the year of the prospect': Here are the three product areas that analysts think will drive Salesforce's growth this year (CRM)

Salesforce lowered its full year guidance by $1 billion when reporting first quarter earnings on Thursday, taking a conservative approach because it's considering the potential uncertainty for the rest of the year.Despite the revision, Salesforce still expects to grow 20 percent this year, and analysts say that growth will come from demand for its products like Service Cloud and Marketing Cloud that help companies stay connected to customers. Service Cloud revenue surpassed Sales Cloud revenue for the first time in Q1, and analysts say this could be because given the current climate, organizations are more focused on serving existing customers rather than trying to gain new ones. Commerce Cloud, which helps businesses create ecommerce tools to make the company digital, will see a similar trend. Salesforce's new tools to help businesses and public agencies reopen safely will also drive demand. While they may not contribute much revenue but they will help it build trust with customers and lead to new customer deals in the long run.Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Salesforce dropped its guidance for the year by $1 billion during its first quarter earnings, and is now projecting 17% revenue growth this year as it deals with the consequences of the coronavirus crisis. However, analysts point out that that growth rate is only slightly lower than what it's predicted in the past. They predict that while Salesforce may close fewer new deals this year, the value it can provide existing customers will help it grow.

Since Salesforce doesn't expect its business to significantly slow-down overall, even at a time when many of its customers are struggling to stay afloat, analysts predict that the highest demand and revenue growth will come from products that help businesses retain their existing customers. In particular, they highlight customer service tool Service Cloud will see high demand and revenue growth. 

"Every company today needs to be able to go out and execute, and serve its customers," Credit Suisse analyst Brad Zelnick told Business Insider. "We think Salesforce's value proposition remains a very high priority [for companies], whether we're in the midst of a pandemic — as we are today — or coming out of it."

Although achieving 17% sales growth in 2020 would be roughly in-line with what Salesforce has predicted in the past, it's not as aggressive as the company originally hoped. Before it's guidance plunge, Salesforce had expected rosier 23% growth for the year. 

And while lowering its full year revenue outlook by about ~5%, makes Salesforce slightly more conservative than cloud peers like Workday and ServiceNow (which only reduced their guidance by 2%), analysts attribute that added caution to its experience as a public company during the 2008 Great Recession.

The entire industry is seeing a slow-down in new deals, and Salesforce isn't immune, even if its subscription-based model is inherently more stable than past ways of doing business. 

Analysts say that while Salesforce is likely anticipating the decrease in new deals, its likely relying on products that could help its existing customers with customer service, ecommerce, marketing, and reopening safely to help it hit its 20% growth goal this year. That means its Service Cloud, Marketing Cloud and Commerce Cloud product areas, since those tools all help organizations stay connected to customers, which is critically important as they try to stay afloat through the economic crisis.

In its first quarter results, Service Cloud revenue surpassed revenue of the original flagship Sales Cloud for the first time in the company's history. Although it was not a huge leap — only surpassing by $7 million — it indicates that organizations in the current climate are more focused on serving existing customers rather than trying to gain new ones. 

"Companies are going to have all their focus on keeping the customers they've got and keeping them happy and spending money," Dan Elman, an analyst Nucleus Research, told Business Insider. 

Zelnick echoed those thoughts: This is year is "the year of the customer, rather than the year of the prospect," he said. 

Salesforce's Service Cloud and Commerce Cloud "are likely better positioned to weather the storm," William Blair analyst Arjun Bhatia also wrote in a note to clients after earnings.

Commerce Cloud helps companies develop ecommerce tools to digitize their business, something many retail stores and restaurants are doing to keep their businesses afloat. Salesforce even released four new easy-to-use tools for Commerce Cloud specifically designed to help businesses with this. 

As companies look to survive the pandemic, the kinds of tools Service Cloud and Commerce Cloud can offer "are going to be really important for all customers" Rebecca Wettemann, an analyst at Valoir, said. 

Additionally, analysts expect there to be increased demand for Marketing Cloud, as companies start to recover and need to ramp up new business again. During the crisis many companies have changed their marketing messages to ones of reassurance versus explicitly selling things — all those "we're here for you" ads you've likely seen — but that will have to change once things start recovering, said Dan Newman, an analyst at Futurum Research.

"In order to rebuild the census pipeline, you're gonna have to see a wave of investment into the marketing stack," Newman said. "And so as the economy starts to return, I do expect there will be some significant investment made in marketing efforts. 

He believes Salesforce will be one the beneficiaries, and an uptick in Marketing Cloud revenues would be an indication of businesses restarting, he said. 

Salesforce's new Work.com tools to help businesses and public agencies reopen safely may not be bringing in much revenue right now, but that they're likely to bring in new customers down the line. That kind of product builds stronger customer relationships, Zelnick said. 

Wettemann agrees, noting that Salesforce was able to quickly repackage and rethink what it was offering to be useful to its customers right now, and that that move will help them long-term. 

"I think there's still a lot of potential there, including in other areas of the portfolio like Tableau and even MuleSoft for them to deliver new solutions to the markets that are compelling right now," Wettemann said. 

JPMorgan analyst Mark Murphy may have put it the most optimistically in a note to clients on Friday:

"While Salesforce could see some choppy bookings quarters ahead," he wrote, "Coming out the other side of the pandemic and economic slowdown, we believe Salesforce remains uniquely well-positioned to grow as a focal-point of acceleration in digital transformation activity." 

Got a tip about Salesforce or another tech company? Contact this reporter via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or Signal at 925-364-4258. (PR pitches by email only, please.) You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Original author: Paayal Zaveri

Continue reading
  24 Hits
May
30

From a Security VAR to a $10 Million ARR SaaS Product Business: Andrew Plato, CEO of Anitian (Part 6) - Sramana Mitra

Sramana Mitra: Do you have about 50 customers right now? Andrew Plato: That sounds right. We’ve got a mixture of some on our platform. It’s not quite 50. It’s probably in the low 20’s. We’d 12 on the...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  19 Hits
May
30

Colors: Cherry Blossoms, Night - Sramana Mitra

I’m publishing this series on LinkedIn called Colors to explore a topic that I care deeply about: the Renaissance Mind. I am just as passionate about entrepreneurship, technology, and business, as I...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  27 Hits
May
30

1Mby1M Virtual Accelerator Investor Forum: With Garrett Goldberg of Bee Partners (Part 5) - Sramana Mitra

Sramana Mitra: How much money had gone into the company at the point of exit? Garrett Goldberg: Probably around $60 million. They raised Series A, a Series A extension, and then Series B. Sramana...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  43 Hits
May
29

Jeremy Conrad left his own VC firm to start a company, and investors like what he’s building

When this editor first met Jeremy Conrad, it was in 2014 in San Francisco, at the 8,000-square-foot former fish factory that was home to Lemnos, the hardware-focused venture firm Conrad co-founded three years earlier.

Conrad — who’d studied mechanical engineering at MIT — was excited in that moment about investing in hardware startups, having just closed a small new fund. One investment his team made around that time was in Airware, a company that made subscription-based software for drones and would go on to garner substantial buzz along with $118 million in venture funding.

Alas, like many hardware-related software startups, it would eventual shut down, closing its doors in 2018. But by then, Conrad had already moved on. Thanks to a team who’d been camping out at Lemnos in 2017, he’d fallen in love with the future of construction. Though he didn’t know much about real estate at the time, the “more I learned about it — not dissimilar to when I started Lemnos — it felt like there was a gap in the market, an opportunity that people were missing,” says Conrad from his home in San Francisco, where he has hunkered down throughout the COVID-19 crisis.

Enter Quartz, Conrad’s now 1.5-year-old, 14-person company, which quietly announced $7.75 million in Series A funding earlier this month, led by Baseline Ventures, with Felicis Ventures, Lemnos and Bloomberg Beta also participating.

What it’s selling to real estate developers, project managers and construction supervisors is really two things, and that’s safety and information.

Here’s how it works: Using off-the-shelf hardware components that are reassembled in San Francisco and hardened (meaning secured to reduce vulnerabilities), the company incorporates its machine-learning software into this camera-based platform, then mounts the system onto cranes at construction sites. From there, the system streams 4K live feeds of what’s happening on the ground, while also making sense of the action.

Say dozens of concrete-pouring trucks are expected on a construction site. The cameras, with their persistent view, can convey through a dashboard system whether and when the trucks have arrived and how many, says Conrad. It can determine how many people are on a job site, and whether other deliveries have been made, even if not with a high degree of specificity.

“We can’t say [to project managers] that 1,000 screws were delivered, but we can let them know whether the boxes they were expecting were delivered and where they were left,” he explains.

It’s an especially appealing proposition in the age of coronavirus, as the technology can help convey information that’s happening at a site that’s been shut down, or even how closely employees are gathered.

Conrad says the technology also saves on time by providing information to those who might not otherwise be able to access it. Think of the developer on the 50th floor of the skyscraper that he or she is building, or even the crane operator who is perhaps moving a two-ton object and has to rely on someone on the ground to deliver directions but can enjoy far more visibility with the aid of a multi-camera set-up.

Quartz, which today operates in California but is embarking on a nationwide rollout, was largely inspired by what Conrad was seeing in the world of self-driving. From sensors to self-perception systems, he knew the technologies would be even easier to deploy at construction sites, and he believed it could make them safer, too. Indeed, like cars, construction sites are highly dangerous. According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, of the worker fatalities in private industry in 2018, more than 20% were in construction.

Conrad also saw an opportunity to take on established companies like Trimble, a 42-year-old, publicly traded, Sunnyvale, Calif.-based company that sells a portfolio of tools to the construction industry and charges top dollar for them. Quartz is meanwhile charging $2,000 per month per crane for its series of cameras, their installation, a live stream and “lookback” data, though this may well rise as its adds features.

It’s a big enough opportunity that, perhaps unsurprisingly, Quartz is not alone in chasing it. Last summer, for example, Versatile, an Israeli-based startup with offices in San Francisco and New York City, raised $5.5 million in seed funding from Germany’s Robert Bosch Venture Capital and several other investors for a very similar platform, though it uses sensors mounted under the hook of a crane to provide information about what’s happening below. Construction Dive, a media property that’s dedicated to the industry, highlights many other, similar and competitive startups in the space, too.

Still, Quartz has Conrad, who isn’t just any founding CEO. Not only does he have that background in engineering, but having launched a venture firm and spent years as an investor may also serve him well. He thinks a lot about the payback period on its hardware, for example.

Unlike a lot of founders, he even says he loves the fundraising process. “I get the highest-quality feedback from some of the smartest people I know, which really helps focus your vision,” says Conrad.

“When you talk with great VCs, they ask great questions. For me, it’s the best free consulting you can get.”

Continue reading
  31 Hits
May
29

The best investment every digital brand can make during the COVID-19 pandemic

Steve Tan Contributor
Steve Tan is a Singapore-based serial entrepreneur and full-stack digital marketer with over 14 years of hands-on experience who is also the CEO and founder of Super Tan Brothers Pte. Ltd, which operates e-commerce, software, logistics, marketing, educational and investment companies around the globe.

Intuitively, stores that sell online should be making a killing during the COVID-19 pandemic. After all, everyone is stuck at home — and understandably more willing to shop online instead of at a traditional retailer to avoid putting themselves and others at medical risk. But the truth is, most smaller online stores have seen better days.

The primary challenge is that smaller shops often don’t have the logistics networks that companies like Amazon do. Consequently, they’re seeing substantially delayed delivery timelines, especially if they ship internationally. Customers obviously aren’t thrilled about that reality. And in many cases, they’re requesting refunds at a staggering rate.

I saw this play out firsthand in April. At that point, my stores were down 20% or in some cases even 30% in revenue. Needless to say, my team was freaking out. But there’s one thing we did that helped us increase our revenue over 200% since the pandemic, decrease refund requests and even strengthen our existing customer relationships.

We implemented a 24-hour live chat in all of our stores. Here’s why it worked for us and why every digital brand should be doing it too.

Avoid the common ‘unreachability’ frustration

When I started my first online store in 2006, challenges that bogged my team down often meant that my team’s first priority became resolving those challenges so that we could serve our customers faster. But admittedly, when these challenges came up, it became more difficult to balance communicating with our customers and resolving the issues that prevented us from fulfilling their orders quickly.

Continue reading
  20 Hits
May
29

Bunq adds donations to charities and tests redesign

Challenger bank Bunq is adding a new feature that lets you donate to charities directly from the app. In addition to that, Bunq is also in the process of redesigning its app. The company is launching a public beta test to get feedback from its users.

Other fintech startups, such as Revolut and Lydia, have launched donation features in the past. But in those cases, startups have selected a handful of charities.

Bunq has chosen a different approach, as you can create your own donation campaigns in the app. As long your local charity has an IBAN number, you can add it to Bunq’s donation feature. You can even add a local business in case you want to help them stay in business.

You can then invite other people to donate to your charities. You can also track the total amount of your donations, as well as the total donations from the entire Bunq user base.

The company has also been working on the third major version of the app. In order to test it before the public release, Bunq is launching a public beta program. The first build will roll out in the coming weeks.

In order to simplify navigation, Bunq has tried to remove clutter by focusing on one main button on each page. The app will be divided in four main tabs.

The first tab, called “Me,” will feature all your personal information — personal bank accounts, savings goals, etc. On the second tab, called “Us,” you can see information about Bunq, such as total investments and total donations. The third tab features your profile information.

Finally, the fourth tab is a dedicated camera button. It lets you scan invoices and receipts, which could be particularly useful for business customers. I’m not sure a lot of people use that feature, but things could still change before the final release.

Continue reading
  23 Hits
May
29

Contact Tracing and Technology Conference – 6/3/20

On Wednesday, June 3rd, a team led by the COVID Tech Task Force is putting on the first of several free public conferences on the topic of Contact Tracing and Technology. Harvard’s Berkman Klein Center, NYU’s Alliance for Public Interest Technology, TechCrunch, Betaworks Studios, and Hangar are also part of organizing the effort.

I’ve gone extremely deep down the contact tracing and exposure notification rabbit hole. In February, I had never heard the phrase contact tracing. Today, I not only understand it well, I have a lot of perspective on the current state of contact tracing technology, along with emerging “new tech solutions” to contact tracing, and the incredible challenge of operationalizing these new technologies.

More importantly (and thankfully), several tech leaders motivated by Harper Reed recognized that the tech community that began talking about “contact tracing” in April was creating massive confusion given the long history of contact tracing. The tech folks (me included) tried to separate it from classical contact tracing by calling it “digital contact tracing.” But, this wasn’t really contact tracing at all and needed a different name. Harper labeled it Exposure Alerting which has finally found its true name as “Exposure Notification.”

Contact Tracing and Exposure Notification are different but related. And the way contact tracing is currently implemented is on a spectrum from legacy software systems to paper/whiteboard tracking. Not surprisingly, a number of tech companies and consulting firms have “contact tracing products” coming out. Some are excellent. Many either inadequate, not contact tracing, or mostly vaporware.

Two weeks ago, on the bi-monthly call that Fred Wilson and I do with several of the leaders of the Covid-19 Task Force, we suggested that they do a series of public events – as inclusive as they could – to help convene anyone who is interested around the issues of contact tracing, exposure alerting, health care, public policy, and technology. Fred wrote about this yesterday. We are both delighted that this has come together so quickly as the public forum on this is badly needed.

This event has several key speakers along with a bunch of demos of emerging products. It’ll be three hours long and live streamed on the web.

RSVP to attend. And, if you are working on a contact tracing or exposure notification application and want to be part of the demo mix, send me an email and I’ll get you connected.

Original author: Brad Feld

Continue reading
  31 Hits
May
29

Best of Bootstrapping: Best Tactic for B2B Startups - Sramana Mitra

What is the best bootstrapping tactic for B-to-B startups? Solve an acute customer pain. Get paid an advance to do so. Leeyo Software CEO Jagan Reddy followed this strategy to bootstrap to $20...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  38 Hits
May
29

How startups can leverage elastic services for cost optimization

Joey Lei Contributor
Joey Lei is director of service management at Synoptek, a global systems integrator and managed services provider. Prior to joining Synoptek, he was a lead product manager for Dell EMC’s Data Protection Division and was a founding product manager for Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager, Dell EMC’s newest generation data protection and data management solution.

Due to COVID-19, business continuity has been put to the test for many companies in the manufacturing, agriculture, transport, hospitality, energy and retail sectors. Cost reduction is the primary focus of companies in these sectors due to massive losses in revenue caused by this pandemic. The other side of the crisis is, however, significantly different.

Companies in industries such as medical, government and financial services, as well as cloud-native tech startups that are providing essential services, have experienced a considerable increase in their operational demands — leading to rising operational costs. Irrespective of the industry your company belongs to, and whether your company is experiencing reduced or increased operations, cost optimization is a reality for all companies to ensure a sustained existence.

One of the most reliable measures for cost optimization at this stage is to leverage elastic services designed to grow or shrink according to demand, such as cloud and managed services. A modern product with a cloud-native architecture can auto-scale cloud consumption to mitigate lost operational demand. What may not have been obvious to startup leaders is a strategy often employed by incumbent, mature enterprises — achieving cost optimization by leveraging managed services providers (MSPs). MSPs enable organizations to repurpose full-time staff members from impacted operations to more strategic product lines or initiatives.

Why companies need cost optimization in the long run

Continue reading
  23 Hits
May
29

487th Roundtable Recording on May 28, 2020: With Christian Czernich, Round2 Capital Partners - Sramana Mitra

In case you missed it, you can listen to the recording here: 487th 1Mby1M Roundtable May 28, 2020: With Christian Czernich, Round2 Capital Partners

___

Original author: Maureen Kelly

Continue reading
  31 Hits
May
29

June 4 – 488th 1Mby1M Mentoring Roundtable for Entrepreneurs - Sramana Mitra

Entrepreneurs are invited to the 488th FREE online 1Mby1M mentoring roundtable on Thursday, June 4, 2020, at 8 a.m. PDT/11 a.m. EDT/5 p.m. CEST/8:30 p.m. India IST. If you are a serious entrepreneur,...

___

Original author: Maureen Kelly

Continue reading
  29 Hits
May
29

Intuit Bets Big on AI - Sramana Mitra

Cloud-based accounting and tax preparation software giant Intuit (NASDAQ: INTU) recently announced its third quarter earnings. The global pandemic has hurt the smaller businesses most and with the US...

___

Original author: MitraSramana

Continue reading
  29 Hits
May
29

Cisco to acquire internet monitoring solution ThousandEyes

When Cisco bought AppDynamics in 2017 for $3.7 billion just before the IPO, the company sent a clear signal it wanted to move beyond its pure network hardware roots into the software monitoring side of the equation. Yesterday afternoon the company announced it intends to buy another monitoring company, this time snagging internet monitoring solution ThousandEyes.

Cisco would not comment on the price when asked by TechCrunch, but published reports from CNBC and others pegged the deal at around $1 billion. If that’s accurate, it means the company has paid around $4.7 billion for a pair of monitoring solutions companies.

Cisco’s Todd Nightingale, writing in a blog post announcing the deal said that the kind of data that ThousandEyes provides around internet user experience is more important than ever as internet connections have come under tremendous pressure with huge numbers of employees working from home.

ThousandEyes keeps watch on those connections and should fit in well with other Cisco monitoring technologies. “With thousands of agents deployed throughout the internet, ThousandEyes’ platform has an unprecedented understanding of the internet and grows more intelligent with every deployment, Nightingale wrote.

He added, “Cisco will incorporate ThousandEyes’ capabilities in our AppDynamics application intelligence portfolio to enhance visibility across the enterprise, internet and the cloud.”

As for ThousandEyes, co-founder and CEO Mohit Lad told a typical acquisition story. It was about growing faster inside the big corporation than it could on its own. “We decided to become part of Cisco because we saw the potential to do much more, much faster, and truly create a legacy for ThousandEyes,” Lad wrote.

It’s interesting to note that yesterday’s move, and the company’s larger acquisition strategy over the last decade is part of a broader move to software and services as a complement to its core networking hardware business.

Just yesterday, Synergy Research released its network switch and router revenue report and it wasn’t great. As companies have hunkered down during the pandemic, they have been buying much less network hardware, dropping the Q1 numbers to seven year low. That translated into a $1 billion less in overall revenue in this category, according to Synergy.

While Cisco owns the vast majority of the market, it obviously wants to keep moving into software services as a hedge against this shifting market. This deal simply builds on that approach.

ThousandEyes was founded in 2010 and raised over $110 million on a post valuation of $670 million as of February 2019, according to Pitchbook Data.

Continue reading
  30 Hits
May
29

From a Security VAR to a $10 Million ARR SaaS Product Business: Andrew Plato, CEO of Anitian (Part 5) - Sramana Mitra

Sramana Mitra: Talk to me a bit about your go-to market experience. Were the first people you went out to people that you had been selling your professional services to? Andrew Plato: It’s a...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  26 Hits
May
29

Roundtable Recap: May 28 – Alternative Financing for Startups - Sramana Mitra

During this week’s roundtable, we had as our guest Christian Czernich, Founder and CEO at Round2 Capital Partners, a firm that is experimenting with an alternative financing model. Prometeo As for...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  31 Hits
May
28

3 bearish takes on the current edtech boom

Edtech is booming, but a short while ago, many companies in the category were struggling to break through as mainstream offerings. Now, it seems like everyone is clamoring to get into the next seed-stage startup that has the phrase “remote learning” on its About page.

And so begins the normal cycle that occurs when a sector gets overheated — boom, bust and a reckoning. While we’re still in the early days of edtech’s revitalization, it isn’t a gold mine all around the world. Today, in the spirit of balance and history, I’ll present three bearish takes I’ve heard on edtech’s future.

Quizlet’s CEO Matthew Glotzbach says that when students go back to school, the technology that “sticks” during this time of massive experimentation might not be bountiful.

“I think the dividing line there will be there are companies that have been around, that are a little more entrenched, and have good financial runway and can probably survive this cycle,” he said. “They have credibility and will probably get picked [by schools].” The newer companies, he said, might get stuck with adoption because they are at a high degree of risk, and might be giving out free licenses beyond their financial runway right now.

Continue reading
  38 Hits
May
28

The secret to trustworthy data strategy

Daniel Wu Contributor
Dan Wu is a Privacy Counsel & Legal Engineer at Immuta, an automated data governance platform for analytics. He’s advocated for data ethics, inclusive urban innovation, and diversity in TechCrunch, Harvard Business Review, and FastCompany. He's helped Fortune 500 companies, governments, and startups with ethical & agile data strategies. He holds a Harvard J.D. & Ph.D.
Eugene Kolker Contributor
Eugene Kolker, PhD is the Chief Economist and Head of XLAB at Fabuwood Corp., an Adjunct Professor at New York University’s Tandon School of Engineering, and President of 1Ekaroni, a consulting and services company. He was formerly the Chief Data Officer of IBM Global Services and the Chief Data and Analytics Officer of Seattle Children's Healthcare System. He has also co-founded three digital technology and healthcare startups.
Leandro DalleMule Contributor
Leandro DalleMule is the General Manager for North America for Planck. He's the former Chief Data Officer and Head of Information Management at AIG. Leandro holds an MBA from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, graduating magna cum laude, a graduate certificate in applied mathematics from Columbia University, and a B.Sc. in mechanical engineering from University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Barbara Cohn Contributor
Barbara Cohn is the managing member of BLC Strategic Advisors. She previously served as the first Chief Data Officer for the State of New York, having led its successful open data initiative for Governor Andrew Cuomo. Prior to that, she was Executive Counsel/HHS Connect Data Interoperability Initiative under Mayor Bloomberg, as well as served in multiple leadership positions in NYS agencies and Office of the NYS Governor.
Carlos Rivero Contributor
Carlos Rivero is the Chief Data Officer for the Commonwealth of Virginia. Prior to his appointment, Rivero served as Chief Data Officer and Chief Enterprise Architect for the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Transit Administration in Washington, D.C.

Shortly after its use exploded in the post-office world of COVID-19, Zoom was banned by a variety of private and public actors, including SpaceX and the government of Taiwan. Critics allege its data strategy, particularly its privacy and security measures, were insufficiently robust, especially putting vulnerable populations, like children, at risk. NYC’s Department of Education, for instance, mandated teachers switch to alternative platforms like Microsoft Teams.

This isn’t a problem specific to Zoom. Other technology giants, from Alphabet, Apple to Facebook, have struggled with these strategic data issues, despite wielding armies of lawyers and data engineers, and have overcome them.

To remedy this, data leaders cannot stop at identifying how to improve their revenue-generating functions with data, what the former Chief Data Officer of AIG (one of our co-authors) calls “offensive” data strategy. Data leaders also protect, fight for, and empower their key partners, like users and employees, or promote “defensive” data strategy. Data offense and defense are core to trustworthy data-driven products.

While these data issues apply to most organizations, highly-regulated innovators in industries with large social impact (the “third wave”) must pay special attention. As Steve Case and the World Economic Forum articulate, the next phase of innovation will center on industries that merge the digital and the physical worlds, affecting the most intimate aspects of our lives. As a result, companies that balance insight and trust well, Boston Consulting group predicts, will be the new winners.

Drawing from our work across the public, corporate, and startup worlds, we identify a few “insight killers” — then identify the trustworthy alternative. While trustworthy data strategy should involve end users and other groups outside the company as discussed here, the lessons below focus on the complexities of partnering within organizations, which deserve attention in their own right.

Insight-killer #1: “Data strategy adds no value to my life.”

From the beginning of a data project, a trustworthy data leader asks, “Who are our partners and what prevents them from achieving their goals?” In other words: listen. This question can help identify the unmet needs of the 46% of surveyed technology and business teams who found their data groups have little value to offer them.

Putting this to action is the data leader of one highly-regulated AI health startup — Cognoa — who listened to tensions between its defensive and offensive data functions. Cognoa’s Chief AI Officer identified how healthcare data laws, like the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, resulted in friction between his key partners: compliance officers and machine learning engineers. Compliance officers needed to protect end users’ privacy while data and machine learning engineers wanted faster access to data.

To meet these multifaceted goals, Cognoa first scoped down its solution by prioritizing its highest-risk databases. It then connected all of those databases using a single access-and-control layer.

This redesign satisfied its compliance officers because Cognoa’s engineers could then only access health data based on strict policy rules informed by healthcare data regulations. Furthermore, since these rules could be configured and transparently explained without code, it bridged communication gaps between its data and compliance roles. Its engineers were also elated because they no longer had to wait as long to receive privacy-protected copies.

Because its data leader started by listening to the struggles of its two key partners, Cognoa met both its defensive and offensive goals.

Continue reading
  40 Hits
May
28

Join GGV’s Hans Tung and Jeff Richards for a live Q&A: June 4 at 3:30 pm EDT/12:30 pm PDT

What does a global mindset look like in a world where most of us no longer travel? And what does it mean to be local when everyone is connected?

Those are the first questions we had in mind when we read GGV Capital’s Twitter bio, which asserts that the investing shop with offices in five cities is a “global venture capital firm that invests in local founders.”

Certainly, some of its investments are far from home, including Khatabook (based in Bangalore), Keep (Beijing), Coder, (Austin) and Slice (New York City). And those are just GGV deals from the last few months.

But what constitutes a local investment in a world where, until recently, no deal was more than a plane ride or two away? Hans Tung and Jeff Richards, managing partners at GGV Capital, are swinging by Extra Crunch Live next week, and we’re going to dive into the above to figure it out.

Of course, we’ll also ask critical, founder-focused questions about their current investing pace, check sizes and how they are adapting to the COVID-19 era. But after that, there’s a lot of work to do.

We’ll call on Tung to share some of what he’s learned from his time investing in China’s tech landscape, with a specific focus on what he sees in the future that might prove encouraging. The other GGV partner joining, Richards, also has international experience working in Asia and Latin America, so the conversation should be interesting.

In February, the firm published a mom-and-pop shop investment thesis. GGV Capital wants to invest in startups that help small retailers digitize operations and work with better supply chains. It is also interested in startups that want to establish logistic and online payment infrastructure. (Surely Shopify can’t be this entire market, right?)

The thesis hinges on consumer shopping habits and retailers open for business, so we’ll see how Tung and Richards are changing their appetite, or further shaping it. 

Details are below for Extra Crunch subscribers; if you need a pass, get a cheap trial here

Chat with you all in a week!

When, where, Zoom

Thursday, June 412:30 p.m. PDT/3:30 p.m. EDT/7:30 p.m. GMTAdd this event to your calendar

Continue reading
  39 Hits