Aug
24

Samsung's new Galaxy Note 10 is the company's first smartphone without a headphone jack, and Samsung didn't include a headphone dongle — here's why

The future of the headphone jack on smartphones is pretty certain at this stage: it's all but over.

Samsung, one of the last smartphone headphone jack holdouts, ditched the headphone jack for the new Galaxy Note 10, and that likely means the Galaxy S11 next year won't have a headphone jack, either.

Somewhat surprisingly, Samsung isn't easing its customers into the headphone jack-less world. The company isn't including headphone jack dongles with the Galaxy Note 10, forcing you instead to use a pair of wireless headphones, use the included USB-C AKG earphones, or buy a $15 dongle separately.

Speaking with Business Insider, Samsung said it would rather include earphones the company values at a $100 instead of a $15 dongle to connect your existing wired headphones.

That's a tough sell, but a sell nonetheless.

Read more: Bose announced a new $350 portable Bluetooth speaker with a handle that could be the last speaker you'd ever need

I tried the AKG earphones that came with the Note 10, and they're actually pretty good. If you don't already have a pair of earphones, they'd work perfectly fine as a daily pair. They have an in-ear design that's more likely to fit a wider range of ears than earbuds like Apple's EarPods that are included with iPhones. And as in-ear earphones, they help block out a little noise, too. When I forgot my wireless headphones one day, the AKG earphones that came with the Note 10 were a welcome and perfectly good backup.

But whether Note 10 users with their own wired headphones will accept the AKG earphones is another matter.

Original author: Antonio Villas-Boas

Continue reading
  39 Hits
Aug
24

Thursday, August 29 – 454th 1Mby1M Mentoring Roundtable for Entrepreneurs - Sramana Mitra

Entrepreneurs are invited to the 454th FREE online 1Mby1M mentoring roundtable on Thursday, August 29, 2019, at 8 a.m. PDT/11 a.m. EDT/5 p.m. CEST/8:30 p.m. India IST. If you are a serious...

___

Original author: Maureen Kelly

Continue reading
  13 Hits
Aug
24

You should change this one setting on your iPhone if you want to save data (AAPL)

Since you probably use your phone for everything from watching Netflix to browsing Facebook and getting directions from point A to point B, it can be easy to breeze through your data plan unknowingly.

But there are a few steps you can take to better manage your data usage. One such trick is by turning of Wi-Fi Assist, a feature that automatically switches your iPhone to a cellular connection if you're on a sluggish Wi-Fi network. Apple added this feature to the iPhone when it launched iOS 9 in back in 2015 to make it easier to keep using the web and apps when Wi-Fi is slow.

Read more: The Apple Card just launched this week — here's how it stacks up against other similar credit cards

However, if you're really trying to cut back on data usage, you might not want your iPhone to automatically switch to cellular service without your knowledge.

Wi-Fi Assist is on by default. Here's how to turn it off.

Original author: Lisa Eadicicco

Continue reading
  28 Hits
Aug
24

Every major change Tesla has made to the Model S throughout the years

The Tesla Model S has earned many accolades, from being labeled the best-selling car in Norway in 2013 to being awarded MotorTrend's "Ultimate Car of the Year" award.

Unlike other mainstream car manufacturers that may significantly update their vehicles before a full redesign, Tesla has taken a different route, implementing small aesthetic and mechanical changes over the course of each vehicle's life cycle, while investing substantially more resources into over-the-air software updates that improve the vehicles internally.

Read more: Tesla rivals Jaguar I-Pace and Audi e-tron are struggling to compete — here's how the cars actually compare to the Model X

Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced on Twitter in July that the Model S would not be refreshed this year, and would — along with its SUV sibling the Model X — only receive incremental changes instead.

And since its introduction, the Model S has undergone many changes, including updates to its drive unit, as well as exterior and interior aesthetic modifications.

Here is a timeline of some major changes the popular electric luxury sedan has undergone since its introduction, both in its aesthetics and in its programming and driving features.

Original author: Brittany Chang

Continue reading
  33 Hits
Aug
24

Here's how WeWork answered the 5 biggest questions about its business — and why analysts are still worried about its upcoming IPO

In its document, WeWork portrayed Neumann in glowing terms and central to its success.

One indication of the importance the company places on Neumann was just the sheer number of times it mentioned his name in the filing — 169 times. By contrast, Uber's IPO filing mentioned "Dara" — the first name of its CEO — just 29 times, Galloway noted in a blog post.

But there was more. In one of the risk factors, the company warned that it didn't have an employment agreement with Neumann, but said that "our future success depends in large part on [his] continued service," calling him "critical to our operations."

In the section where it described the various transactions Neumann and his family members have engaged in with the company, WeWork explained that they were a function of "his deep involvement in all aspects of the growth of our company" and prefaced its descriptions of them by talking about how crucial he is to WeWork.

"From the day he co-founded WeWork, Adam has set the Company's vision, strategic direction and execution priorities," WeWork said in the filing. "Adam is a unique leader who has proven he can simultaneously wear the hats of visionary, operator and innovator, while thriving as a community and culture creator."

The document acknowledged that Neumann had sold shares of WeWork in the past, but said he hadn't sold any since 2017, wouldn't sell any in the IPO, and had committed to not transfer any of his shares or options for a year after the offering.

In terms of his real estate purchases, the company said he did them with its interests at heart.

"In the early days of our business, at a time when landlords were reluctant to recognize the benefits of WeWork as a tenant, Adam bought four buildings in order to help prove WeWork as a viable tenant to landlords," the company said in the filing. "In December 2017, Adam expanded his participation in purchasing real estate by buying a majority interest in downtown San Jose development projects, a first step in pursuing the Company's vision for the future of cities."

Neumann has since agreed not to purchase any additional properties with the intent to lease them to WeWork, the company said. Wanting to address any conflicts of interest with the past transactions, he and the company set up a real estate fund primarily owned by WeWork that will manage his interests in 10 properties, including four leased by the company. The fund has an option to buy the properties for a year.

On the governance front, the company said it adopted its new corporate structure to allow it to more easily expand into new areas, acquire new businesses, or enter into partnerships. It also said the structure would help insulate each one of those business lines from each other so the failing of any one of them wouldn't necessarily bring down the whole company.

While acknowledging that Neumann would retain majority control of WeWork after the offering, the company said that was good, because it is "a founder led company." It also said that Neumann had committed to giving up majority control if the number of shares he owns dips below 5% of the outstanding number.

Original author: Troy Wolverton

Continue reading
  25 Hits
Aug
24

453rd Roundtable Recording on August 8, 2019: With Jonathan Nelson, Hackers/Founders - Sramana Mitra

In case you missed it, you can listen to the recording here:

___

Original author: Maureen Kelly

Continue reading
  38 Hits
Mar
18

Lunchbox and Eniac launch a website for supporting local businesses

On Thursday, VMware shocked no one by confirming that it was re-acquiring Pivotal, the software company it spun out in 2012, not long after it confirmed that it was in acquisition talks. It agreed to pay roughly $2.7 billion for the company, which, like VMware, is a Dell subsidiary.

VMware did shock everyone by announcing a second multi-billion acquisition the same day — specifically, endpoint security company Carbon Black, in a deal valued at $2.1 billion. That's $4.8 billion total for both companies.

VMware CEO Pat Gelsinger Business Insider All of this was on the tail of reporting a respectable Q2, 2020, in which VMware beat expectations slightly on profits and handily on revenue: It reported quarterly revenues of $2.44 billion when $2.43 billion were expected (up 12%); it reported non-GAAP EPS of $1.60 per share, when $1.55 was expected, up about 4% from the year-ago quarter.

For the most part, Wall Street did not seem thrilled with the acquisitions. While many analysts reiterated their buy ratings, RBC, Citigroup, and Merrill Lynch also lowered their share price target.

The stock dropped almost 10% on Friday, the day after VMware reported earnings. That could have come from a few different factors: It's true that VMware executives offered a tad softer-than expected Q3 guidance on the earnings call ($2.4 billion, versus $2.45 billion expected) — but it could have also been a part of the broader market sell-off on Friday, after tweets from President Trump apparently spooked investors.

But one of VMware's few steadfast bears, Nomura/Instinet's Christopher Eberle, pointed out in his research note the elephant in the room. Often when a company announces a spectacular acquisition during its earnings call, it's an attempt at slight-of-hand: look at this shiny new object we bought, and don't look at these other, less pleasant areas.

Eberle points out that both of the new companies have less-than-spectacular growth, and that some of VMware's own business units are also experiencing a slowdown in growth.

"Deal or no deal(s), we still have concerns," Eberle writes. "VMW announced not one, but two acquisitions in conjunction with 2Q earnings, both of which are among the largest in company history ... however, a concerning aspect that both deals have in common is steadily decelerating top-line revenue coupled with uncertain product strategies."

Eberle reiterated his "sell' rating and lowered his target price from $130 to $114. That's extremely low, mind you. The average target price for VMware is $188, as determined from the 26 analysts tracked on Yahoo Finance.

Tepid growth = slowing growth = bearish outlook

Pivotal offers software for developers to build, test and deploy their apps on a variety of cloud platforms. It's also known for its services business, where companies can hire its consultants to help them build their cloud apps.

The modern incarnation of Pivotal was born in 2012, when it spun out of VMware and EMC. It landed in Michael Dell's possession when he bought EMC, which, in turn, owned most of VMware. It went public in April 2018, about 16 months ago, opening at $15 per share.

VMware offered $15 a share to buy it back on Thursday. While a premium over Pivotal's $13.70 closing price on Thursday, it was basically a Hail Mary break-even price for the institutional investors who bought in at the IPO.

Michael DellREUTERS/Brendan McDermidThis, even though in June, Pivotal's shares crashed 40% to under $11 when it reported an okay quarter but then cut its full-year revenue outlook to 15% growth, year over year.

That's the kind of tiny growth expected of mature companies in aging industries, not newly public cloud players with less than $1 billion in revenue. Pivotal expected to end the year at about $760 million in revenue.

Meanwhile, Carbon Black's outlook was to hit just under $250 million in annual revenue for its current fiscal year and its expected growth at about 17%.

To give a comparison, Salesforce, which also announced earnings this week, hit quarterly revenue of $4 billion and is growing at 23% in constant currency, it says.

And that's the bear-case that Eberle sees. He believes that VMware is itself seeing slowing growth in some of its most promising areas, including its networking product NSX and its storage product vSAN.

And he thinks the VMware just spent over $4 billion to buy two startups with tepid growth.

"The financial impact of both deals combined is likely to weigh on operating margins over the next few years," he dourly predicts.

So why buy Pivotal?

Michael Dell may have wanted VMware to take this struggling public company off his hands and work it into its bigger cousin.

Interestingly, Pivotal's last proxy statement filed in June doesn't even pretend that Michael Dell, his company, Dell Technologies, and VMware are separate entities.

Pivotal's most recent proxy statement says that because Dell Technologies controls these companies, and Michael Dell controls Dell Technologies, "Mr. Dell may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of all of the shares of our common stock beneficially owned by Dell Technologies."

Often when a billionaire wants one company he owns to pay a premium to buy another one he owns it's not a good sign for anyone but the billionaire.

Read: Oracle is suing Larry Ellison and Safra Catz over the $9 billion NetSuite deal, thanks to letter written by 3 Oracle board members

But this deal doesn't really shift power between VMware and its overlord Dell, nor does it shift cash into Dell's hands (as much as he needs it with $54 billion in debt on Dell's books).

VMware is paying just over half a share of itself for each Class B share that Dell owns. That will increase Dell's stake in VMware a smidge, from just under 30% to just over. But Dell already owns all of VMware's super-voting right class of shares, with 10 votes of shares, controlling 97% of VMware votes anyway.

Now, one could argue — as VMware's executives are doing — that what VMware really needs is at least some of Pivotal's technology, especially a product called Kubernetes. This is a mega-popular method of managing cloud software "containers." Containers are the preferred method for running software in the cloud.

Containers are viewed as the technology that will make VMware's 20-year-old, bread-and-butter software management tech, known as virtualization, obsolete. So VMware is sort of looking at Kubernetes like a Motorola flip phone might look at an iPhone.

VMware needs to be seen as a major containers/Kubernetes player if it's to have a future in the cloud.

"Kubernetes is driving the biggest shift in enterprise architecture since Java virtualization and cloud, and Pivotal has begun a major shift to Kubernetes," VMware Pat Gelsinger told analysts on Thursday.

On the other hand, VMware and Pivotal had collaborated to create VMware's current Kubernetes offering and they were sister companies. So one could also argue that VMware had no real compelling business to buy Pivotal instead of to continue to partner with it, if it were free to escape Dell's will.

Why buy Carbon Black?

As for Carbon Black: It makes security software that helps software run securely on any device. It has all the buzzwords: cloud, AI, advanced threat detection. VMware has been increasingly running secure software on devices, not just computer servers, ever since it bought a major mobile device security vendor called Airwatch some years back.

Just like VMware needs the next-new thing Kubernets to stay relevant in software, it needs the next new thing in cloud-based security to stay relevant in device management.

This deal was likely the brainchild of VMware's resident dealmaker Sanjay Poonen, who made his marks with the Airwatch deal and has since worked his way up to COO.

Even the bear Eberle notes that Poonen's area of VMware, known as end-user computing, has been "a bright spot" for growth at VMware.

Original author: Julie Bort

Continue reading
  19 Hits
Mar
18

Around is the new floating head video chat multitasking app

In 2015, Murthy Renduchintala quit as co-president of Qualcomm, where he had spent the last 12 years of his career, to join Intel's leadership. Then-CEO Bryan Krzanich welcomed him with a letter, saying: "Intel is truly an inspirational place to work."

But Murthy, as Renduchintala is fondly called, was nervous about "the general reputation that Intel was a very difficult place for executives from the outside to come and be successful," he said.

"My initial concern was: is this going to be an experience of trying to get my fingernails into granite," he told Business Insider. "Half of my nervousness was the calibration of how much I had to learn and my own sense of, 'Could I surmount those learning curves?'"

It's worked out so far: Murthy is now Intel's chief engineering officer, in charge of a team of roughly 75,000 people. He eventually brought in two other outsiders, both known as heavy hitters in the semiconductor world.

Jim Keller, described by VentureBeat as a "rock star chip architect," and by Wired as a "chip wizard," was lured in 2018 from Tesla to lead Intel's silicon engineering group. He's in charge of the Intel teams developing the designs and architectures for new microprocessors that the company hopes to build.

And Raja Koduri, one of the leading graphics chip engineers in the world, joined Intel in 2017 from rival AMD, where Keller also had a distinguished career. Koduri leads the teams developing Intel's high-performance graphics, an area where the company has historically lagged rivals such as AMD and Nvidia. Keller and Koduri are both also veterans of Apple.

Together, these three outsiders have been given a gargantuan task: Take Intel beyond its core PC and server business, and help it conquer what the company's leadership sees as a $300 billion opportunity in cutting-edge markets like high-performance computing and the cloud, autonomous cars, AI, graphics, and networking.

Their efforts are already starting to come to fruition. Intel just introduced the next generations of its current PC and server chip lines, and will unveil its first AI processor built from the ground up later this year.

But their bigger, longer-term goals woud mean transforming Intel into a more agile competitor in multiple arenas.

"90% of a static market is a very different picture than 25% of a large and growing market," Keller told Business Insider. "The company over the last number of years has pivoted to have a lot more market segments, a lot more designs in those market segments. That will generate a lot more chips, a very large amount of IP [intellectual property]."

Murthy used a sports metaphor to illustrate what they needed to do: "Intel was a gold medal winning single sport Olympic winner. We now have to win at Decathlon. We have to be good at sprinting. We have to be good at pole vaulting. We have to be good at javelin. .. We don't have to be a great single sport athlete, but we have to be really good at everything because at the end of the day, a single sport is no longer sufficient."

Asked about the biggest hurdle they face, Murthy, Keller and Koduri offered the same answer: scale. Transforming a 51-year-old tech behemoth with 107,000 employees in 46 countries into a heavyweight that could compete in all these new markets is not going to be simple task.

"You don't turn like a Navy Seals speed boat," Murthy said. "You turn much more systematically because you have to take 100,000 people with you."

There have already been challenges

Even in his short term at Intel, there have already been challenges.

Barely three years after Murthy joined Intel, Krzanich resigned amid revelations that he had an illicit relationship with an employee. He was replaced by chief financial officer Bob Swan, who had joined Intel just a few months after Murthy did.

Suddenly, Murthy, the outsider, found himself reporting to another outsider. Not only was Swan an Intel newbie, he was also a non-engineer tapped to lead a company of mostly engineers which raised questions about his ability to lead Intel.

Jim Keller and Raja Koduri at the 2019 Intel Hot Chips event in Palo Alto, California. Walden Kirsch for Intel

The changes hit Intel at a critical time. Its core PC market is shrinking, and it was facing stiffer competition in the data centers. Suddenly, the company famous for the "Intel Inside" logo found on millions of desktop and laptop computers powered by its processors and for looking within for leadership, was being led by outsiders as it sought to reinvent itself.

In 2016, Intel also acquired an AI chip startup called Nervana as it took aim at the fast-growing field of artificial intelligence, where it is looking to catch up with rival Nvidia.

The shift was underway even before Swan took over, though it shows little sign of stopping now.

Led by Murthy, the three technologists' mission is to help Swan lead Intel's grand pivot — from focusing squarely on a $52 billion market, the world of PCs and servers, which Intel has dominated for the past 30 years, to a nearly $300 billion market, including new and fast growing arenas where Intel is just another contender, and in some cases even an underdog.

Intel is making the move in a challenging time. While it remains dominant in the data center market, rival AMD just rolled out a new server chip that has won rave reviews. Intel is also looking to reestablish itself as a chip manufacturing trailblazer, especially after AMD overtook it in adapting a 7 nanometer process, referring to the manufacturing technology based on the line-width on chips.

Intel has historically led the way in producing smaller and less expensive processors, guided by Moore's Law, the chip industry trend named after Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, in which the number of transistors that companies are able to put on an integrated circuit has roughly doubled every two years.

This trend has allowed chip makers to make smaller, more powerful, and less expensive processors, but Intel and competitors like AMD alike have acknowledged that it's increasingly a challenge to stay on that curve.

Outsiders who failed showed 'a lack of appreciation for what Intel had achieved'

Intel has a long history from which they could draw knowledge and insights, which can also be a challenge, Koduri said. He compared Intel to one of those old gigantic libraries found in Europe, with huge amounts of material.

"Intel is like that. It's great," he told Business Insider. "Lots of knowledge and lots of history. But also like an old library, it's hard to find information. They're not easily Google-searchable."

To be sure, the company had great talent, three of whom Keller named in a recent interview: Ann Kelleher, who leads Intel's manufacturing operations; chief technology officer Mike Mayberry and Rich Uhlig, who leads Intel Labs.

But Intel is also a gargantuan organization, and Murthy identified the challenges he faced early. In a memo to Intel senior managers a few months after he joined, he cited "a lack of product/customer focus in execution that is creating schedule and competitiveness gaps in our products."

But Murthy now says that he understood that the outsiders who joined Intel only to fail showed "a lack of appreciation and a lack of respect for what Intel had achieved."

"It was all about, 'Let me show you how good I am and how I can transform the company,'" he said. "It was a case of, 'Move aside. Let me show you.'"

'I don't want you to come in and bounce off'

Murthy also stressed the importance of adapting to Intel's culture for the people he brought in, including Keller and Koduri.

"His one comment was: 'I don't want you guys to come in and bounce off,'" Keller recalled. "He had seen it happen and I took that heart."

That has meant putting extra effort in adapting to Intel's culture even as they pushed for change. Keller said he has met Intel people who have been at the company for a long time.

"People have said to me, 'We tried to make that change 10 years ago,'" Keller said. "I'm relentless. I'm not really a bounce-off kind of guy."

When a team in Texas said they were wrestling with problems with a project, Keller told a manager, "Get them in a room at 8 o'clock in the morning and I'll go catch a plane." He spent two days "in a room with big white boards" working out problems and answering questions.

"Sometimes, it's tough," he said. "Sometimes, I feel like a beat-up puppy."

Koduri said persistence will be key, citing the technological principle first proposed by Intel's co-founder.

"Moore's Law is relentless, and Intel is relentless," he said. "Relentless and persistent. That's what we need to survive."

Analyst Linley Gwennap, president of the Linley Group, it wasn't surprising that the company was turning to outsiders to pursue that strategy.

"I think when things aren't working, the natural tendency is to turn to outsiders," he told Business Insider.

But it won't be easy.

"Intel is a battleship and it is taking a long time to turn," he said. "There's a lot going on, but we're probably not going to see how well this experiment works for another couple of years."

Got a tip about Intel or another tech company? Contact this reporter via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., message him on Twitter@benpimentel. You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Original author: Benjamin Pimentel

Continue reading
  14 Hits
Mar
18

1Mby1M Virtual Accelerator Investor Forum: With Deepak Jeevankumar of Dell Technologies Capital (Part 1) - Sramana Mitra

The world's largest rainforest is ablaze. On Tuesday, a new fire started every minute in Brazil.

Since August 15, more than 9,500 fires have sparked in Brazil, most of them in the Amazon basin. The blazes can be seen from space, and the smoke even temporarily eclipsed the sun in Sao Paulo on Monday.

So far this year, Brazil has recorded more than 76,000 fires— an annual record, according to Brazil's National Institute for Space Research.

The vast majority of these fires were deliberately started by people: Farmers and loggers purposefully set fire to the rainforest during the summer months to clear swaths of the Amazon for industrial or agricultural use in the coming year.

An aerial view of a tract of Amazon jungle burning as it is being cleared by loggers and farmers near the city of Novo Progresso, Brazil, August 23, 2019.Nacho Doce / Reuters

Here's what's really going on in the Amazon.

Why is the Amazon burning?

Unlike wildfires in California, or the current blazes in Siberia, the Amazon fires aren't natural.

About 99% of Amazon fires start from human actions, "either on purpose or by accident," Alberto Setzer, a senior scientist at Brazil's National Institute for Space Research (INPE), told CNN.

As CNN meteorologist Haley Brink explained in the network's report, "[Farmers] wait for the dry season and they start burning and clearing the areas so that their cattle can graze. That's what we're suspecting is going on down there."

The Amazon's dry season runs from July to October and peaks in late September, and with it comes this annual burning, called the "queimada." The rest of year, wetter weather minimizes the risk of fires.

"The important thing to know about the Amazon is that few fires occur there naturally," Mikaela Weisse, who tracks deforestation and fires for the World Resources Institute, told Vice.

A tract of Amazon jungle burns as it is being cleared by loggers and farmers in Novo Airao, Amazonas state, Brazil August 21, 2019.Bruno Kelly / Reuters

In addition to farmers, illegal loggers and miners sometimes light fires as well, in order to destroy evidence of their activities or drive away indigenous people, Vox reported. At least 400 indigenous tribes live in the rainforest, and their cultures and livelihoods are intimately linked with the state of the Amazon.

If fires are set every summer, why are this year's a big deal?

What's unprecedented this summer is how many individual fires were sparked at the same time. In 2019, Brazil has recorded more fires than in any other year since researchers began keeping track in 2013 — and there are still four months to go.

This surge of fires in Brazil mark an 83% increase from the same time period last year, Brazil's National Institute for Space Research reported. All told, Brazil only had about 40,000 fires in 2018, about half of this year's current total of 76,000.

These fires also come on the heels of another worrisome milestone for the world's largest rainforest. The month of July set a new record for the most deforestation ever in the Amazon in a single month, The Guardian reported. The Amazon shrunk by 519 square miles (1,345 square kilometers). That's more than twice the area of Tokyo.

Data from Brazilian satellites indicated that about three football fields' worth of Amazonian trees fell every minute last month. The total deforested area in July was up 39% from the same month last year.

Deforestation and fires are linked, since setting blazes is one of the main ways people clear land in the Amazon.

An aerial view of a tract of Amazon jungle recently cleared by loggers and farmers near the city of Novo Progresso, Brazil on September 22, 2013. Nacho Doce/Reuters

Experts and environmentalists say this high deforestation rate can be linked to the policies and rhetoric of Brazil's president, Jair Bolsonaro.

Bolsonaro has indicated that protecting the Amazon is not one of his top priorities. He supports development projects like a highway and hydroelectric dam in the Amazon.

His administration has cut down on the seizing of illegally harvested timber. In 2018 (under the previous administration), 883,000 cubic feet of illegal timber was seized. As of May 15, Bolsonaro's government agencies had seized only 1,410 cubic feet, Pacific Standard reported.

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro speaks at the Planalto Palace in Brasilia, Brazil on August 20, 2019. Adriano Machado/Reuters

What's more, between January and May, Bolsonaro's government lowered the number of fines it levied for illegal deforestation and mining (down 34% from the same period in 2018) and decreased its monitoring of illegal activity in the rainforest.

Do the fires have to do with climate change?

Individual events like forest fires, hurricanes, and winter storms can't be directly linked to climate change; however, climate change does increase the likelihood and frequency of wildfires around the world. Warmer conditions also allow blazes do start to grow bigger than they otherwise might have.

The Amazon's humidity usually stifles these fires before they get too big, but this year was particularly hot and dry worldwide.

Smoke billows during a fire in an area of the Amazon rainforest near Humaita, Amazonas State, Brazil on August 17, 2019. Ueslei Marcelino/Reuters

Overall, this year is on pace to be the third hottest on record globally, according to Climate Central. Last year was the fourth warmest, behind 2016 (the warmest), 2015, and 2017.

Hotter air sucks away the moisture from trees and soil, while decreased rainfall makes for parched forests that are more prone to burning. In that sense, climate change and uncontrolled rainforest blazes are interconnected.

How will this affect the planet?

As the world's largest rainforest, the Amazon plays a crucial role in keeping our planet's carbon-dioxide levels in check. Plants and trees take in carbon dioxide and release oxygen back into the air in their process of photosynthesis. This is why the Amazon, which covers 2.1 million square miles, is often referred to as the "lungs of the planet": The forest produces between 6% and 20% of the oxygen in our planet's atmosphere.

An aerial view of a deforested plot of the Amazon near Porto Velho, Rondonia State, Brazil August 22, 2019. Ueslei Marcelino/Reuters

But when trees burn, they release carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere, where it contributes to climate change.

Scientists also fear that over time, the Amazon could suffer so much deforestation that a feedback loop could turn it into an African-savanna-type landscape. If another 20% of the Amazon were to disappear — roughly 20% of the Amazon has already been cut down in Brazil in the past 50 years, according to the Intercept— some experts think that could trigger a process called a dieback, in which the rest of the forest dries out and burns.

If that happens, up to 140 billion tons of stored carbon could get released into the atmosphere, which would cause a further uptick in already rising global temperatures.

"The Amazon is incredibly important for our future, for our ability to stave off the worst of climate change," Christian Poirier, the program director of non-profit organization Amazon Watch, told CNN. "This isn't hyperbole. We're looking at untold destruction — not just of the Amazon but for our entire planet."

Original author: Aylin Woodward

Continue reading
  21 Hits
Aug
24

The CEO of a $600 million startup blasted Silicon Valley's culture of delaying IPOs, likening it to a college victory lap paid for by VCs

Mortgage tech company Better.com, fresh off its $160 million Series C funding round, is already eyeing the public markets— bucking the trend of startups spending lengthy stays under the auspices of private investors.

Vishal Garg, founder and CEO of Better, told Business Insider he's aiming to take his company — which plans to hire 400 people before the end of the year — public in two to three years.

The company's quest to quickly embrace the public markets stands in stark contrast to the broader startup culture, where tech giants are staying private ever longer amid a flood of cheap funding, contributing to a multi-decade decline of the IPO market.

Uber, Slack, and Pinterest each existed for about a decade before their public debuts this year, and WeWork, founded in 2010, is next up to take the plunge. Airbnb, founded in 2008, still hasn't crystallized its plans, and neither have some of the industry's largest and oldest fintech startups, such as Stripe, SoFi, and Credit Karma.

Why is Better racing to publicly list when so many others have been holding out?

In part, it's a difference in philosophy: Garg says once startups reach unicorn status, they should grow-up and embrace transparency rather than taking what amounts to a college victory lap.

Better

"We think the strategy of holding out and having VCs fund the growth and keeping companies private longer actually prevents companies from becoming healthier, from growing up," he said. "It'd be kind of like staying in college six years rather than four years. It's a lot more fun. Nobody's watching. You can do keggers all day long for two extra years."

But that stunts maturation, he says, and all too frequently companies and their leaders can't match the sky-high expectations, leading to a deflating initial experience as a public company.

"They go public at this really crazy valuation, and they can't live up to it," Garg said. "I'd much rather like go public at this lower valuation and then grow with my customers and grow with my shareholders."

Read more: Tech companies have raised billions of dollars from outside of venture capital like Fidelity and T. Rowe — but there's a costly downside as these investors pile on

There are other calculations at play as well. Given the highly regulated nature of the mortgage industry, Better is already accustomed to a higher level of scrutiny and transparency than many startups.

As a startup with a retail product, Garg is also attracted to the notion of enabling mom-and-pop investors who get a mortgage via Better to also buy shares of it.

And then there's the company's ambitious growth plans that will require extensive capital investment, well beyond its Series C funding round.

Better's proprietary mortgage business is blossoming — it originated $1.3 billion in mortgages in 2018 and said it was on pace to eclipse $4 billion this year.

But that's only one of the opportunities the company is trying to finance. It launched mortgage insurance and title insurance this year — businesses Garg said could be as big as their original mortgage offering in the next two to three years — and is delving into life insurance next. They're also building out realtor and appraisal networks.

Read more: The SEC is stepping up scrutiny of mutual funds that have poured money into unicorns like WeWork and Airbnb

And on the back of the company recently with Ally, which is outsourcing its mortgage operations to the startup, Better is also in talks with other financial institutions about partnering up, Garg said.

The company is aggressively hiring to manage these ambitions. Garg said it expected to have 1,100 employees by year-end, up from roughly 400 at the start of 2019. Right now, Better has around 700 employees.

"Our strategy is: We're going to do one more round and then we're going to IPO. The company's growth is really strong. We're making money on a gross-margin basis," Garg said. "We don't have a crazy voting structure. We don't have a lot of the bells and whistles that other people have. We just have a really clean, nice little business."

Original author: Alex Morrell

Continue reading
  19 Hits
Mar
18

Coronavirus forces tech investors and startups to ditch the all-important pitch meeting

Hello and welcome back to Startups Weekly, a weekend newsletter that dives into the week’s noteworthy startups and venture capital news. Before I jump into today’s topic, let’s catch up a bit. Last week, I wrote about the flurry of IPO filings. Before that, I noted the differences between raising cash from angels vs. traditional venture capitalists.

Remember, you can send me tips, suggestions and feedback to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or on Twitter @KateClarkTweets. If you don’t subscribe to Startups Weekly yet, you can do that here.

What’s new

Venture capitalists look for companies poised to disrupt markets untouched by innovative technology. Believe it or not, a very small percentage of jewelry shopping is done online, which means there’s a big opportunity — for the right team — to bring jewelry buyers and sellers to the 21st century.

Enter Pietra, a new startup that’s just raised $4 million in a round led by Andreessen Horowitz’s Andrew Chen (Substack & Hipcamp investor). Robert Downey Jr.’s VC fund Downey Ventures and Will Smith’s fund Dreamers Fund also participated, as did Hollywood manager Scooter Braun, Michael Ovitz and supermodel Joan Smalls.

I spoke to the founding team, which includes Uber alum Ronak Trivedi and Ashley Bryan, who hails from fashion e-commerce site Moda Operandi. The pair bring a healthy mix of technology and fashion expertise to the mix. Trivedi tells TechCrunch he’s drawn on his Uber experience to recruit engineers from top tech companies and to advocate for fast growth. Meanwhile, Bryan has leveraged her fashion industry connections to establish relationships with luxury designers.

 “Fashion is typically really under-resourced in terms of tech,” Bryan tells TechCrunch. “[The fashion industry] is great at the creativity part but it’s tough, especially with jewelry because you really have to put up a lot of capital.”

Pietra’s plan is to create a high-end marketplace for consumers to connect with jewelry designers. To do this, the team has adopted the standard marketplace approach, taking a 30% marketplace fee from sellers, as well as a 7% fee from buyers commissioning jewelry on the platform.

“Whether you do custom jewelry or engagement jewelry or you do jewelry for celebrities like Drake, you can come on Pietra and connect with a global marketplace,” says Trivedi.

The jewelry market is expected to be worth more than $250 billion by 2020, according to McKinsey research. And where there’s a billion-dollar market, there are VCs. 

“Even though gemstones and jewelry have been at the center of art, commerce, and culture since the dawn of human civilization — going from stone jewelry created 40,000 years ago in Africa to the trade routes between East and West to Fifth Avenue in New York to the Instagram feed on your phone — the technology for discovering, designing, and purchasing jewelry online hasn’t evolved much at all,” writes a16z’s Chen, who overlapped with Trivedi during his Uber tenure.

Pietra completed its official launch this week. It has 100 designers on the platform and counting, along with what the founders say is a lengthy waitlist.

In other news

This week I published a long feature on the state of seed investing in the Bay Area. The TL;DR? Mega-funds are increasingly battling seed-stage investors for access to the hottest companies. As a result, seed investors are getting a little more creative about how they source deals. It’s a dog-eat-dog world out there and everyone wants a stake in The Next Big Thing. Read the story here.

Demo Day

Y Combinator graduated another batch of 200 companies this week. We were there both days, taking notes on each and every company. To make things easy on you, I’ve put together the ultimate YC reading list:

All 84 startups from Y Combinator’s Demo Day 1All 82 startups from Y Combinator’s Demo Day 2The 11 best startups from YC’s Demo Day 1 (Extra Crunch membership required.)Our 12 favorite startups from Y Combinator’s S19 Demo Day 2 (Extra Crunch membership required.)YC’s Michael Seibel on building startups and early-stage deal-makingYC is doubling down on these investment theses in its latest batch

Here’s a look at some of the profiles we’ve written on the S19 companies:

Fresh out of YC, Tandem lands millions from a16zStoic is a journaling app with a focus on understanding your feelingsNarrator wants to become the operating system for data scienceThis startup is building a weed breathalyzer for cops Lokal wants to bring local news to 900M Indians in their regional languagesHoly Grail is using machine learning to build better batteriesYC’s latest bet is building a cyberpunk anime MMORent the Backyard wants to build a studio apartment in your yardShiru is developing a protein replacement for food additivesLumineye helps first responders identify people through wallsGradJoy is a fintech startup to help you knock out your student loansTraces AI is creating a less invasive alternative to facial recognition tracking

Listen

We recorded two great episodes of Equity, TechCrunch’s venture capital podcast, this week. The first was with YC CEO Michael Seibel, in which he speaks to trends at the seed stage of investing, changes at the accelerator program, including its move to San Francisco and more. You can listen to that one here. Plus, we had on Unusual Ventures co-founder and partner John Vrionis, who talked to us about direct listings versus IPOs and the future of DoorDash and Airbnb. You can listen to that one here.

Equity drops every Friday at 6:00 am PT, so subscribe to us on Apple PodcastsOvercast and Spotify.

Tips for B2B startups

Contributors Tyler Elliston and Kevin Barry share advice for B2B companies: “Over the years, we’ve seen a lot of B2B companies apply ineffective demand generation strategies to their startup. If you’re a B2B founder trying to grow your business, this guide is for you. Rule #1: B2B is not B2C. We are often dealing with considered purchases, multiple stakeholders, long decision cycles, and massive LTVs. These unique attributes matter when developing a growth strategy. We’ll share B2B best practices we’ve employed while working with awesome B2B companies like Zenefits, Crunchbase, Segment, OnDeck, Yelp, Kabbage, Farmers Business Network, and many more.” Read the full story here. (Extra Crunch membership required.)

Continue reading
  16 Hits
Aug
24

Thought Leaders in Cyber Security: Kris Lahiri, Chief Security Officer, Egnyte (Part 6) - Sramana Mitra

Kris Lahiri: We’ve had a company that specializes in just drone pictures. They take live pictures of a site by drones and keeps that integrated. It uses this as an update to see how that project is...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  14 Hits
Jan
15

Anyline, the Austrian startup that provides OCR tech, picks up $12M Series A and heads to the US

It’s easy to forget that Silicon Valley starts with ‘silicon’, and that there would be no technology innovation without innovation at the silicon level. And Graphcore is well aware of that as the Bristol-based company is designing its own dedicated AI chipset. That’s why I’m glad to announce that Graphcore co-founder and CEO Nigel Toon is joining us at TechCrunch Disrupt Berlin.

Graphcore has managed to attract a ton of attention from day one. Originally founded in 2016, the startup has raised more than $300 million from top investors, such as Sequoia Capital, BMW, Microsoft, Samsung and a ton of others.

The company last raised a $200 million Series D round led by Atomico and Sofina. It values the company at $1.7 billion.

So what is the magic product behind Graphcore? The startup’s flagship product is an Intelligence Processor Unit (IPU) PCIe processor card combined with a software framework. Essentially, it lets you build your own AI applications more efficiently. Those dedidacted AI chips should perform better than repurposed GPUs.

Tobias Jahn, principal at BMW i Ventures, summed it up pretty well in a statement for the Series D round: “The versatility of Graphcore’s IPU – which supports multiple machine learning techniques with high efficiency – is well-suited for a wide variety of applications from intelligent voice assistants to self-driving vehicles. With the flexibility to use the same processor in both a data centre and a vehicle, Graphcore’s IPU also presents the possibility of reduction in development times and complexity.”

It seems crazy that a tiny startup is competing directly with giant chip companies, such as Nvidia, AMD, Intel, Qualcomm, etc. But this isn’t Nigel Toon’s first company. He has been the CEO of Picochip and Icera, two companies that have been sold to Intel and Nvidia.

Graphcore believes that there’s an underserved niche with a lot of potential. And it feels like there’s a race to create the most efficient AI chip. So I can’t wait to hear Nigel Toon’s take on that race.

Buy your ticket to Disrupt Berlin to listen to this discussion and many others. The conference will take place on December 11-12.

In addition to panels and fireside chats, like this one, new startups will participate in the Startup Battlefield to compete for the highly coveted Battlefield Cup.

( function() { var func = function() { var iframe = document.getElementById('wpcom-iframe-8c04370dcd5ec52297bec6ccf0dd3a5b') if ( iframe ) { iframe.onload = function() { iframe.contentWindow.postMessage( { 'msg_type': 'poll_size', 'frame_id': 'wpcom-iframe-8c04370dcd5ec52297bec6ccf0dd3a5b' }, "https:\/\/tcprotectedembed.com" ); } } // Autosize iframe var funcSizeResponse = function( e ) { var origin = document.createElement( 'a' ); origin.href = e.origin; // Verify message origin if ( 'tcprotectedembed.com' !== origin.host ) return; // Verify message is in a format we expect if ( 'object' !== typeof e.data || undefined === e.data.msg_type ) return; switch ( e.data.msg_type ) { case 'poll_size:response': var iframe = document.getElementById( e.data._request.frame_id ); if ( iframe && '' === iframe.width ) iframe.width = '100%'; if ( iframe && '' === iframe.height ) iframe.height = parseInt( e.data.height ); return; default: return; } } if ( 'function' === typeof window.addEventListener ) { window.addEventListener( 'message', funcSizeResponse, false ); } else if ( 'function' === typeof window.attachEvent ) { window.attachEvent( 'onmessage', funcSizeResponse ); } } if (document.readyState === 'complete') { func.apply(); /* compat for infinite scroll */ } else if ( document.addEventListener ) { document.addEventListener( 'DOMContentLoaded', func, false ); } else if ( document.attachEvent ) { document.attachEvent( 'onreadystatechange', func ); } } )();

Graphcore (graphcore.ai) is a new silicon and systems company based in Bristol, UK and Palo Alto, USA that has developed a new type of processor, the Intelligence Processing Unit (IPU), to accelerate machine learning and AI applications. Since its founding in 2016, Nigel has secured over $300m in funding and support for the company from some of the world’s leading venture capital firms including Sequoia Capital, Foundation Capital and Atomico, from major corporations including BMW, Bosch, Dell, Microsoft and Samsung and from eminent Artificial Intelligence innovators.

Nigel has a background as a technology business leader, entrepreneur and engineer having been CEO at two successful VC-backed processor companies XMOS and Picochip (sold to Nasdaq:MSPD, now Intel), a founder at Icera (sold to Nasdaq: NVDA) and VP/GM at Altera (Nasdaq: ALTR, sold to Intel for $17Bn) where he spent over 13 years and was responsible for establishing and building the European business unit that he grew to over $400m in annual revenues. Nigel was a non-executive director at Imagination Technologies PLC until itsacquisition in 2017 and is the author on 3 patents.

Continue reading
  24 Hits
Aug
23

Is Knotel poised to turn WeWork from a Unicorn into an Icarus?

The day of reckoning for the “flexible office space as a startup” is coming, and it’s coming up fast. WeWork’s IPO filing has fired the starting gun on the race to become the game-changer both in the future of property and real estate but also the future of how we live and work. As Churchill once said, “we shape our buildings and afterwards our buildings shape us.”

Until recently, WeWork was the ruler by which other flexible-space startups were measured, but questions are now being asked if it deserves its valuation. The profitable IWG plc, formerly Regus, has been a business providing serviced offices, virtual offices, meeting rooms and the rest, for years, and yet WeWork is valued by 10 times more.

That’s not to mention how it exposes landlords to $40 billion in rent commitments, something which a few of them are starting to feel rather nervous about.

Some analysts even say WeWork’s IPO is a “masterpiece of obfuscation.”

Continue reading
  19 Hits
Aug
23

Best of Bootstrapping: Ownership Matters - Sramana Mitra

For those of you rushing to raise venture capital with a deck of slides or a minimum viable product, let me offer you a challenge: How can you get to a $20 million pre-money valuation in Series A,...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  79 Hits
Mar
18

Deepgram raises $12M for enterprise speech recognition

India today addressed a long-standing challenge that has been affecting the country’s booming startup ecosystem. As part of a raft of measures to boost overall economic growth from a five-year low, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said New Delhi is exempting startups from Section 56(2) — a provision more popularly known as an “angel tax” in the local income tax laws — that required startups to pay a certain tax if they received an investment at a rate higher than their “fair market valuation.”

Local tax authority in India does not recognize the discounted cash flow method that many investors use to value early-stage startups, and instead value the company for what it is worth currently, which as you can imagine, is very little. Investors assess a startup’s value based on what it could eventually become in the future.

Prior to today’s announcement, the government levied a 30% tax on affected startups. Sitharaman said any startup that is registered with the Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion, a government body, will be exempted from the angel tax. Those not registered will remain subjected to it, she said in a press conference Friday.

More than 24,000 startups are currently registered with the Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion. The law was originally introduced amid concerns that wealthy people could invest in bogus startups as a way to launder money.

“Angel tax was there to stop shell companies from creating capital from nowhere,” Piyush Goyal, a minister for commerce and industry as well as railways, said in a statement Friday.

The angel tax, which was introduced in 2012, became a roadblock for many investors who wanted to fund early-stage startups. The announcement today comes weeks after the Narendra Modi government said it would address this issue.

Many prominent investors, startup founders, analysts and other industry executives have long publicly criticized the angel tax, telling the government that it is severely hurting the health of the local ecosystem.

Anand Mahindra, chairman of Mahindra Group, said last year that the angel tax needs “immediate attention or else all chances of building a rival to Silicon Valley in India will be lost.”

Sreejith Moolayil, a founder of health food startup True Elements, said the existence of an angel tax would leave many entrepreneurs like him with no choice but to shut down their companies.

Late last year, India’s tax department sent a flurry of notices to startups demanding them to pay the angel tax on funds they received from individual investors. The notices sparked an uproar, with many calling it “harassment.”

“Hope this will address the concerns of DPIIT registered startups. The proposed cell should look into concerns of all startups including those who are already under notice,” said Ashish Aggarwal, who oversees Public Policy at industry body Nasscom, of today’s announcement.

The government will also set up a dedicated cell to address other tax problems that startups face, Sitharaman said. “A startup having any income-tax issue can approach the cell for quick resolution,” the ministry said in a statement.

Jayanth Kolla, founder and chief analyst at research firm Convergence Catalyst, told TechCrunch earlier that the angel tax was the primary reason early-stage startups in the nation were struggling to raise money from investors.

Even as Indian tech startups raised a record $10.5 billion in 2018, early-stage startups saw a decline in the number of deals they participated in and the amount of capital they received. Early-stage startups participated in 304 deals in 2018 and raised $916 million in funds last year, down from $988 million they raised from 380 rounds in 2017 and $1.096 billion they raised from 430 deals the year before, research firm Venture Intelligence told TechCrunch.

I’ve said before, a willingness to relook at policies is a display of strength, not https://t.co/8y4tPp8Iva’s press conference by @nsitharaman will, I hope, mark the start of a new, interactive & interdependent relationship between Govt&business. @narendramodi @AmitShah (1/4)

— anand mahindra (@anandmahindra) August 23, 2019

Sitharaman also announced the country was scrapping a recently introduced additional levy on foreign funds. The government would revoke the surcharge, which increased tax on foreign companies investing in India to over 40%, she said. She also promised to pay out all pending tax refunds owed to small and medium enterprises within 30 days. Companies have long complained that the tax authority takes too much time to refund the money owed to them.

Continue reading
  15 Hits
Mar
18

1Mby1M Virtual Accelerator Investor Forum: With Ashish Jain of 3Lines Ventures (Part 1) - Sramana Mitra

CEO Jeremy OBriant never intended to create Torch, an agile growth marketing agency based in San Francisco. He started his career as a CPA, but after leading a growth team at Sidecar and running growth projects on his own, forming Torch was the most obvious thing to do. He now leads a team that implements “agile growth,” an iterative approach that involves setting clear goals and running smaller experiments over the course of monthly sprints. Learn more about their approach to growth, their ideal client, and more.

“Torch offers custom solutions to whatever you need. They are fast and deliver on what they promise. They are also scrappy and willing to try stuff to solve unique needs.” Head of Product in SF

Torch’s approach to growth

“We aim to be the thought leaders of Agile Growth. We didn’t invent the term, but we are certainly becoming the leading voice of the process in the growth marketing world. Agile simply means being able to move quickly and with ease. We start with clearly defined business goals and prioritize growth tactics based on the impact, cost, and efficiency. Then collaborate with growth teams to execute a handful of items in recurring growth sprints, typically on a monthly cadence.”

On their ideal client

“Our ideal partner has product-market fit, is redefining their category, and is ready to scale in a sustainable way. We are very strategic in the types of businesses we work with and steer clear of doing narrow prescriptive tactics. We love to collaborate with partners that are open to taking a fresh strategic look at their entire growth stack and embrace the agile approach to discover the right strategy for their unique situation.”

Below, you’ll find the rest of the founder reviews, the full interview, and more details like pricing and fee structures. This profile is part of our ongoing series covering startup growth marketing agencies with whom founders love to work, based on this survey and our own research. The survey is open indefinitely, so please fill it out if you haven’t already. 

Interview with Torch CEO Jeremy OBriant

Yvonne Leow: Tell me about your background and how you became a growth marketer. 

Jeremy OBriant: People are often surprised when I tell them I started my career as a CPA. I ended up working in the trenches on several M&A deals and heard lots of founding stories from entrepreneurs.

Continue reading
  24 Hits
Aug
23

1Mby1M Virtual Accelerator Investor Forum: With Luis Gutierrez Roy of Telegraph Hill Capital (Part 3) - Sramana Mitra

Sramana Mitra: What about other countries in Southern Europe? What else are you tracking and where do you see activities that are interesting? Luis Gutierrez Roy: We just made an investment in a...

___

Original author: Sramana Mitra

Continue reading
  104 Hits
Jul
23

Mint’s first PM raises millions for Monarch, an Accel-backed money management platform

One of the private companies aiming to deliver a commercial lunar lander to the Moon has adjusted the timing for its planned mission, which isn’t all that surprising, given the enormity of the task. Japanese startup ispace is now targeting 2021 for their first lunar landing, and 2023 for a second lunar mission that will also include deploying a rover on the Moon’s surface.

The company’s HAKUTO-R program was originally planned to include a mission in 2020 that would involve sending a lunar orbital vehicle for demonstration purposes without any payloads, but that part of the plan has been scrapped in favor of focusing all efforts on delivering actual payloads for commercial customers by 2021 instead.

This updated focus, the company says, is due mostly to the speeding up of the global market for private launch services and payload delivery, including for things like NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services program, wherein the agency is looking for a growing number of private contractors to support its own needs in terms of getting stuff to the Moon.

Although ispace itself isn’t on the list of nine companies selected in round one of NASA’s program, the Japanese company is supporting American nonprofit Draper in its efforts, which was one of the chosen. The Draper/ispace team-up happened after ispace’s initial commitment to its 2020 orbital demo, so its change in priorities makes sense given the new tie-up.

HAKUTO-R will use SpaceX’s Falcon 9 for its first missions, and the company has also signed partnerships with JAXA, Japan’s space agency, as well as new corporate partners including Suzuki, Sumitomo Corporation, Shogakukan and Citizen Watch.

Continue reading
  23 Hits
Aug
23

For Bottomline Technologies, AI and ML May Not be Enough - Sramana Mitra

According to a McKinsey report, the global payments market is estimated to grow from $1.9 trillion in 2017 at 9% CAGR to $2.9 trillion by 2022. Portsmouth-based Bottomline Technologies (Nasdaq: EPAY)...

___

Original author: MitraSramana

Continue reading
  59 Hits