Feb
13

London needs to embrace blockchain post-Brexit for the next 'Big Bang moment'

A pedestrian walks past the City of London financial district, in London, Britain, January 19, 2018. REUTERS/Hannah McKay

Kay Swinburne MEP: Britain must "embrace" blockchain post-Brexit to help the City "stay relevant." Blockchain, a distributed ledger technology, was first developed to underpin bitcoin but now has potential in everything from mainstream finance to healthcare. Swinburne, a senior Tory MEP, calls for the FCA and the Bank of England to embrace the new technology.


LONDON — An influential British MEP believes the UK needs to embrace blockchain technology post-Brexit in order to help the City of London "stay relevant."

Kay Swinburne MEP told Business Insider: "For me, this whole distributed ledger technology, we have to embrace it.

"The UK post-Brexit: how does the City of London stay relevant? The City of London stays relevant by suddenly becoming the proponents of the new technologies and not just patching existing systems to make them work post-Brexit, actually leapfrogging."

Blockchain, also known as distributed ledger technology, is the name for the next-generation database technology first developed to underpin the digital currency bitcoin.

The technology allows for the creation of a shared database, meaning all parties see the same version. It uses complex cryptography and group authentication to police the editing of the ledger. The technology has almost endless applications for other industries and processes that involve a trusted middleman or central authority — everything from recording births to trading securities.

Banks and trading businesses are particularly keen to adopt blockchain, as its inbuilt security and trust checks can cut out middlemen in processes like settlement and clearing. This, in turn, cuts down costs. Santander estimated in a 2015 report that the technology could save banks as much as $20 billion.

Kay Swinburne MEP. European Parliament

"We have a unique opportunity to actually make our markets more efficient using the new platforms," Conservative MEP Swinburne told BI.

She compared it the potential of distributed ledger technology in the UK to the "Big Bang" of the 1980s, when a wave of financial deregulation led to an explosion of activity in the City.

"I am not a natural risk taker but I genuinely think this is the UK’s opportunity, as it did with the Big Bang moment in the 1980s, this is it’s moment to leapfrog."

Swinburne is one of the UK's most senior MEPs and has been called the "architect of Mifid II" for her central role in drafting the European financial regulation, which came into force in January. A former banker, she is the most senior British legislator on the EU's influential Economic and Monetary Committee.

"I want to see not just the FCA, I want to see the Bank of England, embrace [distributed ledger technology]," Swinburne said. "I want them to be the first central bank to open up and say, maybe the monetary policy of the future doesn’t involve issuing notes all the time, maybe it involves other alternative payment systems."

The FCA is developing several proof of concepts involving blockchain technology and Bank of England Governor Mark Carney has said the technology has the potential to "transform" payments, clearing, and settlement.

Swinburne said: "We’ve got proof of concept of DLT in so many areas. It now needs to be scaled up. We’ve got to take some risks. We have the opportunity to really make a difference in a way that I don’t think Europe post-Brexit is going to be able to do.

"We need to start opening up our minds as to how we leapfrog. The conservative status quo is now too risky with Brexit. We need to leapfrog to stay relevant. The City needs to stay relevant."

Swinburne voted to remain in the EU but has since said she would now vote to leave because she is concerned about the union becoming "a more centralised system."

Original author: Oscar Williams-Grut

Continue reading
  92 Hits
Feb
13

Winter Olympics organizers say the 'Olympic Destroyer' cyberattack took down their computer servers during opening ceremonies

A display from the 2018 Winter Olympics opening ceremony in Pyeongchang, South Korea. NBC Sports Live

Winter Olympics organizers say a cyberattack hit their computer servers during the opening ceremonies, Yonhap reported on Saturday. The attack only affected "non-critical systems," the organizers said. Cybersecurity firms said they uncovered computer malware they called "Olympic Destroyer." The cyberattack follows a string of previous incidents involving various Winter Olympics computer systems, including a spying operation that is believed to have originated from North Korea.


Winter Olympics organizers say their computer servers experienced a cyberattack during opening ceremonies, Yonhap reported on Saturday.

Organizers said that internet-connected televisions crashed at the press center, according to officials cited by the report. The targeted servers were shut down, which also took down the official Winter Olympics website for some time.

The committee said in a statement that the attack only affected "non-critical systems" and said the safety of attendees was not compromised.

Cybersecurity firms on Monday said they uncovered computer malware they called "Olympic Destroyer." According to experts, the malware's aim is to delete backup files on a computer and meddle with boot-up files needed to power up a computer, Axios reported on Monday.

Experts speculated that the malware would be able to spread to other computers on the same network, and that the attackers may have stolen the network's credentials prior to programming it into the malware, Axios reported.

Getty Images

The Winter Olympics were hit by cyberattacks in the days leading up to the opening ceremony, with some experts estimating that over 300 Olympics-related computer systems were affected.

Though it may take months to figure out who is responsible for the attacks and why they were executed, experts say the evidence points to the "hallmarks of a nation state," The New York Times reported.

In a previous cyberattack, documents from Winter Olympics organizations were stolen and leaked by a campaign tied to Russia, while North Korea has also been suspected of spying on the event's various organizations, a Wired report said.

Hacker groups originating from Russia have been on the radar for some time. Russian athletes were prohibited from officially representing the country during the Winter Olympics after a state-sponsored doping scandal, a ban which some believe may be a possible motive for the cyberattacks.

Fancy Bear, a Russian hacker group that reportedly has ties to the 2016 hack on the Democratic National Committee, is believed to have infiltrated Olympic-affiliated systems in November and December — around the same time the "Olympic Destroyer" malware was compiled, Axios reported.

"The Olympics involve so many countries, and so many sports, many of which have their own infrastructure, that it has become a rich target environment for many adversaries," John Hultquist, a director at the cyber security firm FireEye, said in The Times.

Original author: David Choi

Continue reading
  84 Hits
Feb
13

I’m a huge Apple fan — but there are 9 big reasons why I’m not buying the HomePod (AAPL)

Apple HomePodAP

I wouldn’t call myself an Apple loyalist, exactly — even though I'm typing these words on my MacBook while listening to music on my Beats wireless headphones.

(I have an iPhone and and Apple Watch, too.)

It’s just that a few years ago I decided that if I wanted a new gadget, it was easiest to just buy Apple. All of Apple’s stuff works well together, mostly. The more Apple stuff I buy, the more it makes sense for my next big tech purchase to be Apple.

More generally, I find that Apple getting into a market — like tablets, or smartwatches — is a good signal that the technology is ready for real consumers, not just early adopters. 

But this time around, I’m passing on the HomePod, Apple’s new $350 smart speaker. It’s the first major Apple product I’ve passed on in a while.

Here's why:


It’s too expensive.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

At $350, HomePod is not an easy impulse purchase. At worst, it’s a lot of money for a product I’m not sure fits into my life. And even if I like it, HomePod would have to clear a high bar to be worth $350. Besides, I have a quality Bluetooth speaker that works great — and it was a lot cheaper than a HomePod.

I live in a small apartment.

Apple

I don’t have people over often. A loud speaker is not something that I was already looking to purchase. I listen to music on my headphones, or through the Bluetooth speaker I already own. If I really need to play music that loudly, I can just pipe it through my Apple TV.

I mean — look at this image, taken from an official video that Apple uses to show the range on the HomePod . That's bigger than my entire apartment! 

Sound quality simply does not matter that much to me.

The headphones I usually wear — made by Apple — are not known for their sound quality.Hollis Johnson

The fine distinctions in audio quality between speakers is lost to me.

When Apple first unveiled the HomePod in 2017, I got to listen to it directly compared against a high-end Sonos speaker, as well as the $99 Amazon Echo. While the HomePod sounded better, it wasn't so much more spectacular that I wouldn't pick the Sonos for its lower price, or the Echo, for its better integration with Amazon's online services. 

And as an Apple fan, I don't really have a point of comparison. I've spent the last several years mainly listening to music from my MacBook speakers or Apple headphones, so I’m not even sure what I'm missing out on if I don't move towards high-end audio. 

Siri’s functionality is currently limited compared to competing Google and Amazon products.

Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos laughs as he talks to the media while touring the new Amazon Spheres during the grand opening at Amazon's Seattle headquarters in Seattle, Washington, U.S., January 29, 2018.Reuters/Lindsey Wasson

HomePod can't check your calendar or make calls — it can’t even set two timers at the same time.  If I want to try out what the future feels like, I’m much more likely to be satisfied trying it out with a less expensive Amazon Echo or Google Home, both of which cost $99.

Compared with Google's famous practices of scraping user data, I do appreciate Apple's focus on privacy. The company's public commitment to keeping your data private does make me a little more comfortable with the idea of sticking an always-on, net-connected microphone in my house. 

But just because Apple's privacy protections are better, doesn't mean they're good enough. Ultimately, I guess I'm just nervous about the broader implications of putting a HomePod in my home.

The people who live with me use Spotify.

Spotify CEO Daniel Ek.Getty Images News

My roommate and girlfriend both use Spotify, currently the most popular music streaming service in the world. I, personally, use Apple Music. And the HomePod doesn't make it easy for us to meet in the middle.

Although you can technically use Spotify with a HomePod, you can't tell Siri to have it play a song. Instead, you have to use your iPhone to wirelessly connect with the speaker, and then manually queue up the songs you want. At that point, you can play, pause, and skip tracks, and control the volume. But you can't just say "Hey Siri, play Radiohead from Spotify." 

Contrast that with its built-in Apple Music support, which works much more seamlessly. You can simply tell the HomePod "Hey Siri, play my workout playlist," and off it goes. 

We already have a high-quality Bluetooth speaker in the apartment, which works with both Spotify and with Apple Music, across both iPhone and Android. Getting the HomePod would only be useful for me and my Apple Music, while making life more difficult for my roommate.

 

I don’t own any HomePod-supported smart-home gear.

Apple

Apple is pitching the HomePod as perfect for people who have amassed a collection of smart lightbulbs, showerheads, and other products that integrate with Apple's HomeKit standard.

Previously, you've needed to have an Apple TV or iPad in your home to act as a hub for your HomeKit gear. Now, the HomePod fills that role, too — meaning you can tell your HomePod "Hey Siri, turn on the kitchen lights," and assuming you've got the right bulbs, it'll work. 

I don't have any HomeKit-supported products aside from a single smart lightbulb, and I have no plans to get any more. So this banner feature is a non-starter for me. 

It doesn’t work with my home decor.

Now these are beautiful speakers.Amazon/Harman Kardon

HomePod only comes in two colors, black and white. And the modern subtle design just doesn’t work for my aesthetic. Apple has produced a lot of amazing-looking items in the past, including a speaker set that's in the Museum of Modern Art, but something about this little squat barrel doesn't do it for me. I'd be looking for somewhere to hide it on a shelf. 

I don't buy cool technology, I buy products that can do things for me.

Apple

I don’t doubt that there’s a lot of fancy technology in HomePod. Apple's website talks about acoustic analysis, beam-forming, and "the biggest brain ever in a speaker."

But I’m an Apple fan because I don’t want to buy "technology," exactly. It doesn't matter to me which chip is in my speaker. I buy technology because of what it can do for me — and right now, it doesn’t seem like HomePod is the right purchase for me.

There’s no headphone jack.

Only one cord plugs into the HomePod: power.Kif Leswing

Like I said — I'm an Apple fan. I get why Apple didn't include a jack on the HomePod. It looks forward, not back, and the future of audio is wireless and simple.

So it's no surprise why the HomePod only supports AirPlay, its proprietary wireless audio standard. That means you can use it as a speaker for an iPhone, iPad, or Mac — but nothing else. It doesn't support plain-old Bluetooth, even, so it won't work with any Android or PC at all.

So if there were a headphone jack, I could at least be sure I could use HomePod as a pretty sweet desktop speaker.

Original author: Kif Leswing

Continue reading
  88 Hits
Feb
13

After ten years, Apple is totally changing how it makes iPhone software — and users should be ecstatic (AAPL)

AP
Apple is reportedly focusing the next version of iOS, the iPhone software, on performance.This is great news for iPhone owners, who have increasingly been noticing bugs and glitches in Apple's software. Apple is expected to release the new version of iOS in September. 


If you use an iPhone, you've probably encountered an annoying glitch or bug on your iPhone recently. 

In the past few months alone, iPhone owners have run into some real whoppers. For instance: 

D0es this mean that the quality of Apple software is slipping, as experts and armchair analysts have been debating for the last year? It's hard to tell for sure — software always has bugs, and as Apple sells more iPhones, it increases the potential pool of people who will encounter any given glitch. 

But the biggest sign that this is an issue comes from Apple itself, as it upends its traditional software release strategy. 

This year, when Apple releases the next version of iOS, it likely won't have a major redesign of the home screen or a big killer new feature, as previous versions of iOS have brought. Instead, the update will focus on bug fixes, stability, and getting things right, according to reports from Bloomberg and Axios.

Instead, when the next iOS comes out — probably in beta this summer, with a global rollout in the fall — it'll probably be very similar to your current iPhone experience, but faster, more stable, and more reliable.

And isn't that what everyone wants?

Marching to a drum

U.S. Army Reserve color guard soldiers carry the colors on Fifth Avenue during the annual New York City Veterans Day Parade in New YorkThomson ReutersThe decision to focus on bug fixes reveals a huge change in the way Apple develops software going forward.

One thing that makes Apple special among big tech companies, according to people who have worked at Apple, is the importance of the hardware release schedule across the company. Hardware needs to be designed, programmed, built, and shipped by a certain date, and you can't go back and fix it after it's done.

So the whole company keeps its eyes on the all-important product release schedule. Some compare it to an army marching: everyone moves forward in lockstep, with whole swaths of the company working towards a common goal. 

But it trickles down to software as well. In recent years Apple has launched one big new version of iOS alongside the new iPhone. Those new releases come with so-called "tentpole" features — big new additions to iOS that the company uses to market the iPhone itself. Management assigns those "tentpoles" to a software group, who toil day and night to deliver the features by the phone's release date. 

So the fact that Apple is now taking a longer, less deadline-driven view to "tentpole" features is a big change. In fact, according to Bloomberg, engineering managers now have the authority to push back at management if they feel a feature can't be properly implemented in time.

From Bloomberg: 

"Instead of keeping engineers on a relentless annual schedule and cramming features into a single update, Apple will start focusing on the next two years of updates for its iPhone and iPad operating system, according to people familiar with the change. The company will continue to update its software annually, but internally engineers will have more discretion to push back features that aren't as polished to the following year."

The change suggests that Apple now realizes that the vast majority of iPhone users are not necessarily the technology super-experts, as they might have been in the early days of the iPhone or iPad.

Instead, iPhone owners regularly use the devices as their main computer, day-in and day-out. For them, reliability is much more important than a software update that may add a feature their older phones don't even support like the lip-syncing Animoji, currently an iPhone X exclusive. And that's especially true if those software updates introduce the possibility of new bugs or glitches that complicate their experience.

So ultimately, this change is very good news for any iPhone owner. Innovation at Apple won't stop — it still needs to sell new phones every year — but it suggests that Apple won't be pushing out half-baked features just to make old iPhones feel new. 

It's probably also good news for software engineers at Apple, who may get to take a break now and then from the relentless marching forward of the army. Still, some all-nighters are probably yet in their future. 

Don't panic

AppleIn many ways, the shift reported by Bloomberg and Axios show that Apple understands that the iPhone is no longer a young product. Ten years-plus, it's fully mature.

And mature products don't necessarily need to change every year for comparatively arbitrary reasons.

This line of thinking was highlighted by Steven Sinofsky, a former Microsoft executive and current Andreessen Horowitz board partner, who argued in a long series of tweets on Monday that Apple's bugs aren't necessarily more common than they were in the past. Instead, he says, the reported change to its software focus isn't a reaction to outside criticism — it's simply what any big tech company needs to do after a few years of building out its core product.

In other words, Sinofsky argues, what's happening at Apple is a natural reaction to the balance a giant project like iOS needs. 

11/ What is lost in all of this recent discussion is the nuance between features, schedule, and quality. It is like having a discussion with a financial advisor over income, risk, and growth. You don’t just show up and say you want all three and get a “sure”.

And the "buggy feeling" is due to the fact that hundreds of millions of people use iPhones for hours per day. "What is different is that at scale a bug that happens to 0.01% of people is a lot of people," he tweeted. "A stadium full or more."

29/ The more a product is used the more hyper-sensitive people get to how it works. The human brain is extraordinary in how it recognizes even the slightest changes in responsiveness, performance, and sequencing of operations.

His takeaway? Don't panic: Apple knows what it's doing, and whatever change to its development process is currently going on will make Apple stronger in the long run.

31/ But what happens to a team as complexity evolves is simply the challenge of coordination and more importantly consistency or leveling of decisions across a complex system. This is particularly acute if the bulk of the team has only known the previous few years of success.

32/ So Apple will just renew the engineering process. It means thinking about how risk is analyzed, how schedules are constructed, how priorities are set. This is literally what it means to run a project and what we are all paying them to do.

END/ So to me on Apple, even as an outsider, I feel confident saying that this isn’t reactionary/crisis or a response to externalities. Importantly it isn’t a massive pivot/“student body left”. It’s a methodical and predictable evolution of an extremely robust and proven system.

This isn't a move made out of desperation. Apple is deciding to head off a process that had stopped producing the desired output. A grand rethinking of how it's going to produce software for iPhones is a very good development for all Apple users, especially those who value reliability and consistency. 

The next iPhone update may not have super-Animoji. But if it crashes less, lots of people should be happy. 

Original author: Kif Leswing

Continue reading
  79 Hits
Feb
08

Small brands and influencers are worried that Instagram is choking off their traffic — just like Facebook did with publishers

Toru Hanai/Reuters

A growing number of brands and social stars that have built followings on Instagram now fear that the platform is killing their business. They are certain that fewer people are seeing their posts in recent weeks, and fear that Instagram could follow in the footsteps of Facebook's News Feed change. But Instagram says it has not rolled out any changes that would impact reach for a particular type of account, and that its algorithm is based on machine learning and is constantly evolving. 


Instagram has helped foster a unique crop of social media-savvy brands and stars, ranging from the cosmetics company Anastasia Beverly Hills to food influencer brunchboys.

But some of those Instagram-born creators are starting to lose faith in the platform. 

Ever since Facebook announced its massive News Feed shake-up last month, many publishers and social-media-dependent brands have been in panic mode, believing that the days of quickly building audiences on the social network organically (i.e. without paying for them) — are numbered.

Now, some are worried they are seeing the same sort of trend unfold on Instagram. Specifically a growing number of creators are worried that fewer people are seeing their posts.

A post by Anastasia Beverly Hills Anastasia Beverly Hills

"The new Instagram algorithm is hurting the artist community, small brands and even those with lots of followers as most posts are hidden unless they spike in engagement right away," beauty brand Anastasia Beverly Hills posted on its Instagram page. The post has racked up over 310,000 likes and over 30,000 comments since it was first posted on January 25.  

Anastasia Beverly Hills is hardly the only one. Cosplay creator Jessica Nigri recently told Business Insider that she felt that Instagram was starting to restrict creators' reach. Ryan Babenzien, CEO and Founder of Brooklyn-based sneaker startup Greats echoed Nigri, adding that small brands and creators were losing their trust in the platform.

"One should assume that announcements of algorithm changes to the public are the final product, and not what Instagram has been testing without telling anyone," he told Business Insider, saying that the brand had seen its reach fall recently. "When Greats started we gained 10,000 followers completely organically within a matter of weeks. Let's just say those days are over."

Creators say their Instagram audience is not what it used to be

Jeremy Jacobowitz is yet another example. He is the creator of brunchboys, a popular food account on Instagram with nearly 450,000 followers. He says that he feels that his reach has tanked in recent months due to some sort of change in the algorithm, but not necessarily his engagement. 

Jeremy Jacobowitz from brunchboys Jeremy Jacobowitz

"My reach, and consequently my growth, has fallen," he told Business Insider. "I'd get 1,000 new followers a day; now it's less than half."

Unlike its sibling Facebook, Instagram has not publicly announced any changes to its algorithm since 2016, when it switched from a chronological algorithm to one that tailors posts for each specific user. This algorithm uses machine learning to rank posts in users' feeds, so it is constantly adapting and improving over time based on new data, a company rep told Business Insider.

Instagram says it has not rolled out any changes that would impact reach for a particular type of account, regardless of how many followers it has, and no content posted by an account is ever "hidden" from the feeds of those who follow that account.

A spokesperson said that the reach of individual accounts can vary based on a number of factors, and a typical Instagrammer followers hundreds of accounts and has hundreds or even thousands of posts in their feed every day, so it is normal for people to not see them all. 

Instagram's quiet tweaking may be feeding creators' paranoia

Regardless, a series of recent behind-the-scenes changes have led some in the Instagram world to predict that the app will follow sibling Facebook's lead and significantly adjust its algorithm — and severely impact how content is discovered.

Instagram added two new features in December that have yet again altered users' feeds: The ability for users to follow hashtags and surfacing hashtag-focused posts in its feed as well as a "Recommended for you" section that will show posts that users' friends have liked. 

These add to an already cluttered feed, worrying creators and brands that posts that are not backed by a robust paid Instagram strategy are likely to get buried further.

"The platform has been less vocal about any recent changes to its algorithm," said Ben Arnold, managing director at We Are Social North America. "There is a concern that Instagram will go the way of Facebook — which effectively 'switched off' the remaining organic value of content on its platform last month."

Arnold added that while there hasn't been enough data yet to prove a decline in reach over the past one month, these concerns may be valid as the trend leading up to this point has been to increasingly prioritize posts which have driven interactions, in the forms of likes or comments.

Some experts are also viewing this all as a bid to push small brands to pay for more ads on Instagram. Brands of all sizes have been paying to play on Facebook for years, which in turn has seen a tremendous growth in its ad revenue coming from small businesses. So it was only a matter of time before Instagram took a page out of its parent company's playbook, the thinking goes.

"When you look at the commercial success that Facebook has delivered through the monetization of its platform, you would expect Instagram to follow suit at some point in time," Arnold said. "Using Instagram to grow organically as a small brand is definitely going to be tricky."

"Any time a company that makes all its money on advertising controls the throttle and reach — which at one point was purely organic and now is pay-to-play — you can assume that it will affect any brand or person on Instagram while allowing Instagram to increase their ad revenue," said Greats' Babenzien.

Some marketers are seeing plenty of Instagram success

Not everyone in the Instagram world is freaking out. In fact, some brands and creators, such as oral hygiene brand Quip and haircare brand Function of Beauty, say that they have actually seen improvements in their reach and engagement in recent weeks. 

An Instagram post by Function of Beauty Function of Beauty

Comparing January to October, for example, Quip actually saw a 118% increase in organic likes per post and a 56% increase in organic reach per post. Function of Beauty too said that both its reach and engagement grew consistently between October 2017 and January 2018, with the brand reaching over 923,000 collectively in the same time period.

"We have always valued engagement over anything else, and our content is tailored for our very engaged audience," said Zahir Dossa, CEO and co-Founder at Function of Beauty. "Instagram is a meritocracy and has a democratic process in place where everyone is given a platform and where good posts get traction."

Ultimately, quality content will win, said Andy Amendola, senior director of digital strategy and media at The Community. And even if audience growth plateaus and creators reach a smaller audience, one way of looking at it is that audience will engage more meaningfully.

"It’s not personal; the machine learning and AI behind the algorithm doesn’t take sides," he said. "If you create engaging content, your audience will continue to get it."

Anna Lee, vp of growth at women-focused digital publisher PureWow, agreed.

"Success in this environment for any business — small or large — starts with great content," she said. "It's impossible to predict what will happen next, but great, value adding content will always be a sound investment on this platform."

Original author: Tanya Dua

Continue reading
  109 Hits
Feb
08

Cryptocurrencies are rising despite the World Bank president calling the market a Ponzi scheme

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"????>

Markets Insider

Major cryptocurrencies are all rising on Thursday morning but bitcoin is still down 20% over the last 7 days. World Bank Group President Jim Yong Kim compared cryptocurrencies to Ponzi schemes.


LONDON — Cryptocurrencies are rallying strongly on Thursday morning.

After getting hosed earlier in the week, all major cryptocurrencies are solidly in the green this morning. Here's how the scoreboard looks at 8.10 a.m. GMT (3.10 a.m. ET):

Despite the rally, bitcoin is still down around 20% over the last 7 days, as the chart at the top illustrates.

The London Block Exchange, a UK bitcoin startup, writes in its daily market report on Thursday: "As we approach the weekend - traditionally a period with less trading volume and therefore more prone to wild movements, with a tendency to dip - we continue to recommend closely watching bitcoin's price to gauge the direction of the crypto markets.

"While today's early hours have been positive, with bitcoin rising 8% and leaving the past day's bear channel, it's impossible to predict the short-term direction."

The rally in the market comes despite more skepticism from the world of traditional finance. World Bank Group President Jim Yong Kim compared cryptocurrencies to Ponzi schemes at an event in Washington on Wednesday night.

Bloomberg reports that Kim said: "In terms of using Bitcoin or some of the cryptocurrencies, we are also looking at it, but I’m told the vast majority of cryptocurrencies are basically Ponzi schemes."

You can get live cryptocurrency prices on Markets Insider.

Original author: Oscar Williams-Grut

Continue reading
  112 Hits
Feb
08

10 things in tech you need to know today (GOOG, AAPL)

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"????>

A clip of Michael Douglas giving the 'Greed is good' speech in "Wall Street" was shown during the Uber-Waymo trial. YouTube

Good morning! Here is the tech news you need to know this Thursday.

1. Smart thermostat company Nest is being spun back into its owner Google, and will sit alongside Google's Home smart speakers and its Pixel smartphones. Nest was originally spun out when Google reorganised under the umbrella of Alphabet in 2015.

2. Uber's former chief executive, Travis Kalanick, has denied in court that his firm stole trade secrets from Google's self-driving company Waymo. During the third day of the colourful trial, Waymo's lawyers showed a clip of Michael Douglas' famous "Greed is good" speech from "Wall Street."

3. An anonymous user posted core iPhone source code online, which one specialist described as "the biggest leak in history" according to Motherboard. The code may allow security researchers to find vulnerabilities in iOS and achieve iPhone jailbreaks.

4. Amazon has started offering Whole Food deliveries through its Prime subscription service, though only in four US regions of Cincinnati, Austin, Dallas, and Virginia Beach. Now subscribers can receive Whole Foods deliveries within one or two hours.

5. Google is apparently thinking of building a game streaming service, and even a gaming console. The firm is working on a streaming site that is codenamed Yeti, and has been in talks with developers.

6. Samsung's incapacitated chairman, Lee Kun-Hee, has been accused by South Korean police of tax evasion of up to 400 billion won ($368 million, £265 million). Police said Lee Kun-Hee, currently hospitalised after a heart attack, had bank accounts with the funds registered in other people's names.

7. Amazon's market cap was briefly close to beating Microsoft's for the first time. Amazon’s stock was down 1.14% bringing its valuation to $690.4 billion (£498.34 billion), while Microsoft’s 1.83% decline pushed its market cap down to $690.3 billion (£497 billion).

8. Softbank has already invested around 40% of its $100 billion Vision and Delta tech funds, according to financial filings. Chief executive Masayoshi Son noted that deals like Softbank's $8 billion (£5.6 billion) investment in Uber were "impossible" for traditional venture capital to make.

9. Reddit chief executive Alexis Ohanian will step down from day-to-day duties and focus on his early-stage fund, Internalized Capital. Ohanian said the timing related personal factors such as his marriage to Serena Williams, and the subsequent birth of their daughter.

10. Instagram is apparently experimenting with allowing users to "Regram" posts to Stories. The feature would let you share either your or others' past public posts to a Story.

Original author: Shona Ghosh

Continue reading
  91 Hits
Feb
08

Here are 11 of the best games that you can only play on iPhones (AAPL)

Max and Chloe are the two main characters of "Life is Strange."dontnod


One of the best features of Apple's mobile operating system, iOS, is its immense catalog of apps.

Almost 2.5 million applications populate the store, and while not all of them are top-notch, there certainly is a good selection. Games in particular are a crown jewel, so much so that Apple has dedicated them an entire, separate tab in the big redesign unveiled last year at WWDC.

iPhones and iPads have titles that span from those that are sheer fun to small, artistic-driven gems, all the way to powerful, decision-making, story-focused games that have little to envy to triple-A titles on consoles and PC.

Here are 11 great games no iPhone user should miss:


1. The End of The World — $0.99/£0.99

"The End of The World" is not a game for everyone. Its beauty is born out of an overwhelming sadness, which would suit best broken-hearted people.

But that shouldn't be a reason not give developer Sean Wenham your money — whatever his motives were, this game's polarising, almost magnetic setting (a beautifully recreated Newcastle, England) will keep luring you in, as the story of how the world has ended unfolds.

Slowly, the sadness gives way to glimmers of hope, and the message changes from one of depression to one of recovery in the search for a way to move on.

The side-scrolling exploration title won't remain in your head because it's fun, but its gorgeous artistic direction and the rollercoaster-like feelings it evokes will certainly make you think.

If anything, by not treating its themes with a black-or-white, right-or-wrong perspective, The End of The World makes you reflect at each point; and in doing so, it has something many games lack: A distinctively human feel.

If you're looking for a game that screams happiness, you should look elsewhere. For anyone in search of something that will make them think and feel, the emotional charge of "The End of The World" will almost certainly leave you better than it found you.

2. Life is Strange — $2.99/£2.99

dontnod

"Life is Strange" is one of the few titles in this list that was not born on mobile, but it's such a beautiful game that developer dontnod made the right call when it decided to port it over to iOS (there is no Android version yet, though one is supposed to come out "soon").

And the good thing is that its simplistic controls work just fine on your iPhone's touchscreen, so you won't have to worry about that.

The driving theme of "Life is Strange" is its story: Beautifully written, thought-provoking, full of twists, and often gut-wrenching.

The protagonist is Max, a teenage girl who moves back to her hometown — a fictional city in the Pacific Northwest — to study photography; but, in a sudden moment, she discovers that she has the power to rewind time.

Time-bending is the mechanic that unlocks all of Life is Strange's possibilities as a fun game, and that sits perfectly with the role play aspect of it.

You will live a week in Max's life between home and school, as the plot thickens and the events unravel. And bear in mind: This, too, is a game where every single decision you make has consequences, so be careful in the way you want to shape your own story.

The beautiful cartoon-ish art will also help you to fully immerse in a deep, rich, satisfying, powerful game, which will inevitably leave you asking for more.

3. Far From Noise — $2.99/£2.99

George Batchelor

"Far From Noise" is a weird game. For starters, it's almost hard to classify it as a game at all.

What happens, when the game starts, is that you find yourself inside your car, teetering on the edge of a cliff, and likely about to meet your death.

There's not much you can do, obviously, except talk. But there's no trace of fellow humans: Your interlocutor is in fact not a person, but a deer.

Death seems impending throughout your talk — which can go on from one to two hours in a single run — but the setting is still remarkably serene, between the sun setting on the horizon and the waves crushing onto the shore.

The dialogue itself manages to be funny and thoughtful all at once, inspired both by transcendentalist philosophy and just the right pinch of wit.

The decisions you make throughout the story influence what happens next, so replayability is high in "Far From Noise."

However, make no mistake — this is a game that asks you to take your time to think, not to smash buttons or run like crazy.

If you want an interesting, thought-provoking name that remains enjoyable while doubling down on a frenetic pace, you really should look no further.

4. INSIDE — Free

Playdead

"INSIDE," the spiritual sequel to "LIMBO," first appeared on consoles and PC, but was later ported to iOS.

Like "Life is Strange," LIMBO didn't suffer the transition from consoles to mobile, and its incredibly minimal user interface — with no visual elements whatsoever — remains just as enjoyable after a few minutes playing the game as it does after having put hours in it.

"INSIDE" is a game that tells its story in a curious way, essentially dragging you forward in increasingly dystopic scenarios with new and more intricate puzzles.

Some are blatantly obvious and so easy they become almost annoying, while others can prove tremendously challenging, and the absence of clues can easily lead to roadblocks.

The one constant thing about "INSIDE" is that you will die — a lot. There are so many ways you will die (unexpectedly) it would be impossible to list them all here; and they're often brutal, gruesome, grotesque — if a bit creative — deaths.

But trial and error is part of the game's mechanics, and in a way a theme of the story itself.

Other high points come in the art and sound department: Use headphones if you have a chance, and do take your time to appreciate the hand-drawn panels one by one.

5. Wheels of Aurelia — $3.99/£3.99

Santa Ragione

"Wheels of Aurelia" is another title that tries to bring the interactive component of videogames to the forefront and use it to tell a story, rather than the other way around.

The "Aurelia" is a road that goes along most of the coast of west Italy, from Rome all the way up to Ventimiglia and then Nice, France, and was originally built during the Roman age.

The game is set towards the end of the 1970s in Italy, where the protagonist — Lella, who was born in one of the wealthiest parts of town — decides to grab her car and go.

The game itself will require you to drive along the road, and the low-poly style makes for a good mixture of artistic freedom and a somewhat correct representation of how that part of Italy looked at the time.

However, "Aurelia" cannot be described as a driving game, as the story itself is still the most important element.

The Italian culture of the time is strongly present here, with numerous references to famous events and people, so some basic knowledge of that is required to appreciate the game's nuances fully.

However, it's Lella's story that will ultimately drive users forward, alongside the array of secondary characters that will accompany her throughout the journey.

6. Sky — TBD

ThatGameCompany

"Sky" is the upcoming game from ThatGameCompany, the studio behind the critically praised PlayStation 4 hit "Journey."

Not much is known about the game itself, except that it will look, feel — and, presumably, play — a lot like its spiritual predecessor.

ThatGameCompany describes it as "a social adventure game," where multiplayer will be a major component of the experience.

Moving from one place to another, and exploring the various areas of the figurative cloud mountain will have a big role in the game; light, too, is expected to be a major factor, although it's still unclear how that will come into play in terms of gameplay.

Not unlike other titles in this list (and, indeed, "Journey" itself), Sky will be a game that relies a lot on its sound and visual components, and tries to lure you in with an immersive story and adventure rather than addictive mechanics.

The anticipated title should be released sometime in 2018, and when it does, iPhone, iPad and Apple TV users will be the first ones able to enjoy it.

7. Blackbox — Free

Blackbox

This unique puzzle game is unlike anything else you've played on your phone before.

It uses your iPhone's various sensors and settings to unlock different puzzles, which encourages you to use things like the flashlight, microphone, even Wi-Fi settings to solve puzzles.

8. Infinity Blade (I, II, III) — $5.99/£5.99, $6.99/£6.99, $6.99/£6.99

Epic Games

The "Infinity Blade" trilogy is a series of games that sees you fight fearsome opponents and monsters using swords and other weapons.

The games have gorgeous environments and some of the best graphics in iPhone games.

9. Tiny Wings — $2.99/£2.99

Andreas Illiger

Sometimes you don't want to play a stressful game. Instead, you want to relax.

"Tiny Wings" is perfect for those moments. This sweet game sees you play as a bird trying to get to its nest to go to sleep.

You have to try to get there as quickly as possible, using the natural contour of the land to propel you forwards.

It's easy to get started, but there's a surprising amount of skill involved.

10. Beat Sneak Bandit $2.99/£2.99

Simogo

Rhythm-action games don't typically involved stealth, but that's exactly how you play "Beat Sneak Bandit."

Move in time with the beat to sneak past guards and traps.

Mess up your timing and it's game over.

11. Puzzle Agent 2 HD — $2.99/£2.99

Telltale

"Puzzle Agent 2" is an intriguing puzzle game you can play right on your iPhone.

It's the sequel to an earlier game, but this one can be played on its own.

Get ready for puzzles that will test your maths, logic, and geometry skills, all in a creepy setting.

Original author: Edoardo Maggio

Continue reading
  98 Hits
Feb
08

China wants to make the tech behind its supercomputers, drones, and rocket simulators harder to steal

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"????>

STR/AFP/Getty Images

China's military has spoken out in protection of the country's military and technological innovations by suggesting the country tighten its control over its intellectual property.  The military suggested that China needed to create intellectual property rights barriers over its technological developments, like supercomputers, drones, dredgers, and rocket launch simulation technology. The US has launched an investigation into whether China has stolen its intellectual property. 


China's military has suggested the country increase its intellectual property control of military and technological innovations.

In an article in  China National Defence News , reported by South China Morning Post, the military said China needed to create intellectual property barriers to its equipment, including supercomputers, drones, dredgers, and rocket launch simulation technology. 

According to the Post, the article highlighted that China has made several scientific breakthroughs over the last decade and needed to protect them. Otherwise, the article added, technology could be utilized by a foreign power and may even threaten national security.

“We must work on protecting technology as much as we have on researching and developing it,” the article said.

China achieved numerous scientific breakthroughs over the last year alone, including building the world's fastest wind tunnel to test weapons, as well as launching test spy drones in a near space area called the "death zone."

The military said that while many new innovations had been created in China's private sector, they have not focused on helping protect China's national security.

“There have been dangerous cases involving some privately owned companies, research institutions and individuals in pursuit of economic interests or academic honour,” the article said.

The military added that the country's intellectual protection laws lag behind other countries.

"We must work fast to close the gap,” it said. 

The US has accused China of stealing its intellectual property 

The military's comments follow an August investigation by the US into whether China stole its intellectual property. 

US President Donald Trump instructed the US Trade Representative to look into "Chinese law, policies, and practices which may be harming American intellectual property rights, innovation, or technology development," and last month said there was a "potential fine" that will "come out soon."

China has been accused in the past of trying to force companies to give away their intellectual property by spying, hacking, or intimidating companies, an allegation which Beijing denies. One report estimated the cost to the US economy at $600 billion a year.

Several US tech giants including Apple and IBM spoke out on the topic in October during the first hearing in the US' investigation. The companies allege China’s rules on inbound investment violate the intellectual property rights of their companies.

China likely sees the US investigation as an act of aggression, because it provides a loophole for the US President to take actions against its economy without consulting with  the WTO.

Original author: Rosie Perper

Continue reading
  89 Hits
Feb
08

Elon Musk: Model 3 production problems stem from Tesla getting 'overconfident' and 'too comfortable' (TSLA)

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"????>

Reuters

Tesla CEO Elon Musk says Model 3 production bottlenecks are being caused by the battery module assembly line at the company's Gigafactory in Nevada.  Musk said during the company's fourth-quarter earnings call on Wednesday that Tesla became "too confident" in its ability to make batteries, which contributed to its current production problems.  But Musk said that the company is still on target to produce 2,500 Model 3 vehicles by the end of Q1 and 5,000 units per week by the end of Q2. 


Tesla CEO Elon Musk said Model 3 production problems are a result of the company being a little too confident in its ability to make batteries.

“It’s ironic since battery modules should be the thing we are best at,” Musk said during the company’s fourth-quarter earnings call. “We were a little overconfident, got too comfortable with our ability to do battery modules.”

The company has struggled to build its first mass-market car, the Model 3, because of bottlenecks in battery module production.

Tesla built a new assembly line at the Gigafactory to make its Model 3 batteries. But the company ran into problems with the new production line. 

“Two of the zones that were subcontracted to other companies flat-out didn't work. We were promised they would work and they just didn't work,” Musk said during the call.

The bottleneck has caused major delays in Tesla Model 3 production targets.

Tesla originally said it planned to build 5,000 of the cars per week in December, but in November the company changed the timeline and said it would hit that number by the end of the first quarter in 2018. And in January, Tesla revised its projections yet again, stating that it now intends to hit 5,000 per week by mid-year.

Despite the production hiccups, the company still aims to make some 1 million cars per year by 2o20, Musk said on Wednesday. Considering the company made just over 100,000 vehicles in 2017, it still has a long way to go. 

Get the latest Tesla stock price here.

Original author: Cadie Thompson

Continue reading
  101 Hits
Feb
08

An engineer who helped develop Tesla Glass told us why a big part of her job is destroying things (TSLA)

Tesla's master of destruction. Matthew DeBord/Business Insider

Rosie Mottsmith is a staff engineer at Tesla. A former physicist who also once worked on organic farms, she recently helped develop the high-strength glass that went into the Tesla Semi. She and her team developed a special cannon to launch projectiles at the glass to test it.

Editors Note: Business Insider had the chance to speak with four Tesla employees from different parts of the company to learn more about their work. And what we discovered were some of the coolest jobs at Tesla. This is the second in the series. You can read about what a Tesla quality inspector does here.


Everybody knows that engineers build stuff. Bridges, buildings, airplanes, robots.

But engineers also destroy stuff, because they have to identify weaknesses. A weak bridge collapses into a river, a flimsy building teeters, a flawed aircraft falls from the sky, and a bad robot can't do its job.

At Tesla, staff engineer Rosie Mottsmith has an appetite for destruction. For months, she and a team of engineers fired various projectiles from a cannon of their own design at sheets of Tesla's innovative Armor Glass — glass designed to wrap around the cabin of the Tesla Semi that CEO Elon Musk revealed in spectacular fashion in Los Angeles in November.

It wasn't a job she ever imagined doing, even in her wildest dreams.

Originally a physicist, Mottsmith started out at the Bay Area's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, trying, as she puts it without a trace of arrogance, to "make a new light source."

"Ten years from now, that might have led to new research, and 10 years from now that might lead to a new discovery that would lead to a drug that might help somebody," she recalls, sipping tea in a cafeteria at Tesla's headquarters in Palo Alto, California.

The Tesla Semi. Alexandria Sage/Reuters

Physics research was too abstract for Mottsmith's tastes, so she ventured out into the real world and spent some time at a nonprofit, as an elementary school teacher, and as an organic farmer before heading to Stanford to get an advanced degree in materials science and engineering. She joined Tesla in 2014 as a reliability engineer and worked on both drivetrains — chiefly the dual-motor all-wheel-drive system — and Tesla Energy's Powerwall battery.

With a Model 3 on the way to her driveway to join her husband's Model S, she's "all in" with the company, she says.

"What's wonderful about Tesla is how motivated everybody is by the mission," she says. "Not always the easiest place to work — what helps you push through it is knowing that your work is potentially affecting the entire world."

Putting herself in the mind of a trucker

Tesla Armor Glass had to be extra tough. Tesla

Mottsmith might think about glass the way most of us do, as a critical automotive component as well as an aesthetic element; the Tesla Semi features a stunning view of the road for a driver.

But Mottsmith, like most engineers — and unlike most non-engineers — also has a mind that's trained to operate behind the scenes, to peer around corners, to expect the unexpected. For her, the Semi's huge glass windshield is a vital safety feature and a way of keeping a trucker on the road. That understanding came from designing the experiments that entailed firing the cannon thousands of times — "We put on some Judas Priest and blew off stress," Mottsmith says — but also from spending a day on the road with working truck drivers.

"It's a hard job," she says. "Truckers are basically mechanics and handymen. If anything goes wrong, they have to fix it themselves. A lot of times people think about engineers as optimizing things, but true engineering is understanding how your product is going to be used. It doesn't matter what happens in the lab if that doesn't keep the trucker safe."

Mottsmith and her team hurled everything from rocks to shredded tires to tow-hitches at sheets of Tesla Glass, seeking to serve the requirements of truckers while preparing the Semi to face countless problems on the road both seen and unforeseen.

The unique, glass-wrapped cab of the Semi. Tesla

The Semi had to be game changing in many respects, from its rethinking of the traditional big-rig cab to its performance, designed to be far superior to that of diesel-powered trucks. According to Mottsmith, that produced challenges.

"Distinguishing between the impossible and very difficult can be a speed bump," she says. "But what enables our process is pushing things to the limit and not accepting 'no' unless it's dictated by physics."

Joining the revolution

Mottsmith travels between Northern California and Southern California for her job and says she "has no plans to go elsewhere." A typical day could find her in Palo Alto working to interpret data to "find out what all the destruction means," walking the assembly line at the factory in nearby Fremont, consulting with other engineers, or venturing down to the Los Angeles area to shoot cannons at Tesla Glass in the Tesla Design Studio at SpaceX's factory.

"It's great that I don't spend every single day destroying things," she says, adding with a twinkle that "destroying things is really satisfying."

Ultimately, participating in the Semi project has been an amazing experience, even though she is excited about whatever she winds up doing next at Tesla. "The Semi is something completely new — it's going to change everything," she says. "You can just feel it in your gut that will be revolutionary."

Original author: Matthew DeBord

Continue reading
  119 Hits
Feb
08

Chinese police are using facial-recognition glasses to scan travelers

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"????>

This photo taken on February 5, 2018 shows a police officer wearing a pair of smart glasses with a facial recognition system at Zhengzhou East Railway Station in Zhengzhou in China's central Henan province. AFP/Getty Images

Railway police have begun using facial-recognition eyewear to catch criminals. In tests the glasses identified faces within 100 milliseconds. Seven people have been arrested for a range of previous crimes, and another 26 were banned from travel. China has been ramping up its use of facial-recognition technology as it moves toward a nationwide database that can recognize any citizen within three seconds.


Chinese railway police are using facial-recognition sunglasses to catch suspects at train stations in Zhengzhou, the capital of central Henan province.

The eyewear, which looks similar to the original Google Glass, was unveiled earlier this year and has already helped identify seven alleged criminals, according to the Communist Party's official newspaper People's Daily.

The glasses are linked to a database that can match travelers with criminal suspects. It is unclear how long it takes for a match to be made in the real world, butWu Fei, the CEO of LLVision Technology which developed the glasses, told The Wall Street Journal that, during testing, the system could identify faces from a database of 10,000 in 100 milliseconds.

So far the glasses have identified people suspected of misdeeds ranging from traffic infringements to crimes like human trafficking.

A further 26 people using fake identity documents were also prevented from traveling.

In China, people must use identity documents for train travel. This rule works to prevent people with excessive debt from using high-speed trains, and limit the movement of religious minorities who have had identity documents confiscatedandcan wait years to get a valid passport.

While this is the first time Chinese officials have used glasses to implement facial-recognition, the technology is widely used by police. China is also currently building a system that will recognize any of its 1.3 billion citizens in three seconds.

These programs have been condemned by human-rights groups that say this implementation of the technology infringes on people's right to privacy.

“Chinese authorities seem to think they can achieve ‘social stability’ by placing people under a microscope, but these abusive programs are more likely to deepen hostility towards the government,” Sophie Richardson, China director of Human Rights Watch, previously said about different facial recognition technology being used to monitor religious minorities. “Beijing should immediately stop these programs, and destroy all data gathered without full, informed consent.”

The glasses are likely here to stay, having arrived just weeks before Chinese New Year when it is expected that 389 million train trips will be taken between Feb 1 and March 12.

Original author: Tara Francis Chan

Continue reading
  81 Hits
Feb
08

Google’s move to bring Nest back into the fold is a sign it’s taking the huge threat from Amazon seriously (GOOG, GOOGL, AMZN)

Yoky Matsuoka, Nest's chief technology officer, shows off the company's updated product lineup at a press event in September. Stephen Lam/Reuters

Google is folding Nest into its hardware division; the move comes two years after Google set up the smart-home product maker as an independent subsidiary of parent company Alphabet. The move comes as Google is facing an existential threat from Amazon, whose Alexa voice agent could undermine Google's search advertising business. The search giant is trying to shore up Google Assistant, its rival to Alexa, to help thwart the danger from Amazon.


Google is clearly worried about Amazon.

If that wasn't obvious before, it should be now, after the search giant announced it was going to bring Nest, the smart-home product company it spun out as one of parent company Alphabet's other bets two years ago, back in house.

Google spun the decision as a way to boost both Nest and Google's own hardware business. That may be true, but it's just as much about responding to the unique — even existential — threat Amazon presents.

Purchased by Google more than three years ago for $3.2 billion, Nest makes a line of smart-home devices, including its famous connected thermostat. After setting up Nest as one of its sister companies under the auspices of Alphabet, Google is now folding the smart home company into its hardware division, which oversees it Pixel phones, Home smart speakers, and other devices.

Google Assistant is a core part of Google's Pixel phones. Hollis Johnson/Business Insider

The move comes as Amazon has taken an early lead in voice-based computing with its Echo smart speakers and its Alexa assistant. Amazon's Echo line dominates the market, and Amazon has been aggressive about getting Alexa everywhere, from refrigerators to connected cars.

Alexa poses a big threat to Google's search-advertising business

Alexa's rise poses a big challenge to Google, because it doesn't rely on the search giant's stockpiles of data. Instead, to answer users' questions about traffic, restaurant hours, or trivia, it taps into a mix of other sources, including Yahoo and Microsoft's Bing search engine. The danger for Google is that as people use Alexa more, they'll potentially use Google's search engine less. 

But Alexa's threat to Google goes beyond search to advertising, its core business. Amazon has been quietly building its own advertising business. This year, it will reportedly start selling product placement and other ads that will be spoken by Alexa. Should Alexa's user base continue to grow as Amazon thinks it will, Alexa could start to steal advertising dollars and market share from Google. 

Amazon's challenge has forced the search giant to push forward with Google Assistant, its Alexa competitor. If it doesn't stem Amazon's growth now, Google could stand to lose major ground in the near future. 

All of Google's current crop of hardware is powered by Assistant or has the technology built-in. Assistant is the default voice agent on the Pixel phones. It's at the core of the Home smart speakers, the company's competitors to Amazon's Echo devices.

Amazon's Cloud Cam is a direct rival to Nest's cameras. Amazon

Bringing Nest back could boost Google Assistant, the search giant's Alexa rival

Folding Nest into its hardware division offers Google the opportunity to more easily incorporate Assistant into additional devices and give the smart agent new capabilities. Assistant could already be used to control most Nest devices, and Nest had already announced plans to build Assistant into its IQ cameras. But you can expect more such developments going forward.

That could make all the difference as Amazon continues to build out its lineup of Alexa-powered devices. In addition to its smart speakers, its Fire tablets and some of its Fire TV devices have the voice assistant built-in. And Amazon recently introduced the Cloud Cam, a competitor to Nest's camera lineup. 

Even with the move to bring Nest in house, there's still plenty of uncertainty and potential danger ahead for Google. It hasn't yet demonstrated a clear strategy for linking Google Assistant to its core search-advertising business, though it's made some moves with sponsored content and games from the likes of Disney. Just as importantly, Amazon's Echo line is still vastly outselling the Google Home lineup. 

But Google isn't out of the race. Even though the search giant is lagging behind in smart speaker sales, Google Assistant is on 200 million devices, when you factor in the Pixel devices and all the other Android phones that have the agent built-in. That's an install base Alexa has yet to match.

With their respective hardware efforts, Google and Amazon are betting on a future of the technology industry in which the center of computing moves away from the PC and the smartphone to other devices. For its part, Google is trying to build that future before anybody else does — particularly Amazon.

Original author: Matt Weinberger

Continue reading
  79 Hits
Feb
08

A Tesla exec is leaving to be COO of Lyft (TSLA)

FILE PHOTO: An illuminated sign appears in a Lyft ride-hailing car in Los AngelesThomson Reuters
John McNeill is leaving Tesla to join Lyft as COO, Bloomberg reported.He was head of sales and service at Tesla.The news broke as Tesla was conducting a Q4 earnings call.


Executive leadership changes are usually announced at the top of an earnings conference call, not in the middle of them.

But after Tesla reported lower-than-expected fourth-quarter losses and while CEO Elon Musk was on a call with analysts, Musk announced thatJohn McNeill was leaving the company.

"McNeill was president of global sales and service at Tesla and an influential figure at the automaker," Bloomberg reported.

Musk said that he would be effectively taking over the position and that “there are no plans to search for a replacement.”

McNeill gained some serious attention in the industry when it was reported in 2017 that he would receive a $700,000 bonus if Tesla achieved its goal of producing 5,000 Model 3s per week, The Drive reported.

Tesla fell far short of that goal, so McNeill didn't have the cars he needed to sell.

Get the latest Tesla stock price here.

Original author: Matthew DeBord

Continue reading
  88 Hits
Feb
08

Elon Musk says Tesla will launch its cross-country road trip in a self-driving car in 3 to 6 months (TSLA)

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"????>

Tesla

Tesla will take a self-driving car across the US in autonomous mode during the first half of 2018, CEO Elon Musk said during the company's fourth-quarter earnings call on Wednesday.  The company had originally planned to drive from Los Angeles to New York in a self-driving Model S or Model X during 2017.  Musk said the company delayed the demo because the code was not ready to roll out to all Tesla vehicles. 


Tesla will drive one of its vehicles across the US in autonomous mode sometime during the first half of 2018, CEO Elon Musk said during the company's fourth-quarter earnings call on Wednesday. 

Musk had originally aimed to do the road trip during 2017, but he hinted during a second-quarter earnings call last year that the event would be delayed. 

Tesla began rolling out its new Autopilot hardware in all cars in October 2016. Musk has said that the new hardware will be able to support full self-driving capabilities once the software is ready. But even then, a rollout will depend on whether or not regulations are in place for autonomous vehicles. 

During the call on Wednesday, Musk said that the reason the company has delayed the drive from Los Angeles to New York is because the code isn't quite ready to roll out to all Tesla vehicles. But Musk said that the technology is well on its way. 

"The upcoming autonomous coast-to-coast drive will showcase a major leap forward for our self-driving technology. Additionally, an extensive overhaul of the underlying architecture of our software has now been completed, which has enabled a step-change improvement in the collection and analysis of data and fundamentally enhanced its machine-learning capabilities," Musk stated in the fourth quarter earnings letter. 

Because all of Tesla's cars are equipped with the software and hardware necessary to collect data that can be used to improve its ML system, the electric-car company could have a huge edge against other automakers and tech companies working on autonomous vehicles.

"Our neural net, which expands as our customer fleet grows, is able to collect and analyze more high-quality data than ever before, enabling us to rollout a series of new Autopilot features in 2018 and beyond," Musk said in the letter. 

Get the latest Tesla stock price here.

Original author: Cadie Thompson

Continue reading
  83 Hits
Feb
07

Elon Musk just made it clear that a legendary Ford plant is inspiring his ideas about how to reimagine factories (TSLA)

Wikimedia Commons
Tesla CEO Elon Musk admires Henry Ford's most famous factory.River Rouge was a model of vertical integration.Musk wants to replicate it in the 21st century with Tesla's factories.


Tesla CEO Elon Musk wants to reinvent the factory. In fact, as he made clear on a conference call after the company reported fourth-quarter 2017 earnings, he wants to make factories his most important product.

Automation is key. And Henry Ford and his most famous factory is Musk's inspiration.

"The Model T wasn’t the product, it was River Rouge," Musk said, in response to an analyst's question.

"Anybody could make the Model T," Musk said. "Not everybody could make River Rouge. The factory is going to be the product that has the long-term, sustained competitive advantage."

Way back in 2014, Tesla outlined how it's massive Nevada Gigafactory, where it manufactures batteries, might work. In a letter to investors, the company wrote: "Processed ore from mines will enter by railcar on one side and finished battery packs will exit on the other."

Anyone who knows the history of the auto industry will recognize in that description a reference to River Rouge, a sprawling facility that for decades symbolized the might of the US auto industry and the virtues of "vertical integration" in manufacturing. This is a simplification, but for all practical purposes, iron ore went in one end and finished cars rolled out the other. Everything required to build an automobile was on-site.

The gargantuan plant operated until 2004.

Tesla's ambitions for the Gigafactory are huge. It's been noted by industry observers that if the company succeeds in building 500,000 vehicles per year, there won't be enough lithium-ion batteries in the world to supply its needs. So Musk and his team must build the battery capacity that the globe currently lacks.

As Tesla strives to increase production, Musk has begun to stress that more vertical integration is the way forward for the car maker. This runs counter to a multi-decade trend in the auto industry, where so-called "lean" or "just in time" manufacturing has been the preferred operational mode.

Check out these images and stats from the River Rouge factory (they're from an old film that's on YouTube — it's worth watching but, at a half an hour in length, is a bit too long to embed here).

The factory was literally located on a river — the Rouge River in Dearborn, Michigan, where Ford still has its HQ.

Wikimedia Commons

It consisted of nearly 100 buildings.

YouTube

That many structures required a lot of glass, to provide light and ventilation!

YouTube

Materials were moved in and around the plant by a vast network of railroad tracks.

YouTube

It goes without saying that the symbol of America's industrial age was a major employer in Michigan.

YouTube

But in many places, those employees were dwarfed by the plant's impressive machinery.

YouTube

Get the latest Ford stock price here.

Original author: Matthew DeBord

Continue reading
  80 Hits
Feb
07

Elon Musk: 'If we can send a Roadster to the asteroid belt, we can probably solve Model 3 production' (TSLA)

An image from SpaceX's livestream of the 2008 Tesla Roadster included in the Falcon Heavy launch.YouTube / SpaceX
"If we can send a Roadster to the asteroid belt, we can probably solve Model 3 production," Tesla CEO Elon Musk said during the company's fourth-quarter earnings call on Wednesday.Musk was referring to SpaceX's successful Falcon Heavy launch on Tuesday, which included a 2008 Tesla Roadster as its payload.Tesla struggled to produce the Model 3 in 2017, but said it aims to increase its production rate to 5,000 vehicles per week by the end of the second quarter.


Tesla CEO Elon Musk's space exploration company, SpaceX, launched its Falcon Heavy rocket on Tuesday. The rocket was SpaceX's largest to date and the largest launched in the United States since the 1970s, and Musk repeatedly warned about the potential for failure before the launch. 

But the launch went off without a hitch, leaving Musk feeling confident heading into Tesla's fourth-quarter earnings call. 

"If we can send a Roadster to the asteroid belt, we can probably solve Model 3 production," he said during the call, referring to the 2008 Tesla Roadster that was included as the rocket's payload. SpaceX posted a livestream of the Roadster's journey toward Mars, which turned the launch into the world's best car commercial.

But here on Earth, Tesla is still struggling to produce the Model 3, its first mass-market electric car.

At one point, Musk said the company would be producing 20,000 Model 3 vehicles per month by December 2017, but it ended up delivering just over 1,500 Model 3 vehicles during the entire fourth quarter. The company hopes to increase its production rate to 2,500 per week by the end of the first quarter and 5,000 per week by the end of the second quarter, so it has plenty of work to do to reach those goals.

A CNBC report on January 25 included accounts from Tesla employees who claimed the company was making parts of the Model 3 batteries by hand with inexperienced workers in its Gigafactory in Sparks, Nevada. Tesla called the report "extremely misinformed and misleading" in an email to Business Insider.

Get the latest Tesla stock price here.

Original author: Mark Matousek

Continue reading
  66 Hits
Feb
07

You'll be able to watch the best parts of the Olympics straight from Snapchat (SNAP, FB)

A South Korean boy uses mobile phone at the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games PR booth on January 5, 2018 in Seoul, South Korea. North Korea accepted a proposal to hold talks with South Korea on Jan. 9 ahead of the Winter Olympics in February.Chung Sung-Jun/Getty
Snapchat is launching a new feature, called "Live," which will let users view live TV broadcasts. It's going to debut alongside NBC's coverage of the Winter Olympics, starting on Saturday. CEO Evan Spiegel has said that he sees deals like this as a way for Snapchat to make a bigger dent in Facebook's and Google's ad marketshare.

 

For the first time ever, Snapchat will let you use the photo chat app to watch live television, the company announced on Wednesday. And to kick it off, Snapchat will be airing highlights from the 2018 Winter Olympics on Saturday.

Snapchat is calling the service "Live." It allows broadcasters to air "snippets" of live content on Snapchat's Discover section.

Snapchat's first deal with Live is with NBCUniversal, which invested $500 million in Snapchat when the company went public. Basically, Snapchat Live will air a single clip per day of a "pivotal moment," simultaneous with NBC's primetime broadcast of the Olympics.

These clips will typically last 2-6 minutes, Snapchat confirmed with Business Insider. And users can opt in for push notifications when Snapchat will be showing a clip live.

Users will be able to watch key moments from the Pyeongchang Games in Snapchat's Discover section.Courtesy of SnapThe announcement comes on the heels of Snap Inc., Snapchat's parent company, exceeding Wall Street earnings estimates on Tuesday. At the time, CEO Evan Spiegel lauded the company's efforts to partner with broadcasters as a way to capture some of the advertising dollars it's been losing to Facebook and Instagram.

The Live broadcast of the Olympics won't include advertising, The Wall Street Journal reported. But Snap told The Journal it is considering monetizing broadcasts in the future.

While it certainly could present a new revenue stream for Snapchat, not everybody is so convinced. Dan Rayburn, principal analyst at Frost and Sullivan, tells Business Insider that "it's too early to tell" what Snap could do with this — but that because the videos are so short, it may be harder for Snapchat to display multiple ads per video.

"We're still talking about short-form video here. This isn't a long video where they can put in 5 or 6 different ads. So I don't think this will impact Snap's bottom line at all," says Rayburn. 

And yet, he says, the Olympics is a good fit for Snapchat and its audience: "It's not surprising Snap is doing this. Look at Snap's audience, it's a younger demographic. They want to promote content they think will appeal to a younger crowd," says Rayburn.

Snapchat appears to be doubling down on an already successful partnership with NBCUniversal, which produces "Stay Tuned," an original, Snapchat-only news program. E! Network and EPSN also have partnerships for original programming on the platform.

Get the latest Snap stock price here.

Original author: Rachel Sandler

Continue reading
  90 Hits
Feb
07

Here's the last shot SpaceX got of Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster and its dummy driver 'Starman'

YouTube / SpaceX

SpaceX successfully launched its Falcon Heavy  rocket carrying Elon Musk's 2008 Tesla Roadster, complete with a dummy driver named "Starman" wearing a SpaceX spacesuit, into space on Tuesday. The payload was able to capture live footage of its journey through space for a time as it made its way toward Mars.  In the last shot SpaceX got of the car and Starman, a crescent-shaped Earth is seen disappearing into the background.

 

SpaceX on Tuesday successfully launched its biggest rocket ever.

As its payload, the test rocket carried Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster and a dummy named "Starman" wearing one of SpaceX's spacesuits.

For a while after launch, SpaceX was able to keep tabs on the Roadster with cameras that broadcast a livestream. The epic views lasted until the car's battery died, which Musk had warned was likely to happen 12 hours after launch.

Before it ran out of juice, the car was able to take one final breathtaking shot.

Musk posted the last picture on Wednesday — a crescent-shaped Earth is shown fading into the distance as the car heads out to its elliptical orbit around the sun. 

The initial plan was to have the Roadster head toward Mars orbit. Instead, the payload overshot, exceeding the red planet's spot in the solar system, and is headed toward the Asteroid Belt that's between Mars and Jupiter. 

It's likely this is the last we'll ever see of the car and Starman — though they'll likely be in orbit for millions of years. 

Get the latest Tesla stock price here.

Original author: Lydia Ramsey

Continue reading
  71 Hits
Feb
03

This 25-year-old entrepreneur went from leaving school at 16 to running the 'Airbnb of retail'

Ross Bailey, centre, the CEO and founder of Appear Here. Appear Here

Appear Here lets businesses rent pop-up space and has been called the "Airbnb of retail." The London startup raised $20 million last year and is currently planning international expansion. CEO Ross Bailey sat down with Business Insider to talk department stores, skipping university, and how to maintain company culture.


LONDON — Ross Bailey wants to talk about department stores.

"If analysts walked around some of them I think they would be trading at less than 30% their net asset value," Bailey says, referencing the already bombed out US "mall" sector.

He whips out his phone and starts scrolling through pictures that illustrate his point — dreadful carpets, too much stock cluttered together, and bad paintings hung up near concessions.

"If you saw that in someone's house you'd think they've got bad taste," he says in his typically enthusiastic style.

Why does he spend his time photographing poorly designed department stores? "It's my passion."

Appear Here, which Bailey founded in 2012, is a startup trying to do for retail space what Airbnb did for hotel rental. Bailey spends his days engrossed in retail — both good and bad.

His platform lets people and brands rent "pop up" space across cities, letting aspiring entrepreneurs trial ideas like takeaway porridge stalls or designers launch capsule collections.

Over 1,000 spaces are listed by Appear Here in the UK, with 1,000 in New York, where it launched last year, and even more in Paris. Everyone from Google to Moleskin has used the platform to book space and Made In Chelsea star Jamie Laing used Appear Here for the launch of his sweet brand Candy Kittens.

A pop-up in London's Old Street station publicising Netflix's Black Mirror and booked through Appear Here. Appear Here

Bailey had the idea for the business while running his own pop-up. He quit school at 16 to move from his home in Buckinghamshire to London and was involved in several entrepreneurial endeavours before running a temporary fashion stall in Soho to coincide with the 2012 London Olympics.

He noticed that people were coming up to him to ask about he'd managed to secure the space — Under Armour even approached him at one point.

"There's a pricing issue in real estate," Bailey, now 25, says. "It's based on 10-year leases. That model doesn't work anymore. Now we're seeing rent is a variable cost, not a fixed cost."

Retail occupancy rates are declining around the world as traditional players grapple with the rise of e-commerce. Shops are closing, sales are down, and fewer people are visiting.

Real estate needs to move more towards a more flexible pricing model, Bailey argues, like Uber's surge pricing or how hotel prices rise when a conference is in town.

"If you can make 70% of your revenue in December, you shouldn't be saying the same price for the space in January when there are no sales," Bailey argues.

"A few years ago people said it was a stupid idea, landlords will never do it. Now it's a case of OK, this is definitely going to happen."

Ten of the biggest landlords in the US have signed exclusive deals with Appear Here, including Blackstone and Simon, the biggest mall operator in the US. (Bailey didn't say whether he'd critiqued their carpets.)A New York pop-up organised by Warner Brothers using Appear Here's platform.Appear Here

Appear Here raised $12 million last year to go global and Bailey is currently scoping out a location for a new US office. Property VC Fifth Wall, which is backed by the likes of CBRE and Loewe's, has also invested an undisclosed sum and Bailey hints at another deal with a "fashion fund" that will be announced shortly.

It's all very impressive for someone still just in his mid-twenties. "Instead of uni, this has been my learning curve," Bailey says.

Six years on, what has he learned?

"I think I've definitely learned to delegate. You need to jump between high-level stuff and details."

Bailey logged 80 flights between London, Paris, and New York last year. He says he is always tired but it doesn't show — he is a whirlwind of ideas and opinions, talking a mile a minute. Towards the end of our conversation, though, a solitary yawn escapes.

"A big focus over the last six months was building out the exec team," Bailey says. Appear Here recently hired two execs from Uber to run the London and Paris offices. The company has also hired a new CTO and a new chief strategy officer.A pop-up for Kanye West's Life of Pablo album in London.Appear Here

The company has yet to file a set of full accounts, claiming small company exemption, but Appear Here says it has booking requests worth $110 million made every week across its platform — although not all are successfully fulfilled.

Appear Here charges a 15% booking fee, meaning that if even a small fraction of that $110 million figure is actually being booked, it is likely making tens of millions a year in revenue.

The future looks rosy for Appear Here but Bailey is keen to maintain the company culture as it grows. All employees use the same company issued notebooks and pens — a small touch, but one that's clearly important to Bailey — and all 70 staff still have lunch together on Fridays.

"You have to build a company that you're going to love and attract people with the same values," Bailey says.

Where did he learn that? During our interview, he mentions lunches with Net-A-Porter founder Massenet and hanging out with Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky in San Francisco ("He loved our brand").

Bailey in Appear Here's offices. Appear Here

Net-A-Porter and Airbnb are two of the three companies Bailey most admires. The other is Nike. He has just finished reading Shoe Dog, the memoir of Nike founder Phil Knight, and implores me to read it.

"Nike defined an industry," Bailey says. Before Nike, "if you weren't running track, you didn't buy trainers. We want to be the Nike for entrepreneurs and creatives."

Around 40% of pop-ups on Appear Here are food and drinks stalls, while the rest are fashion, consumer goods, or other retailers like florists. Around 125,000 people have registered on the platform to rent space.

"I love the idea that we can help everyone bring their ideas to life," Bailey says.

Tokyo, Manchester, and even Toulouse come up when we talk about cities that could be interesting to Appear Here — but Bailey won't be drawn on specifics.

"We've got to be where the best ideas are," he says simply.

Original author: Oscar Williams-Grut

Continue reading
  82 Hits