Oct
16

We are entering a new era for AI-powered robotics 

PlayVS, the startup building esports infrastructure at the high school level, has today announced the close of a $15 million Series A funding round. The financing was led by New Enterprise Associates, with participation from existing investor Science, as well as CrossCut Ventures, Coatue Management, Cross Culture Ventures, the San Francisco 49ers, Nas, Dollar Shave Club founder Michael Dubin, Twitch cofounder Kevin Lin, and others.

PlayVS first publicly launched out of the LA-based Science startup studio in April. The company partnered with the NFHS, the equivalent of the NCAA for high school-level sports, to build out leagues, rules and more around high school esports.

Most high school sports are governed by the NFHS, which writes the rules, hires referees, schedules seasons and determines the format of playoffs and state championships. That same infrastructure might carry over from one high school sport to another, but esports represents a new challenge for the NFHS.

PlayVS brings to market a platform that schedules games, helps schools hold try-outs and form teams, and pulls in stats real-time from games thanks to partnerships with game publishers.

In October, PlayVS will launch its inaugural season, bringing organized esports to more than 18 states and approximately 5 million students across 5,000 high schools.

As esports continue to grow, colleges and professional organizations have already started investing in scholarship programs and pro teams respectively. But whereas other high-level teams look at high school athletes for recruiting, the same infrastructure has not yet been put into place for esports.

PlayVS wants to change that. The new round of funding will go towards expanding the product and the team to eventually put PlayVS in every high school across the country. The company has yet to announce which schools will participate and which games will be available during the first season, but PlayVS has confirmed that the games will be PC-based and will come from the Multiplayer Online Battle Arena, Fighting and Sports genres.

Continue reading
  38 Hits
Jun
04

ING backs FinCompare, the German comparison platform for SME financing

FinCompare, the German fintech startup that offers a comparison platform for SME financing, has closed €10 million in Series A funding. The round is led by ING Ventures, the venture capital arm of dutch bank ING. The company’s previous backers Speedinvest, and UNIQA Ventures also followed on.

The comparison site currently only operates in Germany and since entering the market in February 2017 says it has attracted more than 2,500 customers and has processed more than one billion Euros. The new capital will be used by FinCompare to invest in its IT platform, including expanding the team, and for further European expansion.

The FinCompare platform itself follows a pretty traditional price comparison model, letting small to medium-sized businesses find, compare and even close a variety of financing options such as credit, leasing, factoring and finetrading. The products on offer are from more than 200 banks, alternative financial service providers, and development banks online.

The comparison platform claims to be independent, even if — like most comparison sites — FinCompare receives a kick back for any brokered loan or other financing solution in the form of commission from its financing partners. The fintech is also keen to talk up its independence in light of backing from ING Ventures, noting that remaining neutral in terms of the products it pushes is essential for any comparison platform.

ING’s investment in FinCompare is being positioned as part of the bank’s wider digitalization strategy: “ING Ventures was founded with the aim to invest in fintechs who establish a unique customer experience. Further, the investment in FinCompare enables us to expand our presence in the SME-segment in Germany,” says Benoit Legrand, CEO of ING Ventures.

Legrand also says the German SME industry is among the most attractive in Europe. “Here we can set incentives together with FinCompare and make life easier for businesses. This investment helps ING in the implementation of the bank’s strategy to become the market-leading platform for financing needs,” he adds.

Meanwhile, I understand FinCompare’s planned European expansion will see it eye up the german speaking markets of Austria and Switzerland during the next few months. Netherlands and Poland are also on the list, along with the U.K. “We are planning to launch in the U.K. in 2019, perhaps even through an acquisition,” FinCompare founder and CEO Stephan Heller tells me. Competitors in the U.K. include Fundingoptions, and Capitalise.

Continue reading
  49 Hits
Jun
04

N26 now has 1 million customers

You don’t sign up for a bank account every day. And yet, German startup N26 has managed to attract 1 million clients across Europe. They generate €1 billion in transaction volume every month ($1.17 billion).

It took N26 only nine months to grow from 500,000 to 1 million. And the company now plans to have 5 million users by 2020.

It’s an aggressive goal, but N26 plans to expand beyond the Eurozone. The company confirms that customers based in the U.K. and the U.S. will be able to create an N26 account in the coming months.

While N26 announced a new metal card at TechCrunch Disrupt in December 2017, the card has only been available to some customers. Everybody will be able to sign up for a metal card within the next few weeks.

Revolut is still slightly ahead of N26, but both companies are growing quite rapidly. N26 currently gets 2,500 new users every day. Back in February, Revolut said it was attracting between 6,000 and 8,000 new users per day. The company now has nearly 2 million users.

Of course, you can’t really compare Revolut with N26 as Revolut isn’t technically a bank account. It’s much easier to sign up to Revolut as you don’t need to initiate a video call to verify your identity.

But it’s clear that both companies are doing incredibly well right now when it comes to growth.

Continue reading
  52 Hits
Apr
22

Surreal photos from Coachella take you inside the most famous music festival on Earth

TransferWise might be best known for its international money transfer app, but the European fintech unicorn has always had ambitions of being a broader platform play entirely agnostic of how you access the service. This includes providing banks with access to the TransferWise API to power their own international money transfer features. However, perhaps understandably — given that the company also competes with banks — these partnerships have been small in number.

With that said, today TransferWise is adding what looks like its most significant banking partner to date: BPCE Groupe, France’s second largest bank. The partnership will see TransferWise provide international money transfer services for BPCE Groupe’s 15 million or so customers, which, the company notes, is the first time a major bank in Europe will directly integrate TransferWise’s API into its mobile banking apps.

TransferWise’s existing bank partnerships are with Estonia’s LHV, and German challenger bank N26. It was due to add U.K. challenger bank Starling to the list, but the integration with the bank’s app never materialised and TechCrunch learned last week that the partnership has now dissolved entirely.

Meanwhile, the partnership between Groupe BPCE/Natixis Payments and TransferWise isn’t set to be launched until the beginning of 2019. Once it does launch, the bank’s customers will be able to send money outside of the eurozone at TransferWise’s standard fees via the banks’ app.

“Both TransferWise and BPCE are committed to offering the best possible service and the fairest deal to their customers and this collaboration is an important step in making that a reality for everyone,” says TransferWise. “The service will enable BPCE customers to send money to over 60 countries at TransferWise’s usual low fee of 0.5 per cent on most currency routes and at the mid-market exchange rate”.

Adds Kristo Käärmann, co-founder and CEO of TransferWise: “TransferWise has a mission to make money move around the world as fast and as cheaply as email. This partnership is a momentous step on that journey – for the first time a major mainstream bank is offering its customers the chance to benefit from TransferWise’s lightning fast, low cost service. It’s proof that we can scale our technology, which will allow other big institutions to seamlessly integrate with the service”.

On that note, it will be interesting to see how TransferWise continues to walk the tight rope of partnering whilst, in some ways and with increasing feature parity, competing with the same potential partners.

The original target for the company’s consumer and business money transfer app was incumbent banks who typically charge high fees for international money transfers and aren’t always transparent about the way they mark up the underlying exchange rate. And more recently it has launched its “Borderless” account, a multi-currency banking product that includes a debit card and lets you deposit, send and spend money. However, TransferWise co-founder and Chairman Taavet Hinrikus has always insisted that the Borderless account is designed to work as a companion product to your main current account and not a fully fledged bank replacement.

Continue reading
  23 Hits
Jun
04

Catching Up On Readings: Jobs Report - Sramana Mitra

This feature from The Washington Post looks at the Jobs report published early this month and analyses the health of the Trump economy over the past year. For this week’s posts, click on the...

___

Original author: jyotsna popuri

Continue reading
  160 Hits
Jun
03

1Mby1M Virtual Accelerator Investor Forum: With Asheem Chandna of Greylock Ventures (Part 3) - Sramana Mitra

Sramana Mitra: There are a few issues with what you said. At a 30,000 foot level, what you said is true. When you start peeling the onion and poking in the guts of that statement, there are lots of...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  138 Hits
Jun
03

Google's making a move to dominate advertising on platforms like Spotify, Pandora, and SoundCloud — and it represents a $1.6 billion opportunity

Radio advertising is going digital thanks to streaming-music services like Pandora and Spotify, and Google wants a piece of the small but growing space.

The tech giant has plugged its programmatic buying platform into Spotify, SoundCloud, Google Play Music, and TuneIn so that advertisers can buy audio ads directly from DoubleClick Bid Manager the same way they do for display and video ads. It says ad inventory from Pandora, which is building a version of a programmatic platform through the $145 million acquisition of AdsWizz, will also be added in the next couple of months.

Buzz around programmatic audio advertising has been slowly building up for a few years, but the market for digital audio advertising represents only a fraction of overall radio ad spending. According to the Interactive Advertising Bureau, $1.6 billion was spent on audio ads within the US last year. To compare, advertisers spent about $18.2 billion on radio ads in 2017.

Streaming audio is a tiny but potentially lucrative market

While the market is small, there's significant opportunity to crack into the space as more programming shifts to streaming, said Payam Shodjai, the director of product management at Google.

Advertisement

"Radio advertising has existed for 95 years — it's a little bit different from how digital ads have been auctioned," he said.

In terms of targeting, programmatic audio ads can be targeted based on demographic and age but are "not as complicated or involved as programmatic in general," he said.

Part of the reason it has taken marketers so long to go in on programmatic audio is because radio buyers are hesitant about digital's shaky conversion metrics that track whether someone purchased a product after hearing an ad for it, said John Rosso, the president of market development at Triton Digital, a supply-side platform that helps broadcasters shift to streaming.

Instead, the programmatic audio industry leans on many of the same metrics used to track digital ads, such as completion rates, impressions, and time spent, as well as stats that measure whether someone pauses a song.

"Programmatic has always been conversion-driven whereas audio and traditional radio [measures] more upper-funnel and branding activities," Rosso said. Big brands that have run ads through Triton's programmatic audio marketplace include Ford, McDonald's and Walgreens.

Advertisement

Another challenge: The inventory for audio ads is far smaller than for display ads that can appear in every nook and cranny of a website.

"Unlike display advertising, there's not an endless supply," Rosso said. "In audio, even though the business is growing, the publishers don't just add more units."

Google

Ad-tech firms are getting into the space

Meanwhile, the programmatic audio space is getting crowded for ad-tech firms that all want a bigger slice of advertisers' budgets. For example, Triton Digital works with 300 vendors — including The Trade Desk, AppNexus, and MediaMath — that essentially help marketers transact with streaming apps and services, Rosso said.

Then there's Pandora, which is building its programmatic pipes through the acquisition of AdsWizz. In addition to Pandora, AdsWizz also works with Spotify and Cox Media Group.

Advertisement

The streaming app is beta testing programmatic buying through AdsWizz, The Trade Desk, and MediaMath and plans to integrate with Google to "leverage demand through DoubleClick Bid Manager," said Chris Record, the senior vice president of platform and partner operations at Pandora.

On top of the growth in voice-enabled devices like Amazon Alexa and Google Home, "there's a fairly constrained supply of quality video" inventory online, Record said.

"More and more audiences are in front of their connected TV or are in front of a connected speaker," he added. "It's going to be important for advertisers to tap into that growing audio inventory."

Original author: Lauren Johnson

Continue reading
  109 Hits
Jun
03

Apple's plan to give away most of its cash might have had an unlikely supporter: Steve Jobs (AAPL)

Apple cofounder Steve Jobs remains a guiding influence on CEO Tim Cook and the company even seven years after his death. Apple

Investors may love Apple's plan to reduce its massive cash balance to $0, but what would Steve Jobs think?

Given how Jobs ran the company after he returned to it in the late 1990s, one might suppose that he would hate the plan. But one of his former close collaborators at Apple thinks Jobs would have eventually embraced it, or at least something like it, albeit likely belated and possibly begrudgingly. The fact that the company is overflowing with cash would have forced him to.

"I do think ultimately he would have come around to it," said Fred Anderson, who served as Apple's chief financial officer from 1996 to 2004, during most of which time Jobs was its CEO. "With the massive operating cash flows, I think he would have returned cash to shareholders."

On its face, Apple's plan to get down to $0 in net cash would seem contrary to the financial ethos Jobs helped instill in the company.

Advertisement

When Jobs returned to Apple in the late 1990s, the computer maker was weeks away from running out of money, an experience that shaped Jobs' outlook for the rest of his term there. Over the next 14 years, under his leadership, the company paid off its debts and stockpiled cash.

Under Jobs, Apple cut unprofitable products from its lineup, emphasizing a handful of big money makers. It gained tight control over its inventory and logistical operations to the point where it needed little working capital. And it avoided major acquisitions. Collectively, the steps helped turn the company into a cash machine.

Jobs famously eschewed the idea of giving out some of Apple's mounting stockpile to shareholders. Even long after Apple had returned to firm financial ground and was generating cash by the boatload, he refused to reinstate a dividend, which the company had discontinued during its days of financial duress. And while Apple's board put in place a $500 million stock repurchase plan in 1999, the company under Jobs never bought back all the stock it was authorized to buy under the program.

Because of Apple's near-death experience, "Steve retained his conservative outlook and wanting to have a strong cash position," Anderson said.

Apple's a much different company than when Jobs returned to it

But the Apple of today is a fundamentally different company than when Jobs resumed control and nursed it back to health, Anderson said. The company isn't in any danger of dying. It's generating more than enough cash each quarter to fund the development of new products and to tide it through a possible downturn.

Advertisement

In fact, when it comes to cash, the biggest problem Apple now faces isn't how to ensure it has enough set aside, but how to go about purging its surplus.

Under Jobs' successor, Tim Cook, Apple has been much less tight-fisted about its finances. In 2014, Apple made its first billion-dollar acquisition when it bought Beats. Over the last five years, it has more than tripled its research-and-development spending. It has nearly tripled its capital expenditures over the last six years.

What's more, unlike Jobs, Cook embraced the idea of giving some of Apple's cash to shareholders. Soon after he replaced Jobs, he restarted Apple's dividend program and then launched a succession of gigantic stock repurchase programs. Last year, for example, Apple spent a whopping $32.9 billion buying back stock and handed out another $12.8 billion in dividends.

To help fund those programs without having to repatriate and pay taxes on its overseas stockpile, Apple under Cook also took on massive amounts of debt. At the end of its most recent quarter, Apple had $101 billion in long-term debt, up from $0 when Jobs left the company.

Apple has become a 'cash-flow machine'

Even so, even with all this profligacy, Apple still has more cash than it seems to know what to do with. In its last fiscal year, for example, the company's net cash balance — the difference between its cash and marketable securities on the one hand and its debt on the other — actually increased by $6.5 billion, even in spite of all the money it invested or returned to shareholders.

Advertisement

"Apple has all the money it needs for organic growth," Anderson said. "They're like a cash-flow machine."

Given the magnitude of the build-up in cash, he would have come around.

And if a company has too much cash that its not profitably reinvesting, it can actually be a drag on its shares, because the stockpile depresses the company's return on equity.

Jobs eventually would have recognized the situation the company was in, Anderson said. To be sure, it would probably have taken a lot of education, and he likely wouldn't have come around as fast or as far as Cook did.

"I think he probably wouldn't have gone so far as zero net cash," Anderson said.

But Jobs would have seen the necessity of finding a way to dispense Apple's cash rather than hoarding it, Anderson said.

Advertisement

"Given the magnitude of the build-up in cash, he would have come around," he said.

And for his part, Anderson, now a managing director at venture-capital firm NextEquity Partners, thinks Apple's plan to disperse cash to shareholders is a good one.

"My bottom line is it makes total sense to me," he said.

Original author: Troy Wolverton

Continue reading
  167 Hits
Apr
22

How to find the secret ending to the huge new 'God of War' game on PlayStation 4

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff may have an affinity for Hawaiian culture, but it's a Japanese phrase which holds the most weight when it comes to making big decisions at the $93 billion tech company.

That phrase is shoshin, Japanese for a "beginner's mind," and a tenet of Zen Buddhism. Shoshin refers to an attitude of open-mindedness and endless possibility which many people have when they first start a project or learn something new.

The idea is to never get stuck doing something one way just because it was done that way in the past.

In a call with investors Tuesday after its blockbuster quarterly earnings report, Benioff and chief product officer Bret Taylor both referenced the concept when asked whether Salesforce is committed to exclusively offering its software via the cloud.

Advertisement

"We're not attached to any sort of religious dogma around the cloud," Benioff said. "We're going to do what's best for our customers and for our company."

When Salesforce was founded in 1999, it was one of the first companies to offer cloud-based software, and one of the first to fully embrace the notion of Software-as-a-Service, or SaaS. Under the SaaS model, a company doesn't need to run software on its own servers, instead accessing it via the internet.

Salesforce's run as a cloud-only company lasted until May when it acquired MuleSoft for $6.8 billion. With the deal, Salesforce got MuleSoft's on-premise offering — a version of its services that can be installed on a company's own servers. It's the exact opposite of the cloud model.

While MuleSoft will stay as is, and keep the on-premise offering, both Benioff and Taylor reassured investors that it's not a sign of things to come. Salesforce doesn't plan to move its legacy products to a hybrid-cloud model, which uses a combination of the public cloud and private servers, the executives said.

The executives highlighted the convenience that cloud brings for customers, especially at a company like Salesforce where the service is updated three times a year.

Advertisement

But with shoshin front of mind, they stopped short of saying Salesforce is definitively a cloud-only company.

Salesforce is on the cloud, Taylor said, "because it means we can deliver innovation to our customers faster," but ultimately that could change if customers' needs evolve to require on-premise services.

"We'll continue to have that beginners mind," Taylor said.

Marc Benioff relies on these monks for guidance — here are their tips for holding better, more mindful meetings

Original author: Becky Peterson

Continue reading
  120 Hits
Jun
02

Everything you need to know about Discord, the new "Skype for gamers"

The messaging app got some bad publicity last year, when it was reported that many alt-right; "incel," or male supremacist; and other hate groups were using it to meet, talk, and plan real-life gatherings, particularly ahead of the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, last August. The app allows users to chat anonymously and privately, which helped attract the groups.

Discord's developers have since banned many of those hate groups. But identifying and ousting them can be like playing a game of whack-a-mole; even after they're banned, many come back in other places.

Still, in general, Discord is safe. No one can join a channel except by invitation, and users have to choose to join them. So no one can make you view or post content you're not interested in.

Discord also offers you the ability to block content that's unsuitable for work and to disconnect from servers at any time. You can easily mute or block individual users and prevent anyone you don't know from adding you as a friend.

Even so, such features won't necessarily prevent all harassment or bullying within particular text or voice channels.

For parents who are concerned about their teens using Discord to chat with friends, I recommend the same amount of caution you would have with social-media sites such as Twitter or Reddit. I suggest you read Discord's Community Guidelines and the Parent's Guide to Discord, written by one of the service's developers.

Original author: Kaylee Fagan

Continue reading
  102 Hits
Jun
02

Google built a tiny Street View car to map out one of the world's largest model cities, and the results are incredible (GOOG)

An artist paints the tiny mounted camera on Google's mini Street View car. Google The "Miniatur Wunderland" exhibition, located in Hamburg, Germany, is the world's largest model railway.

If you've never seen it before, it's one of the cutest, most detailed miniature models you'll ever see in your life.

To bring new perspective to the massive model railway, Google in 2016 built a miniature version of its Street View car to capture footage within the Miniatur Wunderland with an array of tiny mounted cameras. You can actually see all the various worlds within the Miniatur Wunderland on Google Street View.

The results are stunning. Take a look:

Original author: Dave Smith

Continue reading
  116 Hits
Oct
01

How companies can accelerate transformation

Apple may be getting back into the mobile advertising business.

The iPhone maker has held talks with Snap, Pinterest, and other companies about them joining an Apple-designed ad network, The Wall Street Journal reported. The network would place ads in the companies' apps, and Apple would share ad revenue with the companies, according to the report.

At least as it's being conceived, the effort would build off of the business Apple runs of selling promotional ads for apps in its App Store, The Journal reported. The new network would help developers promote their apps inside other apps. The apps would be displayed when users searched using certain keywords in Pinterest, say, or Snapchat, according to the report.

It's not clear whether or when Apple will launch the new ad network.

Advertisement

Apple CEO Tim Cook has been highly critical of other tech companies, particularly Facebook, that have built their businesses around advertising, charging that they collect far too much information on their customers. But Apple is no stranger to the advertising game.

The company in 2010 launched the iAd network with the aim of placing ads in mobile apps. But the service got little traction, and Apple shut it down in 2016. That same year, the company launched its app promotion ads in the App Store.

However, Apple tends to collect and use less information about its users when targeting ads than do its rivals.

Original author: Troy Wolverton

Continue reading
  111 Hits
Oct
01

How to choose the right NLP solution

America’s mayors have spent the past nine months tripping over each other to curry favor with Amazon.com in its high-profile search for a second headquarters.

More quietly, however, a similar story has been playing out in startup-land. Many of the most valuable venture-backed companies are venturing outside their high-cost headquarters and setting up secondary hubs in smaller cities.

Where are they going? Nashville is pretty popular. So is Phoenix. Portland and Raleigh also are seeing some jobs. A number of companies also have a high number of remote offerings, seeking candidates with coveted skills who don’t want to relocate.

Those are some of the findings from a Crunchbase News analysis of the geographic hiring practices of U.S. unicorns. Since most of these companies are based in high-cost locations, like the San Francisco Bay Area, Boston and New York, we were looking to see if there is a pattern of setting up offices in smaller, cheaper cities. (For more on survey technique, see Methodology section below.)

Here is a look at some of the hotspots.

Nashville

One surprise finding was the prominence of Nashville among secondary locations for startup offices.

We found at least four unicorns scaling up Nashville offices, plus another three with growing operations in or around other Tennessee cities. Here are some of the Tennessee-loving startups:

When we referred to Nashville’s popularity with unicorns as surprising, that was largely because the city isn’t known as a major hub for tech startups or venture funding. That said, it has a lot of attributes that make for a practical and desirable location for a secondary office.

Nashville’s attractions include high quality of life ratings, a growing population and economy, mild climate and lots of live music. Home prices and overall cost of living are also still far below Silicon Valley and New York, even though the Nashville real estate market has been on a tear for the past several years. An added perk for workers: Tennessee has no income tax on wages.

Phoenix

Phoenix is another popular pick for startup offices, particularly West Coast companies seeking a lower-cost hub for customer service and other operations that require a large staff.

In the chart below, we look at five unicorns with significant staffing in the desert city:

 

Affordability, ease of expansion and a large employable population look like big factors in Phoenix’s appeal. Homes and overall cost of living are a lot cheaper than the big coastal cities. And there’s plenty of room to sprawl.

One article about a new office opening also cited low job turnover rates as an attractive Phoenix-area attribute, which is an interesting notion. Startup hubs like San Francisco and New York see a lot of job-hopping, particularly for people with in-demand skill sets. Scaling companies may be looking for people who measure their job tenure in years rather than months.

Those aren’t the only places

Nashville and Phoenix aren’t the only hotspots for unicorns setting up secondary offices. Many other cities are also seeing some scaling startup activity.

Let’s start with North Carolina. The Research Triangle region is known for having a lot of STEM grads, so it makes sense that deep tech companies headquartered elsewhere might still want a local base. One such company is cybersecurity unicorn Tanium, which has a lot of technical job openings in the area. Another is Docker, developer of software containerization technology, which has open positions in Raleigh.

The Orlando metro area stood out mostly due to Robinhood, the zero-fee stock and crypto trading platform that recently hit the $5 billion valuation mark. The Silicon Valley-based company has a significant number of open positions in Lake Mary, an Orlando suburb, including HR and compliance jobs.

Portland, meanwhile, just drew another crypto-loving unicorn, digital currency transaction platform Coinbase. The San Francisco-based company recently opened an office in the Oregon city and is currently in hiring mode.

Anywhere with a screen

But you don’t have to be anywhere in particular to score jobs at many fast-growing startups. A lot of unicorns have a high number of remote positions, including specialized technical roles that may be hard to fill locally.

GitHub, which makes tools developers can use to collaborate remotely on projects, does a particularly good job of practicing what it codes. A notable number of engineering jobs open at the San Francisco-based company are available to remote workers, and other departments also have some openings for telecommuters.

Others with a smattering of remote openings include Silicon Valley-based cybersecurity provider CrowdStrike, enterprise software developer Apttus and also Docker.

Not everyone is doing it

Of course, not every unicorn is opening large secondary offices. Many prefer to keep staff closer to home base, seeking to lure employees with chic workplaces and lavish perks. Other companies find that when they do expand, it makes strategic sense to go to another high-cost location.

Still, the secondary hub phenomenon may offer a partial antidote to complaints that a few regions are hogging too much of the venture capital pie. While unicorns still overwhelmingly headquarter in a handful of cities, at least they’re spreading their wings and providing more jobs in other places, too.

Methodology

For this analysis, we were looking at U.S. unicorns with secondary offices in other North American cities. We began with a list of 125 U.S.-based companies and looked at open positions advertised on their websites, focusing on job location.

We excluded job offerings related to representing a local market. For instance, a San Francisco company seeking a sales rep in Chicago to sell to Chicago customers doesn’t count. Instead, we looked for openings for team members handling core operations, including engineering, finances and company-wide customer support. We also excluded secondary offices outside of North America.

Additionally, we were looking principally for companies expanding into lower-cost areas. In many cases, we did see companies strategically adding staff in other high-cost locations, such as New York and Silicon Valley.

A final note pertains to Austin, Texas. We did see several unicorns based elsewhere with job openings in Austin. However, we did not include the city in the sections above because Austin, although a lower-cost location than Silicon Valley, may also be characterized as a large, mature technology and startup hub in its own right.

Continue reading
  237 Hits
Jun
02

6 reasons why you should start your company in New York instead of Silicon Valley

Shutterstock

When it comes to building a company, choosing the appropriate location to launch is an important decision, but also a daunting one. While entrepreneurs have traditionally swarmed to Silicon Valley to kick off their companies, more and more founders are thinking beyond California's borders .

Among their top choices is New York, where the city is leading the way when in terms of both venture capital spending and female entrepreneurship.

If you're considering launching a company, here are the top 6 reasons why you should consider launching in the Big Apple:

Original author: Zoë Bernard

Continue reading
  88 Hits
Jun
02

3 great TV shows you should watch on Netflix this month

Erica Parise/Netflix There's a ton of television and, thankfully, an outrageous amount of it is available to stream on Netflix without ads.

But with so many options available on Netflix, from its originals to the classics, we thought you might need help figuring out your next binge-watch.

Every month, we'll select three TV shows that you should fit into your free time, to save you some time.

This month, we selected two Netflix originals that have second seasons making their debut in June, and one AMC critical darling that completed its run in 2017.

From the critically acclaimed tech drama "Halt and Catch Fire" to the reality series "Queer Eye," these are wonderful TV series on Netflix that you can watch this month (along with why you should watch, and their scores on Rotten Tomatoes):

Original author: Carrie Wittmer

Continue reading
  67 Hits
Oct
01

Intel plunges into consumer and datacenter GPUs amid market uncertainty

Mark Blinch/Reuters

Google loves its engineers.

But there's a lot more to running Google than just programming. And Google is willing to pay top dollar for the best candidates, regardless of the field, according to annual salary data we pulled from Glassdoor.

The way the salary data on Glassdoor is aggregated involves both current and recent employees voluntarily sharing anonymous reports.

Using this data, we pulled together Google's 17 highest-paying jobs, from marketing director to senior product manager to director of engineering. And to avoid redundancy, we only included entries that had at least five reviews.

Take a look below at what some of the highest-earning Google employees make at the company.

Karyne Levy, Matt Lynley, and Matt Weinberger contributed reporting to an earlier version of this story.

Original author: Katie Canales

Continue reading
  70 Hits
Jun
02

Why Siri sucks

Siri has been around for almost 7 years, but it still kind of sucks. Personal assistants like Google Assistant and Amazon's Alexa are constantly improving. Here's what's wrong with Siri and some simple things Apple can do to make it a lot better. Following is a transcript of the video.

Steve Kovach: Hey Siri, what time is Westworld on?

Siri: Here are matches for Westworld. Westworld, Westworld, Beyond Westworld, Westworld on a Budget.

Steve Kovach: Siri has been around for almost seven years, but it still kinda sucks. Google Assistant and Amazon's Alexa keep getting updated with cool new features, but Siri feels outdated and stuck in 2013. Here's what went wrong with Siri and what Apple can do to fix some of the problems right now.

Siri felt revolutionary when it first came out in 2011 on the iPhone 4S. While it wasn't the first digital assistant ever created, it felt almost magical to be able to talk to your iPhone and have it respond. But the magic didn't last very long. Within a year, Google had a similar answer called Google Now. Google Now tapped into Google's vast knowledge of the internet to get you exactly what you asked for. You could ask things like, "How old is Tom Cruise," or, "show me cute pictures of corgi puppies," and you'd get exactly that. Siri started to look pretty dumb by comparison and it never caught up. Now we have three major digital assistants fighting for your attention. There's Apple's Siri, Google's Assistant, and Amazon's Alexa. And Apple could actually look to those rivals for inspiration to fix Siri now.

The biggest problem with Siri today is that it doesn't integrate with third-party services very well. There are a few categories it does work with, like messaging or ride-hailing, but for the most part it's a closed-off ecosystem. This turns out to be Alexa's greatest strength. There are thousands of third-party skills and apps that work with Alexa, meaning it's a wide-open ecosystem where anything's possible. You can check your bank balance, you can order a coffee from Starbucks and have it waiting for you when you arrive, and it works with a lot more smart home appliances than Siri does. And it's the same story with Google's Assistant. Think of it like this. How terrible would your iPhone be if you couldn't download any third-party apps from the App Store? That's the state we're in with Siri today.

Another huge problem with Siri is that there's so many fragmented versions of the service. Siri on the HomePod is mostly just to ask for songs from Apple Music. It can't even do basic stuff like checking your calendar appointments. Siri on the iPhone is different than Siri on the Mac, and that's different than Siri on the Apple TV and the Apple Watch. Apple has failed to give you one consistent version of Siri, no matter which Apple device you're using. If a digital assistant's going to be successful, it needs to be the same, no matter where you are, in the home, in the car, in the office, and no matter what gadget you're using. This is another area Amazon's Alexa and Google Assistant excel. Today, Siri is a fragmented mess when it should be the same everywhere. Apple should unify it so there's one version across all of its devices.

The final major problem with Siri is updates. While Google Assistant and Alexa constantly get better over time, Siri only gets significant updates once a year with new versions of iOS on the iPhone. Apple should really start looking at Amazon and Google's strategy here and update Siri throughout the year as soon as the updates are ready. The bottom line: Siri has a long road ahead of it, and Amazon and Google aren't going to quit. But there are a lotta simple things Apple could do right now that'd make the experience a whole lot better. It's not too late, but Apple needs to act fast.

Siri: Here are shows available on iTunes. Vanderpump Rules, The Last Ship, Turn, Washing--

Steve Kovach: Shut up.

Original author: Grant Eizikowitz and Steve Kovach

Continue reading
  92 Hits
Jun
02

7 reasons you should buy these $180 wireless earbuds instead of Apple's AirPods (AAPL)

The Jaybird Run Jaybird

To me, AirPods are the best Apple invention since the iPhone.

But they're not for everyone.

My fiancée, for instance, says AirPods don't fit her ears well. I know this is the case for many people, where Apple's one-size-fits-all earbud solution doesn't quite "fit all."

Also, if you have an Android phone, you won't get some of the AirPods' best features, like how they automatically play or pause when you take them in and out of your ears.

So, what's the best alternative to AirPods? While no other product right now has the same level of polish, one pair of wireless earbuds come mighty close: The Jaybird Run earbuds cost $179 — just $10 more than AirPods — but actually top Apple's offering in a few notable ways.

Here are 7 reasons to consider the Jaybird Run instead of Apple AirPods:

Original author: Dave Smith

Continue reading
  103 Hits
Jun
02

The space between Earth and the moon is mind-boggling. This graphic reveals just how big it is — and what's out there.

Earth seems to float above the moon's surface in this Apollo-era photo. NASA

Sitting low on the horizon, a full moon sometimes look close enough to reach out and grab. But our worldly perceptions deceive us.

The airless chasm between Earth and the moon is so vast, stretching an average of 239,200 miles wide, that it'd take a 747 jet airplane flying at top speed more than 14 days to arrive. Even traveling at several thousand miles per hour, it took Apollo astronauts three days to arrive after launch. (Driving a car would take about a year.)

That's an enormous stage for human spaceflight history, fleets of thousands of satellites, and strange natural phenomena.

Business Insider wanted to illustrate the scale of the Earth-moon distance, and all of the fascinating stuff in between, so we consulted dozens of sources to create the interactive graphic below. (Note: Best viewed on a laptop or desktop computer.)

Advertisement

Don't get discouraged by how long it takes to scroll from the moon to the Earth — you'll make it back home eventually — but if you want to skip ahead, click or tap the waypoints on the left side:

If nothing else, the graphic shows just how many objects and points of interest exist just a breath away from Earth.

This includes the demarcation between Earth and space itself, called the Karman Line. NASA and the Fédération Aéronautique Internationale, the organization for international aeronautical and astronautical record-keeping, recognize this line as the point where space begins, your aeronautic feats become astronautics, and you become an astronaut.

If you find this distance oppressive to navigate, then try scrolling through a to-scale virtual solar system where the moon is just 1 pixel large.

Advertisement

Sean Kane contributed to this post.

A previous version of this post misstated the travel time to the moon at the speed of a 747 jet airplane. We apologize to all future lunar adventurers for the error

Original author: Dave Mosher and Samantha Lee

Continue reading
  81 Hits
May
10

Thought Leaders in Artificial Intelligence: Samir Addamine, CEO of FollowAnalytics (Part 2) - Sramana Mitra

This tiny blue rock upon which we hurtle through the vastness of space is the perfect home for us.

We can breathe the air and drink the water — both of which are essential to life as we know it. Our atmosphere protects us from radiation that could mutate our DNA and cut our lives short. We and the other creatures on Earth have evolved to function according to the planet's gravity, which affects our bones, muscles, and the fluids inside our body.

NASA and other space agencies — as well as individuals like Elon Musk— are actively working towards creating settlements on Mars. But before humans can attempt to establish long-term outposts on Mars or elsewhere in space, we have a lot to consider. Beyond the logistics of space travel, food, water, breathable air, and radiation, there's the question of human reproduction.

A paper newly published in the journal Futures describes just how complicated that could be.

Advertisement

Since Mars is the likely first location for a long-term populated outpost, the researchers behind the paper decided to analyze some physical and social problems that we'd encounter in trying to have babies on the red planet.

"A manned mission to Mars and the establishment of the first human settlement in outer space was once a mere figment of science fiction but is now being planned and expected to take place in the following 20 years," the authors wrote. "We assume that human reproduction in a Mars settlement will be necessary for the long-term success of an outer space mission."

NASA-JPL Caltech

Could there ever be new generations of Martians?

Any human settlement on Mars will be initially populated by crews from Earth. But at some point, if we truly want to have a large long-term Martian colony with a sustainable population, kids are going to need to be born there.

Whether or not it's possible to have children in the Martian environment is still unknown.

Advertisement

We know that when astronauts spend time in space, it has serious effects on their bodies. A lack of gravity causes body fluids to shift, which can change and impair vision as pressure changes affect the eyeball. Bones become less dense and muscles can atrophy, though regular exercise can help reduce these effects. People get taller as they stretch out, uncompressed. Then there's radiation exposure, which affects DNA and could increase cancer risk.

The International Space Station (ISS). NASA

Being on Mars wouldn't be exactly like being on the International Space Station, which is where most of this information comes from. But Mars still only has about 38% of the gravity we experience on Earth.

We don't know how these changes would affect reproductive cells, fertilization, embryonic development, the developing fetus, or growing children.

It's possible that children born and raised on Mars might have an easier time adapting to the requirements of life there, since it would be the world they would grow up in. But what those adaptations would look like are anyone's guess.

Advertisement

Many of these questions can be studied, especially with animal models. But they'll be important issues to investigate before any Mars colonization plans take shape.

Ethical questions

Assuming humans do someday try to reproduce in space, a host of other intriguing questions arise.

One is how big a population needs to be to truly sustain itself. According to the paper's authors, accepted estimates of the minimum size for a self-sustaining group range from 5,000 to 5,800 individuals. But they write that a Martian colony may need to have a larger population due to the extreme nature of the environment.

Then there's the issue of reproductive rights. Since living on Mars isn't going to be easy, the authors write that there should be genetic counseling available for couples to make sure that traits that could help people survive on Mars are encouraged in the reproductive process. At the same time, they write that liberalized abortion policies would be important, since pregnancies could pose high risks to mothers and environmental conditions could make serious birth defects more likely.

People who do choose to have children should be carefully supported through that process, according to the paper. That support system would need to extend beyond birth to help parents cope with the stresses that come with Martian children.

Advertisement

The authors also bring up an even bigger question: how much we should use technology to transform humans living in space.

YouTube / SpaceX

Potential solutions

It's possible that some of us carry genetic traits that make us better suited to life on Mars than other people. Such traits may make it easier for our bodies to adapt to reduced gravity, for example, or make us less susceptible to cancer or disability caused by radiation.

A Martian colony might encourage people with those genetic traits to pass them on.

But it also might be possible to use genetic editing technologies to give people these traits and to modify DNA in other ways that make it easier for humans to survive in space. Genetic editing tools like CRISPR, which can find and replace sections of DNA, could allow doctors to modify embryos conceived via in vitro fertilization to give them these space-life-friendly traits.

Advertisement

Eventually, it might turn out that the "humans" who thrive best on Mars don't much resemble people on Earth.

Science fiction authors have wrestled with this idea. In "The Expanse," authors Daniel Abraham and Ty Franck (pen name: James S. A. Corey) describe how "belters," residents of human settlements in the asteroid belt, are different from Earth-born humans. They have elongated bodies uncompressed by gravity, and their bones can't support human weight when exposed to the crushing pressure of life on Earth. It's possible that people born and raised on Mars would have a similarly difficult time adapting to life on Earth.

It's even feasible that humanity might speciate: develop new species that evolve out of Homo sapiens, according to the authors of the paper. They say that's unlikely to happen naturally, but could happen if humans wind up heavily genetically engineered to better survive on different planets.

NASA

Is escaping to Mars really a possibility?

In the paper, the authors quote Stephen Hawking, who once said: "I believe that the long-term future of the human race must be space and that it represents an important life insurance for our future survival, as it could prevent the disappearance of humanity by colonizing other planets."

Advertisement

But this paper shows how complicated that insurance policy would be. And that analysis is yet another reminder that we need to ensure that humanity can continue to survive on its home planet.

Astronaut Mae Jemison leads an organization called 100-Year Starship, a NASA- and DARPA-funded project that launched in 2011 to tackle the questions involved in making humans capable of voyaging beyond our solar system within the next 100 years.

But as Jemison explained to me in 2016, most of us are already on the starship that's best suited for carrying us through space: it's Earth.

"We're going to be on this planet," she said.

That's not to say that we shouldn't settle on Mars — it's important to understand how we could survive on new worlds. But we shouldn't avoid tackling simpler issues like climate change in order to keep humanity's first home habitable, too.

Original author: Kevin Loria

Continue reading
  57 Hits