May
16

199th 1Mby1M Entrepreneurship Podcast With Deb Kemper, Golden Seeds - Sramana Mitra

Deb Kemper is Managing Director and Chair of the Boston Forum at Golden Seeds, an Angel Group and Micro VC focused exclusively on women entrepreneurs.

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  62 Hits
May
16

Deliveroo employees are getting shares, riders are getting nothing

Food delivery startup Deliveroo is feeling generous today. The company is handing out equity to all full-time staff members. In other words, 2,000 employees are going to receive the equivalent of $13.5 million in Deliveroo shares.

“Our phenomenal growth and success has been made possible thanks to the hard work, commitment and passion of the people who make this company what it is,” co-founder and CEO Will Shu told Reuters. “And that deserves recognition which is why I want all employees to be owners in Deliveroo and to have a real stake in the company’s future as we expand and grow.”

This is a great way to prove that you care about your employees. And yet, there are a few caveats.

First, the company is currently worth over $2 billion. In total, Deliveroo is just handing out 0.675 percent of the company to its employees. I’m sure plenty of early employees already have equity.

But those who joined more recently aren’t likely to get rich over this — it represents a $6,750 equity bonus per employee on average. And shares usually vest after a certain amount of time.

Second, this is the perfect example of the gig economy. In addition to the usual benefits, full-time employees are getting rewarded once again. If you’re a self-employed rider, Deliveroo doesn’t want to thank you.

Arguably, Deliveroo still thinks that riders are disposable. They might be the ones who pick up food in restaurants and hand it to customers, but they will never be full-time employees.

Sure, Deliveroo and Uber Eats are now providing free accident insurance coverage, but it mostly covers hospital bills. Riders have been asking for better rights, and this insurance package is just a good way to ease the pressure.

Working with contractors at scale is the backbone of Uber, Deliveroo and many other on-demand startups. This way, startups don’t have to pay the minimum wage or expensive benefits. Startups can also terminate their relationships with their ‘partners’ without any consequence.

It’s a great way to pressure your contractors in working more for less money. And today’s move by Deliveroo is further proof that riders are just an afterthought.

Continue reading
  41 Hits
May
16

1Mby1M Virtual Accelerator Investor Forum: With David Blumberg of Blumberg Capital (Part 3) - Sramana Mitra

David Blumberg: I was speaking at a conference in Mexico recently. It was about transportation of the future. I’m not an expert in that, but I’ve got some theories. A lady from Ford Motors got...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  44 Hits
May
16

Circle raises $110 million (or 13,300 BTC)

Cryptocurrency startup Circle has raised a $110 million funding round, which values the company near $3 billion. Cryptocurrency mining company Bitmain is leading the round.

Existing investors IDG Capital, Breyer Capital, General Catalyst, Accel, Digital Currency Group and Pantera are investing more money. Blockchain Capital and Tusk Ventures are investing in Circle for the first time. Goldman Sachs also invested in the company in a previous round.

It’s hard to describe Circle in a few words because the company has been active on all fronts. For a really long time, the company pitched itself as a social payment company, a Venmo and Square Cash competitor. But Circle is more focused than ever on cryptocurrencies.

The company has been operating one of the largest over-the-counter trading desks for big cryptocurrency investors and exchanges. Circle Trade manages more than $2 billion a month in transactions and is able to fulfill large orders and provide liquidity.

More recently, the company launched Circle Invest, a really simple mobile app for the U.S. market. It lets you buy and sell Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, Litecoin, Zcash and Monero in just a few taps. It’s a good way to get started with cryptocurrencies without learning about exchanges and order types. It could become a good Coinbase competitor for small cryptocurrency investors.

And Circle also acquired Poloniex, one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the U.S.

But the most interesting projects right now are probably CENTRE and a new tokenized USD coin. There are so many different cryptocurrencies, fiat currencies, exchanges and wallets that it has become hard to make everything work together. Cryptocurrencies still suffer from price volatility, so bitcoin can’t be the common denominator.

That’s why Circle is creating a token that is pegged to the U.S. dollar. The USD Coin is based on an open source framework developed by CENTRE and everything should be audited regularly.

CENTRE is a Circle initiative to create a common framework to connect all electronic wallets. This protocol could let you send money to an Alipay user with your Square Cash balance.

It’s clear that Circle wants to build the infrastructure of the cryptocurrency industry. The company will need to convince multiple industry players to work with Circle, but it could help the cryptocurrency ecosystem as a whole.

Continue reading
  53 Hits
May
16

Step Into The VC Time Machine

May 16, 2018

One of the things humans are bad at is remembering the past and incorporating the lessons they learned from difficult experiences. I’m sure there’s a philosophical word for this, but I’ve now heard the phrase “this time it is different” so many times that it doesn’t register with me as a valid input.

I woke up this morning to Howard Lindzon’s post R.I.P Good Times (Said Sequoia in October, 2008) and Nobody Knows Anything pointing to David Frankel’s tweet:

.@sequoia R.I.P. Good Times is nearly 10 years old! Wonder how many of today’s young seed investors have even heard of it … https://t.co/PBjVxirzew pic.twitter.com/hnjj4y8FNn

— David Frankel (@dafrankel) May 15, 2018

All of this ultimately led to me reviewing Sequoia’s classic slide deck from 2008.

I remember reading it in 2008. We were about a year into our first Foundry Group fund, which we raised in 2007. That now feels like a very long time ago.

I encourage everyone to review the deck. It would be awesome if an economist (Ian Hathaway, are you out there?) made a new deck with an update to 4 through 38 that extended the time frame (and analysis) to 2018.

Also published on Medium.

Previous Post
Original author: Brad Feld

Continue reading
  36 Hits
Nov
20

Catching Up On Readings: Media Cross Ownership - Sramana Mitra

As we increasingly hear about automation, artificial intelligence and robots taking away industrial jobs, Parsable, a San Francisco-based startup sees a different reality, one with millions of workers who for the most part have been left behind when it comes to bringing digital transformation to their jobs.

Parsable has developed a Connected Worker platform to help bring high tech solutions to deskless industrial workers who have been working mostly with paper-based processes. Today, it announced a $40 million Series C cash injection to keep building on that idea.

The round was led by Future Fund with help from B37 and existing investors Lightspeed Venture Partners, Airbus Ventures and Aramco Ventures. Today’s investment brings the total to nearly $70 million.

The Parsable solution works on almost any smartphone or tablet and is designed to enter information while walking around in environments where a desktop PC or laptop simply wouldn’t be practical. That means being able to tap, swipe and select easily in a mobile context.

Photo: Parsable

The challenge the company faced was the perception these workers didn’t deal well with technology. Parsable CEO Lawrence Whittle says the company, which launched in 2013, took its time building its first product because it wanted to give industrial workers something they actually needed, not what engineers thought they needed. This meant a long period of primary research.

The company learned, it had to be dead simple to allow the industry vets who had been on the job for 25 or more years to feel comfortable using it out of the box, while also appealing to younger more tech-savvy workers. The goal was making it feel as familiar as Facebook or texting, common applications even older workers were used to using.

“What we are doing is getting rid of [paper] notebooks for quality, safety and maintenance and providing a digital guide on how to capture work with the objective of increasing efficiency, reducing safety incidents and increasing quality,” Whittle explained.

He likens this to the idea of putting a sensor on a machine, but instead they are putting that instrumentation into the hands of the human worker. “We are effectively putting a sensor on humans to give them connectivity and data to execute work in the same way as machines,” he says.

The company has also made the decision to make the platform flexible to add new technology over time. As an example they support smart glasses, which Whittle says accounts for about 10 percent of its business today. But the founders recognized that reality could change and they wanted to make the platform open enough to take on new technologies as they become available.

Today the company has 30 enterprise customers with 30,000 registered users on the platform. Customers include Ecolab, Schlumberger, Silgan and Shell. They have around 80 employees, but expect to hit 100 by the end of Q3 this year, Whittle says.

Continue reading
  50 Hits
May
16

Gfycat starts rolling out 360 degree GIF content

GIFs offer a way to compress a ton of information into a small amount of space, and while Gfycat has positioned itself as more of a short-form video centric platform, it’s going to take a step further to see what a step beyond a standard GIF looks like.

The company today said it would be rolling out 360 degree GIF-like short form videos, which will allow users to plant themselves in the middle of what is effectively a looping video like a GIF. While that presents much more of a challenge to users for generating content, CEO Richard Rabbat said the proliferation of tools like 3D cameras and content from the actual producers like video studios would make it an increasingly popular way to interact with short-form content in a compact form factor.

“We’ve always thought that GIFs are amazing from many perspectives,” Rabbat said. “That goes beyond whether you’re looking at the content to use it in messaging, or you’re consuming it for entertainment value, or you’re using it for decoration in the case of the augmented reality effort we’re working on. We want people to really get excited about how they consume the content to the point where they can see the subjects of the content in a much more lifelike way, and really get excited about that.”

It’s not going to be all that unfamiliar from 360 degree videos you might find on Facebook or other platforms. Users on desktop can use their mouse to move a GIF around, while on mobile devices users can pan their phone around in order to see different parts of the GIF. The idea is to give users a way to have a more robust interaction with a piece of content like a GIF in a compact experience without having to strap on a VR headset or anything along those lines.

The company is starting off by rolling out some 360 degree content from Paramount, which is producing 360 degree content around its Mission Impossible films. And while a lot of content on Gfycat — or other platforms — comes from shows, movies or games along those lines, it makes more sense for those studios to use these kinds of tools to increase awareness for their shows or movies.

via Gfycat

There are a lot of companies working on figuring out the best messaging experiences around GIFs. But Google acquiring Tenor, a GIF search tool that works across multiple platforms, may have set a bare minimum bar for the value of companies that are looking to help users share GIFs with their friends. Gfycat positions itself as something that’s geared toward more creator tools, and recently said it hit 180 million monthly active users.

“We’re creating experiences that we think are going to enable others and inspire others to create that same kind of content,” Rabbat said.” We expect it’s going to be a subset of what people do with 2D, but a much more immersive experience where people will spend more time looking at the content. From a consumption perspective, by not requiring people to put on VR headsets, we’re making it much more consumer friendly.”

Continue reading
  60 Hits
May
16

Lemonade wants to rewrite the insurance policy itself

Lemonade has made some big moves in the world of insurance. The company uses AI and bots to sell insurance, and has flipped the business model to ensure that Lemonade is never in conflict with customers filing insurance claims.

But the product itself, the actual insurance policy, hasn’t changed much at all. For decades, insurance companies have been held to long, tedious legalese in their insurance contracts. In Lemonade’s case, the document is more than 40 pages long and incredibly difficult to understand.

For a company that wants to make buying insurance as easy and as consumer-centric as possible, the very product they sell is in complete opposition to that. Which is why Lemonade is re-writing the policy from scratch.

“I’m a recovering attorney, and I’ve been clean for 20 years,” said Lemonade CEO and cofounder Daniel Schreiber. “I think my English is pretty good, and I have a passing familiarity with insurance and generally I can’t understand this insurance policy. To do the next big thing in insurance means changing insurance. It’s not been done in generations. This is a historic document that’s been optimized around lawyers.”

So Lemonade has re-written the whole thing to read like a blog post. Policy 2.0, according to Schreiber, is meant to give consumers a clear and easy way to understand what is and what is not covered in their insurance policy.

But, in a little bit of a twist, Lemonade is open-sourcing the policy on GitHub. Anyone, from state regulators to consumer advocacy groups to Lemonade competitors or even interested customers can make edits and contributions to the policy. Plus, Lemonade is opening up use of the policy to other insurance providers under the GNU’s Free Documentation License.

Part of this has to do with transparency to consumers, but another part is simply about Lemonade’s greater mission of making insurance simple.

“We sold you a policy on your phone,” said Schreiber. “We want a policy that makes sense on a five-inch screen.”

I asked Schreiber whether or not there is any concern over rewriting a policy in more plain language when historically, lawyers use specific language to stay within the realms of legal precedent and remove any grey areas that may be litigated.

“Anytime you abandon language that’s been litigated for years you invite legal uncertainty,” answered Schreiber. “But we think if you’re optimizing for the consumer, giving them clarity into exactly what’s covered and exactly what isn’t, you won’t feel cheated if we can’t cover things because you’ll see that you had that info all along, in plain English.”

One hurdle, however, will be regulators. A good deal of the language in that 10,000 word-long insurance policy is legally required to be in the document. This change from Lemonade requires the company to work with regulators to allow the new policy to be sold, and that conversation differs from state to state.

That’s why Schreiber believes Policy 2.0 won’t be available for purchase until sometime in 2019, rolling out on a statewide basis as is approved by regulators.

That said, Schreiber said he’s already in conversation with regulators and is seeing willingness to be flexible on this.

When Policy 2.0 does come to the main stage, current Lemonade subscribers will be able to immediately change over to the new policy or keep their original policy.

Lemonade has raised a total of $180 million, including a whopping $120 million round led by SoftBank from December.

Continue reading
  69 Hits
May
16

Instagram will soon show you just how addicted you are to the app (FB)

Are you an #Instaddict?

Instagram is working on a new feature that will show users just how much time they spend with the app, in a wider effort from tech companies to get people to look up from their phones.

The new feature was originally discovered by Jane Manchun Wong, a computer scientist with a record of reverse engineering popular apps to uncover upcoming features. Wong's find was first reported by TechCrunch, and confirmed by Instagram CEO Kevin Systrom on Twitter.

Wong dug around in Instagram's code and found a feature seemingly known internally as "time spent." This is seemingly visualised on the app as a sidebar feature called "Usage insights."

You can see her full thread and what the feature looks like here:

There's no further detail on what the "Usage insights" feature will actually show, like your overall time spent on Instagram, or whether it just shows a limited time period of a month or a day.

Systrom simply tweeted "It's true" when TechCrunch first reported the story.

The new feature follows Google introducing time management controls for Android, with a new dashboard that lets users set how much time they want to spend on each app. When they use up their allotted time, the app will gray out on their phone screen.

Apple has similarly promised better usage controls for children, but has yet to deliver.

Original author: Shona Ghosh

Continue reading
  77 Hits
Nov
19

Pact Coffee founder steps down from CEO role as London startup looks to B2B for growth

Sometimes I think of spreadsheets as the dirty secret of the IT world today. We’ve seen a huge explosion in the number of productivity tools on the market tailored to help workers with different aspects of doing their job and organising their information, in part to keep them from simply dumping lots of information into Excel or whatever program they happen to use. And yet, spreadsheets are still one of the very, very most common pieces of software in use today to organise and share information: Excel alone now has around 1 billion users, and for those who are devotees, spreadsheets are not going to go away soon.

So it’s interesting that there are now startups — and larger companies like Microsoft — emerging that are tapping into that, creating new services that still appear like spreadsheets in the front end, while doing something completely different in the back.

One of the latest is a startup called dashdash, a startup out of Berlin and Porto that is building a platform for people, who might to be programmers but know their way around a spreadsheet, to use those skills to build, modify and update web apps.

The dashdash platform looks and acts like a spreadsheet up front, but behind the scenes, each ‘macro’ links to a web app computing feature, or a design element, to build something that ultimately will look nothing like a spreadsheet, bypassing all the lines of code that traditionally go into building web apps.

The startup is still in stealth mode, with plans to launch formally later this year. Today, it’s announcing that it has received $8 million in Series A funding to get there, with the round being led by Accel, with participation from Cherry Ventures, Atlantic Labs, and angel investors including Felix Jahn, founder of Home24. (It’s raised $9 million to date including $1 million in seed funding.)

Co-founded by serial entrepreneurs Humberto Ayres Pereira and Torben Schulz — who had also been co-founders of food delivery startup EatFirst — Ayres Pereira said that the idea came out of their own observations in work life and the bottleneck of getting things fixed or modified in a company’s apps (both internal and customer-facing).

“People have a lot of frustration with the IT department, and their generally access to it,” he said in an interview. “If you are part of an internet business, it’s very hard to get features prioritised in an app, no matter how small they are. Tech is like a big train on iron tracks, and it can be hard to steer it in a different direction.”

On the other hand, even among the less technical staff, there will be proficiency with certain software, including spreadsheets. “Programming and spreadsheets already store and transform data,” Ayers Pereira said. “There are already a lot of people trying to do more with incumbent spreadsheets, and [combining that with] non-IT people frustrated at having no solution for working on apps, we saw an opportunity to use this to build an elegant platform the empower people. We can’t teach people to program but we can provide them with the tools to do the exact same job.”

While in stealth mode, he said that early users have ranged from smaller businesses such as pharmacies, to “a multi-billion-dollar internet company.” (No names, of course, but it’s interesting to me that this problem even exists at large tech businesses.)

Dashdash is not the only company that is tapping this opportunity. The other week, and IoT startup called Hanhaa launched a service that would let those using Hanhaa IoT sensors in their networks to monitor and interact with them by way of an Excel spreadsheet — another tip of the hat to the realisation that those who might need to keep tabs on devices in the network might not be the people who are the engineers and technicians who have set them up.

That, in turn, is part of a bigger effort from Microsoft to catapult Excel from its reputation as a piece of clunky legacy software into something much more dynamic, playing on the company’s push into cloud services and Office 365.

In September of 2017, Microsoft gave a developer preview of new “streaming functions” for Excel on Office 365, which lets developers, IT professionals and end users the ability to bring streams of data from a variety of sources such as websites, stock tickers and hardware directly into a cell or cells in an Excel spreadsheet, by way of a custom function. “Because Excel is so widely used and familiar to so many people, the ability to do all kinds of amazing things with that data and without complex integration is now possible,” said Ben Summers, a senior product manager for the Office 365 ecosystem team, in a statement to TechCrunch.

That ability to remove the bottleneck from web app building, combined with the track record of the founders, are two of the reasons that Accel decided to invest before the product even launched.

“We believe in dashdash’s mission to democratise app creation and are excited to back Humberto and Torben at such an early stage in their journey,” said Andrei Brasoveanu, the Accel principal who led the deal. “The team has the experience and vision to build a high-impact company that brings computing to the fingertips of a broad audience. Over the past decade we’ve seen a proliferation of web services and APIs, but regular business users still need to rely on central IT and colleagues with development skills to leverage these in their day-to-day processes. With dashdash anyone will be able to access these powerful web services directly with minimal effort, empowering them to automate their day to day tasks and work more effectively.”

With every tool that emerges that frees up accessibility to more people — be they employees or consumers — there are inevitably questions about how that power will be used. In the case of dashdash, my first thought is about those who I know who work in IT: they generally don’t want anyone able to modify or “fix” their code, lest it just creates more problems. And that’s before you start wondering about how all these democratised web apps will look, and if they might inadvertently will add to more overall UI and UX confusion.

Ayres Pereira said dashdash is mindful of the design question, and will introduce ways of helping to direct this, for example for companies to implement their own house styles. And similarly, a business can put in place other controls to help channel how web apps created through dashdash’s spreadsheet interface ultimately get applied.

Continue reading
  54 Hits
May
16

Oxford-based MeVitae wants to scale the hiring process and remove unconscious bias

The HR departments of large companies face a common challenge: how to scale the hiring process when they receive hundreds if not thousands of applicants, and how to remove unconscious bias so the best or most suitable candidates are shortlisted. That’s the specific problem MeVitae, an Oxford-based startup founded by neuroscientist Riham Satti and computer scientist Vivek Doriaiswamy, has set out to solve.

Dubbed “Augmented Intelligence,” more broadly the burgeoning company is developing AI technology that uses what Satti describes as “cognitive techniques” designed to compensate for the limitations of humans.

The premise — in part backed up by her neuroscience research at Oxford University — is that our brains have limitations that restrict our cognitive ability, including the relatively slow speed when processing information, unconscious biases, and limited memory. Limitations, she says, that machines do not possess. Applying to this to various aspects of recruitment is the startup’s initial bet.

Intended to be deployed after a new job opening has been advertised, the MeVitae software plugs into a company’s current Application Tracking System. It then sifts through all of the applications/CVs that have been received and analyses each CV (relative to the job spec) giving it a score.

“This is done by analysing every component of a CV (e.g. education, experience etc.) and using the web to reason and validate each score,” explains Satti.

The hiring company then receives the ranked and shortlisted applicants within their ATS system, and — crucially — is also able to see a “road map” explaining MeVitae’s reasoning behind each score. In addition, through the use of NLP, MeVitae takes each CV and find parts of it that could result in discrimination (e.g. gender, ethnicity) and redacts this information for an employer i.e. CV blinding.

The result is that employers now have ranked and redacted applicant CVs and can quickly shortlist top and diverse talent. “The ranked and anonymised candidates are provided to the recruiter/employer of the company to review,” says the MeVitae co-founder. “The employer will decide who they want to interview from the shortlist… [and] over time the system learns from each employer’s choices for more intelligent decision-making”. In other words, the longer MeVitae is employed by an individual company the more responsive it becomes to that company’s hiring priorities and isn’t a one size fits all solution.

Meanwhile, MeVitae is disclosing that it has raised £500,000 in funding, in a round led by angel investor club Startup Funding Club. Others participating include Force Over Mass, Twenty Ten Capital, BBH ZAG (brand arm of Bartle Bogle Hegartyand), and the tax-payer funded London Co-Investment Fund (launched by the Deputy Mayor of London). Dhiraj Mukherjee, (co-founder of Shazam), Simon Samuel (search and recruitment executive), and Geoff Hughes (Microsoft director and Honorary Research Associate at UCL) have also invested and join the MeVitae board.

Prior to this, the startup has been funded by a number of grants, totalling around £250,000. These came from Innovate UK, European Space Agency BIC, and Regional Growth Fund, amongst others. The funding was used to finance over 3 years of R&D as MeVitae built the technology and got its current product offering to market.

Continue reading
  43 Hits
May
07

Locatee raises $4M Series A for its workplace analytics platform

Teatime Games, a new Icelandic “social games” startup from the same team behind the hugely popular QuizUp (acquired in by Glu Mobile), is disclosing $9 million in funding, made up of seed and Series A rounds.

Index Ventures led both, but have been joined by Atomico, the European VC fund founded by Skype’s Niklas Zennström, for the $7.5 million Series A round. I understand this is the first time the two VC firms have done a Series A deal together in over a decade.

Both VCs have a decent track record in gaming. Index counts King, Roblox and Supercell as previous gaming investments, whilst Atomico also backed Supercell, along with Rovio, and most recently Bossa Studios.

As part of the round, Guzman Diaz of Index Ventures, Mattias Ljungman of Atomico, and David Helgason, founder of Unity, have joined the Teatime Games board of directors.

Meanwhile, Teatime Games is keeping shtum publicly on exactly what the stealthy startup is working on, except that it plays broadly in the social and mobile gaming space. In a call with co-founder and CEO Thor Fridriksson yesterday, he said a little more off the record and on condition that I don’t write about it yet.

What he was willing to describe publicly, however, is the general problem the company has set out to solve, which is how to make mobile games more social and personalised. Specifically, in a way that any social features — including communicating with friends and other players in real-time — enhances the gameplay rather than gets in its way or is simply bolted on as an adjunct to the game itself.

The company’s macro thesis is that games have always been inherently social throughout different eras (e.g. card games, board games, arcades, and consoles), and that most games truly come to life “through the interaction between people, opponents, and the audience”. However, in many respects this has been lost in the age of mobile gaming, which can feel like quite a solitary experience. That’s either because they are single player games or turn-based and played against invisible opponents.

Teatime plans to use the newly disclosed investment to double the size of its team in Iceland, with a particular focus on software engineers, and to further develop its social gaming offering for third party developers. Yes, that’s right, this is clearly a developer platform play, as much as anything else.

On that note, Atomico Partner Mattias Ljungman says the next “breakout opportunity” in games will see a move beyond individual studios and titles to what he describes as fundamental enabling technologies. Linked to this he argues that the next generation of games companies being developed will “become ever more mass market and socially connected”. You can read much more on Ljungman and Atomico’s gaming thesis in a blog post recently published by the VC firm.

Continue reading
  43 Hits
Nov
20

Fintech startup Glint de-cloaks to offer a multi-currency account and card that supports spending gold

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos is a big spender when it comes to capital expenditures. REUTERS/Abhishek N. Chinnappa

Major infrastructure investments by tech giants like Facebook and Amazon have led to a surprise bump in 2018 data center spend, according to Morgan Stanley analyst Katy L. Huberty.

In a report Tuesday, Huberty said that Morgan Stanley expects cloud capital expenditures to grow 29% year over year in 2018, thanks to "continued workload shift to public cloud and easing component constraints." The firm had originally expected 23% growth, but raised its estimate after seeing how companies acted in the first quarter.

This puts growth in the space 13 percentage points higher in 2018 than in 2017, when the space saw just 16% growth.

"We see hyperscale data center investment inflecting above our prior expectations," Huberty wrote.

Among the big spenders are Amazon, Facebook, Google and Microsoft, who together make up 75% of the capital expenditures of the 14 companies tracked by Morgan Stanley its Cloud CapEx Tracker.

Amazon "continues to invest heavily to expand AWS capabilities and improve data center efficiency," while Facebook also has plans to invest around $15 billion in data centers, servers, network infrastructure and office facilities, according to the report.

"Similarly, both Google and Microsoft highlighted the need to invest aggressively in their data center business," Huberty wrote.

But it's not just giants making investments in cloud. An April Morgan Stanley survey of 100 chief information officers "suggests the percentage of total company workloads residing on the public cloud will increase from 20% today to 44% by 2021," according to the report. Morgan Stanley

Original author: Becky Peterson

Continue reading
  85 Hits
May
16

Aircall raises another $29 million

French startup Aircall has raised a funding round of $29 million for its cloud based call center solution. Draper Esprit led the round with NextWorld Capital, Balderton Capital and Newfund also participating.

The company has raised $40.5 million in total. Aircall participated in the Startup Battlefield at TechCrunch Disrupt SF a few years ago. The company first started at eFounders.

Aircall is following the software-as-a-service playbook. First, you take a boring industry like phone systems for large support and sales teams. Second, you bet everything on software. And third, you keep adding new features and integrations, and chasing new customers.

The company now has two offices in New York and Paris and handles millions of calls every day. With today’s funding round, the company plans to hire more people in both offices.

When you sign up to Aircall, you get virtual phone numbers in one or multiple countries. You can then configure a greeting message, add business hours and handle your call queue.

But the magic happens when you have multiple people handling sales or support calls. When someone calls, it can ring multiple people at once or someone specific first, then a second person if the first person isn’t available, etc. You get an overview of all your calls so you can assign them, tag them and more.

Aircall doesn’t work in a vacuum. So you can integrate Aircall with CRMs and other solutions like Salesforce, Zendesk and Zoho. The startup also launched a deep integration with Intercom that lets you switch from a text conversation to a phone call from the popup window.

It’s hard to list all the features right here. But chances are that if you’re running a call center, you’ll have everything you need for your team. Aircall currently costs $30 to $50 per user and per month to access all of this.

Continue reading
  70 Hits
May
16

Verizon once had big plans to compete with Amazon's cloud juggernaut — now it's a big Amazon cloud customer (VZ, AMZN)

On Tuesday, Amazon announced that Verizon was going to vastly increase its usage of Amazon's cloud. Verizon had been an under-the-radar customer of Amazon Web Services since 2015, but it is now going to move 1,000 of its applications into Amazon's cloud in a very public way.

It is also going to be a user of Amazon's database, Aurora.

All of this is significant for a number of reasons.

For one, it marks how Amazon has taken yet another would-be competitor and brought them into its own orbit. Verizon once had ambitions to be a public cloud provider that competed with Amazon. In 2011, Verizon spent $1.4 billion to buy cloud data center provider Terremark. At the time, the cloud market was young, and every big tech company was scrambling to nab their piece of it.

It didn't really work out. In 2015, Verizon started using Amazon Web Services to power some of its own software. A year later, as Amazon's dominance rose, Verizon's in-house cloud ambitions faded. Verizon quietly closed its cloud unit. Last year, it sold its data centers to Equinix for $3.6 billion, and sold the remnants of its cloud business to IBM, with terms undisclosed.

So becoming a "preferred cloud vendor" for Verizon is a definitely feather in Amazon's cap.

And the announcement that Verizon will use the Amazon Aurora database is significant because it gives Amazon another huge, marquee customer for its fast-growing Oracle competitor.

And the list of Aurora is starting to get long and significant. AWS CEO Andy Jassy says that Aurora is the fastest growing service in Amazon's history, with "tens of thousands" of customers using it and it grew at about 250% last year. Big-name Aurora customers include ADP, Autodesk and Choice Hotels. Verizon is a standout addition, nonetheless.

It isn't clear which type of databases Verizon is moving to AWS Aurora. Back in 2015, Verizon famously had issues with a MongoDB database when a hacker claimed to have stolen the customer data out of it, and was offering to sell that data for $100,000.

Other companies who couldn't beat the mighty AWS and later opted to join it, (albeit as partners, not customers), include VMware and Rackspace.

Original author: Julie Bort

Continue reading
  99 Hits
May
16

MoviePass may be in bigger trouble than people realize (HMNY)

MoviePass CEO Mitch Lowe and Helios and Matheson Chief Executive Ted Farnsworth MoviePass/Reuters

Enjoy your MoviePass subscriptions while you've got one. They may not work for much longer.

It's no secret that Helios and Matheson Analytics, MoviePass' corporate parent, is in financial peril. The company is losing more than $20 million a month and its cash stockpile is dwindling.

But recently filed regulatory documents — as well as the company's recent stock performance — indicate it may be in deeper trouble than is widely appreciated.

In the first quarter, it burned through cash at a faster rate than it previously reported. It's so low on cash that it says it's going to need to sell more equity in the company to the public this month to raise funds, which would mark the third time this year it's tapped the public markets. But because of its recent stock slump, that tap may run dry before the year is out.

"Without additional funding, the company will not have sufficient funds to meet its obligations within one year," Helios and Matheson said in its quarterly report, filed on Tuesday.

It continued: "Without raising additional capital, there is substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern through May 15, 2019."

MoviePass is burning through cash at a faster-than-reported rate

Helios and Matheson's troubles stem from MoviePass, which has become the core of its business. As its fans know well, MoviePass offers a $10-a-month service that allows subscribers to see a movie-a-day in the theaters.

When subscribers go see a movie, the company generally pays the theater the retail price of the tickets on behalf of those subscribers. Because ticket prices in many places are more than $10 and because many subscribers see more than one movie a month, many customers are getting a great deal — and MoviePass is losing money hand over fist.

In the first quarter, for example, Helios and Matheson posted $49.4 million in sales — $47.2 million of which came from MoviePass subscriptions. But the company's direct costs associated with those sales were $136 million in the period, almost all of which was likely due to buying movie tickets for its customers. In other words, on average, MoviePass customers are getting about $28 in tickets each month for their $10 subscription.

That's translated into a massive outflow of cash. In the first quarter, the company's operations burned through $68.4 million. That's nearly $23 million a month — or about $1 million more every month than what the company had previously said it has averaged during the seven-month period since September.

Helios and Matheson have been using the stock market like an ATM

To fund these ongoing and mushrooming losses, Helios and Matheson has started to use the stock market as a kind of ATM. The company sold $105 million worth of stock in February and another $30 million worth last month.

Despite the repeated fund raising, the company said in a regulatory filing last week that it had just $15.5 million in cash on hand at the end of last month, a perilously low figure, given its cash burn rate. While the company assured investors that it had cut down its losses significantly at the beginning of this month, it warned investors that it didn't think it has sufficient funds to last it even for the rest of the month.

"We will need proceeds from sales of our common stock ... or other sources of capital, starting in May 2018," the company said.

The company has already filed the paperwork to sell another $265 million worth of stock, so the next round of sales could happen at any time.

But Helios and Matheson's stock has now fallen below Nasdaq's listing standards

Selling stock to raise money is a good game, but it can't go on forever, particularly if the cash raised is immediately burned. All else being equal, floating more shares on the market will make each share worth less. And if the company has nothing to show for the money invested except a larger and larger accumulated deficit, investors are likely to sour on putting more money in.

But there's another practical problem with Helios and Matheson's fund-raising strategy: Its stock is now at risk of being delisted by mid-December.

The Nasdaq — the market on which the company's shares trade — requires listed companies to have a stock price of at least $1 a share and a market capitalization of at least $50 million. Helios and Matheson fell below both standards last week. At the close of trading Tuesday, its stock was priced at 65.21 cents a share, and its market capitalization stood at $41.4 million.

Should the company stay below Nasdaq's price or market value standards for 30 days, it will officially be noncompliant with Nasdaq's standards and will almost certainly get a warning letter from the exchange. If it can't meet those standards for the next six months, Nasdaq will delist Helios and Matheson's shares. At that point, its game of selling stock to pay for subscribers' tickets will almost certainly be up.

That's, of course, not the picture CEO Ted Farnsworth has been painting publicly about the company lately. He's said he's "not worried at all" about the MoviePass's cash burn rate he told Variety on Monday, saying the company has "17 months worth of cash" thanks to a $300 million line of credit.

But Helios and Matheson didn't mention that line of credit in its regulatory filings, an odd omission given its apparent financial straits.

So, have your fun on MoviePass. Just don't be shocked when it all comes to an end.

Original author: Troy Wolverton

Continue reading
  90 Hits
May
16

The $8.8 billion UK gambling giant that owns Paddy Power and Betfair is considering buying FanDuel

Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images

The United States Supreme Court struck down a federal law prohibiting sports betting, and the British gambling giant behind Paddy Power and Betfair wants a piece of the action.

Paddy Power Betfair — valued on the public markets at £6.5 billion ($8.8 billion) — is close to buying FanDuel, a New York-based fantasy sports company, according to multiple media reports. Business Insider also spoke to a source with knowledge of the deal.

According to The Financial Times, Paddy Power Betfair is due to make an announcement on Wednesday morning, and that negotiations are "ongoing."

Legal Sports Report, meanwhile, reported that the two companies are "close" to a deal, but that it's not clear when it might be finalized.

FanDuel lets users build fantasy teams, follow games, and win cash, and it would offer Paddy Power Betfair a major doorway into the US market — as well as details on tens of millions of users that might use its other gambling products. (Paddy Power Betfair already has a horseracing TV network called TVG in the US, and some smaller operations.) As of 2016, FanDuel was said to be worth over $1 billion.

On Monday, the US Supreme Court ruled that a ban of sports betting is unconstitutional, paving the way for the individual states to legalize sports gambling.

New Jersey and Pennsylvania have already passed such legislation, and a recent study found that 14 states are likely to have sports gambling within two years, including Montana, Colorado, Michigan, and Massachusetts.

In 2017, FanDuel had planned to merge with rival DraftKings, but it was called off after the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) said it would oppose the merger. Paddy Power Betfair was formed in 2016 when Paddy Power and Betfair merged.

Original author: Rob Price and Zoë Bernard

Continue reading
  70 Hits
May
15

Warren Buffett says he 'blew it' when he didn't invest in Amazon early, and the regret is what keeps him from investing today (AMZN)

Jeff Bezos REUTERS/Abhishek N. Chinnappa

Some mistakes are so big that you just have to fess up and move on with your life.

That's the way Warren Buffett feels about his decision not to invest in Amazon back in 1997 when he was pitched to invest in its IPO, but passed. Amazon launched on the public markets that year at $18 a share.

At the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting earlier this month, and also in an interview with CNBC, Buffett talked about turning down Amazon as one of the decisions he regrets.

"The truth is that I've watched Amazon from the start and I think what Jeff Bezos has done is something close to a miracle, and the problem is if I think something is going to be a miracle I tend not to bet on it," he said at the meeting.

A couple of days later, CNBC's Becky Quick asked him if he's going to do an about-face, like he did with Apple, and invest in Amazon.

Warren Buffet Dennis Van Tine/AP Buffett said, "It'll probably be tough. I've probably got so many psychological problems with the fact that I didn't do it that it's very hard to do it."

He reiterated praise for Amazon founder Jeff Bezos calling him "an extraordinarily clear thinker as well as being a brilliant thinker."

He also said that Amazon and Bezos have far surpassed "anything I would have dreamt could have been done. I mean, 'cause if I had dreamt it-- if I had really felt it could have been done, I should have bought it then."

Remember, back when Amazon was founded in 1994, most people thought his idea to sell books over this thing called the internet was crazy. A lot of people had never even hard of the internet. When Bezos tried to raise money from VCs, they all turned him down. In 1995, it was so difficult to scrape together seed money, he had to hustle to secure $1 million from 20 angel investors each kicking in $50,000, he said in a 2001 interview.

Four years later, in part because of Amazon's success, investors would go so crazy for internet businesses and the so-called internet bubble would arrive.

Buffett says he still gets a pang these days every time he sees a new Amazon annual report because Bezos always includes his original 1997 shareholder letter in it. In that letter, Bezos tells investors that he has a long-term view, and promises "online bookselling, and online commerce in general, should prove to be a very large market."

Buffett told CNBC, "I knew he would do the most with whatever idea he had. I had no idea that it had this potential. I blew it."

Original author: Julie Bort

Continue reading
  60 Hits
May
15

HTC just unveiled a blockchain-powered smartphone designed to help reinvent the internet

A collection of HTC phone models -- but not the blockchain powered phone in question. HTC

On Tuesday, HTC unveiled the HTC Exodus — a phone that it's describing as "the world's first native blockchain phone."

The HTC Exodus, will be similar to HTC's other Android smartphones. The difference is that will be designed to support for blockchain-based distributed apps, and feature what the company describes as "built-in secure hardware."

Details, including price, are currently scant. The big-picture idea, says HTC, is that this is a phone for the privacy-minded user. By using blockchain tech, HTC promises that the Exodus can give privacy-minded users control over their data, without having to rely on the major technology companies for cloud storage.

Furthermore, the phone will come with a built-in cryptocurrency wallet. Ultimately, HTC says that each Exodus will act as a node for the bitcoin and ethereum blockchains — so that every phone increases the overall size and scope of the network.

Overseeing the project is Phil Chen, best known as the founder of HTC's Vive virtual reality headset business. He left the company in 2015 to get into venture capital, but is now returning to HTC as Decentralized Chief Officer.

Chen discussed his vision for the Exodus at the blockchain conference Consensus in New York. The goal, he said, is to build a phone that supports a decentralized system. Chen said that he believes that a blockchain-powered smartphone might inspire a new wave of decentralized systems, in the same way that the availability of computers once paved the way for the makings of the internet.

The company suggests that future customers might be able to pay for the phone with cryptocurrencies, but hasn't gone into details.

"We think that the phone can be an agent in the future for decentralization," said Chen. "We want you to hold your own key [through] a secure management method in our phones."

Here's a sketch, hinting at what the Exodus will look like:

HTC

Original author: Zoë Bernard

Continue reading
  73 Hits
Nov
07

Neos launches IoT-powered home insurance UK-wide

Workplaces everywhere ground to a halt on Tuesday as everybody argued whether the robot in this recording says "Yanny" or "Laurel."

To cut right to the chase, here's the recording, as shared on Twitter by influencer and designer Cloe Feldman:

Some Twitter users have said they hear "Yanny" and some say they hear "Laurel."

Apparently, both sides are correct according to some Redditors.

There are two separate voices in the recording, one saying "Laurel" at a lower frequency and the other saying "Yanny" at a higher frequency. If you play the recording at a high volume, you're probably more likely to hear "Laurel," while if the volume is at a lower level, you'll hear "Yanny."

The video apparently originated on Reddit.

This isn't the first time a conundrum like this has taken the internet by storm. People were left befuddled by the infamous dress incident of 2015 in which no one could decide if a dress in the photo was white and gold or black and blue.

And similarly, late last year bad lighting in a photo of a pair of sneakers made it difficult to settle on what color they were.

Like the viral phenomenons before it, the recording will fade into nonexistence within a matter of days.

Original author: Katie Canales

Continue reading
  45 Hits